İşbirlikli Planlama ve Uygulama Döngüsü ile Öğretmen Adaylarının Matematiği Öğretme Becerilerinin Desteklenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışma, "İşbirlikli Planlama ve Uygulama Döngüsü (IPUD)" süreci kapsamında öğretmen adaylarının deneyimlerini ve mesleki becerilerindeki gelişimi incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, nitel bir durum çalışması deseni kullanarak tek bir durum ve analiz birimi üzerinde yapılmıştır. Katılımcılar, ölçüt örnekleme yöntemiyle belirlenen sınıf öğretmenliği lisans programının üçüncü sınıfındaki dört öğretmen adayıdır. Çalışmada, üç veri toplama aracı kullanmıştır: hazırlık süreci raporları, ders planları ve yansıtıcı değerlendirme raporları. Her bir araç, işbirlikli planlama ve uygulama döngüsünün aşamaları temelinde özelleştirilmiştir. Veri analizi açık kodlama, sınıflandırma ve alt kategorilere ayrıştırma adımlarıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçları, öğretmen adaylarının hazırlık çalışmalarında gereklilikleri daha detaylı ele alabilme konusunda yeterlik kazandığını göstermiştir. Adaylar tarafından geliştirilen planların çoğunun boyutların gerekliliklerine sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Adayların yansıtıcı raporları ise çeşitli kazanımlar sağladığını ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuç olarak, IPUD süreci, öğretmen adaylarının matematik öğretme becerilerini desteklemekte ve geliştirmekte etkili bir araç olarak görülmektedir. Araştırmanın bulguları, öğretmen eğitim programlarına dair öneriler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Matematik Öğretimi
• Öğretmen Eğitimi Programı
• Kuram ve Uygulama Entegrasyonu
• İşbirlikli Planlama
• Farklılaştırılmış Öğretim.

Developing Pre-Service Teachers on Teaching Mathematics through Collaborative Planning and Implementation

Abstract

This study aims to examine the experiences of teacher candidates and their professional skill development within the scope of the "Collaborative Planning and Implementation Cycle (CPIC)" process. The research was conducted using a qualitative case study design, focusing on a single case and a single unit of analysis. The participants were four teacher candidates in the third year of the primary school teaching undergraduate program, selected through criterion sampling. Three data collection instruments were utilized in the study: preparation for planning reports, lesson plans, and reflective assessment reports. Each instrument was customized based on the stages of the collaborative planning and implementation cycle. Data analysis was conducted through open coding, classification, and sub-categorization steps. The findings of the study demonstrate that the teacher candidates have gained competence in addressing the requirements more comprehensively through their preparation work. It was observed that most of the plans developed by the candidates met the requirements of the dimensions. The reflective reports provided by the candidates revealed various achievements. Consequently, the CPIC process is considered an effective tool in supporting and enhancing the mathematical teaching skills of teacher candidates. The findings of the study offer recommendations for teacher education programs.

Keywords

• Mathematics Teaching
• Teacher Education
• Theory and Practice
• Collaborative Planning
• Differentiated Instruction.

Kaynakça

1. Akar, H. (2019). Durum çalışması. İçinde A. Saban & A. Ersoy (Ed.), Eğitimde nitel araştırma desenleri. Anı Yayıncılık
2. Akınoğlu, O., & Karsantık, Y. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ opinions on teaching thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.925a
3. Andrews, L. (2002). Preparing general education pre-service teachers for inclusion: Web-enhanced case-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(3), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340201700302
4. Arslan, A. (2021). Öğretmen adaylarının mikro öğretimle “öğretmenlik” yolculuğu: Bir karma desen araştırması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 46(207), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2021.9406
5. Bayrak-Özmutlu, E. (2022). The relationship between theory and practice: An examination based on pre-service teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 22(30), 223–249. https://doi.org/10.14689/ENAD.30.10
6. Baysal, Z. N., Çarıkçı, S., & Yaşar, E. B. (2017). Classroom teachers’ awareness of teaching thinking skills. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 5(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.14689/ISSN.2148-2624.1.5C1S1M
7. Bauml, M. (2014). Collaborative lesson planning as professional development for beginning primary teachers. The New Educator, 10(3), 182-200. doi:10.1080/1547688X.2014.925741
8. Benzehaf, B. (2016). Expanding teacher comfort zones: Developing professionalism. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.21462/JELTL.V1I3.30

9. Berry, A. (2007). Tensions in teaching about teaching: Understanding practice as a teacher educator. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
10. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2014). Defining twenty-first century skills. In Griffin, P., & Care (Ed.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (pp. 17-66). Springer.
