Öğretmen Kalitesi ve Çalışma Koşullarının TIMSS 2019 Matematik Başarısındaki Rolü

Öz

İlişkisel desende tasarlanan bu araştırmada öğretmen kalitesinin ve çalışma koşullarının, 4. ve 8. sınıf Türk öğrencilerinin TIMSS 2019 matematik başarısındaki rolü incelenmiştir. Öğretmen kalitesi, TIMSS 2019'da kullanılan öğretmen anketine dayalı olarak tanımlanmıştır ve üç kategoride ele alınmıştır: kişisel özellikler, öğretmen nitelikleri ve öğretmen uygulamaları. Araştırma verisi çok düzeyli regresyon kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre başarıdaki varyansı en fazla çalışma koşulları (4. sınıfta %49 ve 8. sınıfta %40) ve en az öğretmenlerin kişisel özellikleri açıklamaktadır (4. Sınıfta %19 ve 8. sınıfta %11). Okullar arası varyansın üçte birini öğretmen nitelikleri (4. sınıfta %35 ve 8. sınıfta %26) ve beşte birini öğretmen uygulamaları (4. sınıfta %23 ve 8. sınıfta %27) açıklamaktadır. Öğretmenlerin yaşı, deneyimi, öğretimi sınırlandıran öğrenciden kaynaklı sorunlar ve velilerden çok fazla baskı hissetme gibi bazı değişkenler 4. ve 8. sınıftaki TIMSS başarısı ile yüksek korelasyon göstermiştir. Başarıyı yordayan diğer bazı önemli değişkenler ise şunlardır: Eğitim ve matematik alanlarında uzmanlaşma, sınıfa ilginç materyaller getirme, değerlendirmede uzun süreli projeler kullanma, çok fazla idari göreve sahip olma ve sınıftaki öğrenci sayısı.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• öğretmen kalitesi
• çalışma koşulları
• matematik
• öğretmen anketi
• TIMSS 2019

Role of Teacher Quality and Working Conditions in TIMSS 2019 Mathematics Achievement

Öz

This correlative study examined the role of teacher qualities and working conditions in 4th and 8th-grade Turkish students’ mathematics achievement in TIMSS 2019. Teacher qualifications were defined based on the teacher questionnaire used in TIMSS 2019 and were discussed in three categories: personal characteristics, teacher qualifications, and teacher practices. Data were analyzed using multilevel regression analysis. According to the results, working conditions explained most of the variance in the achievement scores (49% in the 4th-grade and 40% in the 8th-grade), while teachers’ characteristics explained the least variance (19% in the 4th-grade and 11% in the 8th-grade). Teacher qualifications explained about one-third of the between-schools variance (35% in the 4th-grade and 26% in the 8th-grade). Teacher practices explained the one-fifth of the between-schools variance (23% in the 4th-grade and 27% in the 8th-grade). Some variables had a high correlation with TIMSS achievement in 4th and 8th-grade, such as teachers’ age, experience, teaching limited by students not ready for instruction, and parental pressure on teachers. Other significant predictors were having a major in education and mathematics, bringing interesting materials to class, using long-term assessment projects, having too many administrative tasks, and the number of students in the class.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• teacher quality
• working conditions
• mathematics
• teacher questionnaire
• TIMSS 2019

Kaynakça

1. Akyüz, G. (2006). Teacher and classroom characteristics: Their relationship with mathematics achievement in Turkey, European Union countries and candidate countries [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Middle East Technical University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences.
2. Akyüz Aru, S. (2020). Investigation of variables affecting science and mathematics success of grade 4 students “TIMSS 2015 status analysis”. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences.
3. Alpar, R. (2013). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatiksel yöntemler (4th ed.). Detay.
4. Arıkan, S., Özer, F., Şeker, V., & Ertaş, G. (2020). The importance of sample weights and plausible values in large-scale assessments. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 11(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/ 10.21031/epod.602765
5. Arifoğlu, A. (2019). Investigating of school effects on student achievement: A multilevel analysis of Turkey’s TIMSS 2015 data [Unpublished doctorate dissertation]. Hacettepe University Institute of Educational Sciences.
6. Baier, F., Decker, A., T., Voss, T., Kleickmann, T., Klusmann, U., & Kunter, M. (2019). What makes a good teacher? The relative importance of mathematics teachers’ cognitive ability, personality, knowledge, beliefs, and motivation for instructional quality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 767–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12256
7. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. K., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
8. Batı, E. (2021). The prediction of mathematics achievement of students attending TIMSS 2019 according to family engagement variables [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Hacettepe University Institute of Educational Sciences.

