E-Portfolyo: Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilişötesi Gelişimi için Katalizör

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3 - Türkiye Cumhuriyeti 100.Yıl Özel Sayısı, 1293 - 1313, 29.10.2023

Bilal Atasoy , Akça Okan Yüksel , Ezgi Gün-tosik

https://doi.org/10.38151/akef.2023.112

Öz

Günümüzde öğretmenlerden çevrimiçi teknolojileri etkili bir şekilde kullanabilen bilişötesi becerilere sahip bireyler olmaları beklenmektedir. Yansıtma etkinliklerinin yer aldığı ePortfolyo ortamlarının bu öğretmen yeterliliklerinin kazandırılmasında etkili olacağı düşünülmektedir. Bu araştırmanın amacı yansıtıcı etkinliklerin yer aldığı ePortfolyo ortamlarının öğretmen adaylarının bilişötesi farkındalıklarına ve çevrimiçi teknolojilere yönelik öz yeterlik algılarına etkisini araştırmaktır. Tek grup öntest sontest desenin kullanıldığı çalışmada uygun örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bir devlet üniversitesinin İngilizce öğretmenliği 3.sınıfında yer alan 53 öğretmen adayı ile 12 hafta süre ile gerçekleştirilen çalışmada Mahara ePortfolyo platformu kullanılmıştır. Çevrimiçi teknolojilere yönelik öz yeterlik algısını ölçmek için Miltiadou ve Yu (2000) tarafından geliştirilen, Horzum ve Çakır (2009) tarafından Türkçe’ye uyarlanan ölçüm aracı kullanılırken; bilişötesi farkındalığı ölçmek için Schraw ve Dennison (1994) tarafından geliştirilen, Akın, Abacı ve Çetin (2007) tarafından Türkçe’ye uyarlanan ölçüm aracı kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları yansıtma etkinliklerinin yer aldığı ePortfolyo ortamının öğretmen adaylarının bilişötesi farkındalıklarında ve çevrimiçi teknolojilere yönelik öz yeterlik algılarında anlamlı farklılığa sebep olduğunu göstermiştir. Bilişötesi farkındalık alt faktörlerinden prosedürel bilgi ve değerlendirme hariç, açıklayıcı ve durumsal bilgi, planlama, izleme ve hata ayıklama alt faktörlerinde anlamlı artış gözlenmiştir. Ayrıca öğretmen adaylarının çevrimiçi teknolojilere yönelik öz yeterlik algısı ile bilişötesi farkındalıkları arasında pozitif ve anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu da tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları yansıtma etkinliklerinin yer aldığı ePortfolyo ortamlarının, öğretmen adaylarının çevrimiçi öz yeterlik algıları ve bilişötesi farkındalıklarını artırmak için etkili bir araç olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ePortfolyo, Bilişötesi, Bilişötesi farkındalığı, Yansı, Çevrimiçi teknolojilere yönelik özyeterlik

E-Portfolios: A Catalyst for Metacognitive Growth in Pre-service Teachers

Öz

Nowadays, teachers are expected to have metacognitive skills and be able to use online technologies effectively. It is believed that e-portfolio environments that incorporate reflection activities will be effective for acquiring these teacher competencies. This study aims to examine the effect of e-portfolio environments with reflective activities on pre-service
teachers' metacognitive awareness and self-efficacy perceptions regarding online technologies. In the study that employed a one-group pretest-posttest design, a convenient sampling technique was utilized. The Mahara e-portfolio platform was utilized in the 12-week study involving 53 pre-service teachers in their third year of English language teaching at a state university. The measurement tool developed by Miltiadou and Yu (2000) and adapted into Turkish by Horzum and Çakır (2009) was used to assess self-efficacy perceptions of online technologies, whereas the measurement tool developed by Schraw and Dennison (1994) and adapted into Turkish by Akın, Abacı, and Çetin (2007) was used to assess metacognitive awareness. The results of the study indicated that the e-portfolio environment with reflection activities caused a significant difference in pre-service teachers' metacognitive awareness and self-efficacy perceptions regarding online technologies. With the exception of procedural knowledge and evaluation, significant increases were observed in the explanatory and situational knowledge, planning, monitoring, and debugging subfactors of metacognitive awareness. It was also discovered that there was a positive and statistically significant relationship between the self-efficacy perception of preservice teachers toward online technologies and their metacognitive awareness. The study's findings indicate that e-portfolio environments with reflection activities are a valuable tool for enhancing the online self-efficacy perceptions and metacognitive awareness of pre-service teachers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

