Parents' Opınıons About the Partıcıpatıon of Gıfted Chıldren in Extracurrıcular Actıvıtıes

Öz

Educational services for gifted students are supported at school and out of class by taking the principle of equal opportunities into account. In the study, parents' experiences about the participation of gifted children in extracurricular activities were examined. The purposive sampling technique was used in the study designed in the phenomenological design in the qualitative research method. Interviews were conducted with 6 mothers, 5 teachers and 1 nurse, who participated in the study voluntarily. The data were collected through the focus group interview and evaluated with content analysis. The findings were gathered around four (4) main themes: First realization: a long way, We have school tomorrow: Transition plans, Balance between preferences and responsibilities in the education process, Supports, expectations, suggestions. Mothers, indicating that they realized the potential of their children through observations from the early period, stated that they need information about the giftedness and extracurricular activities contribute to their children's social and emotional development.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Family participation
• extracurricular activities
• qualitative research
• gifted children
• inclusion
• inclusive education

Özel Yetenekli Çocukların Ders Dışı Etkinliklere Katılımlarına Yönelik Ebeveyn Görüşleri

Öz

Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin eğitim hizmetleri fırsat eşitliği gözetilerek okulda ve ders dışı olmak üzere desteklenmektedir. Araştırmada özel yetenekli öğrencilerin ders dışı etkinliklere katılımı hakkında ebeveynlerin deneyimleri incelenmiştir. Nitel araştırma yönteminde fenomenolojik desendeki araştırmada amaçlı örneklem tekniği tercih edilmiştir. Gönüllü katılan 5’i öğretmen, 1’i hemşire anne ile görüşülmüştür. Veriler odak grup görüşme tekniği ile toplanmış, içerik analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular dört (4) ana temadan oluşmaktadır. İlk fark ediş: Uzun bir yol, Yarın okul var: Geçiş planlamaları, Eğitim sürecinde tercihler ve sorumluluklar arasındaki denge, Destekler, beklentiler, öneriler. Çocuklarının erken dönemden itibaren potansiyellerini gözlem yoluyla fark ettiklerini söyleyen anneler, özel yetenek hakkında bilgi gereksinimleri olduğunu ders dışı etkinliklerin çocuklarının sosyal duygusal gelişimlerine katkısı olduğunu belirtmişlerdir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Aile katılımı
• ders dışı etkinlikler
• nitel araştırma
• özel yetenekli çocuklar
• kapsayıcı eğitim

Kaynakça

1. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://-doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
2. Ayoub, A. E. A., Abdulla Alabbasi, A. M., & Plucker, J. A. (2021). Closing poverty-based excellence gaps: Supports for gifted students from low-income households as correlates of academic achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44(3), 286-299. https://-doi.org/10.1177/01623532211023598
3. Besnoy, K. D., Swoszowski, N. C., Newman, J. L., Floyd, A., Jones, P., & Byrne, C. (2015). The advocacy experiences of parents of elementary age, twice-exceptional children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(2), 108-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215569275
4. Borders, C., Woodley, S. & Moore, E. (2014). Inclusion and giftedness. In Rotatori, A. F., Bakken, J. P., & Obiakor, F. E. (Eds). Gifted education: Current perspective and issues. pp. 127-146). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
5. Calvert, E., & Cleveland, E. (2006). Extracurricular activities. In F. A. Dixon & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The handbook of secondary gifted education (pp. 527–546). Prufrock Press Inc.
6. Creswell, J. W., & Poth C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Fifth Edition.). Sage Publications.
8. Demirel Dingeç, Ş., Bayar, S., Kılıçarslan, S., Tamul, Ö. F., & Ünal, N. E. (2023). Needs of families with gifted children in Türkiye. HAYEF: Journal of Education, 20(3), 279-287. https://doi.org/10.5152/hayef.2023.23028

