Examination of nurses' perceived support levels and factors affecting

Yıl 2020, , 59 - 67, 23.04.2020

Banu Terzi , Şehrinaz Polat

https://doi.org/10.30569/adiyamansaglik.656294

Cited By: 4

Öz

Aim: To identify nurses' perceived support levels and factors affecting.

Materials and Methods: The descriptive and relationship-seeking study was completed with 445 nurses. Research data was obtained via "Nurse Information Form" and "Perceived Support Scale". 

Results: Nurses' perceived manager support score average was 3.63±0.96 (Min.=1-Max.=5), perceived coworker support score average was 3.77±0.71 (Min.=1-Max.=5), perceived organizational support score average was 2.71±0.80 (Min.=1-Max.=5). It was identified that there were statistically significant differences between nurses' period of working in the organization and in the profession and their perceived manager support level total average scores (p<0.05). According to the results of Logistic Regression Analysis, duties, age and period of working in the profession have statistically significant effects on the perceived organizational support level total average score.

Conclusion: It was identified that nurses' perceived co-worker support level was highest and perceived organizational support level was lowest. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Perceived support, Co-worker, Nurses, Organization, Manager

Hemşirelerin algıladıkları destek düzeyleri ve etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesi

Öz

Amaç: Hemşireler tarafından algılanan destek düzeylerini ve etkileyen faktörleri belirlemektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı ve ilişki arayıcı tipteki araştırma toplam 445 hemşire ile tamamlandı. Araştırmanın verileri, “Hemşire Bilgi Formu” ve “Algılanan Destek Ölçeği” ile toplandı. 

Bulgular: Hemşirelerin algılanan yönetici desteği puan ortalamaları 3,63±0,96 (Min.=1-Maks.=5), algılanan çalışma arkadaşları desteği puan ortalamaları 3,77±0,71 (Min.=1-Maks.=5), algılanan örgütsel destek puan ortalamaları 2,71±0,80 (Min.=1-Maks.=5)’dır. Hemşirelerin kurumda ve meslekte çalışma süreleri ile algılanan yönetici destek düzeyi toplam puan ortalamaları arasında istatistiksel anlamlılıkla farklılıklar olduğu belirlendi (p<0,05). Lojistik Regresyon Analizi sonucuna göre; görev, yaş ve meslekte çalışma süresi değişkenlerinin algılanan örgütsel destek düzeyi toplam puan ortalamaları üzerindeki etkilerinin anlamlı olduğu görüldü.

Sonuç: Araştırmanın sonucunda, hemşirelerin çalışma arkadaşları destek algısının en yüksek, örgütsel destek algısının en düşük düzeyde olduğu belirlendi. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Algılanan destek, Çalışma arkadaşları, Hemşire, Örgüt, Yönetici

