Using a Poetry Wiki: How Can the Medium Support Pre-service Teachers of English in their Professional Learning about Writing Poetry and Teaching Poetry Writing in a Digital Age?

Öz

In this paper we report on one aspect of a qualitative study about an online wiki community, which was developed to build collaborative knowledge about poetry among a group of pre-service English teachers. Our paper explores pre-service teachers’ experiences of writing in a digital medium and their perceptions of themselves as writers. We focus specifically on the processes of poetry writing (both collaborative and independent) undertaken in this digital medium by two groups of teachers, who were working in contrasting settings in the UK and Canada during their pre-service year. We investigate the affordances (Laurillard, Stratford, Lucklin, Plowman, & Taylor, 2000) that a multimodal, wiki environment offered these teachers for learning about poetry writing and question the impact that these affordances have had both on the teachers’ collaborations and the poetry they wrote. In analysing the pre-service teachers’ wiki writings we were interested to observe how they shaped themselves as writers and intervened in each other’s work in progress within a digital third space. We also wanted to explore how the wiki had supported their professional learning about the teaching of poetry writing during their training year and the implications that this support could have for their own future classroom practice as teachers of writing.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Collaboration
• digital dialogue
• Initial Teacher Education
• online community
• poetry
• poetry pedagogy
• professional learning
• Viki
• writing poetry

Bir Şiir Vikisi Kullanmak: Bu Ortam Dijital Bir Çağda İngilizce Öğretmen Adaylarının Şiir Yazma ve Şiir Yazmayı Öğretme Konusunda Meslekî Bilgi Öğrenmelerine Nasıl Destek Olabilir?

Öz

Bu makalede bir grup İngilizce öğretmeni adayının katılımıyla şiir hakkında işbirlikli bilgi yapılandırmak üzere oluşturulan çevrimiçi bir Viki topluluğu ile ilgili yapılan nitel bir çalışmanın bir bölümünü sunuyoruz. Makalemiz öğretmen adaylarının dijital bir ortamda yazma deneyimlerini ve yazar olarak kendileriyle ilgili algılarını araştırmaktadır. Biz özellikle hizmet öncesi yılları boyunca Birleşik Krallık ve Kanada'da farklı ortamlarda çalışan iki grup öğretmen tarafından bu dijital ortamda girişilen (hem işbirlikli hem de bağımsız) şiir yazma süreçlerine odaklanmaktayız. Çok çeşitli iletişim olanaklarını içinde barındıran Viki ortamının bu öğretmenlere şiir yazmayı öğrenmeleri için sunduğu imkânları (Laurillard, Stratford, Lucklin, Ploughman ve Taylor, 2000) araştırıyor ve bu imkânların öğretmenlerin yaptıkları işbirlikleri ve yazdıkları şiirler üzerindeki etkisini sorguluyoruz. Bu çalışmada öğretmen adaylarının Viki yazışmalarını analiz ederken yazar olarak kendilerini nasıl biçimlendirdiklerini ve dijital bir üçüncü alanda birbirlerinin devam eden çalışmalarına nasıl müdahale ettiklerini gözlemlemekle ilgilendik. Ayrıca, Viki'nin kendilerine eğitim aldıkları yılda şiir yazma öğretimi konusunda meslekî bilgi öğrenmelerine nasıl destek olduğunu ve bu desteğin yazma öğretmenleri olarak gelecekteki sınıf içi uygulamaları için getirebileceği sonuçları araştırmak istedik.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• işbirliği
• dijital diyalog
• hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitimi
• çevrimiçi topluluk
• şiir
• şiir pedagojisi
• meslekî bilgi öğrenme
• Viki
• şiir yazma

Kaynakça

1. Adisa (2002) What is Poetry? In A. Hoyles & M. Hoyles (Eds.), (2002). Moving voices: Black performance poetry (pp. 128-129). London: Hansib Publications.
2. Andrews, R. (1991). The problem with poetry, Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
3. Barton, M. (2005). The future of rational-critical debate in online public spheres. Computers and Composition, 22(2), 177-190.
4. Benton, P. (1984). Teaching Poetry: The rhetoric and the reality. Oxford Review of Education, 10(3), 319 –327.
5. Buckingham, D. (2003). Media Education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6. Burn, A., & Durran, J. (2007). Media literacy in schools. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
7. Carrington, V. (2009). From Wikipedia to the humble classroom Wiki: why we should pay attention to Wikis. In V. Carrington & M. Robinson (Eds.), Digital literacies (pp. 65-80). London: UKLA/Sage.
8. Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF). (2008). Teaching for progression: Writing. DCSF. Retrieved May 17, 2009, from http://nationalstrategies.standards.dcsf.gov.uk/node/154838 .

