3D Stratejisi Öğretiminin Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Öğrencilerin Okuduğunu Anlama Becerilerine Etkisi

Burcu Kılıç Tülü; Ahmet Bilal Özbek; Cevriye Ergül

doi:10.53444/deubefd.775878

3D Stratejisi Öğretiminin Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Öğrencilerin Okuduğunu Anlama Becerilerine Etkisi

Öz

Okuduğunu anlama problemleri öğrencilerin tüm akademik alanlardaki performanslarını ve eğitim hayatlarını olumsuz olarak etkileyen bir durumdur. Bu araştırmanın amacı kendini düzenleme stratejileri gelişimi (KDSG) modeline göre yapılan Okuma öncesinde-sırasında-sonrasında Düşün (TWA) 3D strateji öğretiminin öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin bilgi veren metinlerde okuduğunu anlama performanslarına etkisini belirlemektir. Bu amaçla öğrenme güçlüğü tanısı almış 4. sınıfa devam eden dört erkek öğrenci ile çalışılmıştır. Araştırma tek denekli deneysel desenlerden denekler arası çoklu başlama düzeyi modeline göre yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın sonucunda KDSG modeline göre yürütülen 3D strateji öğretiminin öğrencilerin metni anlama soruları ve metni anlatma performansları üzerinde etkili olduğu görülmüştür. İzleme oturumlarında da öğrencilerin kazanımlarını büyük ölçüde korudukları belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen veriler KDSG modeline göre yapılan strateji öğretiminin öğrencilerin okuduğunu anlama becerilerinde etkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Bulgular alanyazın temelinde tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

okuduğunu anlama , öğrenme güçlüğü , kendini düzenleme stratejileri , bilgi veren metinler , okuma stratejileri

Kaynakça

Aktaş, N. (2015). Okuma Öncesi Strateji Öğretiminin 4. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Ekrandan Okuduğunu Anlama Düzeyine Etkisi (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Ankara.
Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2009). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Almasi, J. (2003). Teaching strategic processes in reading. New York: Guilford.
Applegate, M. D., Applegate, A. J., & Modla, V. B. (2009). "She’s my best reader; she just can’t comprehend": Studying the relationship between fluency and comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 62(6), 512-521.
Ateş, S. ve Yıldırım, K. (2014). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin okuma becerisine yönelik uygulamaları: Strateji Öğretimi ve Anlama. Elementary Education Online, 13(1), 235-257.
Atik-Çatak, A. ve Tekinarslan, E. (2006). Powerpoint sunu programıyla hazırlanan okuma materyalinin eğitilebilir zihin engelli öğrencilerin okuduğunu anlama becerisi üzerine etkisi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 107-124.
Baker, S., Gertsen, R., & Scanlon, D. (2002). Procedural facilitators and cognitive strategies: Tools for unraveling the mysteries of comprehension and the writing process, and for providing meaningful access to the general curriculum. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 65–77.
Bastug, M. (2014). The structural relationship of reading attitude, reading comprehension and academic achievement. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 4(4), 931-946.
Bender, W. N. (2002). Differentiating instruction for students with learning disabilities. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Corwin Press.
Bender, W. (2012). Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Bireyler ve Eğitimleri- Özellikleri, Tanılama ve Öğretim Stratejileri, Çeviri Editörü Hakan Sarı, Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.