Kaynakça

• 1. Sodeify R, Vanaki Z, Mohammadi E. Nurses’Experiences of Perceived Support and Their Contributing Factors: A Qualitative Content Analysis. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013;18(3):191–197.
• 2. Fındıklı Afacan M. Algılanan lider desteği ve algılanan örgütsel destek ile işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisinde örgütsel özdeşlemenin aracılık rolü: İstanbul'da kamu çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma. İ. Ü. İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi. 2014;25(77):136-157.
• 3. Yıldız Bağdoğan S. Algılanan örgütsel destek, psikolojik iyi oluş ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkilerin değerlendirilmesi. The Journal of Industrial Relations & Human Resources. 2018;20(3):5-20.
• 4. Babin BJ, Boles JS. The effects of perceived co-worker involvement and supervisor support on service provider role stress, performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Retailing. 1996;72(1):57-75.
• 5. Eisenberger R, Stinglhamber F, Vandenberghe C, Sucharski I L, Rhoades L. Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002;87(3):565-573.
• 6. Emhan A, Kula S, Töngür A. Analysis of relationship among manager support, organizational commitment, organizational performance, and burnout with structural equation model: the case of government sector. Hacettepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Science. 2013;31(1):53-69.
• 7. Abou Hashish EA. Relationship between ethical work climate and nurses’ perception of organizational support, commitment, job satisfaction and turnover intent. Nursing Ethics. 2017;24(2):151-166.
• 8. Hämmig O. Health and well-being at work: the key role of supervisor support. SSM-Population Health. 2017;3:393-402.
• 9. Liaw YJ, Chi NW, Chuang A. Examining the mechanisms linking transformational leadership, employee customer orientation, and service performance: the mediating roles of perceived supervisor and coworker support. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2010;25(3):477-492.
• 10. Ariapooran S. Compassion fatigue and burnout in Iranian nurses: the role of perceived social support. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research. 2014;19(3):279.
• 11. Barnett MD, Martin KJ, Garza CJ. Satisfaction with work–family balance mediates the relationship between workplace social support and depression among hospice nurses. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2018;1-8
• 12. Puaha LN, Ong LD, Chong WY. The effects of perceived organizational support, perceived supervisor support and perceived co-worker support on safety and health compliance. JOSE. 2016;22(3):333–339.
• 13. Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1986;71(3):500-507.
• 14. Rhoades L, Eisenberger R. Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002;87(4):698.
• 15. Gupta V, Agarwal UA, Khatri N. The relationships between perceived organizational support, affective commitment, psychological contract breach, organizational citizenship behaviour and work engagement. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2016;72(11):2806-2817.
• 16. Cowin LS, Moroney R. Modelling job support, job fit, job role and job satisfaction for school of nursing sessional academic staff. BMC Nursing. 2018;17:22.
• 17. Giray MD, Sahin DN. Algılanan örgütsel, yönetici ve çalışma arkadaşları desteği ölçekleri: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2012;15(30):1.
• 18. Çetinkaya Ulusoy E, Ecevit Alpar Ş. Hemşirelerde meslektaş dayanışması ve iş doyumu ile ilişkisi. F.N. Hem. Derg. 2013;21(3):154-163.
• 19. Labrague LJ, McEnroe Petitte DM, Leocadio MC, Van Bogaert P, Tsaras K. Perceptions of organizational support and ıts ımpact on nurses' job outcomes. Nurs Forum. 2018;53:339–347.
• 20. Robaee N, Atashzadeh-Shoorideh F, Ashktorab T, Baghestani A, Barkhordari-Sharifabad M. Perceived organizational support and moral distress among nurses. BMC Nursing. 2018:17(2):1-7.
• 21. Yavuzer Zan S, Altuntaş S. The effect of nurses' perceptions of organizational support on organizational cynicism. DEUHFED. 2019:12(2):100-106.
• 22. Vera M, Martınez IM, Lorente L, Chambel MJ. The role of co-worker and supervisor support in the relationship between job autonomy and work engagement among portuguese nurses: a multilevel study. Soc Indic Res. 2016;126:1143–1156.
• 23. Blanco-Donoso LM, Moreno-Jiménez B, Pereira G, Garrosa E. Effects of co-worker and supervisor support on nurses’ energy and motivation through role ambiguity and psychological flexibility. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 2019;22:e25.
• 24. Tran KT, Nguyen PV, Dang TTU, Ton TNB. The impacts of the high-quality workplace relationships on job performance: a perspective on staff nurses in Vietnam. Behav. Sci. 2018:8:109;1-21.
• 25. El Akremi A, Colaianni G, Portoghese I, Galletta M, Battistelli A. How organizational support ımpacts affective commitment and turnover among ıtalian nurses: a multilevel mediation model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2014;25(9):1185-1207.
• 26. Erkol H. Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin algıladıkları örgütsel desteğin bireysel özelliklerine göre incelenmesi. Anadolu Eğitim Liderliği ve Öğretim Dergisi. 2015;3(1):1-17.
• 27. Spence Laschinger HK, Nancy P, Julia C, Joan A. Antecedents and consequences of nurse managers' perceptions of organizational support. Nursing Economics. 2006;24(1):20-29.
• 28. Labrague LJ, McEnroe Petitte DM, Leocadio M, Van Bogaert P, Tsaras K. Perceptions of organizational support and its ımpact on nurses’ job outcomes. Nurs Forum. 2018;53:339–347.