Connecting Theory and Practice in Pre-Service Early Childhood Teacher Education Programs

Öz

In this study, we aimed to improve the levels of teacher candidates’ sense of teaching efficacy and their attitudes toward teaching. We used non-equivalent control group design with 17 teacher candidates in control group and 23 teacher candidates in experimental group. Different from the control group, we adopted the theory-practice connection as a principle in the experimental group; and we integrated the two methods courses and field experiences. The results of the analysis of covariance revealed that theory-practice connection had a statistically significant effect on the attitude toward teaching but not on the sense of teaching efficacy. Among the strengths of the treatment are structured observations; and being low-cost. Consequently, we recommend that teacher educators should compensate for the limitations of the present study and carry out similar studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Pre-service teacher education,Connecting theory and practice,Sense of teaching efficacy,Attitude toward teaching

Kaynakça

1. Alakuş, A. O. (2005). Öğretmen adaylarının okul deneyiminin kazandırdığı mesleki yeterliklere ilişkin algıları [Perceptions of student teachers’ professional competences acquired through school experiences]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 30(138), 3-9.
2. Allsopp, D. H., DeMarie, D., Alvarez-McHatton, P., & Doone, E. (2006). Bridging the gap between theory and practice: Connecting courses with field experiences. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(1), 19-35.
3. Atay, D. (2007). Beginning teacher efficacy and the practicum in an EFL context. Journal of Teacher Development, 11(2), 203-219.
4. Aydilek-Ciftci, M., Ozgun, O., & Erden, S. (2011). Self-efficacy and satisfaction of pre-service early childhood education teachers as a function of perceived needs and experiences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 539–544.
5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.
7. Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9-44.
8. Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., & Beyer, J. (1977). Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(3), 125–139.