E-portfolio, Metacognition, Metacognitive awareness, Reflection, Online technologies self efficacy

Kaynakça

• Abdillah, I., Kartimi, K., & Gloria, R. Y. (2021). Instagram Assisted Portfolio Assessment to Improve Students' Creative Thinking Skills. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 10(1), 83-96.
• Akın, A., Arabacı, R., & Çetin, B. (2007). Bilişötesi Farkındalık Envanteri’nin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Educational Psychology, 67, 483-496.
• Akpunar, B. (2011). The effect of webblog based instruction on the metacognition levels of preservice teachers. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 7(2), 38-45.
• Alan, Ü. (2021). Distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey: Identifying the needs of early childhood educators. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(5), 987-994.
• Alexiou, A., & Paraskeva, F. (2013, Haziran). Exploiting motivation and self-efficacy through the implementation of self-regulated oriented ePortfolio. In International Conference on E-Learning in the Workplace, NY, USA.
• Altıok, S., Başer, Z., & Yükseltürk, E. (2019). Enhancing metacognitive awareness of undergraduates through using an e-educational video environment. Computers & Education, 139, 129-145.
• Andrade, M. (2019). ePortfolios and online learning: Applying concepts of organizational behavior. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 34(1).
• Aşkar, P., & Umay, A. (2001). Perceived computer self-efficacy of the students in the elementary mathematics teaching programme. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 21(1), 1-8.
• Babovič, M., Fu, R. H., & Monrouxe, L. V. (2019). Understanding how to enhance efficacy and effectiveness of feedback via e-portfolio: a realist synthesis protocol. BMJ open, 9(5), e029173.
• Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 3-38.
• Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills in reading. In D. P. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). New York: Longman.
• Balaban, I., & Bubas, G. (2010, Haziran). Educational potentials of ePortfolio systems: Student evaluations of Mahara and Elgg. In Proceedings of the ITI 2010, 32nd International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (pp. 329-336). IEEE.
• Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 4(3), 359-373.
• Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(5), 805.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
• Barrett, M. (2000). Windows, mirrors, and reflections: a case study of adult constructions of children's musical thinking. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 43-61.
• Barrett, H. C. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436-449.
• Blakey, E., & Spence, S. (1990). Developing metacognition. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
• Bowman, J., Lowe, B. J., Sabourin, K., & Sweet, C. S. (2016). The Use of ePortfolios to Support Metacognitive Practice in a First-Year Writing Program. International Journal of ePortfolio, 6(1), 1-22.
• Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other mysterious mechanisms. In Weinert F.E. & Kluwe, R.H. (Eds).Metacognition,motivation and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Brown, T. (2004). Critical thinking and learning: An encyclopedia for parents and teachers: Bloom’s taxonomy and critical thinking. Westport: Greenwood Press.
• Brown, A. L. (2017). Metacognitive development and reading. In Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (Ed. Rand J. S, Bertram C. B, William F. B. (pp. 453-482). Routledge.
• Brown, M., Anderson, B., Simpson, M., & Suddaby, G. (2007). Showcasing Mahara: A new open source eportfolio. Proceedings ascilite Singapore, 82-84.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2020). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem.
• Campbell, C., & Tran, T. L. N. (2021). Using an Implementation Trial of an ePortfolio System to Promote Student Learning through Self-Reflection: Leveraging the Success. Education Sciences, 11(6), 263.
• Can, A. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. Ankara: Pegem.
• Carr, M., & Biddlecomb, B. (1994). Metacognition in Mathematics from a Constructivist Perspective. J. Metcalfe AP Shimamura (Ed.), Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing, (pp. 69-89).