11. Boyraz, C., & Türkcan, B. (2022). İlkokul sınıflarında neler oluyor? Düşünme becerileri üzerine bir durum çalışması. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 12(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.18039/AJESI.848472
12. Bozkurt, G., & Yiğit- Koyunkaya, M. (2022). Supporting prospective mathematics teachers’ planning and teaching technology-based tasks in the context of a practicum course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 119, 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2022.103830
13. Brandenburg, R. (2008). Powerful pedagogy: Self-study of a teacher educator’s practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
14. Brevik, L. M., Gunnulfsen, A. E., & Renzulli, J. S. (2018). Student teachers’ practice and experience with differentiated instruction for students with higher learning potential. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2017.12.003
15. Brinkmann, J. L. (2019). Making a difference: Increasing elementary pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy in mathematics. Educational Planning, 26(1), 7–21.
16. Brown, A. B., Westenskow, A., & Moyer-Packenham, P. S. (2011). Elementary pre-service teachers: Can they experience mathematics teaching anxiety without having mathematics anxiety?. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 5.
17. Brownell, M. T., Griffin, C., Leko, M. M., & Stephens, J. (2011). Improving collaborative teacher education research: Creating tighter linkages. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34(3), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406411404570
18. Buitink, J. (2009). What and how do student teachers learn during school-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2008.07.009
19. Bush, A., & Grotjohann, N. (2020). Collaboration in teacher education: A cross-sectional study on future teachers’ attitudes towards collaboration, their intentions to collaborate and their performance of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 102968. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2019.102968
20. Cajkler, W., Wood, P., Norton, J., Pedder, D., & Xu, H. (2015). Teacher perspectives about lesson study in secondary school departments: A collaborative vehicle for professional learning and practice development. Research Papers in Education, 30(2), 192–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2014.887139
21. Çakmak, M. (2014). Grup çalışmasına yönelik yansımalar: Öğretmen adaylarının düşünceleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(174), 338–347. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.2275
22. Campbell, P. F., Nishio, M., Smith, T. M., Clark, L. M., Conant, D. L., Rust, A. H., … Choi, Y. (2014). The relationship between teachers’ mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge, teachers’ perceptions, and student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 419–459. https://doi.org/10.5951/JRESEMATHEDUC.45.4.0419
23. Canales, A., & Maldonado, L. (2018). Teacher quality and student achievement in Chile: Linking teachers’ contribution and observable characteristics. International Journal of Educational Development, 60, 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.09.009
24. Celik, S. (2021). Teacher education program supporting critical thinking skills: A case of primary school teachers. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 10(41), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.41.05.19
25. Chen, S., & Zhang, B. (2019). Improving prospective teachers’ lesson planning knowledge and skills through lesson study. In R. Huang, A. Takahashi, J. Ponte (Eds), Theory and practice of lesson study in mathematics: An international perspective, (pp. 549–575). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04031-4_27
26. Cohen, J., Wong, V., Krishnamachari, A., & Berlin, R. (2020). Teacher coaching in a simulated environment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(2), 208–231. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720906217
27. Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2015). The effects of changes in mathematical knowledge on teaching: A longitudinal study of teachers’ knowledge and instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(3), 280–330. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
28. Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River; NJ.
