LIBERATING THE MIND FROM THE BRAIN: THE EXTENDED MIND HYPOTHESIS

Öz

This article critically examines the “extended mind” hypothesis, which challenges brain-centered views of the mind and emphasizes its emergence through the interaction between body, environment, and cultural tools. Tracing philosophical debates from reductive materialism to functionalism and embodied cognition, the paper argues that mental processes are not confined within the skull but arise from dynamic engagement with bodily and external structures. Developed by philosophers such as David Chalmers and Andy Clark, the theory claims that external tools (e.g., notebooks, computers, symbols) can function as constitutive parts of cognitive systems. Central to this approach is the “parity principle,” which asserts that internal and external cognitive processes should be treated equally if they play the same functional role. The article also addresses critiques of the hypothesis (notably by Adams & Aizawa and Rupert) and explores alternative models such as cognitive integration, cultural integration, and material engagement. It further shows how neuroscientific frameworks like predictive processing and theories of cognitive evolution support the plausibility of extended cognition. Ultimately, the paper defends the idea that the mind is not solely a biological phenomenon but a culturally and environmentally distributed process. The extended mind hypothesis emerges as one of the most innovative and interdisciplinary approaches in contemporary philosophy of mind.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• System Philosophy
• Extended Mind
• Andy Clark
• parity principle
• cultural integration
• predictive processing

Zihni Beyinden Kurtarmak: Yayılmış Zihin Hipotezi

Öz

Bu makale, zihni beyin merkezli yaklaşımlardan kurtararak beden, çevre ve kültürel araçlar bağlamında genişleten “yayılmış zihin” hipotezini felsefi bir arka plan ve çağdaş literatür ışığında ele almaktadır. Makale, zihin felsefesi tarihinde indirgemeci materyalizm, işlevselcilik ve bedenli biliş yaklaşımları arasındaki tartışmaları inceleyerek, zihnin yalnızca kafatası içinde değil, bedenin ve çevrenin aktif unsurlarıyla birlikte belirdiğini savunur. David Chalmers, Andy Clark ve diğer filozofların katkılarıyla yaygınlaşan bu teori, düşünsel süreçlerin harici araçlarla (defter, bilgisayar, sembol vs.) eş zamanlı olarak yürütülebileceğini ve bu araçların zihinsel süreçlerin kurucu unsurları olarak kabul edilmesi gerektiğini ileri sürer. Bu bağlamda Clark ve Chalmers’ın denklik ilkesi öne çıkar. Makale ayrıca, bu teze yöneltilen eleştirileri (Adams & Aizawa, Rupert), bilişsel bütünleşme, kültürel entegrasyon ve maddi angajman gibi yeni sentez yaklaşımlarıyla karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirir. Son olarak, öngörücü işlemleme (predictive processing) gibi nörobilimsel modellerin ve bilişsel evrim teorilerinin yayılmış zihin hipotezini nasıl desteklediği gösterilir. Böylece zihnin sadece biyolojik değil, çevresel ve kültürel olarak da şekillendiği iddia edilir. Yayılmış zihin hipotezi, analitik felsefenin en yoğun gündemi olan çağdaş zihin felsefesinin en üretken ve çok disiplinli yaklaşımlarından biri olarak öne çıkmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• : Felsefe Tarihi
• Yayılmış zihin
• Andy Clark
• denklik ilkesi
• kültürel entegrasyon

Kaynakça

1. Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14(1), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080120033571
2. Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2009). Why the Mind Is Still in the Head. İçinde P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (1. bs, ss. 78-95). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816826.005
3. Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2010a). Defending the Bounds of Cognition. İçinde R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind (ss. 67-80). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014038.003.0004
4. Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2010b). The bounds of cognition. Wiley-Blackwell.
5. Anderson, M. L., Richardson, M. J., & Chemero, A. (2012). Eroding the Boundaries of Cognition: Implications of Embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 717-730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01211.x
6. Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756-756. https://doi.org/10.1038/35784
7. Bourbaki, R. (2021, Ekim 25). Genişletilmiş Zihin (E. C. Esgiyusufo, Çev.). Öncül Analitik Felsefe.
8. Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford University Press.

