Evaluation of the Effects of Foreign Trade on Mark-up ın Turkish Manufacturing Industry

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 3, 979 - 996, 25.12.2020

Demet Yaman Songur

Öz

In terms of examining the effects of foreign trade on firm behavior and market structure, the effects of foreign trade on mark-up is one of the major interests of both theoretical and applied international economics literature. In this context, the aim of this study is examining the impacts of foreign trade on mark-ups for 189 sub-sectors of Turkish manufacturing industry by using panel data analysis during the 2004-2015 period. The results show that there is a positive relationship between mark-up and import penetration rate in total and competitive manufacturing sectors, and a negative relationship between mark-ups and export intensity. Additionally, sectoral real exchange rate, concentration ratio and total employment variables also have a positive effect on mark-ups in all manufacturing industry sub-sectors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mark-Up, Foreign Trade, Sectoral Real Exchange Rate, GMM

Türkiye İmalat Sanayii’nde Dış Ticaretin Mark-up Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Dış ticaretin, firma davranışları ve piyasa yapısı üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi bakımından, dış ticaretin mark-up üzerindeki etkileri hem teorik hem de uygulamalı uluslararası iktisat yazınının önemli ilgi alanlarından birisidir. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye İmalat Sanayii’nin 189 alt sektöründe dış ticaretin mark-up üzerindeki etkisini, 2004-2015 yılları için panel veri analiz yöntemi kullanarak tahmin etmektedir. Sonuçlar, Türkiye İmalat Sanayii’nde mark-up ile ithalat penetrasyon oranı arasında pozitif, mark-up ve ihracat yoğunluğu arasında negatif bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca sektörel reel döviz kuru, yoğunlaşma oranı ve toplam istihdam değişkenlerinin ise mark-up üzerinde pozitif bir etkisi olduğu görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mark-up, Dış Ticaret, Sektörel Reel Döviz Kuru, GMM

Kaynakça

• Amidei, F. B., & Gomellini, M. (2014). Direct measures of competition and Italian industry performance. In The Long Run. Conference, “Mercato E Crescıta In Italia: Il Lungo Perıodo”, 29-30 October 2014, Roma.
• Arellano, M. (1987). Practitioners’corner: Computing robust standard errors for within‐ groups estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 49(4), 431-434.
• Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
• Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the ınstrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
• Aslan, A., & F. Kula (2008). Dış ticaret serbestisinin Türk İmalat Sanayi fiyat maliyet marjları üzerindeki etkisi, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(13), 175-192.
• Baldwin, R. E., & Venables, A. J. (1995). Regional economic ıntegration. Handbook of International Economics, 3, 1597-1644.
• Baltagi, B. H., & Wu, P. X. (1999). Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR(1) disturbances. Econometric Theory, 15(6), 814-823.
• Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., & Kortum, S. (2003). Plants and productivity ın ınternational trade. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1268-1290
• Brandt, L., Van Biesebroeck, J., Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2017). WTO accession and performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2784-2820.
• Chen, N., Imbs, J., & Scott, A. (2009). The dynamics of trade and competition. Journal of International Economics, 77(1), 50-62.
• De Loecker, J., & Warzynski, F. (2012). Markups and firm-level export status. American Economic Review, 102(6), 2437-71.
• De Loecker, J., Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K., & Pavcnik, N. (2016). Prices, markups, and trade reform. Econometrica, 84(2), 445-510.
• Edmond, C., Midrigan, V., & Xu, D. Y. (2012). Competition, markups, and the gains from international trade. NBER Working Paper No. 18041.
• Epifani, P., & Gancia, G. (2011). Trade, markup heterogeneity and misallocations. Journal of International Economics, 83(1), 1-13.
• Fedderke, J., Kularatne, C., & Mariotti, M. (2007). Mark-up pricing ın South African Industry. Journal of African Economies, 16(1), 28-69.
• Foroutan, F. (1991). Foreign trade and its relation to competition and productivity in Turkish Industry. The World Bank, Paper No. 604.
• Gunay, A., Metin-Ozcan, K., & Yeldan, E. (2005). Real wages, profit margins and inflation in Turkish manufacturing under post-liberalization. Applied Economics, 37(16), 1899-1905.
• Hornok, C., & Muraközy, B. (2015). Markup and productivity of exporters and importers, Iehas Discussion Papers, No. Mt-Dp-2015/30.
• Jägerstedt, H. (2016). On The Link Between Innovation, Markups And Exporting. Master Thesis, Lund University.
• Keisuke, K. (2018). Markups, City Size, and Exports: Evidence from Japan. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, No. 18017.
• Konings, J., Van Cayseele, P., & Warzynski, F. (2001). The dynamics of ındustrial markups ın two small open economies: Does national competition policy matter?. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(5), 841-859.
• Lapham, B. (2015). International Trade with Firm Heterogeneity: Theoretical Developments and Policy Implications. Redesigning Canadian Trade Policies For New Global Realities.
• Lee, S., & Choi, Y. S. (2011). Export ıntensity, markup & productivity: Micro-evidence from the Korean manufacturing. ERIA Research Project Report 2011, No. 3.
• Li, Y., & Miao, Z. (2018). Trade costs, import penetration, and markups. MPRA Paper No. 85690.
• Liu, H., Xu, M., & Zhong, T. (2019). Import competition and export markups: Evidence from Chinese multi-product exporters. Annals Of Economics & Finance, 20(1), 357-385.
• Martín, L. M., & Rodríguez, D. R. (2010). Export activity, persistence and mark-ups. Applied Economics, 42(4), 475-488.
• Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity, Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725.
• Melitz, M. J., & Ottaviano, G. I. (2008). Market size, trade, and productivity. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(1), 295-316.
• Metin-Özcan, K., Voyvoda, K., & Yeldan, E. (2002). The impact of the liberalization program on the price-cost margin and investment of Turkey’s Manufacturing sector after 1980, Emerging Markets Finance And Trade, 38(5), 72-103.
• Mıhçı, S., & Wigley, A. A. (2002). Dış ticaret serbestisinin Türk İmalat Sanayi sektörleri üzerindeki yoğunlaşma ve karlılık etkileri, Gazi Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 5(3), 77-91.
• Mıhçı, S., & Wigley, A. A. (2003). Avrupa Birliği ile Gümrük Birliği’nin Türk İmalat Sanayi alt sektörleri üzerinde karlılık etkileri, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 71-89.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper No. 1229.
• Roodman, D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to. “Difference” and “system” GMM in Stata. Working Paper, 103.
• Tamminen, S. (2014). Heterogeneous Firms, Mark-Ups and Income Inequality. Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht University School of Economics.
• Taymaz, E., Voyvoda, E., & Yılmaz, K. (2008). Türkiye imalat sanayiinde yapısal dönüşüm, üretkenlik ve teknolojik değişme dinamikleri. Economic Research Center Working Papers in Economics, 106K050.
• Yalçın, C., (2000). Price-cost margins and trade liberalization in Turkish manufacturing ındustry: A panel data analysis. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Research Department Working Paper, Ankara.
• Yentürk, H. (1997). Türk İmalat Sanayiinde Ücretler, İstihdam ve Birikim. Friedericht Ebert Shifting Araştırma Sonuçları, İstanbul.