An Alternative Method in the Training of School Administrators: Simulations

Abstract

The methods of school administrators training also affect the professional qualification of administrators. However, any method of agreed of each country regarding the training of effective school administrators has not been presented. From this lack of education, the use of simulations in the training of school administrators was discussed in this study. For this purpose, firstly the problems experienced during the training of the school administrators, later reflections of simulations to the training of school administrators, and the preparation and limitations of managerial problem scenarios were discussed. The research was conducted as a qualitative study based on literature review. However, survey was been limited to abroad literature as there have been no studies on the use of simulations in the training of school administrators in domestic literature. As a result of the literature search, it was seen that most of the studies demonstrating the effectiveness of simulations have been conducted with formal education (primary, secondary and high school) or with university students. In these studies, it was seen that important results were obtained regarding the effectiveness of simulations in training children and young adults and pointed out that simulations are based on adult learning theory. Some studies have also suggested that the use of problem scenarios in the training of school administrators as simulations may be more effective.  At the end of the study, various suggestions were made about the use of simulations in Turkish Education System.  

Keywords

• school administrator,training of school administrators,training programs,simulation

Okul Yöneticilerinin Yetiştirilmesinde Alternatif Bir Yöntem: Simülasyonlar

Öz

Okul yöneticilerini yetiştirme yöntemleri yöneticilerin mesleki kalitesini de etkilemektedir. Ancak, etkili okul yöneticilerinin yetiştirilmesine ilişkin her ülkenin üzerinde anlaştığı herhangi bir yöntem hala ortaya koyulamamıştır. Bu eğitim eksikliğinden yola çıkılarak, bu çalışmada okul yöneticilerinin yetiştirilmesinde simülasyonların kullanımı ele alınmıştır. Bu amaçla, ilk olarak okul yöneticilerinin yetiştirilmesinde karşılaşılan sorunlara değinilmiş, daha sonra da simülasyonların okul yöneticilerini yetiştirmeye yansımaları ile yönetsel problem senaryolarının hazırlanması ve sınırlılıkları ele alınmıştır. Araştırma, literatür taramasına dayanan nitel bir çalışma olarak yürütülmüştür. Ancak yurtiçi alanyazında okul yöneticilerinin yetiştirilmesinde simülasyonların kullanımı ile ilgili herhangi bir çalışmaya rastlanmadığı için tarama yurtdışı kaynaklarla sınırlı kalmıştır. Literatür taraması sonunda, simülasyonların etkinliğini ortaya koyan çalışmaların çoğunun örgün eğitim (ilk, orta ve lise dengi okullar) veya üniversite öğrencileri ile yürütüldüğü görülmüştür.  Bu çalışmalarda, çocukların ve genç erişkinlerin eğitiminde, simülasyonların etkililiği ile ilgili önemli sonuçların ortaya çıktığı ve simülasyonların yetişkin öğrenme teorisine dayandığına işaret edildiği görülmüştür. Bazı çalışmalarda da okul yöneticilerinin eğitiminde kullanılan problem senaryolarının simülasyonlar şeklinde sunulmasının daha etkili olabileceği ortaya çıkmıştır. Çalışmanın sonunda simülasyonların Türk Eğitim Sisteminde kullanımı ile ilgili çeşitli öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• okul yöneticisi,okul yöneticilerinin yetiştirilmesi,yetiştirme programları,simülasyon

Kaynakça

1. Bottoms, G., O'Neill, K., Fry, B., & Hill, D. (2003). Good Principals Are the Key to Successful Schools: Six Strategies To Prepare More Good Principals. ERIC.
2. Bradshaw, L., & Buckner, K. (1998). From the “Springfield Development Program” to the “21st Century School Administrator Skills (SAS) Program” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Secondary School Principals assessment directors, Louisville, KY.
3. Bridges, E. M. (2012). Administrator preparation: Looking backwards and forwards. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(4), 402-419.
4. Brunner, C. C., Miller, M. D., & Hammel, K. (2003). Leadership preparation and the opposite of control: A technologically-delivered Deweyan approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Albuquerque, NM.
5. Bush, T., & Jackson, D. (2002). A Preparation for School Leadership: International Perspectives. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 30, 417-429.
6. Cameron, B., & Dwyer, F. (2005). The effect of online gaming, cognition and feedback type in facilitating delayed achievement of different learning objectives. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(3), 243–258.
7. Celep, C., Ay, F. K., & Göğüş, N. (2010). Türkiye, Finlandiya ve Kanada’daki lisansüstü düzeyde eğitim yöneticisi yetiştiren kurumların karşılaştırılması. V. Ulusal Eğitim Yönetimi Kongresi.
8. Chance, E. W., & Chance, P. L. (2000). Th e use of simulations in principal preparation programs: A bridge between the classroom and field-based experiences. In R. Muth & M. Martin (Eds.), Toward the Year 2000: Leadership for quality schools: Sixth annual yearbook of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (pp. 132–139). Lancaster, PA: Technomic.