Berkeley, S., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2010). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities,1995-2006: A meta analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31(6), 423-436.
Bilgi, A. D. ve Özmen, E. R. (2014). Uyarlanmış çok ögeli bilişsel strateji öğretiminin zihinsel engelli öğrencilerin metin anlama sürecinde kullanılan üstbilişsel strateji bilgisini kazanmalarında etkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 14(2), 693-714.
Block, C. C., & Pressley, M. (2007). Best practices in teaching comprehension. In L. B. Gambrell, L. M. Morrow, & M. Pressley (Eds.). Best practices in literacy instruction (3rd ed., pp. 220– 242). New York: Guilford.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2011). Matthew Effects in young readers: reading comprehension and reading experience aid vocabulary development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(5), 431-443.
Cora-İnce, N. (2007). Zihin engelli çocuklara okuduğunu anlama becerilerinin öğretilmesinde işbirlikçi öğrenme yaklaşımı ile sunulan öğretim programının etkililiğinin incelenmesi (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Ankara.
Coşkun, S. (2011). Bilişsel farkındalık stratejilerine dayalı okuma eğitimi etkinliklerinin okuduğunu anlama becerilerini geliştirmeye etkisi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi. Bolu.
Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42, 462–473.
Dermitzaki, I., Andreou, G., & Paraskeva, V. (2008). High and low reading comprehension achievers’ strategic behaviors and their relation to performance in a reading comprehension situation. Reading Psychology, 29(6), 471-492.
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2008). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. The Journal of Education, 189(1/2), 107-122.
Elbro, C., & Petersen, D. K. (2004). Long term effects of phoneme awareness and letter sound training: An intervention study with children at risk for dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 660-670.
Entwisle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., & Olson, S. (2005). First grade and educational attainment by age 22: A new story. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1458–1502.
Fırat, T., & Ergül, C. (2020). 3D strateji öğretiminin öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin bilişsel ve üstbilişsel stratejileri kazanmalarına etkisi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 28(3), 1390-1406.
Fisher, W., Kelley, M., & Lomas, J. (2003). Visual aids and structured criteria for improving visual inspection and interpretation of single-case designs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 387–406.
Forness, S.R., Kavale, K.A., Blum, I.M., & Lloyd, J.W. (1997). Mega-analysis of meta-analyses: What works in special education and related services. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(6), 4.
Gajria, M., Jitendra, A. K., Sood, S., & Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of learning disabilities, 40(3), 210-225.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279-320.
Girli, A. ve Öztürk, H. (2017). Metacognitive reading strategies in learning disability: Relations between usage level, academic self-efficacy and self-concept. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(1), 93-102.
Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 525-538.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (2002). Teaching and research reading. Harlow, UK: Longman.
Graham, L. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In C. A. MacArthur, S.. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187-207). New York: Guilford Press.
Graham, L., & Bellert, A. (2005). Reading comprehension difficulties experienced by students with learning disabilities. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 10(2), 71-78.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In L. Swanson, K. R. Harris & Graham (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning disabilities (pp, 383-402). New York, NY: Guilford.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Writing better: Effective strategies for teaching students with learning disahilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Macarthur, C. A., & Schwartz, S. (1991). Writing and Writing Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: Review of a Research Program. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(2), 89-114.
Güldenoğlu, İ. B. ve Kargın, T. (2012). Karşılıklı öğretim tekniğinin hafif derecede zihin engelli öğrencilere okuduğunu anlama becerilerinin öğretiminde etkililiğinin ve sürekliliğinin incelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 13(1), 17-34.
Güler, Ö. ve Özmen, R. G. (2010). Using the brief experimental analysis to determine the effective reading comprehension strategy in story comprehension of students with mental retardation (Electronic version). International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(3), 930-954.
Hedin, L., Mason, L. H., & Gaffney, J. (2011). TWA plus prompted discourse: Reading comprehension effects for three students with learning disabilities. Preventing School Failure, 55, 148–157.
Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165-179.
Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2011). Children's reading comprehension difficulties: Nature, causes, and treatments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 139–142.
Jitendra, A. K., Cole, C. L., Hoppes, M. K., & Wilson, B. (1998). Effects Of A Direct Instruction Main Idea Summarization Program And Self‐Monitoring On Reading Comprehension Of Middle School Students With Learning Dısabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14(4), 379-396.
Jitendra, A. K., Hoppes, M. K., & Xin, Y. P. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction. The Journal o f Special Education, 34(3), 127-139.
Johnson, L, Graham, S., & Harris, K. (1997). The effects of goal setting and self-instruction on learning a reading comprehension strategy: a study of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 80–91.
Johnson, J. W., Reid, R., & Mason, L. H. (2011). Improving the reading recall of high school students with ADHD. Remedial and Special Education, 33(4), 258–268.
Jones, A. G. (2010). The effects of duet reading on the reading fluency and comprehension of high school students with learning disabilities (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3434146)
Kamil, M. L. (2003). Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st Century. Washington DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Kendeou, P., Papadopoulos, T. C., & Spanoudis, G. (2012). Processing demands of reading comprehension tests in young readers. Learning and Instruction, 22(5), 354–367.