29. Cueto, S., León, J., Sorto, M. A., & Miranda, A. (2017). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and mathematics achievement of students in Peru. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10649-016-9735-2/TABLES/5
30. D’Intino, J. S., & Wang, L. (2021). Differentiated instruction: A review of teacher education practices for Canadian pre-service elementary school teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(5), 668–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1951603
31. Daharnis, D., Nirwana, H., Ifdil, I., Afdal, A., Ardi, Z., Taufik, T., … Fikriyanda, F. (2019). Mathematics anxiety among prospective elementary school teachers and their treatment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 042089. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042089
32. Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Building a profession of teaching: Teacher educators as change agents. In M. Ben-Peretz, S. Kleeman, R. Reichenberg, & S. Shimoni (Eds.), Teacher educators as members of an evolving profession (pp. 87–102). New York: Rowman and Littlefi eld Education.
33. Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review/teacher learning: What matters. Educational leadership, 66(5), 46-53.
34. Dervent, F. (2015). The effect of reflective thinking on the teaching practices of preservice physical education teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 25(3), 2015.
35. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D. C. Heath.
36. Dimova, Y., & Loughran, J. (2009). Developing a big picture understanding of reflection in pedagogical practice. Reflective Practice, 7(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940500489716
37. Dolapcıoğlu, S. (2020). Action learning in teacher education for teaching twenty-first-century thinking skills. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 17(3), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2020.1819611
38. Elipane, L. (2012). Integrating the essential elements of lesson study in pre-service mathematics teacher education. Københavns universitet.
39. Erdamar, G., & Demirel, H. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının grup çalışmalarına ilişkin algıları. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 205–223.
40. Gibbs, K. (2022). Voices in practice: Challenges to implementing differentiated instruction by teachers and school leaders in an Australian mainstream secondary school. Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13384-022-00551-2
41. Ginja, T. G., & Chen, X. (2020). Teacher educators’ perspectives and experiences towards differentiated instruction. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 781–798. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2020.13448A
42. Gonzalez, K., & Maxwell, G. M. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ efficacy, experience, certification and their ımpact on student achievement. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 21.
43. Gravett, S., de Beer, J., Odendaal-Kroon, R., & Merseth, K. K. (2017). The affordances of case-based teaching for the professional learning of student-teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(3), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1149224
44. Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., & Vantieghem, W. (2021). Exploring pre-service teachers’ beliefs and practices about two inclusive frameworks: Universal Design for Learning and differentiated instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, 103503. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2021.103503
45. Güler, M., & Çelik, D. (2022). Supporting novice mathematics teachers: The impact of e-mentoring on lesson analysis skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 113, 103658. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2022.103658
46. Gülten, A. Z. (2013). Am i planning well? Teacher trainees’ voices on lesson planning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1409–1413. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2013.10.053
47. Gutierez, S. B. (2021). Collaborative lesson planning as a positive ‘dissonance’ to the teachers’ individual planning practices: characterizing the features through reflections-on-action. Teacher Development, 25(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2020.1856177
48. Hollingsworth, H. L., & Knight-McKenna, M. (2018). “I am now confident”: academic service-learning as a context for addressing math anxiety in preservice teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 39(4), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2018.1514337
49. Huang, R., & Shimizu, Y. (2016). Improving teaching, developing teachers and teacher educators, and linking theory and practice through lesson study in mathematics: an international perspective. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(4), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-016-0795-7
50. Kager, K., Jurczok, A., Bolli, S., & Vock, M. (2022). “We were thinking too much like adults”: Examining the development of teachers’ critical and collaborative reflection in lesson study discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 113, 103683. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2022.103683
51. Kardaş, M. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının iş birlikli öğrenme uygulamalarına ilişkin görüşleri. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(8), 761–777.