9. Chu, H. Q., & Cravens, X. C. (2012). Principal professional development in China: challenges, opportunities, and strategies. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(2), 178–199.
10. Creighton, T. (2001). Lessons from the performing arts: Can auditioning help improve the selection process in university administration preparation programs in the 21st century? In T. J. Kowalski & G. Perreault (Eds.), 21st century challenge for school administration (pp. 101–112). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
11. Adobor, H., & Daneshfar, A. (2006). Management simulations: Determining their effectiveness. The Journal of Management Development, 25(2), 151–168.
12. Culbertson, Jack A. & University Council for Educational Administration, Columbus, OH. (1967). Revising and updating the jefferson township simulation materials. final report. [Washington, D.C.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED018012
13. Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., Orr. M. T., & Cohen, C. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs. Stanford, CA, Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
14. Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., & Meyerson, D. (2005). Developing successful principals. Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
15. Driscoll, M., & Carliner, S. (2005). Advanced web-based training strategies: Unlocking instructionally sound online learning. John Wiley & Sons.
16. Ed Leadership SIMS, (2015). Focusing on principal preparation: What if I don’t have any experience? https://www.edleadershipsims.com/single-post/2016/04/11/Focusing-on-Principal-Preparation-What-if-I-don%E2%80%99t-have-any-experience
17. Edmonds, R. R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15-27.
18. Ellis, R., Marcus, G., & Taylor, R. (2005). Learning through ınquiry: Student difficulties with online course-based material. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 239–252.
19. Gash, S. (1999). Effective literature searching for research. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Ltd.
20. Gibson, D., & Baek, Y. (2009). Digital Simulations for Improving Education: Learning Through Artificial Teaching Environments: Learning Through Artificial Teaching Environments. IGI Global.
21. Gredler, M. E. (2004). Games and simulations and their relationships to learning. In D. Jonassen, (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 571-581). Mahwah: Erlbaum Associates.
22. Ağaoğlu, E., Altınkurt, Y., Yılmaz, K., & Karaköse, T. (2012). Okul yöneticilerinin yeterliklerine ilişkin okul yöneticilerinin ve öğretmenlerin görüşleri (Kütahya İli). Egitim ve Bilim, 37(164), 159-175.
23. Hallinger, P., & Bridges, E. M. (2016). A systematic review of research on the use of problem-based learning in the preparation and development of school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(2), 255-288. doi: 10.1177/0013161X16659347.
24. Hallinger, P., Shaobing, T., & Jiafang, L. (2017). Learning to make change happen in Chinese schools: adapting a problem-based computer simulation for developing school leaders. School Leadership & Management, 37(1-2), 162-187.
25. Huber, S. G. (2002). Washington, New Jersey, California, USA: Extensive Qualification Programs and a Long History of School Leader Preparation, In Stephan Gerhard Huber (Ed.). Preparing School Leaders for the 21st Century, pp. 269-278.
26. Kaya, Y. K. (1984). Eğitim yönetimi kuram ve Türkiye’deki uygulama. Ankara, TODAİE Yayınları.
27. Knowles, M.S., Holton, E.F., III, & Swanson, R.A. ( 2005). The adult learner (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier. Google Scholar
28. Kobu, B. (1975). Üretim yönetiminde simülasyon modelleri. Sevk ve İdare Dergisi, 80
29. Köroğlu, S., A. (2015). Literatür taraması üzerine notlar ve bir tarama tekniği. GİDB/DERGİ, 1, 61-69.
30. Lipschutz, R. P. (2004). The ABCs of e-learning. Portal Magazine. www.portalsmag.com/articles/default.asp?ArticleID=5629.
31. Louis, S. K., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School İmprovement, 21(3), 315-336.
32. Lu, J. , Hallinger, P., & Showanasai, P. (2014). Simulation-based learning in management education: A longitudinal quasi-experimental evaluation of instructional effectiveness. Journal of Management Development, 33(3), 218–244.
33. Ağaoğlu, E., Gültekin, M., & Çubukçu, Z. (2002). Okul yöneticisi yeterliklerine dayalı eğitim programı önerisi (Hizmet öncesi - Hizmet içi eğitim) 21.YY Eğitim Yöneticilerinin Yetiştirilmesi Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, s. 144-161. Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları.
34. Memduhoğlu, H. B. (2007). Türk Eğitim Sisteminde Okulların Yönetimi ve Okul Yöneticilerinin Yetiştirilmesi Sorunsalı. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 176, 86-97
35. Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29-40.
36. Mitchell, R. C. (2004). Combining cases and computer simulations in strategic management, Journal of Education for Business, 79(4), 198-204.
37. Moos, L., Johansson, O., & Day, C. (Eds.). (2011). How School Principals Sustain Success over Time: International Perspectives, 14. Springer.
38. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R.E. (2004). Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 165–173.
39. Nelson, J. O. (1993). School system simulation: An effective model for educational leaders. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
40. Perreault, G., & Bradshaw, L. (1998). Integrating simulations, extended internships, and portfolios in a principal preparation program. In R. Muth & M. Martin (Eds.), Toward the Year 2000: Leadership for quality schools. The sixth annual yearbook of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (pp. 247–257). Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