• Chafouleas, S. M., Johnson, A. H., Riley-Tillman, T. C., & Iovino, E. A. (2021). School-based behavioral assessment. Guilford Publications.
• Chau, J., & Cheng, G. (2010). Towards understanding the potential of e-portfolios for independent learning: A qualitative study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7).
• Chen, H.L., &. Light, T. P. (2010). Electronic Portfolios and Student Success: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Learning. American Association of College and Universities (AAC&U), Washington. 44 p.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (Second edition). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Asociates.
• Choy, S. C., & Cheah, P. K. (2009). Teacher perceptions of critical thinking among students and its influence on higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 198–206.
• Chou, C. M. (2012). Influence of teachers' perceived e-portfolio acceptance on teacher evaluation effectiveness in Taiwan. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4).
• Clark, J. E., & Eynon, B. (2009). E-portfolios at 2.0--Surveying the field. Peer Review, 11(1), 18-24.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. Routledge.
• Coutinho, S. (2008). Self-efficacy, metacognition, and performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(1).
• Cüceloğlu, D. (2012). İnsan ve davranışı. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
• Çiftçi, S., & Ocak, M. A. (2016). Web Temelli Bilişüstü Haritalama Aracının Öğrencilerin Öz Düzenleme Becerilerine ve Bilişüstü Farkındalıklarına Etkisi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 547-564.
• Darabi, A. A., Sikorski, E. G., & Harvey, R. B. (2006). Validated competencies for distance teaching. Distance Education, 27(1), 105-122.
• De Jager, T. (2019). Impact of ePortfolios on Science student-teachers’ reflective metacognitive learning and the development of higher-order thinking skills. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16(3), 3.
• Deture, M. (2004). Cognitive style and self-efficacy: Predicting student success in online distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 21–38.
• Dimmitt, C., & McCormick, C. B. (2012). Metacognition in education. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 157–187). American Psychological Association.
• Dogan Lacin, B., & Yalçın, İ. (2019). Predictive roles of self-efficacy and coping strategies in cognitive flexibility among university students. Hacettepe Unıversıtesı Egıtım Fakultesı Dergısı-Hacettepe Unıversıty Journal of Educatıon, 34(2).
• Domenici, V. (2020). Distance education in chemistry during the epidemic Covid-19. Substantia, 961-961. Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (1998). What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. Acta Psychologica, 98(1), 37-56.
• Farrelly, D. N. (2021). Using Faculty Feedback to Inform Improvements in an Education Program ePortfolio Initiative. Community College Enterprise, 27(2), 20-32.
• Flavell JH (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of psychological inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
• Gama, C.A. (2004). Integrating Metacognition Instruction in Interactive Learning Environments, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
• Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Ablex Publishing.
• Girash, J. (2014). Metacognition and instruction. In V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, & C. M. Hakala (Eds.), Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum (pp. 152–168). Society for the Teaching of Psychology.
• Goodman, B., Soller, A., Linton, F., and Gaimari, R. (1998). Encouraging Student Reflection and Articulation Using a Learning Companion. International Journal of Artificial 90 Intelligence in Education, 9(3-4), 237-255.
• Gorbunovs, A., Kapenieks, A., & Kudina, I. (2013). Competence development in a combined assessment and collaborative e-portfolio information system. Procedia Computer Science, 26, 79-100.
• Gourgey, A. F. (2001). Metacognition in basic skills instruction. In Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 17-32). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
• Gök, B. & Çakmak, E. K. (2020). Uzaktan eğitimde ders veren öğretim elemanlarının uzaktan eğitim algısı. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 28(5), 1915-1931.