9. Clark, A. (2005). Intrinsic content, active memory and the extended mind. Analysis, 65(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/65.1.1
10. Clark, A. (2007). Curing Cognitive Hiccups: A Defense Of The Extended Mind. Journal of Philosophy, 104(4), 163-192. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2007104426
11. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001
12. Clark, A. (2010a). Coupling, Constitution, and the Cognitive Kind: A Reply to Adams and Aizawa. İçinde R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind (ss. 81-99). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014038.003.0005
13. Clark, A. (2010b). Memento’s Revenge: The Extended Mind, Extended. İçinde R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind (ss. 43-66). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014038.003.0003
14. Clark, A. (2015). Radical Predictive Processing. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 53(S1), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12120
15. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
16. Constant, A., Clark, A., Kirchhoff, M., & Friston, K. J. (2022). Extended active inference: Constructing predictive cognition beyond skulls. Mind & Language, 37(3), 373-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12330
17. Crisafi, A., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Hegel and the extended mind. AI & SOCIETY, 25(1), 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0239-9
18. De Bruin, L. (2018). False-Belief Understanding, 4E Cognition, and Predictive Processing. Içinde A. Newen, L. De Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition (1. bs, ss. 493-512). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.26
19. De Vignemont, F. (2018). The Extended Body Hypothesis: Referred Sensations from Tools to Peripersonal Space. Içinde A. Newen, L. De Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition (1. bs, ss. 389-404). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.20
20. Doğan, M. (2023). Kafatasından Öteye Geçen Zihin: Zihnimin Sınırı Dünyamın Sınırı Olabilir Mi? İçinde F. Çakmak (Ed.), Sosyal & Beşerî Bilimler Alanında Akademik Çalışmalar III (C. 3, ss. 165-180). Gece Kitaplığı.
21. Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787
22. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind (1. bs). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199271941.001.0001
23. Gallagher, S. (2023). Embodied and enactive approaches to cognition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009209793
24. Heil, J. (2021). Zihin Felsefesi: Çağdaş Bir Giriş (S. Akbıyık & M. Bilgili, Çev.; 1. bs). Küre Yayınları.
25. Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. Oxford University Press.
26. Kirchhoff, M., Parr, T., Palacios, E., Friston, K., & Kiverstein, J. (2018). The Markov blankets of life: Autonomy, active inference and the free energy principle. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 15(138), 20170792. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0792
27. Kiverstein, J. (2018). Extended Cognition. İçinde The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition (ss. 19-40). Oxford University Press.
28. Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., & Feldman, M. W. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00002417
29. Malafouris, L. (2013). How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9476.001.0001
30. Malafouris, L. (2015). Metaplasticity and the Primacy of Material Engagement. Time and Mind, 8(4), 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/1751696X.2015.1111564
31. Malafouris, L. (2018). Bringing things to mind: 4Es and Material Engagement. Içinde A. Newen, L. De Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition (1. bs, ss. 755-772). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.40
32. Maravita, A., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2003). Multisensory integration and the body schema: Close to hand and within reach. Current Biology, 13(13), R531-R539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00449-4
33. Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive integration: Mind and cognition unbounded. Palgrave Macmillan.
34. Menary, R. (2018). Cognitive Integration: How Culture Transforms Us and Extends Our Cognitive Capabilities. Içinde A. Newen, L. De Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition (1. bs, ss. 187-216). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.10
35. Odling-Smee, F. J., Lala, K., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution (Online-Ausg). Princeton University Press.
36. Paul, A. M. (2022). Genişletilmiş Zihin: Beynimizin Ötesinde Düşünmenin Gücü (O. Özaltın, Çev.; 1. bs). Serenad.
37. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (1997). The Space Around Us. Science, 277(5323), 190-191. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5323.190
38. Rowlands, M. (2018). Disclosing the World: Intentionality and 4E Cognition. Içinde A. Newen, L. De Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition (1. bs, ss. 335-352). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.17
39. Rupert, R. D. (2004). Challenges to the Hypothesis of Extended Cognition: Journal of Philosophy, 101(8), 389-428. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2004101826
40. Sterelny, K. (2010). Minds: Extended or scaffolded? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 465-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9174-y
41. Sterelny, K. (2018). Culture and the Extended Phenotype: Cognition and Material Culture in Deep Time. Içinde A. Newen, L. De Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition (1. bs, ss. 773-792). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.41
42. Stotz, K. (2010). Human nature and cognitive–developmental niche construction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 483-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9178-7
43. Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and Interdisciplinarity: History, the Extended Mind, and the Civilizing Process. İçinde R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind (ss. 189-225). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014038.003.0009
44. Wheeler, M. (2010). In Defense of Extended Functionalism. İçinde R. Menary (Ed.), The Extended Mind (ss. 244-270). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014038.003.0011
45. Wilson, M. (1994). What is it Like to Be a Robot? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1(2), 355-368.
46. Wilson, R. A., & Clark, A. (2001). How to Situate Cognition: Letting Nature Take Its Course. İçinde P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (1. bs, ss. 55-77). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816826.004
47. Wilson, R. A., & Clark, A. (2009). How to Situate Cognition: Letting Nature Take Its Course. İçinde P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (1. bs, ss. 55-77). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816826.004