9. Davies, J., & Merchant, G. (2007). Looking from the inside out: Academic blogging as new literacy. In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 168-197). New York: Peter Lang.
10. Davies, J., & Merchant, G. (2009). Negotiating the blogosphere: Educational possibilities. In V. Carrington & M. Robinson (Eds.), Digital Literacies (pp. 81-94). London: UKLA/Sage.
11. Doe, C. (2006) Lively language arts: The Digital Age invades the classroom. Multimedia & Internet@Schools, 13(5), 30-33.
12. Dunn, J., Styles, M., & Warburton, N. (1987). In tune with yourself. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Dymoke, S. (2000). The teaching of poetry in secondary schools. Unpublished PhD thesis: University of Nottingham, UK.
14. Dymoke, S. (2007). Pre-service poetry teaching: Can the pursuit of “quality” also embrace creativity? Paper presented at American Educational Research Association (AERA) 2007 Annual Convention, Chicago, April 7-14, 2007.
15. Fountain, R. (2005). Wiki pedagogy. Retrieved August 8, 2008, from www.profeticorg/dossiers/dossiers-imprimer.php3 .
16. Gee, J. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.
17. Gioia, D. (2004). Disappearing ink: Poetry at the end of print culture. Minnesota: Graywolf Press.
18. Grainger, T., Goouch, K., & Lambirth, A. (2005). Creativity and writing. London: Routledge.
19. Graves, D. (1981). Renters and owners. English Magazine, 8, 4 -7.
20. Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. London: Heinemann.
21. Grossman, P. (1991). What are we talking about anyway? Subject-matter knowledge of secondary English teachers. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 2 (pp. 245-264). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.
22. Gudmundsdottir, S. (1995). The narrative nature of pedagogical content knowledge. In H. McEwan &K. Egan (Eds.), Narrative in teaching, learning and research (pp. 24-38). New York: Teachers College Press.
23. Hardy, T. (1976). “The convergence of the twain”, The Complete Poems (pp. 306-7), London: Macmillan.
24. Harrison, B., & Gordon, H. (1983). Metaphor is thought: Does Northtown need poetry? Educational Review, 35(3), 265-278.
25. Hauser, J. (2007). Media specialists can learn Web 2.0 tools to make school more fun. Computers in Libraries, 27(2), 6-7; 46-48.
26. Hennessey, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2003). Teachers perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155 -192.
27. Hughes, J. (2008). The “screen-size” art: Using digital media to perform poetry. English in Education, 42(2), 148-164.
28. Hughes, J., & Dymoke, S. (submitted). “Wiki-Ed poetry”: Transforming pre-service teachers’ preconceptions about poetry and poetry teaching.
29. Johnson, B. (2009, August 12). Wikipedia approaches its limits. The Guardian (Technology). Retrieved August 17, 2009, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/aug/12/wikipedia-deletionistinclusionist .
30. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (Eds.). (2007). A new literacies sampler. New York: Peter Lang.
31. Koch, K. (1970). Wishes, lies and dreams. New York: Harper and Row.
32. Koch, K. (1973). Rose, where did you get that red? New York: Vintage.
33. Lamb, B. (2004). Open spaces: Wikis, ready or not. EDUCAUSE Review, 39(5), 36-48. Retrieved August 8, 2008 from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0452.pdf .
34. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. buckingham: Open University Press.
35. Laurillard, D., Stratfold, M., Lucklin, R., Plowman, L. & Taylor, J. (2000). Affordances for learning in a non-linear narrative medium. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 2000, 2.
36. Lewis, C. (2007). New literacies. In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 229-38). New York: Peter Lang.
37. Lyon, G. (1999). Where I’m from. Where I’m from: Where poems come from. Spring, Texas: Absey and Co.
38. Mathieson, M. (1980). The problem of poetry. Use of English, 31, 2.
39. National Curriculum Board. (2009). Shape of the Australian curriculum: English. NCB. Retrieved August 13, 2009, from http://www.ncb.org.au/verve/_resources/Australian_Curriculum_-_English.pdf .
40. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
41. Nicholls, J. (1990, May, 11). Verse and verbiage. Times Educational Supplement. B27.
42. Ofsted (2007, July). Poetry in schools: A survey of practice. London: Ofsted. Retrieved December 7, 2009, from http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/Ofstedhome/Publications-and-research/Browse-all-by/Education/Curriculum/English/Poetryin-schools/(language)/eng-GB .
43. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007). The Ontario curriculum, Grades 9-12: English. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
44. Ray, R. (1999). The diversity of poetry: How trainee teachers’ perceptions affect their attitudes to poetry teaching. The Curriculum Journal, 10(3), 403-418.
45. Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
46. Saskatchewan Education, (1998). Writing. English Language Arts 20: A curriculum guide for the secondary level. Regina, SK: Saskatchewan Education. Retrieved May 5, 2009 from http://www.sasked.gov.sk.ca/docs/ela20/copyright.html .
47. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–13.
48. Steinkuehler, C. (2005). The new third place: Massively multiplayer online gaming in American youth culture. Tidskrift för lärarutbildning och forskning, Umea Universitet, 3(12), 17-32.
49. Stibbs, A. (1981). Teaching poetry. Children’s Literature in Education, 12(1), 39-50. Training and Development Agency. (2007) Professional standards for qualified teacher status. London: Training and Development Agency for Schools. Thompson. L. (Ed.). (1996). The teaching of poetry: European perspectives. London: Cassell Education.
50. Vratulis, V., & Dobson, T. (2008). Social negotiations in a wiki environment: A case study with pre-service teachers. Education Media International, 45(4), 285-294.
51. Wheeler, S., & Wheeler, D. (2009). Using wikis to promote quality learning in teacher training. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(1), 1-10.
52. Wyatt-Smith, C., & Kimber, K. (2005). Valuing and evaluating student-generated online multimodal texts: Rethinking what counts. English in Education, 39(2), 22-43.
53. Yates, C. (1999). Jumpstart: Poetry in the secondary school. London: Poetry Society.