• Gökçe, A. T. (2008). Küreselleşme sürecinde uzaktan eğitim. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 1-12.
• Güss, C. D., & Wiley, B. (2007). Metacognition of problem-solving strategies in Brazil, India, and the United States. Journal of cognition and Culture, 7(1-2), 1-25.
• Hall, B. C. (2008). Investigating the relationships among computer self-efficacy, professional development, teaching experience, and technology integration of teachers (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati).
• Hartman, H. J. (1998). Metacognition in teaching and learning: An introduction. Instructional science, 1-3.
• Hartman, H. J. (2002). Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (Vol. 19). Springer Science & Business Media.
• Horzum, M. B., & Cakir, O. (2009). The Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Online Technologies Self-Efficacy Scale. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 9(3), 1343-1356.
• Huang, J. J., Yang, S. J., Chiang, P. Y., & Tzeng, L. S. (2012). Building an e-portfolio learning model: Goal orientation and metacognitive strategies. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 4(1), 16.
• Huffman, A. H., Whetten, J., & Huffman, W. H. (2013). Using technology in higher education: The influence of gender roles on technology self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1779-1786.
• Hughes, A. J., & Partida, E. (2020). Promoting preservice stem education teachers' metacognitive awareness: Professional development designed to improve teacher metacognitive awareness. Journal of Technology Education, 32(1), 5.
• Iwai, Y. (2016). Promoting strategic readers: Insights of preservice teachers’ understanding of metacognitive reading strategies. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 4.
• Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3-4), 255-278.
• Janssens, O., Haerens, L., Valcke, M., Beeckman, D., Pype, P., & Embo, M. (2022). The role of ePortfolios in supporting learning in eight healthcare disciplines: A scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice, 103418.
• Jenson, J. D., & Treuer, P. (2014). Defining the E-Portfolio: What it is and why it matters. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 46(2), 50-57.
• Jia, X., Li, W., & Cao, L. (2019). The role of metacognitive components in creative thinking. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2404.
• Jaleel, S. (2016). A Study on the Metacognitive Awareness of Secondary School Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 165-172.
• Khasawneh, M., Alkhawaldeh, M., & Al-Khasawneh, F. (2020). The Level of Metacognitive Thinking Among Students with Learning Disabilities. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(5).
• Kohler, J. J., & Zile-Tamsen, V. (2020). Metacognitive Matters: Assessing the High-Impact Practice of a General Education Capstone ePortfolio. International Journal of ePortfolio, 10(1), 33-43.
• Kong, A., & Teng, M. F. (2020). The operating mechanisms of self-efficacy and peer feedback: An exploration of L2 young writers. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(2), 297-328.
• Krieger, F., Azevedo, R., Graesser, A. C., & Greiff, S. (2022). Introduction to the special issue: the role of metacognition in complex skills-spotlights on problem solving, collaboration, and self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 17(3), 683-690.
• Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. D. (2016). Educational testing and measurement. John Wiley & Sons.
• Kurt, M., & Kurt, S. (2017). Improving design understandings and skills through enhanced metacognition: Reflective design journals. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(2), 226-238.
• Kusuma, I., & Waluyo, B. (2023). Enacting e-portfolios in online English-Speaking courses: Speaking performance and self-efficacy. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 75-95.
• Lai, E. R. (2011). Metacognition: A literature review. Always learning: Pearson research report, 24, 1-40.
• Lane, C. (2007). The power of" e": Using e-portfolios to build online presentation skills. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(3).
• Lewis, L. (2015). A critical reflection on eportfolio as a teaching tool. Teachers' Work, 12(2), 115-130.
