YAPAY ZEKA TEMELLİ KURULUŞLARDA DÖNÜŞÜMSEL LİDERLİĞİN ETKİSİ: BİR META-ANALİZ

Öz

Yapay zeka (AI), modern organizasyonlarda liderlik tarzlarını ve organizasyonel dinamikleri etkileyen dönüştürücü bir güç haline gelmiştir. Çeşitli liderlik yaklaşımları arasında dönüşümcü liderlik, inovasyonu teşvik etme, çalışanları motive etme ve teknolojik değişikliklere uyum sağlama yeteneği ile yaygın olarak tanınmaktadır. Bu çalışma, yapay zeka ve dönüşümsel liderlik arasındaki ilişkiyi kapsamlı bir meta-analiz yoluyla inceleyerek literatürdeki boşluğu doldurmayı amaçlamaktadır. Yapay zekâ ve dönüşümcü liderlik arasındaki bağlantıyı keşfetmek için çalışmada meta-analiz yaklaşımı kullanılmıştır. Dahil edilecek ilgili çalışmaları belirlemek için Google Scholar’dakapsamlı bir arama yapılmıştır. Bu arama sonucunda, yapay zekâ ve dönüşümcü liderlik arasındaki doğrudan veya dolaylı ilişkiyi araştıran altı ampirik çalışma seçilmiştir. Bu çalışmalar, meta-analiz için gerekli örneklem büyüklüklerini ve korelasyon katsayılarını veya p-değerlerini sağlamıştır. Analiz CMA 13 yazılımı (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 13.0) kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. İlişki, havuzlanmış korelasyon katsayısı, Fisher'ın Z dönüşümü, Z istatistiği ve p-değerleri aracılığıyla değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmalara toplam 1091 örnek dahil edilmiştir. Analizde hem sabit-etki (Z = 13.66; p < 0.05) hem de rastgele-etki (Z = 2.91; p < 0.05) modelleri kullanılmış ve YZ ile dönüşümcü liderlik arasındaki istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki teyit edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, yapay zekâ tabanlı organizasyonlarda liderliğin insan merkezli boyutunu vurgulayarak literatüre katkıda bulunmaktadır; bu boyut, teknik tartışmaların gölgesinde kalmaktadır. Pratikte, bulgular, dönüşümsel liderliğin, yöneticilerin çalışan motivasyonunu, yenilikçiliğini ve uyum yeteneğini korurken yapay zekâ teknolojilerinden yararlanmaları için stratejik bir araç olarak hizmet edebileceğini vurgulamaktadır. Teknoloji yoğun sektörlerdeki liderler, bu içgörüleri etik kaygılar, iş gücü dönüşümü ve teknolojik verimlilik arasında denge kurarak sürdürülebilir kurumsal performansı garanti altına almak için kullanabilirler.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• yapay zeka
• dönüşümsel liderlik
• meta analiz

THE IMPACT OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED ORGANIZATIONS: A META-ANALYSIS

Öz

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a transformative force affecting leadership styles and organizational dynamics in modern organizations. Among various leadership approaches, transformational leadership is widely recognized for its ability to foster innovation, motivate employees and adapt to technological changes. This study aims to fill the gap in the literature by examining the relationship between AI and transformational leadership through a comprehensive meta-analysis. A meta-analysis approach was used in the study to explore the link between AI and transformational leadership. A comprehensive search was conducted on Google Scholarto identify relevant studies to be included. As a result of this search, six empirical studies investigating the direct or indirect relationship between artificial intelligence and transformational leadership were selected. These studies provided the required sample sizes and correlation coefficients or p-values for meta-analysis. The analysis was conducted using CMA 13 software (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 13.0). Association was assessed by means of the pooled correlation coefficient, Fisher's Z transformation, Z statistic and p-values. A total of 1091 samples were included in the studies. Both fixed-effect (Z = 13.66; p < 0.05) and random-effect (Z = 2.91; p < 0.05) models were used in the analysis and the statistically significant relationship between AI and transformational leadership was confirmed. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the human-centered dimension of leadership in AI-based organizations, an aspect often overshadowed by technical discussions. Practically, the findings emphasize that transformational leadership can serve as a strategic tool for managers to harness AI technologies while maintaining employee motivation, fostering innovation, and ensuring adaptability. Leaders in technology-intensive industries can use these insights to balance ethical concerns, workforce transformation, and technological efficiency, ensuring sustainable organizational performance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• transformational leadership
• artificial intelligence
• meta analysis