52. Kaskens, J., Segers, E., Goei, S. L., van Luit, J. E. H., & Verhoeven, L. (2020). Impact of children’s math self-concept, math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and teacher competencies on math development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 103096. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2020.103096
53. Kearney, W. S., & Garfield, T. (2019). Student readiness to learn and teacher effectiveness: Two key factors in middle grades mathematics achievement. Research in Middle Level Education, 42(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2019.1607138
54. Kılıç, A. (2010). Learner-centered micro teaching in teacher education. International Journal of Instruction, 3(1).
55. Kim, Y., & Silver, R. E. (2016). Provoking reflective thinking in post observation conversations. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(3), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116637120
56. Koehler, A. A., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2019). Developing preservice teachers’ instructional design skills through case-based instruction: Examining the impact of discussion format. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118755701
57. König, J., Blömeke, S., Jentsch, A., Schlesinger, L., née Nehls, C. F., Musekamp, F., & Kaiser, G. (2021). The links between pedagogical competence, instructional quality, and mathematics achievement in the lower secondary classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10649-020-10021-0/TABLES/7
58. Körkkö, M., Kyrö-Ämmälä, O., & Turunen, T. (2016). Professional development through reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education.
59. Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching, 23(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
60. Korthagen, F., & Kessels, J. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028004004
61. Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1020-1041.
62. Korthagen, F., & Vasalos, A. (2005). Levels in reflection: Core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teachers and Teaching, 11(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060042000337093
63. Kurtoglu-Hooton, N. (2015). From ‘Plodder’ to ‘Creative’: Feedback in teacher education. ELT Journal, 70(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/ELT/CCV050
64. Lampert, M., Beasley, H., Ghousseini, H., Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. (2010). Using designed instructional activities to enable novices to manage ambitious mathematics teaching. In Instructional explanations in the disciplines. (pp. 129–141). Boston, MA.: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0594-9_9
65. Latham, N., & Vogt, W. (2007). Do professional development schools reduce teacher attrition? Evidence from a longitudinal study of 1,000 graduates. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487106297840
66. Le, P. T. A., & Vásquez, C. (2011). Feedback in teacher education: Mentor discourse and intern perceptions. Teacher Development, 15(4), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2011.635264
67. Lee, S., & Lee, E. (2020). Teacher qualification matters: The association between cumulative teacher qualification and students’ educational attainment. International Journal of Educational Development, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102218
68. Letzel, V., Pozas, M., & Schneider, C. (2022). Challenging but positive! – An exploration into teacher attitude profiles towards differentiated instruction (DI) in Germany. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJEP.12535
69. Lim, W., Son, J. W., & Kim, D. J. (2018). Understanding preservice teacher skills to construct lesson plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-016-9783-1
70. Maamin, M., Maat, S. M., & Ikhsan, Z. (2020). A systematic review of teacher factors and mathematics achievement. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 998–1006. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080334
71. Marbán, J. M., Palacios, A., & Maroto, A. (2021). Enjoyment of teaching mathematics among pre-service teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(3), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13394-020-00341-Y/FIGURES/3
72. Meng, C., & Sam, L. (2013). Developing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge for teaching mathematics with the geometer’s sketchpad through lesson study. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n1p1
73. Mergler, A. G., & Tangen, D. (2010). Using microteaching to enhance teacher efficacy in pre‐service teachers. Teaching Education , 21(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210902998466
74. Merriam, S., & Grenier, R. (2019). Qualitative research in practice : Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
75. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2020). Eğitim Analiz ve Değerlendirme Raporları Serisi Türkiye Ön Raporu- TIMSS 2019.
76. Murata, A., & Pothen, B. (2011). Lesson study in preservice elementary mathematics methods courses: Connecting emerging practice and understanding. In L. Hart, A. Alston, Ai Murata (Ed.) Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 103–116). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9941-9_8
77. Nicolae, M. (2013). Teachers’ beliefs as the differentiated instruction starting point. IATES, 2235–2240.
78. Nicolae, M. (2014). Teachers’ beliefs as the differentiated instruction starting point: Research basis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 426–431.