• Lorenzo, G., & Ittelson, J. (2005). An overview of e-portfolios. Educause Learning İnitiative, 1(1), 1-27.
• Lukitasari, M., Hasan, R., Sukri, A., & Handhika, J. (2021). Developing Student's Metacognitive Ability in Science through Project-Based Learning with E-Portfolio. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 948-955.
• Lukitasari, M., Susilo, H., Ibrohim, I., & Corebima, A. D. (2014). Lesson study in improving the role of e-portfolio on the metacognitive skill and concept comprehension: a study on cell biology subject in IKIP PGRI Madiun, Indonesia. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(10), 919-924.
• Magno, C. (2010). The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 137-156.
• Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information systems research, 9(2), 126-163.
• Martin, F., & Tutty, J. I. (2008, Mart). Learning Management System Self-efficacy of online and hybrid learners: Using LMSES scale. In Proceeding of the UNC Teaching and Learning with Technology Conference, Raleigh, NC.
• Mayer, R.E. (2002).Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Motivational Aspects of Problem Solving . Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice. ed. H.J. Hartman. Springer Science & Business Media.
• McDonald, T., & Siegall, M. (1992). The effects of technological self-efficacy and job focus on job performance, attitudes, and withdrawal behaviors. The Journal of Psychology, 126(5), 465-475.
• McAllister, L. M., Hallam, G. C., & Harper, W. E. (2008). The ePortfolio as a tool for lifelong learning: Contextualising Australian Practice. In International Lifelong Learning Conference 2008 (pp. 246-252).
• Medina, M. S., Castleberry, A. N., & Persky, A. M. (2017). Strategies for improving learner metacognition in health professional education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(4).
• Martinez, M. E. (2006). What is metacognition?. Phi delta kappan, 87(9), 696-699.
• Meyer, E., Abrami, P. C., Wade, C. A., Aslan, O., & Deault, L. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL. Computers & Education, 55(1), 84-91.
• Miltiadou, M., & Yu, C. H. (2000). Validation of the Online Technologies Self Efficacy Scale (OTSES). Paper presented at the AECT International Convention, Denver CO.
• Miller, R., & Morgaine, W. (2009). The benefits of e-portfolios for students and faculty in their own words. Peer review, 11(1), 8-12.
• Nahm, E. S., & Resnick, B. (2008). Development and testing of the Web-Based Learning Self-Efficacy Scale (WBLSES) for older adults. Ageing International, 32(1), 3-14.
• Ngui, W., Pang, V., Hiew, W., & Lee, K. W. (2020). Exploring the impact of e-portfolio on ESL students’ writing skills through the lenses of Malaysian undergraduates. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 21(3), 105-121.
• Nguyen, L. T., & Ikeda, M. (2015). The effects of ePortfolio-based learning model on student self-regulated learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(3), 197-209.
• O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2002, November). Text coherence effects: Interactions of prior knowledge and reading skill. In Poster presented at the 24th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas, MO.
• Osborn, V. (2001). Identifying at-risk students in videoconferencing and web-based distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 41–54.
• Özüdoğru, M. (2022). Understanding the experiences of teacher candidates related to online flipped learning in relation to Community of Inquiry framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(2), 338-349.
• Palincsar, A. S., & Ransom, K. (1988). From the mystery spot to the thoughtful spot: The instruction of metacognitive strategies. The Reading Teacher, 41(8), 784-789.
• Paulson, P. R., & Paulson, F. L. (1991). Portfolios: Stories of knowing.
• Pennazio, V., & Fedeli, L. (2021). The e-portfolio as a reflection tool in the education science degree course. In INTED2021 Proceedings (pp. 683-690). IATED.
• Reeve, R. A., & Brown, A. L. (1985). Metacognition reconsidered: Implications for intervention research. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13(3), 343-356.
• Rickey, D., & Stacy, A. M. (2000). The role of metacognition in learning chemistry. Journal of chemical education, 77(7), 915.