9. de Souza Fleith, D., Muniz Prado, R., & Vilarinho-Pereira, D. (2023). Supporting and guiding families of gifted children: The role of a psychoeducational program. Gifted and Talented International, 38(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2023.2238798
10. Drew, T. J. (2003). Parenting stress and daily parenting hassles as predictors of difficult mealtime interaction (Doctoral Thesis, Northern Illinois University).
11. Fonseca, C. (2011). Emotional intensity in gifted students: Helping Kids Cope with Explosive Feelings. Prufrock Press.
12. Garn, A. C., Matthews, M. S., & Jolly, J. L. (2012). Parents’ role in the academic motivation of students with gifts and talents. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 656-667. https://-doi.org/10.1002/pits.21626
13. Housand, A. (2016). Centennials: The world is waiting!. Parenting for High Potential, 5(2), 6-9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1094009
14. Jacobi-Vessels, J. L. (2013). Discovering nature: The benefits of teaching outside of the classroom. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 41(3), 4–10. https://eric.ed.gov/-?id=EJ1044065
15. Jeronen, E., & Jeronen, J. (2012). Outdoor education in Finnish schools and Universities. University of Oulu, University of Jyväskylä. https://assets.edu-quip.co.uk/uploads/-finland_1.pdf
16. Kronborg, L., & Plunkett, M. (2013). Responding to professional learning: How effective teachers differentiate teaching and learning strategies to engage highly able adolescents. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 22(2), 52–63. https://search.informit.org/doi/-10.3316/ielapa.862094236752354
17. Krueger, R. A. (2002). Designing and conducting focus group interviews. University of Minnesota https://www.eiu.edu/ihec/Krueger-FocusGroupInterviews.pdf
18. Largo-Wight, E., Guardino, C., Wludyka, P. S., Hall, K., Wight, J. T., & Merten, J. W. (2018). Nature contact at school: The impact of an outdoor classroom on children’s well-being. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 28(6), 653–666. https://-doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2018.1502415
19. LaRocque, M., Kleiman, I., & Darling, S.M. (2011). Parental involvement: The missing link in school achievement. Preventing school failure. Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 55(3), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459880903472876
20. Lauri, M.A. (2019). WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Collecting qualitative data using focus groups. Early Human Development, 133, 65-68, https://doi.org/10.1016/-j.earlhumdev.2019.03.015
21. Leana-Tascilar, M. Z., Ozyaprak, M., & Yilmaz, O. (2016). An online training program for gifted children’s parents in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 65, 147-164. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.65.09 Leana Taşcılar, M. (2025). Identifying the skills parents of gifted children need to support their children’s development. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi. 26(3), 453-471. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.1452321
22. Lubis, F. Y., Hawadi, L. F., Salim, R. M. A., & Purwono, U. (2020). Maladaptive perfectionism and academic achievement in indonesian gifted undergraduate students: goal adjustment as moderator. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 7(2), 169-184. https://doi.org/-10.15575/psy.v7i2.9619
23. Mahony, L. A. (1997). Factors that affect parental involvement in gifted education (Order No. 1385149). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304433393). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/factors-that-affect-parental-involvement-gifted/docview/304433393/se-2
24. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2021). Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği. https://-orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2021_09/13145613_Ozel_EYitim_Hizmetleri_YonetmeliYi_son.pdf Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2023). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı 2023-2024 yılı Bilim ve Sanat Merkezleri (BİLSEM) öğrenci tanılama ve yerleştirme kılavuzu. https://-www.meb.gov.tr/bilsem-ogrenci-tanilama-ve-yerlestirme-kilavuzu-yayimlandi/haber/32075/tr
25. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Sage Ltd.
26. Moon, S. M., Kelly, K. R., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1997). Specialized counseling services for gifted youth and their families: A needs assessment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629704100103
27. Morawska, A., & Sanders, M. R. (2009). Parenting gifted and talented children: Conceptual and empirical foundations. Gifted Child Quartely, 53(3), 163-173. https://-doi.org/10.1177/0016986209334962
28. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage Publications.
29. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Lee, S.Y. (2004). The role of participation in ın-school and outside-of-school activities in the talent development of gifted students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15(3), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2004-454
30. Patton M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
31. Peebles, J. L., Mendaglio, S., & McCowan, M. (2023). The experience of parenting gifted children: A thematic analysis of ınterviews with parents of elementary-age children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 67(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862221120418
32. Plucker, J. A., & Peters, S. J. (2017). Closing poverty-based excellence gaps: Conceptual, measurement, and educational issues. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738566
33. Renati, R., Bonfiglio, N. S., & Pfeiffer, S. (2017). Challenges raising a gifted child: Stress and resilience factors within the family. Gifted Education International, 33(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416650948
34. Renati, R., Bonfiglio, N.S., Dilda, M., Mascia, M.L., & Penna, M.P. (2023). Gifted children through the eyes of their parents: Talents, social-emotional challenges, and educational strategies from preschool through middle school. Children, 10(1), 42. https://-doi.org/10.3390/children10010042
35. Renzulli, J. S. (2000). The identification and development of giftedness as a paradigm for school reform. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(2), 95-114. https://-doi.org/10.1023/A:1009429218821
36. Renzulli J. S. (2008). La educación del sobredotado y el desarrollo del talento para todos. Rev. Psicol. 26, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.200801.002
37. Saranlı, A. G. (2017). Research on coping methods and support systems of parents of gifted children in Turkey. Journal of Education and Future (11), 1-13.
38. Stratton, S.J. (2024). Purposeful Sampling: Advantages and pitfalls. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine,39(2), 121-122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X24000281
39. UNESCO (2016). Education 2030 Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action: Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all (ED2016/WS/28). UNESCO.
40. Vialle W., Heaven P. C., & Ciarrochi J. (2007). On being gifted, but sad and misunderstood: social, emotional, and academic outcomes of gifted students in the Wollongong Youth. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(6), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/-13803610701786046
41. Webb, J. T., Gore, J. L., Amend, E. R., & DeVries, A. R. (2007). A parent’s guide to gifted children. Great Potential Press.