Proaktif Kişilik Yapısının ve Yenilikçi Davranışın Görev Performansına Etkisi

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 325 - 335, 27.04.2018

Sezai Tunca Meral Elçi Gülay Murat

https://doi.org/10.30803/adusobed.413208

Cited By: 13

Öz

Bu araştırma ile proaktif kişilik yapısının ve
yenilikçi davranışın, görev performansına anlamlı bir etkisinin olup olmadığını
ortaya çıkarma amacı güdülmektedir. Bu amaca yönelik olarak İstanbul, Aydın ve
Kocaeli illerinde çeşitli sektörlerde görev yapan 329 çalışana gönüllülük esasına
dayalı anket uygulanarak veri toplanmış, toplanan veriler SPSS 17 paket
programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Gerçekleştirilen analizler sonucunda hem proaktif
kişiliğin hem de yenilikçi davranışların görev performansı üzerinde istatistiki
olarak anlamlı ve pozitif yönlü bir etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Proaktif Kişilik, Proaktif Davranış, Yenilikçilik, Yenilikçi Davranış

The Effect of Proactive Personality Structure and Innovative Behaviour on Task Performance

Öz

This research examined the impact of proactive
personality structure and innovative behavior on task performance. It is aimed
to find out whether the proactive personality structures and innovative
behavior of 329 individuals working in different sectors have a meaningful
effect on the performance of the task
force. For this purpose, data were gathered by the method of survey application
to the employees working in various sectors. Hierarchical regression analysis
was used to determine the direct and regulatory effects of variables with the
generated model. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the
proactive person has a positive effect on task performance and innovative
behavior, has a positive effect on task performance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Proactive Personality, Proactive Behavior, Innovation, Innovative Behavior, Task Performance

Kaynakça

• AMABİLE, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Hachette UK.
• ARYEE, S., WALUMBWA, F. O., ZHOU, Q., & HARTNELL, C. A. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance, 25(1), 1-25.
• BATEMAN, T. S., & CRANT, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of organizational behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
• BECHERER, R. C., & MAURER, J. G. (1999). The proactive personality disposition and entrepreneurial behavior among small company presidents. Journal of small business management, 37(1), 28-36.
• BEFORT, N., & HATTRUP, K. (2003). Valuing task and contextual performance: Experience, job roles, and ratings of the importance of job behaviors. Applied HRM Research, 8(1), 17-32.
• BİNDL, U. K., & PARKER, S. K. (2010). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 2, 567-598.
• CHAN, D. (2006). Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 475.
• BORMAN, W. C., & BRUSH, D. H. (1993). More progress toward a taxonomy of managerial performance requirements. Human performance, 6(1), 1-21.CRANT, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of management, 26(3), 436.
• ÇALIŞKAN, A. (2013). İç Odaklı Örgüt Kültürünün Yenilikçi Davranışa Etkisinde Personel Güçlendirmenin Aracılık Rolü. Is, Guc: The Journal of Industrial Relations & Human Resources, 15(1).
• DE JONG, J., & DEN HARTOG, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
• DEMEŠKO, N. (2017). Effects of transformational and transactional leadership styles on innovative work behavior: the role of employee's locus of control(Doctoral dissertation, ISM University of Management and Economics).
• DÖRNER, N. (2012). Innovative work behavior: The roles of employee expectations and effects on job performance. University of St.Gallen, Doctor of Philosophy, Germany.
• GİLSON, L. L. (2008). Why be creative: A review of the practical outcomes associated with creativity at the individual, group, and organizational levels. Handbook of organizational creativity, 303-322.
• GONG, Y., HUANG, J. C., & FARH, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.
• GRANT, A. M., & ASHFORD, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in organizational behavior, 28, 3-34.
• JANSSEN, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and organizational psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
• JANSSEN, O., VAN DE VLİERT, E., & WEST, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 129-145.
• JAİN, R. (2010). Innovation in organizations: A comprehensive conceptual framework for future research. South Asian Journal of Management, 17(2), 81-111.
• JAWAHAR, I. M., & CARR, D. (2007). Conscientiousness and contextual performance: The compensatory effects of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(4), 330-349.
• LAMBERT, T. A., EBY, L. T., & REEVES, M. P. (2006). Predictors of networking intensity and network quality among white-collar job seekers. Journal of career development, 32(4), 351-365.
• KHENG, Y. K., JUNE, S., & MAHMOOD, R. (2013). The determinants of innovative work behavior in the knowledge intensive business services sector in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 9(15), 47-59.
• OUKES, T. (2010). “Innovative work behavior”, University of Twente, Bachelor thesis, Holland.
• PİETERSE, A. N., VAN KNİPPENBERG, D., SCHİPPERS, M., & STAM, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of organizational behavior, 31(4), 609-623.
• ROBBİNS, S. P., & JUDGE, T. A. (2013). “Örgütsel davranış.” (İ. Erdem, Çev.) Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• SEİBERT, S. E., CRANT, J. M., & KRAİMER, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of applied psychology, 84(3), 416-427.
• SCOTT, S. G., & BRUCE, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37(3), 580-607.
• SULİMAN, A. M. (2001). Work performance: is it one thing or many things? The multidimensionality of performance in a Middle Eastern context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(6), 1049-1061.
• ÖZDEVECİOĞLU, M., & KANIGÜR, S. (2009). Çalışanların ilişki ve görev yönelimli liderlik algılamalarının performansları üzerindeki etkileri. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2009(1), 53-82.
• THOMAS, J. P., WHİTMAN, D. S., & VİSWESVARAN, C. (2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta‐analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 275-300.
• UNCUOĞLU YOLCU, İ., & ÇAKMAK, A. F. (2017). PROAKTİF KİŞİLİK İLE PROAKTİF ÇALIŞMA DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİ ÜZERİNDE PSİKOLOJİK GÜÇLENDİRMENİN ETKİSİ. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(2), 425-438.
• WEST, M.A., AND FARR, J.L. (1990) Innovation at work. In M.A. West and J.L. Farr (Eds), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3-13). Chichester, England: Wiley.
• WİLLİAMS, L. J., & ANDERSON, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of management, 17(3), 601-617.
• YUAN, F., & WOODMAN, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342.