79. Norton, J., Helgevold, N., & Bjuland, R. (2019). The role of collaborative planning: How to use joint planning as a learning process in lesson study. Lesson Study in Initial Teacher Education: Principles and Practices, 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-797-920191005
80. Olfos, R., Vergara-Gómez, A., Estrella, S., & Goldrine, T. (2022). Impact of a theory-practice connecting scaffolding system on the ability of preschool teachers-in-training to teach mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 120, 103887. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2022.103887
81. Özdemir, M. (2010). Nitel veri analizi: Sosyal bilimlerde yöntembilim sorunsalı üzerine bir çalışma. Eskişehir Osmangazi üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi, 11(1), 323-343.
82. Pérez, A., Santamaria, E. K., Operario, D., Tarkang, E. E., Zotor, F. B., Cardoso, S. R. de S. N., … Volk, J. E. (2017). Instructional media. BMC Public Health, 5(1), 1–8.
83. Puri, S. (2022). Effective learning through the case method. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1811133
84. Reid, M., & Reid, S. (2017). Learning to be a math teacher: What knowledge is essential?. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(4), 851–872.
85. Rocha, H. (2020). Using tasks to develop pre-service teachers’ knowledge for teaching mathematics with digital technology. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(7), 1381–1396. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-020-01195-1/FIGURES/13
86. Russo, J., Bobis, J., Sullivan, P., Downton, A., Livy, S., McCormick, M., & Hughes, S. (2020). Exploring the relationship between teacher enjoyment of mathematics, their attitudes towards student struggle and instructional time amongst early years primary teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 102983. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2019.102983
87. Şahin-Taşkın, C. (2017). Exploring pre-service teachers’ perceptions of lesson planning in primary education. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(12), 57–63.
88. Saraçoğlu, G., Gürışık, A., & Furat, D. (2018). İngilizce öğretmen adaylarının mikro-öğretim uygulamaları sonrasında yapılan eleştiri ile ilgili görüşleri. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-5953(02)00106-3
89. Saric, M., & Steh, B. (2017). Critical reflection in the professional development of teachers: challenges and possibilities. CEPS Journal 7 (2017) 3, S. 67-85, 7(3), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:14908
90. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
91. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching:foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/HAER.57.1.J463W79R56455411
92. Smets, W., & Struyven, K. (2020). A teachers’ professional development programme to implement differentiated instruction in secondary education: How far do teachers reach? Cogent Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1742273
93. Stephan, M., Pugalee, D., Cline, J., & Cline, C. (2018). Ders kurgulama (C. Çevik, M., Abdioğlu, Ed.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
94. Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good?: A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111404241/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_0022487111404241-FIG2.JPEG
95. Taggart, G. L., & Wilson, A. P. (2005). Promoting reflective thinking in teachers: 50 action strategies. Corwin Press.
96. Timoštšuk, I., & Ennist, G. (2015). Differentiated instructıon in primary science classes–student teachers´ experiences. IATED., 938–944.
97. Uddin, M. S. (2022). Exploring the effect of student-teaching on elementary student-teachers’ math anxiety. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(4), em0708. https://doi.org/10.29333/IEJME/12316
98. Ulvik, M., Eide, H. M. K., Eide, L., Helleve, I., Jensen, V. S., Ludvigsen, K., … Torjussen, L. P. S. (2020). Teacher educators reflecting on case-based teaching – a collective self-study. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1712615, 48(4), 657–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1712615
99. van den Kieboom, L. A., & Groleau, S. V. (2022). Pre-service teacher planning for differentiation of instruction in mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 111(2), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10649-022-10149-1/TABLES/8
100. Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1977.11075533
101. Wijnen, F., Walma van der Molen, J., & Voogt, J. (2021). Measuring primary school teachers’ attitudes towards stimulating higher-order thinking (SHOT) in students: Development and validation of the SHOT questionnaire. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100954. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2021.100954