Kendeou, P., & Trevors, G. (2012). Learning from texts we read: What does it take. In M. J. Lawson & J. R. Kirby (Eds.), The quality of learning, (pp. 251-275). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P. Helder, A., & Karlsson, J. (2014). A cognitive view of reading comprehension: Implications for reading difficulties, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(1), 10–16.
Kim, W., Linan‐Thompson, S., & Misquitta, R. (2012). Critical factors in reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities: A research synthesis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(2), 66-78.
Kirby, J. R., & Savage, R. S. (2008). Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy, 42, 75–82.
Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. What Works Clearinghouse. Retrived from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.
Kucan, L., & Beck, I. L. (2003). Inviting students to talk about expository texts: A comparison of two discourse environments and their effects on comprehension. Literacy Research and Instruction, 42(3), 1-31.
Lederer, J. M. (2000). Reciprocal teaching of social studies in inclusive elementary classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 91–106.
Luna, B., Garver, K. E., Urban, T. A., Lazar, N. A., & Sweeney, J. A. (2004). Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood. Child Development, 75(5), 1357-1372.
Lyon, G. R. (1998). Overview of reading and literacy initiatives. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Mahdavi, J. N., & Tensfeldt, L. (2013). Untangling reading comprehension strategy instruction: Assisting struggling readers in the primary grades. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57(2), 77-92.
Malone, L., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 21, 270–279.
Mason, L. H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: Effect on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283–296.
Mason, L. H., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2013). Strategies for improving student outcomes in written expression. In M. Tankersly & B. Cook (Eds.), Effective practices in special education (pp. 86-97). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Mason, L. H., Hickey Snyder, K., Jones, D. P., & Kedem, Y. (2016). TWA + PLANS Strategies for expository reading and writing: Effects for nine 4th-grade students. Exceptional Children, 73(1), 69-9.
Mason, L. H., Meadan-Kaplansky, H., Hedin, L., & Corso, L. (2006). Self-regulated strategy development instruction for expository text comprehension. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 47–52.
Nation, K. (2005). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 248-266). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Özbek, A. B. (2019). Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Öğrencilerde Strateji Öğretimi Yazılımının Okuduğunu Anlama Becerilerinin Geliştirilmesine Etkisi (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Ankara.
Özdemir, Y. (2017). Okumadan önce, okuma esnasında, okumadan sonra düşün” stratejisinin okuduğunu anlama becerisine etkisi (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi) Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Samsun
Partanen, M., & Siegel, L. S. (2014). Long-term outcome of the early identification and intervention of reading disabilities. Reading and Writing, 27(4), 665-684.
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical basis of comprehension skill. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), Decade of behavior. On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 67–86). American Psychological Association.
Pressley, M., & Hilden, K. (2005). Towards more ambitious comprehension instruction. In E. R. Silliman & L. C. Wilkinson (Eds.), Language and literacy learning in schools (pp. 151–174). New York: Guilford.
Rogevich, M. E., & Perin, D. (2008). Effects on science summarization of a reading comprehension intervention for adolescents with behavior and attention disorders. Exceptional Children, 74, 135-154.
Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum, 10(2), 75-119.
Scharlach, T. D. (2008). START comprehending: Students and teachers actively reading text. The Reading Teacher, 62(1), 20-31.
Schultz, G. E, & Switzky, H. N. (1993). The academic achievement of elementary and junior high school students with behavioral disorders and their non-handicapped peers as a function of motivational orientation. Leaming and Individual Differences, 5, 31-42.
Sesma, H. W., Mahone, E. M., Levine, T., Eason, S. H., & Cutting, L. E. (2009). The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension. Child Neuropsychology, 15(3), 232-246.
Simmons, D. C., Coyne, M. D., Kwok, O. M., McDonagh, S., Harn, B. A., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2008). Indexing response to intervention: A longitudinal study of reading risk from kindergarten through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(2), 158-173.
Swanson, H. L. ( 1999). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis of ıntervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 504-532.
Tunmer, W. E. (2008). Recent developments in reading intervention research: Introduction to the special issue. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21(4), 299–316.
van den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. E. (1999). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. In B. Taylor, M. Graves, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning (pp. 1–31). New York: Teacher’s College Press.
van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Jr., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers' goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1081–1087.
Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N. K., Metz, K., Murray, C. S., Roberts, G., & Danielson, L., (2013). Extensive reading interventions for students with reading difficulties after grade 3. Review of Education Research, 83, 163–195.
Watson, S. M., Gable, R. A., Gear, S. B., & Hughes, K. C. (2012). Evidence‐based strategies for improving the reading comprehension of secondary students: implications for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(2), 79-89.
Williams, J. P., & Atkins, J. G. (2009). The role of metacognition in teaching reading comprehension to primary students. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 26-43). New York, NY: Routledge.
Winograd, P. N. (1983). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Technical Report No. 274. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED228616.pdf
Wolf, M. (1997). A provisional, integrative account of phonological and naming-speed deficits in dyslexia: Implications for diagnosis and intervention. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 67–92). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Wong, B. (Ed.). (2011). Learning about learning disabilities. Academic Press.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Burcu Kılıç Tülü ^*
0000-0002-9623-8392
Türkiye

