Araştırma Makalesi

THE IMPACT OF TOXIC LEADERSHIP ON ORGANIZATION PRISONIZATION AND THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL OF THE EMPLOYEES

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 30 Aralık 2020
PDF İndir
TR EN

THE IMPACT OF TOXIC LEADERSHIP ON ORGANIZATION PRISONIZATION AND THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL OF THE EMPLOYEES

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the effects of employees' organizational convictions and psychological capital by measuring their perceptions of toxic leadership behaviors about senior managers. Data from 527 employees working in different sectors was collected through a convenience sampling method (such as online surveys and hand-out surveys) and analyzed. The study focuses on correlation and regression analysis to put forward the relationship between the variables and the impacts. The model can be said to be significant based on the ANOVA test results showing the influence of toxic leadership on prisonization. It has been determined that a self-promoting leader from the lower dimensions of toxic leadership does not create any impact on the prisonization whereas one can refer to a certain influence on the prisonization for the organizations with unpredictable abusive leaders and the ones with narcissistic and authoritarian leaders. The results point out that toxic leadership has a negative influence on organizational prisonization. However, ANOVA test results also point out that the model is not significant for the impact of toxic leadership on the psychological capital. Toxic leadership has, indeed, no influence on psychological resilience, hope, self-sufficiency, and positivity. Therefore, it can be inferred that toxic leadership does not have a meaningful influence on psychological capital. This research presents a discussion on all the results within the body of literature.

Keywords

Toxic Leadership , Organizational Prisonization , Psychological Capital

Kaynakça

  1. Akçay, V. H. (2011). Pozitif psikolojik sermaye kavramı ve işletmelerde sürdürülebilir rekabet üstünlüğü sağlamadaki rolü. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, 13(1), 73-98.
  2. Avey, J., Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2010). The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviours. Journal of Management, 36(2), 430-452.
  3. Basım, N., & Çetin, F. (2012, Mart). Örgütsel psikolojik sermaye: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 45(1), 121-137.
  4. Berry, J. (1997). Immigration acculturation and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 5-68.
  5. Çalışkana, A., & Pekkan, N. Ü. (2017). Psikolojik sermayenin işe yabancılaşmaya etkisinde örgütsel desteğin aracılık rolü. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 4(1), 17-33.
  6. Çelebi, N., Güner, H., & Yıldız, V. (2015). Toksik liderlik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 249-268.
  7. Çetin, F., Şeşen, H., & Basım, H. N. (2013). Örgütsel psikolojik sermayenin tükenmişlik sürecine etkileri: Kamu sektöründe bir araştırma. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(3), 95-108.
  8. Çetinkaya, H., & Ordu, A. (2018). Okul yöneticilerinin toksik (zehirli) liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin tükenmişlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (31), 15-28.
  9. Çicek, B., & Almali, V. (2020). The effect of toxic leadership onconflict in the workplace. Ekinoks Ekonomi İşletme ve Siyasal Çalışmalar Dergisi, 7(2), 214-235
  10. Eğinli, A. T., & Bitirim, S. (2008). Kurumsal başarının önündeki engel: Zehirli (toksik) iletişim. Selçuk İletişim, 5(3), 124-140.

Kaynak Göster

APA
İrge, N. T., & Bayram, V. (2020). THE IMPACT OF TOXIC LEADERSHIP ON ORGANIZATION PRISONIZATION AND THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL OF THE EMPLOYEES. Business Economics and Management Research Journal, 3(2), 101-116. https://izlik.org/JA86MU53TH