9. Burroughs, N., & Chudgar, A. (2017, October). The role of teacher quality in fourth-grade mathematics instruction: Evidence from TIMSS 2015 (Policy Brief No. 16). IEA. https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2019-04/IEA_Policy_Brief_Oct2017.pdf
10. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
11. Coşkun, B. (2021). The effects of student and school characteristics on TIMSS 2015 science and math achievement [Unpublished doctorate dissertation]. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Institute of Educational Sciences.
12. Çavdar, D. (2015). The relationship between TIMSS 2011 math achievement and characteristics of students and teachers [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences.
13. Elezović I., Lameva B., & Brese F. (2022) The role of learning resources, school environment, and climate in transforming schools from buildings to learning communities. In Japelj Pavešić, B., Koršňáková, P., Meinck, S. (Eds.) Dinaric Perspectives on TIMSS 2019 (pp. 123-149). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85802-5_6
14. Eriksson, K., Helenius, O., & Ryve, A. (2019). Using TIMSS items to evaluate the effectiveness of different instructional practices. Instructional Science, 47, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9473-1 Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2010). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
15. Goe, L. (2007). The link between teacher quality and student outcomes: a research synthesis. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED521219.pdf
16. Güven, U., & Sezer, B. B. (2020). Velilerin öğretmenler üzerindeki baskılarının öğrenci başarısı üzerine etkisi. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(3), 1380-1399. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefad/issue/59386/853990
17. Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 798-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009
18. Hegarty, S., & Rutkowski, L. (Eds.) (2019). Teaching for excellence and equity analyzing teacher characteristics, behaviors and student outcomes with TIMSS. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16151-4
19. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371
20. Hong, H. K. (2012). Trends in mathematics and science performance in 18 countries: multiple regression analysis of the cohort effects of TIMSS 1995-2007. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(33), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v20n33.2012
21. Hwang, S. (2021). The mediating effects of self-efficacy and classroom stress on professional development and student-centered instruction. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 1-16. https://e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2021_1_1.pdf
22. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (2021). TIMSS 2019 international database. [Data set]. https://timss2019.org/international-database/?_gl=1*bf0qid*_ga*NDQyNzY0MjI0LjE2NDI2MjMxOTU.*_ga_L2FMXN42HR*MTY0MjYyMzE5NS4xLjAuMTY0MjYyMzE5NS4w
23. Jepsen, C. (2005). Teacher characteristics and student achievement: Evidence from teacher surveys. Journal of Urban Economics, 57, 302-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2004.11.001
24. König, J., Blömeke, S., Jentsch, A., Schlesinger, L., née Nehls, C. F., Musekamp, F., & Kaiser, G. (2021). The links between pedagogical competence, instructional quality, and mathematics achievement in the lower secondary classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107, 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10021-0
25. LaRoche, S., Joncas, M., & Foy, P. (2020). Sample design in TIMSS 2019. In M. O. Martin, M. von Davier, I. V. S. Mullis (Eds.) Methods and procedures: TIMSS 2019 technical report (pp. 3.1-3.33). Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/methods
26. Lee, S. W., & Lee, E. A. (2020). Teacher qualification matters: The association between cumulative teacher qualification and students’ educational attainment. International Journal of Educational Development, 77, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102218
27. Liang, G., Zhang, Y., Huang, H, Shi, S., & Qiao, Z. (2015). Professional development and student achievement: international evidence from the TIMSS data. Journal of Postdoctoral Research, 3(2), 17-31. http://www.postdocjournal.com/file_journal/767_55399091.pdf
28. Martin, M.O. & Mullis, I.V.S. (Eds.). (2012). Methods and procedures in TIMSS and PIRLS 2011. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/methods/index.html
29. Ministry of National Education [MONE]. (2020). TIMSS 2019 Türkiye ön raporu. http://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_12/10173505_No15_TIMSS_2019_Turkiye_On_Raporu_Guncel.pdf
30. Mohammadpour, E., & Ghafar, M. N. A. (2014). Mathematics achievement as a function of within- and between- school differences. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(2), 189-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.725097
31. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2015). Mplus user’s guide. (7th ed.). Muthén and Muthén.
32. Oz, E. (2021). Comparability of teachers’ educational background items in TIMSS: a case from Turkey. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 9(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-021-00097-2
33. Palardy, G. J., & Rumberger, R. W. (2008). Teacher effectiveness in first grade: the importance of background qualifications, attitudes, and instructional practices for student learning. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 111-140. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373708317680
34. Provasnik, S. J., & Young, B. O. (2003). The relationship of teacher quality to student mathematics achievement at the 8th grade: Findings from the National Assessment of Education Progress (2000). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, April 2003. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED476650.pdf
35. Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Economic Policy Institute.
36. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
37. Sandoval-Hernandez, A., Jaschinski, K., Fraser, P., & Ikoma, S. (2015, January). Is teacher experience associated with mathematics achievement? (IEA’s Policy Brief Series, No. 4). IEA. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED561890.pdf
38. Sarı, M. H., Arıkan, S., & Yıldızlı, H. (2017). Factors predicting mathematics achievement of 8th graders in TIMSS 2015. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 8(3), 246-265. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.303689
39. Sarıer, Y. (2020). Turkey’s performance in TIMSS applications and variables predicting academic achievement. Journal of Primary Education, 2(2), 6-27. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/temelegitim/issue/57288/745624
40. Scheerens, J., & Blömeke, S. (2016). Integrating teacher education effectiveness research into educational effectiveness models. Educational Research Review, 18, 70-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.03.002
41. Şahin, M. G., & Boztunç Öztürk, N. (2018). How classroom assessment affects science and mathematics achievement?: Findings from TIMSS 2015. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(5), 559-569. http://dx.doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018541305
42. Şen, S. (2020). Mplus ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi uygulamaları. Nobel.
43. Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). Routledge.
44. Suna, H. E., & Özer, M. (2021). Türkiye’de sosyoekonomik düzey ve okullar arası başarı farklarının akademik başarı ile ilişkisi. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 12(1), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.860431
45. Telese, J. A. (2012). Middle school mathematics teachers’ Professional development and student achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 105, 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.521209follows
46. The Guardian. (2014, May 6). OECD and PISA tests are damaging education worldwide – academics. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/may/06/oecd-pisa-tests-damaging-education-academics
47. Toraman, Ç. (2019). Effective teacher characteristics. Asian Journal of Instruction, 7(1), 1-14. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/aji/issue/46556/512793
48. Toropova, A., Johansson, S., & Myrberg, E. (2019). The role of teacher characteristics for student achievement in mathematics and student perceptions of instructional quality. Education Inquiry, 10(4) 275-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1591844
49. Yalcin, S., Demirtasli, R. N., Ilgun Dibek, M., & Yavuz, H. C. (2017). The effect of teacher and student characteristics on TIMSS 2011 mathematics achievement of fourth-and eighth-grade students in Turkey. International Journal of Progressive Education, 13(3), 79-94. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1159910.pdf
50. Yetkiner Özel, Z. E., & Özel, S. (2013). Mathematics teacher quality: Its distribution and relationship with student achievement in Turkey. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14, 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9242-4
51. Yıldırım, Ö., & Bilican Demir, S. (2014). The examination of teacher and student effectiveness at TIMSS 2011 science and math scores using multi level models. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 30(6), 1211-1218.
52. Yıldırım, H. H., & Yıldırım, S. (2009). Inconsistent student responses in TIMSS questionnaire items on mathematics lessons. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 226-237. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/39790
53. Zuzovsky, R. (2009). Teachers’ qualifications and their impact on student achievement: findings from TIMSS 2003 data for Israel. IEA. https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2019-04/IRC2008_Zuzovsky2.pdf