GENDERED ENERGY INSECURITY: ADRESSING THE NEXUS BETWEEN ENERGY SECURITY RISKS AND GENDER EQUALITY

Öz

Energy is widely recognized as a fundamental driver of economic growth and sustainable development. However, uncertainties in energy supply and demand pose significant challenges to global energy security. This study investigates whether gender equality can mitigate energy security risks by examining the case of the United States over the period 1989–2019. Using an Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) framework, the study explores the long-run relationship between gender equality (SDG 5) and energy security (SDG 7), measured by the Gender Inequality Index (GII) and the Energy Security Risk Index (ESRI), respectively. The analysis also incorporates key control variables, including real GDP per capita, urban population, and the share of female investors. The findings provide evidence of a significant long-term relationship between gender equality and energy security risk. By integrating gender dynamics into the analysis of energy security, this study contributes to the literature by offering a more comprehensive perspective and provides policy-relevant insights for promoting inclusive and resilient energy systems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Energy security risk
• SDG7
• Gender inequality
• SDG5
• Women investors.

TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYETLE İLİŞKİLİ ENERJİ GÜVENSİZLİĞİ: ENERJİ GÜVENLİĞİ RİSKLERİ VE TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET EŞİTLİĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN ELE ALINMASI

Öz

Enerji, ekonomik büyümenin ve sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın temel belirleyicilerinden biri olarak geniş ölçüde kabul edilmektedir. Ancak enerji arz ve talebine ilişkin belirsizlikler, küresel enerji güvenliği açısından önemli zorluklar yaratmaktadır. Bu çalışma, 1989–2019 dönemi için Amerika Birleşik Devletleri örneğini inceleyerek, toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliğinin enerji güvenliği risklerini azaltıp azaltamayacağını araştırmaktadır. Çalışmada, Otoregresif Dağıtılmış Gecikmeli (ARDL) yaklaşımı kullanılarak, toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği (SKA 5) ile enerji güvenliği (SKA 7) arasındaki uzun dönemli ilişki analiz edilmektedir. Bu kapsamda, toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliği Birleşmiş Milletler tarafından geliştirilen Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitsizliği Endeksi (GII) ile, enerji güvenliği ise Enerji Güvenliği Risk Endeksi (ESRI) ile ölçülmektedir. Analize ayrıca kişi başına reel gelir, kentsel nüfus ve kadın yatırımcıların payı gibi temel kontrol değişkenleri de dahil edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği ile enerji güvenliği riski arasında anlamlı bir uzun dönemli ilişki olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışma, enerji güvenliği analizine toplumsal cinsiyet dinamiklerini entegre ederek literatüre daha bütüncül bir bakış açısı kazandırmakta ve kapsayıcı ve dirençli enerji sistemlerinin geliştirilmesine yönelik politika yapıcılara önemli çıkarımlar sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Enerji güvenliği riski
• SKH7
• Toplumsal cinsiyet eşitsizliği
• SKH5
• Kadın yatırımcılar

Kaynakça

1. Alshwawra, A., & Almuhtady, A. (2020). Impact of Regional Conflicts on Energy Security in Jordan. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(3), 45-50. doi:10.32479/ijeep.9031
2. Axon, C., & Darton, R. (2021). Sustainability and risk – a review of energy security. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1195-1204. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.018
3. Blanka, M. S., Bardhan, R., & Haquec, A. N. (2019). Gender, domestic energy and design of inclusive low-income habitats: A case of slum rehabilitation housing in Mumbai, India. Energy Research & Social Science, 49, 53-67. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.020
4. Blum, H., & Legey, L. (2012). The challenging economics of energy security: Ensuring energy benefits in support to sustainable development. Energy Economics, 34(6), 1982-1989. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.013
5. Dagar, V., Dagher, L., Rao, A., Doytch, N., & Kagzi, M. (2024). Economic policy uncertainty: Global energy security with diversification. Economic Analysis and Policy, 82, 248-263. doi:10.1016/j.eap.2024.03.008
6. Dutta, J., & Sahu, S. K. (2024). Access to cleaner cooking fuel in India: the regional and gender disparities. Environment, Development and Sustainability. doi:10.1007/s10668-023-04373-9
7. Elmassah, S., & Hassanein, E. A. (2025). Advancing environmental sustainability in the UAE: the interplay of women’s empowerment, financial development, and natural resource management. Discover Sustainability, 6(1006), 1-28. doi:10.1007/s43621-025-02002-1
8. European Parliament. (2019). Women, gender equality and the Energy Transition in the EU. Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs . Retrieved August 28, 2024, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses

9. Feenstra, M. (2022). Women Engendering the Just Energy Transition. In Gender and Energy Transition (pp. 57-72). Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78416-4_4
10. Fija, N., & Grigorie, E. (2021). Factors of achieving and ensuring energy security in the context of national and EuroAtlantic security. MATEC Web of Conferences, 342, pp. 1-8. doi:10.1051/matecconf/202134204011
11. Fordham, M. (2011). Gender and Disasters. Encyclopedia of Environmental Health, 834-838. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-52272-6.00475-X
12. Gbolonyo, E. Y., Obeng, C. K., Nunoo, J., & Armah, M. K. (2025). Women’s empowerment and renewable energy consumption in Ghana: bridging gender disparities and advancing inclusive development. Energy Efficiency, 18(7), 1-24. doi:10.1007/s12053-025-10372-8
13. Glemarec, Y., Bayat-Renoux, F., & Waissbein, O. (2016). Removing barriers to women entrepreneurs’ engagement in decentralized sustainable energy solutions for the poor. AIMS Energy, 136-172. doi:10.3934/energy.2016.1.136
14. Global Energy Institute. (2020). Index of U.S. Energy Security Risk: Assessing America's vulnerabilities in a global energy market. Washington, DC: U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
15. Habersbrunner, K., & Kuschan, M. (2024). Gender-Just Energy Communities: A Catalyst for Sustainable and Just Development. In Women and the Energy Sector (pp. 177-210). Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43091-6_8
16. Hirmer, S., Mazzone, A., Leonard, A., & Conforti, C. (2022). The power of language: Exploring values, empowerment dynamics and communication strategies for gender-inclusive energy service design in rural Uganda. Energy Research & Social Science, 85(102379), 1-15. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102379
17. International Energy Agency. (2022). World Energy Outlook 2022. Retrieved August 27, 2024, from https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022/energy-security-in-energy-transitions
18. Jessel, S., Sawyer, S., & Hernandez, D. (2019). Energy, poverty, and health in climate change: a comprehensive review of an emerging literature. Frontiers in Public Health, 1-19. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00357
19. Kartal, G. (2022). Relationship Between Energy Security and Economic Growth: A Bootstrap Panel Granger Causality Analysis. Politická Ekonomie, 70(4), 477-499. doi:10.18267/j.polek.1357
20. Kaur, S., Yadav, A. K., Ansari, M. A., & Jena, P. K. (2024, October 25). Symmetric and Asymmetric Impact of Gender Inequality, Gender Parity Index, Trade Openness, Green Energy and FLFP on Economic Growth in India. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5247714/v1
21. Kundo, H. K., Brueckner, M., Spencer, R., & Davis, J. (2023). The politics of linking disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation with social protection in Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 89, 1-18. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103640
22. Luft, G., & Korin, A. (2009). Energy security challenges for the 21st century: a reference handbook. Greenwood Publishing Group.
23. Mansson, A. (2014). Energy, conflict and war: Towards a conceptual framework. Energy Research & Social Science, 4, 106-116. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.10.004
24. Musango, J. K., Smit, S., Ceschin, F., Ambole, A., Batinge, B., Anditi, C., . . . Mukama, M. (2020). Mainstreaming gender to achieve security of energy services in poor urban environments. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101715. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101715
25. Nawaz, S. N., & Alvi, S. (2018). Energy security for socio-economic and environmental sustainability in Pakistan. Heliyon, 4(10), 1-21. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00854
26. Opoku, E. E., Kufuor, N. K., & Manu, S. A. (2021). Gender, electricity access, renewable energy consumption and energy efficiency. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 173(121121), 1-15. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121121