41. Poppenhagen, B. W., & McArdle, R. J. (1982). Computer simulation and decision-making: Th e preparation of mid-level managers for higher education. Paper presented at the International Conference on Improving University Teaching, Berlin.
42. Rhodes, C., & Beneicke, S. (2002). Coaching, mentoring and peer-networking: Challenges for the management of teacher professional development in schools. Journal of In-Service Education, 28(2), 297-310
43. Rogers, V., & Goodloe, A. H. (1973). Simulation games as method. Educational Leadership, 30(8), 729-732.
44. Aldrich, C. (2003). Simulations and the future of learning: An innovative (and perhaps revolutionary) approach to e-learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
45. Romme, A. G. L. (2004). Perceptions of the value of microworld simulation: Research note. Simulation & Gaming, 35(3), 427-436.
46. Routledge, H. (2016). Why games are good for business: How to leverage the power of serious games, gamification and simulations. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
47. Rutherford-Hemming, T. (2012). Simulation methodology in nursing education and adult learning theory. Adult Learning, 23(3), 129-137.
48. Salas, E., Wildman, J., & Piccolo, R. (2009). Using simulation-based training to enhance management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(4), 559–573.
49. Schmucker, K. (1999). A taxonomy of simulation software. Learning Technology Review, 40-75.
50. Sezer, Ş. (2016). Okul yöneticilerinin seçimle belirlenmesine ilişkin yönetici görüşleri: fenomenolojik bir çözümleme. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 22(3), 351-373.
51. Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64, 489–528
52. Sparks, S. D. (2012). Simulations help school leaders practice "Tough conversations". Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 77(9), 18-22.
53. Staub, N. A., & Bravender, M. (2014a). Principal Candidates Create Decision-Making Simulations to Prepare for the JOB. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 9(1), 1.
54. Staub, N. A., & Bravender, M. (2014b). The Construction of Simulations as an Instructional Activity for Graduate Students in an Education Leadership Program. Leadership and Research in Education, 1, 67-78.
55. Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
56. Storey, V. A., & Dambo, N. J. (2016). Mixed-Reality Immersive Environment as an Instructional Tool for Building Educational Leadership Capacity: Is This the Future?. In Special and Gifted Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 2187-2213). IGI Global.
57. Sugrue, B. (2004). ASTD state of the industry report. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.
58. Süngü, H. (2013). Recruiting and Preparing School Principals in Turkey, Germany, France and England. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 2(1), 33-48.
59. Şimşek, H. (2002). Türkiye'de Eğitim Yöneticisi Yetiştirilemez!. 21.YY Eğitim Yöneticilerinin Yetiştirilmesi Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, s. 307-312. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları.
60. Şişman, M. (2012). Eğitimde Mükemmellik Arayışı Etkili Okullar. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
61. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2005). Cultivating principals’ sense of efficacy: Supports that matter. In Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Nashville, TN.
62. Vogel, J. J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bower, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2006b). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 229–243
63. Vogel, J.J., Greenwood-Erickson, A., Cannon-Bowers, J., & Bowers, C.A. (2006a), Using Virtual Reality with and Without Gaming Attributes for Academic Achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39, 105–118.
64. Washbush, J., & Gosen, J. (2001). An exploration of game-derived learning in total enterprise simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 32, 281-296.
65. Weinstein, J., Azar, A., & Flessa, J. (2017). An ineffective preparation? The scarce effect in primary school principals’ practices of school leadership preparation and training in seven countries in Latin America. Educational Management Administration & Leadership,1–32. doi: 10.1177/1741143217728083.
66. Anderson, M. E. (1991). Principals: How to train, recruit, select, induct, and evaluate leaders for America's schools. ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management College of Education, University of Oregon.
67. Wolfe, J. (1997). The effectiveness of business game in strategic management course work. Simulation & Gaming, 28, 360-376.
68. Yan, W., & Catherine Ehrich, L. (2009). Principal Preparation and Training: A Look at China and its Issues. International Journal of Educational Management, 23(1), 51-64.
69. Yavuz, M. (2006). İlköğretim Okulu Müdürlerinden Beklenen Roller ve Karşılanma Düzeyleri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16, 657-670.
70. Young, M. D., Crow, G. M., Murphy, J., & Ogawa, R. T. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of research on the education of school leaders. Routledge.
71. Arabacı, İ. B., Şanlı, Ö., & Altun, M. (2015). Okul yöneticilerinin yetiştirilme ve atama yöntemlerine ilişkin sendika temsilcilerinin, maarif müfettişlerinin ve okul yöneticilerinin görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(31), 166-186.
72. Bell, B. S., Kanar, A. M., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008). Current issues and future directions in simulation-based training (CAHRS Working Paper #08-13). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/ cahrswp/492
73. Blough, J. A. (1972). Participant evaluation of UCEA urban simulation materials and workshops. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.