Authorship and Responsibility

Under no circumstances should generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools be listed as authors or co-authors of an academic article. The author(s) bear full responsibility for the content, accuracy, and originality of the submitted work. The use of AI tools does not eliminate the scientific, ethical, and intellectual responsibilities of the authors. Pamukkale University Journal of Business Research (PIAR) strictly prohibits the use of AI to create fake authors or distort identity.

Transparency and Declaration
The use of any AI tool during research, writing, or processes must be clearly and transparently declared within the article. This declaration should be included in the "Methods" or "Acknowledgments" section where appropriate. It is necessary to specify in detail how and for what purpose these tools were used, along with the full names and version numbers of the AI tools used in the statement.

Confidentiality and Intellectual Property Responsibility
Pamukkale University Journal of Business Research (PIAR) editors should not upload unpublished articles, files belonging to them, images, or any related information to AI tools. Protecting the confidentiality of submitted content and securing the intellectual property rights of authors are among the fundamental responsibilities of editors.

Use of AI in the Evaluation Process
PIAR editors may use AI tools at certain stages of the editorial workflow—such as initial eligibility screening or reviewer selection—only with the explicit approval of the journal management. Such AI use must be transparently notified to the authors.

Management of Suspected Misuse
In case of uncertainty or concern regarding AI use, PIAR editors will establish open and transparent communication with the authors and may request supporting evidence if necessary.

Evaluation of Authors' Statements on AI Use
PIAR editors are expected to carefully examine authors' statements regarding the use of AI tools and request clarification or additional information when necessary. It is the editors' responsibility to evaluate whether the declared AI use complies with the journal's established policies.

Tracking Policy Developments
PIAR editors must closely follow developments in generative AI technologies and be informed about the journal's updated policies in this area.

Detection of AI Use by Reviewers
Reviewers are encouraged to attempt to detect potential undeclared AI use in the articles they evaluate and to inform editors if they suspect such a situation. However, such evaluations must be based on clear and objective assessment criteria.

Confidentiality and Ethical Responsibility of Reviewers
Reviewers must not, under any circumstances, upload unpublished articles or any related documents sent for peer review to generative AI platforms. Such action may violate confidentiality and infringe on intellectual property rights. The evaluation process must be conducted with the reviewer's own level of expertise and knowledge accumulation.

Reviewers' Ethics of Evaluation
Reviewers must evaluate authors' AI use impartially; they should not allow personal opinions or biases to interfere with the journal's established policies. Any feedback or criticism regarding AI use should be constructive and compatible with the journal's official guidelines.


PERMITTED USES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
• Conceptual Diagrams and Explanatory Visuals: Generative AI can be used to visually express theoretical ideas, conceptual frameworks, or processes. Visuals created in this way must accurately reflect the author's own understanding and explanations.
• Data Visualization: Authors may use AI tools to improve the visual presentation of research data. These tools can be particularly useful in enhancing the design and comprehensibility of graphs, tables, and diagrams.
• Graphical Depictions and Representative Visuals: Visuals created with AI can be used as symbolic or explanatory representations to simplify and clarify complex ideas. Such visuals should support the reader's better understanding of the subject and should not distort or misrepresent the concepts described.


RESTRICTED OR PROHIBITED AREAS IN AI USE
• Content Generation: It is not appropriate for AI to generate significant sections of an article—such as the abstract, introduction, literature review, or discussion. Content generated by AI should only be considered as a draft or suggestion and must be carefully reviewed, rewritten, and improved by the author(s) to ensure academic rigor and originality.
• Generation and Interpretation of Research Findings: AI tools should not be used for the purpose of generating, reporting, or interpreting research results. All responsibility regarding the accuracy, scope, and validity of data analysis belongs solely to the author(s).
• Reference Generation and Citation: Creating fabricated, unverifiable, or non-existent sources with AI tools is strictly prohibited. All cited sources must be verifiable in accordance with academic standards, correctly cited, and approved by the author(s).
• Academic Writing and Justification: The development of the article's fundamental arguments, theoretical contributions, and main thesis is solely the responsibility of the author(s). AI can only be used as an auxiliary tool in the writing process; it cannot replace the author's critical thinking or original academic contribution.


Process to be Followed in Case of Policy Violation
If the use of AI tools is not clearly declared or is used in violation of these guidelines, the article may be rejected during the evaluation process. If a violation is detected after publication, corrective actions such as publishing a correction or retracting the article may be applied. Repeated or serious violations of this policy may lead to the rejection of future submissions by the author(s) by the journal.