Kaynakça

1. Abositta, A., Adedokun, M. W. and Berberoğlu, A. (2024). Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Engineering Management Decision-Making with Mediating Role of Transformational Leadership. Systems, 12(12), 570.
2. Alrowwad, A., Abualoush, S. H. and Masa'deh, R. E. (2020). Innovation and intellectual capital as intermediary variables among transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and organizational performance. Journal of Management Development, 39(2), 196-222.
3. Avolio, B. J. and Yammarino, F. J. (2013). Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead. Emerald Group Publishing.
4. Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., Olsen, O. K. and Espevik, R. (2023). Daily transformational leadership: A source of inspiration for follower performance?. European Management Journal, 41(5), 700-708.
5. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. Free Press, Collier Macmillan.
6. Bass, B. M. and Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
7. Bengio, Y., Lecun, Y. and Hinton, G. (2021). Deep learning for AI. Communications of the ACM, 64(7), 58-65.
8. Benmira, S. and Agboola, M. (2021). Evolution of leadership theory. BMJ leader, 5(1), 3-5.

9. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T. and Rothstein, HR. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
10. Bunjak, A., Bruch, H. and Černe, M. (2022). Context is key: The joint roles of transformational and shared leadership and management innovation in predicting employee IT innovation adoption. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102516.
11. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, Harper & Row.
12. Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D. and Giovando, G. (2023). Digital workplace and organization performance: Moderating role of digital leadership capability. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100334.
13. Collins, C., Dennehy, D., Conboy, K. and Mikalef, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in information systems research: A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102383.
14. Cooper, K., Gregory, J. D., Walker, I., Lambe, S. and Salkovskis, P. M. (2017). Cognitive behaviour therapy for health anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy, 45(2), 110-123.
15. Deshwal, V. and Ali, M. A. (2020). A systematic review of various leadership theories. Shanlax International Journal of Commerce, 8(1), 38-43.
16. Du‐Harpur, X., Watt, F. M., Luscombe, N. M. and Lynch, M. D. (2020). What is AI? Applications of artificial intelligence to dermatology. British Journal of Dermatology, 183(3), 423-430.
17. Faupel, S. and Süß, S. (2019). The effect of transformational leadership on employees during organizational change–an empirical analysis. Journal of Change Management, 19(3), 145-166.
18. Fragkos, K. C., Tsagris, M. and Frangos, C. C. (2014). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Confidence intervals for Rosenthal’s fail-safe number. International scholarly research notices, 2014, Article ID 825383.
19. Gerpott, F. H. and Schyns, B. (2025). Beyond the Emptiness Machine: New Directions for Leadership Research in Digital and AI-Driven Work Contexts. Research for People in Organizations, 1, 1-23.
20. Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T. and Ghamrawi, NA. (2023). Exploring the impact of AI on teacher leadership: regressing or expanding?. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 8415-8433.
21. Giraud, L., Zaher, A., Hernandez, S. and Akram, AA. (2023). The impacts of artificial intelligence on managerial skills. Journal of Decision Systems, 32(3), 566-599.
22. Goralski, M. A. and Tan, T. K. (2020). Artificial intelligence and sustainable development. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 100330.
23. Gruetzemacher, R. and Whittlestone, J. (2022). The transformative potential of artificial intelligence. Futures, 135, 102884.
24. Hamed, K. H. (2011). The distribution of Kendall's tau for testing the significance of cross-correlation in persistent data. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56(5), 841-853.
25. Hunter, J. E. and Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage.
26. Larson, L. and DeChurch, L. A. (2020). Leading teams in the digital age: Four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams. The leadership quarterly, 31(1), 101377.