• Rowsome, P., Lane, D., & Gordon, S. (2014, Haziran). Capturing Evidence of Metacognitive Awareness of Pre-service STEM Educators Using ‘Codifying’of Thinking Through e-Portfolios (Research-to-Practice). In 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 24-25).
• Salmon,G.( 2002). E-Moderating, USA:Stylus Publishing
• Saygı, H. (2021). Covid-19 pandemi uzaktan eğitim sürecinde sınıf öğretmenlerinin karşılaştığı sorunlar. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 109-129.
• Schraw, G. (2002). Students' metacognition and cognition. Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice. (Ed. H.J. Hartman). Springer Science & Business Media.
• Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
• Schraw, G., & Graham, T. (1997). Helping gifted students develop metacognitive awareness. Roeper Review, 20(1), 4-8.
• Schraw G, & Moshman D (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Reviews, 7(4), 351-371. Segaran, M. K., & Hasim, Z. (2021). Self-regulated Learning through ePortfolio: A Meta-analysis. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 131-156.
• Seman, S. A. A., Rashid, W. E. W., & Nasir, H. M. (2012). E-teaching Portfolio Implementation using Mahara Open Source Management System. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 974-979.
• Senemoğlu, N. (2005). Gelişim ve Öğrenme. Ankara: Pegem.
• Shen, D., Cho, M. H., Tsai, C. L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10-17.
• Sweat-Guy, R., & Buzzetto-More, N. A. (2007). A comparative analysis of common E-Portfolio features and available platforms. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 4.
• Tarrant, P., & Holt, D. (2016). Metacognition in the primary classroom: A practical guide to helping children understand how they learn best. Routledge.
• Teke, F., Kaya, O. N., & Kaya, Z. (2021). Çevrimiçi Öz Ve Akran Geribildirimlerin Biçimlendirici Niteliğini Belirlemeye Yönelik Analitik Rubrik Geliştirme Çalışması. Uşak Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 22-50.
• Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 66.
• Topcu, A., & Ubuz, B. (2008). Effects of the Asynchronous Web-Based Course: Preservice Teachers’ Achievement, Metacognition, and Attitudes towards the Course. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (3), 181-197.
• Totter, A., & Wyss, C. (2019). Opportunities and challenges of e-portfolios in teacher education. Lessons learnt. Research on Education and Media, 11(1), 69-75.
• Tsai, M.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of Internet selfefficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40, 43–50.
• Vekiri, I., & Chronaki, A. (2008). Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1392-1404.
• West, R. E., Hannafin, M. J., Hill, J. R., & Song, L. (2013). Cognitive perspectives on online learning environments. In Handbook of distance Education (Ed. Moore, M. G.), pp.125-141.
• Winne, P. H., Hadwin, A. F., & Perry, N. E. (2013). Metacognition and computer-supported collaborative learning. In The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 462-479). Routledge.
• Wozniak, K., & Zagal, J. (2013). Finding evidence of metacognition through content analysis of an ePortfolio community: Beyond text, across new media. https://repository.isls.org/handle/1/1804 adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Yıldız Durak, H., & Seferoğlu, S. S., (2018). Uzaktan eğitim öğrencilerinin çevrim içi teknolojilere yönelik özyeterlik algılarının incelenmesi. Uluslararası Bilim ve Eğitim Kongresi 2018 (UBEK2018).
• Yıldız, E., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2020). Uzaktan eğitim öğrencilerinin çevrim içi teknolojilere yönelik öz yeterlik algılarının incelenmesi. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(1), 33-46.
• Zhang, J., Li, F., Duan, C., & Wu, G. (2001, November). Research on self-efficacy of distance learning and its influence to learners’ attainments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE)/SchoolNet (pp. 1510-1517). Incheon, Korea: Incheon National University of Education.
• Zellers, M., & Mudrey, R. R. (2007). Electronic portfolios and metacognition: A phenomenological examination of the implementation of e-Portfolios from the instructors' perspective. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34(4), 419-431.