Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Akademik metinlerde kaçınma ve güçlendirme ifadeleri: İngiliz dili eğitimi ve fizyoterapi araştırma makaleleri üzerine karşılaştırmalı çalışma

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu derlem çalışması ile 2020 ve 2022 yılları arasında yayınlanan İngiliz Dili Eğitimi ve Fizyoterapi araştırma makalelerinin tartışma bölümlerinde kaçınma ve güçlendirme ifadelerinin kullanımının incelenmesi ve karşılaştırılması amaçlamıştır. Bu çalışma ile aynı zamanda, iki disiplinde kaçınma ve güçlendirme ifadelerinin kullanım sıklığının ve kullanılan ifadelerin türlerinin keşfedilmesi de hedeflenmiştir. Seçilen iki disiplinden ayrı ayrı 15 araştırma makalesi, tanımlayıcı istatistik yöntemleriyle analiz edilmiştir. Bunun yanında iki disiplin arasında kaçınma ve güçlendirme ifadelerinin kullanılması açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olup olmadığını belirlemek için ki-kare testi uygulanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre, kaçınma ifadelerinin kullanımının her iki disiplinde de güçlendirme ifadelerinin kullanımından daha fazla olduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca bulgular, iki disiplin arasındaki kaçınma ifadelerinin kullanımı açısından anlamlı farklar olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Diğer yandan, güçlendirme ifadelerinin kullanımı açısından iki disiplin arasında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamıştır. Son olarak çalışmada iki farklı disiplinde incelenen araştırma makalelerinin tartışma bölümlerinde kullanılan kaçınma ve güçlendirme ifadelerinin türlerinde bazı benzerlikler ve farklılıklar bulunmuştur.

Keywords

Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Hedges and boosters in academic texts: a comparative study on English language teaching and physiotherapy research articles

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

The current corpus study intended to examine and compare the use of hedges and boosters in discussion sections of English Language Teaching and Physiotherapy research articles that were published between 2020 and 2022. This study also aimed to discover the frequency and types of hedges and boosters in two disciplines. 15 research articles from each disciple were analyzed through descriptive statistics. The chi-square test was also run to analyze the data to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference in terms of the use of hedges and boosters between the two disciplines. According to the results of the descriptive statistics, the number of hedges outnumbered the boosters in both disciplines. Furthermore, findings revealed that the differences in the use of hedges between the two disciplines were significant and meaningful. On the other hand, there were no significant differences regarding the use of boosters. Some similarities and variations were found in terms of the categories of hedges and boosters used in the discussion sections of research articles in the two disciplines.

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan

Year 2023, Issue: 32, 1335 - 1349, 21.02.2023

Ezgi Akman , Pınar Karahan

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Keywords

Academic writing hedges boosters discourse analysis research articles Akademik yazma kaçınma güçlendirme söylem çözümleme araştırma makaleleri

References

  • Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The coding of epistemology in language (pp. 261-272). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  • Demirel, E. T. (2019). The Use of Hedging Strategies in Research Articles: A Corpus Comparison of Native and Non-Native Researchers. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 349-362.
  • Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis, in: Lindzey, G. &Aronson, E. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hyland, K. E. N. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
  • Klimova, B. F. (2014). Using corpus linguistics in the development of writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.023
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society papers, 8, 183-228.
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1997). Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a Pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 3- 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, F. (2007). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
  • Sepehri, M., Hajijalili, M. & Namaziandost, E. (2019). Hedges and boosters in medical and engineering research articles: A comparative corpus-based study. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 9(4), 2-225. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v9i4.4342
  • Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of Hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
  • Varttala, T. A. (2001). Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tarnpereen Yliopisto, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi//pdf/951-44-5 195-3.pdf.
  • Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Linguistics
Journal Section World languages, cultures and litertures
Authors

Ezgi Akman 0000-0002-2798-5634

Pınar Karahan 0000-0002-7475-8960

Publication Date February 21, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Issue: 32

Cite

APA Akman, E., & Karahan, P. (2023). Hedges and boosters in academic texts: a comparative study on English language teaching and physiotherapy research articles. RumeliDE Dil Ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi(32), 1335-1349. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1252902

Cited By

Use of comparative research in the study of chemistry education: A systematic analysis of the literature
Heliyon
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22881
 Download Cover Image