27. Madanchian, M. (2024). From recruitment to retention: AI tools for human resource decision-making. Applied Sciences, 14(24), 11750.
28. Modise, J. M. (2025). Ethics leadership and sustainable development. MRS Journal of Arts, Humanities and Literature, 2(7), 45-56.
29. Narne, S., Adedoja, T., Mohan, M. and Ayyalasomayajula, T. (2024). AI-driven decision support systems in management: enhancing strategic planning and execution. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 12(1), 268-276.
30. Peifer, Y., Jeske, T. and Hille, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence and its impact on leaders and leadership. Procedia Computer Science, 200, 1024-1030.
31. Peters, J. L., Sutton, A. J., Jones, D. R., Abrams, K. R., Rushton, L. and Moreno, S. G. (2010). Assessing publication bias in meta-analyses in the presence of between-study heterogeneity. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 173(3), 575-591.
32. Porath, U. (2023). Advancing managerial evolution and resource management in contemporary business landscapes. Modern Economy, 14(10), 1404-1420.
33. Pratiwi, E. C., Purwanto, F. and Irfan, M. (2025). Leadership 4.0: How Transformational Leadership Shapes Employee Engagement in the Era of Industry 5.0. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 7(2), 277-281.
34. Saad Alessa, G. (2021). The dimensions of transformational leadership and its organizational effects in public universities in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 682092.
35. Santiago-Torner, C., González-Carrasco, M. and Miranda Ayala, R. A. (2024). Ethical leadership and emotional exhaustion: The impact of moral intensity and affective commitment. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), 233.
36. Selenko, E., Bankins, S., Shoss, M., Warburton, J. and Restubog, S. L. D. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: A functional-identity perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(3), 272-279.
37. Simuka, J. (2021). Relevance of leadership theories in promoting effective leadership practices. Africa Journal of Leadership and Governance (AJOLG), 1(1), 143-157.
38. Soori, M., Arezoo, B. and Dastres, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review. Cognitive Robotics, 3, 54-70.
39. Strich, F., Mayer, A. S. and Fiedler, M. (2021). What do I do in a world of artificial intelligence? Investigating the impact of substitutive decision-making AI systems on employees’ professional role identity. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(2), 9.
40. Quaquebeke, N. V. and Gerpott, F. H. (2023). The now, new, and next of digital leadership: How Artificial Intelligence (AI) will take over and change leadership as we know it. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 30(3), 265-275.
41. Taranto-Vera, G., Galindo-Villardón, P., Merchán-Sánchez-Jara, J., Salazar-Pozo, J., Moreno-Salazar, A. and Salazar-Villalva, V. (2021). Algorithms and software for data mining and machine learning: a critical comparative view from a systematic review of the literature. The Journal of Supercomputing, 77, 11481-11513.
42. Thornton, A. and Lee, P. (2000). Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 53(2), 207-216.
43. Van Aert, R. C., Wicherts, J. M. and Van Assen, M. A. (2019). Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis. PloS one, 14(4), e0215052.
44. Wamba-Taguimdje, S. L., Fosso Wamba, S., Kala Kamdjoug, J. R. and Tchatchouang Wanko, C. E. (2020). Influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on firm performance: the business value of AI-based transformation projects. Business Process Management Journal, 26(7), 1893-1924.
45. Verawati, D. M. and Hartono, B. (2020). Effective leadership: From the perspective of trait theory and behavior theory. Jurnal REKOMEN (Riset Ekonomi Manajemen), 4(1), 13-23.
46. Yazıcı, A. M. (2023). The moderator role of career decidedness in the effect of artificial intelligence anxiety on employment hope. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 11(4), 12601274.
47. Yazıcı, A. M. and Sivaslıoğlu, F. (2024). The Moderating Role of General Attitude towards Artificial Intelligence in The Impact of Digital Transformation on Employee Satisfaction. Journal of Research in Business, 9(2), 335-364.
48. Zirar, A., Ali, S. I. and Islam, N. (2023). Worker and workplace Artificial Intelligence (AI) coexistence: Emerging themes and research agenda. Technovation, 124, 102747.