Ahmet Bilal Özbek
0000-0002-0200-4932
Türkiye

Cevriye Ergül
0000-0001-6793-6469
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Haziran 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

30 Temmuz 2020

Kabul Tarihi

10 Haziran 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Sayı: 51

DOI

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.775878

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA84FP58KT

APA

Kılıç Tülü, B., Özbek, A. B., & Ergül, C. (2021). 3D Stratejisi Öğretiminin Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Öğrencilerin Okuduğunu Anlama Becerilerine Etkisi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 51, 97-118. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.775878

Cited By

ÜSTBİLİŞSEL OKUMA STRATEJİLERİ ÖĞRETİMİNİN ÖĞRENME GÜÇLÜĞÜ ÇEKEN 4.SINIF ÖĞRENCİSİNİN OKUMA BECERİSİNE ETKİSİ: BİR DURUM ÇALIŞMASI

International Journal Of Turkish Literature Culture Education

https://doi.org/10.7884/teke.1514638

Akıcı Okuma ve Okuduğunu Anlama Destek Eğitim Programının Etkileşimli Tahta Aracılığıyla Sunulmasının Özel Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Bir Öğrencinin Okuma Becerisine Etkisi

Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education

https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1582450

3D Stratejisi Öğretiminin Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Öğrencilerin Okuduğunu Anlama Becerilerine Etkisi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

Cited By

ÜSTBİLİŞSEL OKUMA STRATEJİLERİ ÖĞRETİMİNİN ÖĞRENME GÜÇLÜĞÜ ÇEKEN 4.SINIF ÖĞRENCİSİNİN OKUMA BECERİSİNE ETKİSİ: BİR DURUM ÇALIŞMASI

Akıcı Okuma ve Okuduğunu Anlama Destek Eğitim Programının Etkileşimli Tahta Aracılığıyla Sunulmasının Özel Öğrenme Güçlüğü Olan Bir Öğrencinin Okuma Becerisine Etkisi