27. Osunmuyiwaa, O., & Ahlborga, H. (2019). Inclusiveness by design? Reviewing sustainable electricity access and entrepreneurship from a gender perspective. Energy Research & Social Science, 53, 145-158. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.010
28. Paravantis, J., & Kontoulis, N. (2020). Energy Security and Renewable Energy: A Geopolitical Perspective. In Renewable Energy - Resources, Challenges and Applications. doi:10.5772/intechopen.91848
29. Pueyo, A., & Maestre, M. (2020, February). Gender and Energy: Opportunities for All. IDS Bulletin; Transforming Development Knowledge, 51(1), pp. 1-111.
30. Saha, T. (2024). Gender and Energy Transition: How do Political Risk and Regulation Matter? Politická Ekonomie, 72(2), 306-330. doi:10.18267/j.polek.1434
31. Scott, M., Nguyen, H., Boyland, M., Ituarte-Lima, C., Biskupska, N., Somboon, P., & Fransson, L. (2023). FIRE: A framework for integrating human rights and gender equality in disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. Climate and Development, 15(7), 622-627. doi:10.1080/17565529.2022.2138694
32. Shakya, S., & Buchy, M. (2024). Exploring policy coherence to understand limited progress of gender and social inclusion in the energy sector: The case of Nepal. Energy Policy, 190, 114-140. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114140
33. Soliman, J., Lopez, N., & Biona, J. (2019). Evaluation of political risk factors influencing energy supply disruption. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 268, pp. 2-7. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/268/1/012123
34. Søraaa, R. A., Anfinsena, M., Foulds, C., Korsnesa, M., Lagesena, V., Robison, R., & Ryghaug, M. (2020). Diversifying diversity: Inclusive engagement, intersectionality, and gender identity in a European Social Sciences and Humanities Energy research project. Energy Research & Social Science, 62, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101380
35. Sovacool, B. (2012). Energy security: challenges and needs. WIREs Energy and Environment, 1(1), 51-59. doi:10.1002/wene.13
36. Standal, K., Wither, T., & Danielsen, K. (2018). Energy Politics and Gender. In The Oxford Handbook of Energy Politics (pp. 196-215). Oxford Academic. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190861360.013.6
37. Sumarno, T. B., Yusgiantoro, I. B., Fitriyanti, V., & Khusna, V. A. (2024). Challenges in increasing Women’s participation in the energy transition in ASEAN and G7 countries: A qualitative approach based on the three tenets of justice. Energy Policy, 191, 114-163. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114163
38. Tadadjeua, D., Tadadjeu, S., Njangang, H., & Djeunankana, R. (2023). Women’s Political Participation and Energy Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: Effects and Transmission Channels. REP, 133(2), 1-38.
39. The World Bank Group. (2016). Energy, Economic Growth, and Poverty Reduction: A Literature Review. Retrieved 12 04, 2024, from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/312441468197382126/pdf/104866-v1-REVISED-PUBLIC-Main-report.pdf
40. U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2023). International Energy Outlook 2023.
41. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2008). Gender Perspectives: Integrating Disaster Risk Reduction into Climate Change Adaptation Good Practices and Lessons Learned. United Nations. Retrieved August 28, 2024, from https://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/pdf/2008_isdr_gender_perspectives_disaster_risk_reduction_cc_eng.pdf
42. Usman, O., Özkan, O., Alola, A. A., & Ghardallou, W. (2024). Energy security-related risks and the quest to attain USA’s net-zero emissions targets by 2050: a dynamic ARDL simulations modeling approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(12), 18797-18812. doi:10.1007/s11356-024-32124-4
43. Zhilkina, Y. (2019). Risks in the energy sector: management practices analysis in the electricity market. E3S Web of Conferences, 139, pp. 1-4. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/201913901071