9. Cevher-Kalburan, N. (2014). Early childhood pre-service teachers’ concerns and solutions to overcome them: The case of Pamukkale University. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1-18.
10. Cunningham, D. D. (2014). Re-conceptualizing early childhood teacher education: Enacting a paradigm shift to bring developmentally appropriate practice to higher education. Critical Questions in Education, 5(1), 52-63.
11. Çağlar, Ç. (2013). The relationship between the levels of alienation of the education faculty students and their attitudes toward the teaching profession. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1507-1513.
12. Çobanoğlu, R. (2011). Teacher self-efficacy and teaching beliefs as predictors of curriculum implementation. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 35–47.
15. Demirtaş, H., Cömert, M., & Özer, N. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının özyeterlik inançları ve mesleğe yönelik tutumları [Pre-service teachers’ self-efficacybeliefs and attitudes towards profession]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(159), 96-111.
16. Dewey, J. (1927). The relation of theory to practice in education. In Charles A. Mc Murry (Ed), The relation of theory to practice in the education of teachers (Third Yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education, Part I) (3rd ed.) (pp. 9-30). Illinois: Public School Publishing Company.
17. Engin, G., & Koç, G. Ç. (2014). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutumları: Ege Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi örneği [The attitudes of prospective teachers towards teaching: The case of Ege University, Faculty of Education]. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 18(2), 153-167.
18. Er, E. (2009). Self-efficacy levels of pre-service teachers and its predictors. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
19. Ertürk, H. G., Özen-Altınkaynak, Ş. Ö., Veziroğlu, M., & Erkan, S. (2014). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerin üniversite deneyimlerinin mesleki yaşantılarına etkisine ilişkin görüşlerinin belirlenmesi [A study on the views of preschool teachers on the effects of their university experiences on their professional lives]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 22(3), 897-908.
20. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (9th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
21. Giallousi, M., Tselfesa, V., & Gialamasa, V. (2014). Using student-teachers’ reports of self-efficacy to evaluate an early childhood science course. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(4), 337-356.
22. Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3-13.
23. Green, S., Salkind, N., & Akey, T. (2000). Using SPSS for Windows: Analyzing and understanding data (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
24. Gülmez Dağ, G. (2012). Effectiveness of early childhood teacher education programs: Perceptions of early childhood teachers. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
25. Gültekin, M. (2006). The attitudes of preschool teacher candidates studying through distance education approach toward teaching profession and their perception levels of teaching competency. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 184-197.
26. Gürbüztürk, O., & Şad, S. N. (2009). Student teachers’ beliefs about teaching and their sense of self-efficacy: A descriptive and comparative analysis. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(3), 201-226.
27. Halmatov. M., Celik, İ., & Kırmızısac, Z. (2014). Preschool teachers candidates’ view on the profession in the context of past, today and tomorrow. International Journal of Elementary Education, 3(1), 14-20.
28. Hart, L. C. (2006). Standards-friendly lessons in university methods courses. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13(4), 211-215.
29. Isikoglu, N. (2008). The effects of a teaching methods course on early childhood preservice teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 29(3), 190-203.
30. Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
31. Kadim, M. (2012). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin oyun öğretimine ilişkin öz-yeterliklerinin incelenmesi. Unpublished master’s thesis, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bolu.
32. Kennedy, A. S., & Heineke, A. (2014). Re-envisioning the role of universities in early childhood teacher education: Community partnerships for 21st-century learning. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(3), 226-243.
33. Kesen, İ., & Polat, M. (2014). Determination of 4th class preservice teachers' attitudes toward the teaching profession in faculty of education: Sample of Muş Alparslan University. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 10(2), 556-578.
34. Kim, H., & Cho, Y. J. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ motivation, sense of teaching efficacy, and expectation of reality shock. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 421, 67–81.
35. Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. C. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76.
36. Martins, M., Costa, J., & Onofre, M. (2014). Practicum experiences as sources of pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 263-279.
37. MEB. (1998). Öğretmen adaylarının Milli Eğitim Bakanlığına bağlı eğitim öğretim kurumlarında yapacakları öğretmenlik uygulamasına ilişkin yönerge [Directions for teaching practices in Ministry of National Education schools]. Retrieved November 27, 2014, from http://tebligler.meb.gov.tr/index.php/tuem-sayilar/viewcategory/62-1998
38. Moulding, L. R., Stewart, P. W., & Dunmeyer, M. L. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ sense of efficacy: Relationship to academic ability, student teaching placement characteristics, and mentor support. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 60–66.
39. NAEYC. (2011). 2010 NAEYC Standards for initial & advanced early childhood professional preparation programs. Retrieved August 18, 2015, from http://www.naeyc.org/ncate/files/ncate/file/faculty/Standards/NAEYC%20Initial%20and%20Advanced%20Standards%203_2012.pdf
40. National Association for the Education of Young Children [NAEYC]. (2009). NAEYC standards for early childhood professional preparation programs. Retrieved February 26, 2015, from http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/ProfPrepStandards09.pdf
41. Özcan, M. (2013). Okulda üniversite: Türkiye’de öğretmen eğitimini yeniden yapılandırmak için bir model önerisi [University within school: A new model to re-structure teacher education in Turkey]. Retrieved July 12, 2014, from http://www.tusiad.org.tr/komisyonlar/sosyal-620 politikalar-komisyonu/rapor/okulda-universite--turkiyede-ogretmen-egitimini-yeniden-621 yapilandirmak-icin-bir-model-onerisi/
42. Öztürk, M. (2008). Induction into teaching: Adaptation challenges of novice teachers. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
43. Recchia, S. L., & Beck, L. M. (2014). Reflective practice as “Enrichment”: How new early childhood teachers enact preservice values in their classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(3), 203–225.
44. Riojas-Cortez, M., Alanís, I., & Flores, B. B. (2013). Early childhood teachers reconstruct beliefs and practices through reflexive action. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 34(1), 36–45.
45. Rose, J., & Rogers, S. (2012). Principles under pressure: student teachers' perspectives on final teaching practice in early childhood classrooms. International Journal of Early Years Education, 20(1), 43-58.
46. Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A Review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-338.
47. Seçer, Z., Çeliköz, N., & Kayılı, G. (2010). Okul öncesi öğretmenliği okul uygulamalarında yaşanan sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri [Problems in school practices in Department of Pre-School Teaching and solution offers]. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 128-152.
48. Seo, S., & Moon, H. (2013). A comparative study of teaching efficacy in pre-service and in-service teachers in Korean early childhood education and care (ECEC). Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 363-376.
49. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
50. Tarman, B. (2012). Prospective teachers’ beliefs and perceptions about teaching as a profession. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(3), 1964-1973.
51. Tepe, D. (2011). Okulöncesi öğretmenlerinin öz yeterlik inançlarını belirleme ölçeği geliştirme. Unpublished master’s thesis, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Burdur.
52. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001).Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.
53. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956.
54. Tunçeli, H. İ. (2013). The relationship between candidate teachers’ communicatıon skills and their attitudes toward teaching profession: Sakarya University sample. Pegem Journal of Education & Instruction, 3(3), 51-58.
55. University of Delaware. (2015). Overview of field experiences. Retrieved September 16, 2015, from http://www.education.udel.edu/ete/overview-of-field-experiences/
56. Ünver, G., Bümen, N., & Başbay, M. (2008). Ege Üniversitesi’nde yürütülmekte olan ortaöğretim alan öğretmenliği tezsiz yüksek lisans programının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the Secondary Teacher Education Graduate Program at Ege University]. (Tech. Rep. No. 05.EGF.003). İzmir: Ege University.
57. Wertheim, C., & Leyser, Y. (2002). Efficacy beliefs, background variables, and differentiated instruction of Israeli prospective teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 54-63.
58. Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations: A research report prepared for the U.S. Department of Education (Document R-01-3). University of Washington. Retrieved February 26, 2015, from http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02- 2001.pdf
59. Yükseköğretim Kurulu. (2006). Eğitim fakültelerinde uygulanacak yeni programlar hakkında açıklama [Announcement about new teacher education programs at educational faculties]. Retrieved November 27, 2014, from http://www.yok.gov.tr/egitim/ogretmen/programlar_aciklama.doc
60. Zeichner, K. (2006). Reflections of a university-based teacher educator on the future of college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 326-340.
61. Zeichner, K., & McDonald, M. (2011). Practice-based teaching and community field experiences for prospective teachers. In A. Cohan & A. Honigsfeld (Eds), Breaking the mold of preservice and inservice teacher education: Innovative and successful practice for the 21st century (pp. 45-54). Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.