THE NEXUS BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, GREEN ENERGY, AND GREEN TECHNOLOGY IN BRICS COUNTRIES: A HETEROGENEOUS PANEL CAUSALITY APPROACH

Öz

Reaching the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires a dramatic balance of economic growth, environmental limits, and social well-being. This approach has transformed sustainable development into a multidimensional issue rather than a strictly macroeconomic one. To examine this dynamic, this study employs a novel index that combines human development and ecological impact, spanning annual data from the BRICS economies from 1992 to 2022. Accordingly, it applies a heterogeneous panel methodology that explicitly controls for cross-sectional dependence and slope-parameter heterogeneity. Empirical findings reveal country-specific patterns. Initially in China, green energy drives sustainable development, and there is strong unidirectional causality from sustainable development to green technology. In India, sustainable development and green energy influence each other mutually. By contrast, Brazil and South Africa display bidirectional causality from sustainable development to green technology. Russia also shows that there is bidirectional causality from green technology to sustainable development. Ultimately, this study fills a critical gap in the literature by clarifying how the green transition supports overall sustainable development. The results provide practical insights for policymakers on effective long-term sustainability strategies and precautions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sustainable Development
• Environmental Sustainibility
• Green Energy
• Green Technology
• BRICS

Destekleyen Kurum

There is no supporting organisation.

Etik Beyan

As secondary data has been used, no ethical declaration is required.

BRICS ÜLKELERİNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMA, YEŞİL ENERJİ VE YEŞİL TEKNOLOJİ İLİŞKİSİ: HETEROJEN PANEL NEDENSELLİK YAKLAŞIMI

Öz

Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedefleri’ne (SKH) ulaşmak, ekonomik büyüme, çevresel sınırlar ve sosyal refah arasında hassas bir denge kurulmasını gerektirir. Bu yaklaşım, sürdürülebilir kalkınmayı sadece makroekonomik bir mesele olmaktan çıkarıp çok boyutlu bir konuya dönüştürmüştür. Bu dinamiği incelemek amacıyla bu çalışma, insani gelişme ile ekolojik etkiyi birleştiren ve 1992’den 2022’ye kadar BRICS ekonomilerine ait yıllık verileri kapsayan yeni bir endeks kullanmaktadır. Buna uygun olarak, çalışma, kesitsel bağımlılığı ve eğim parametresi heterojenliğini kontrol eden heterojen panel metodolojisini uygulamaktadır. Ampirik bulgular, ülkeye özgü farklılıkları ortaya koymaktadır. İlk olarak, Çin’de yeşil enerji, sürdürülebilir kalkınmayı yönlendirmektedir ve sürdürülebilir kalkınmadan yeşil teknolojiye doğru güçlü tek yönlü bir nedensellik mevcuttur. Hindistan’da ise sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve yeşil enerji birbirlerini karşılıklı olarak etkilemektedir. Buna karşılık, Brezilya ve Güney Afrika’da sürdürülebilir kalkınmadan yeşil teknolojiye doğru çift yönlü bir nedensellik görülmektedir. Rusya’da da yeşil teknolojiden sürdürülebilir kalkınmaya doğru çift yönlü bir nedensellik olduğu gözlemlenmektedir. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma yeşil dönüşümün genel sürdürülebilir kalkınmayı nasıl desteklediğine ilişkin literatürdeki kritik bir boşluğu doldurmaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, politika yapıcılar için etkili uzun vadeli sürdürülebilirlik stratejileri ve önlemler konusunda pratik içgörüler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma
• Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik
• Yeşil Enerji
• Yeşil Teknoloji
• BRICS

Destekleyen Kurum

Destekleyen herhangi bir kurum bulunmamaktadır.

Etik Beyan

İkincil verilere başvurulduğundan etik beyana ihtiyaç duyulmamaktadır.

Kaynakça

1. Ahmad, N., Liu, Y., Žiković, S., and Belyaeva, Z. (2023). The effects of technological innovation on sustainable development and environmental degradation: Evidence from China. Technology in Society, 72, 102184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102184
2. Amin, N., Shabbir, M. S., Pan, Y., and Asif, M. (2025). Beyond growth: the triple green strategy (green energy, green innovation, and green finance) for sustainable emissions reduction in BRICS countries. Sustainable Development, 33(4), 5567-5586. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3411
3. Assa, J. (2021). Less is more: The implicit sustainability content of the human development index. Ecological Economics, 185, 107045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107045
4. Azam, A., Rafiq, M., Shafique, M., and Yuan, J. (2023). Interpreting the dynamic nexus between green energy, employment, fossil fuel energy, and Human Development Index: A panel data investigation. Energies, 16(7), 3132. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073132
5. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., and Wu, T.-P. (2018). Housing prices and real effective exchange rates in 18 OECD countries: A bootstrap multivariate panel Granger causality. Economic Analysis and Policy, 60, 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2018.09.005
6. Behera, B., Behera, P., Pata, U. K., Sethi, L., and Sethi, N. (2025). Artificial intelligence-driven green innovation for sustainable development: Empirical insights from India’s renewable energy transition. Journal of Environmental Management, 389, 126285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126285
7. Caglar, A. E., Dastan, M., Ahmed, Z., Mert, M., and Avci, S. B. (2024). The synergy of renewable energy consumption, green technology, and environmental quality: Designing sustainable development goals policies. Natural Resources Forum, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12577
8. Chen, L., Olawunmi, I. K., Ribeiro, M. P., Khan, K. A., and Abbas, S. (2024). Exploring the dynamic capability of green technology innovation for achieving sustainable development: An empirical insight from China. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 31(7), 747-760. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2024.2331744

9. Clark, C. M. A., Kavanagh, C., and McGeady, J. (2024). Measuring progress: The sustainable progress index 2024. Social Justice Ireland.
10. Costantini, V., and Monni, S. (2007). Sustainable human development for European countries. Journal of Human Development, 6(3), 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880500287654
11. Costanza, R., Daly, L., Fioramonti, L., Giovannini, E., Kubiszewski, I., Mortensen, L. F., Pickett, K. E., Ragnarsdottir, K. V., De Vogli, R., & Wilkinson, R. (2016). Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN sustainable development goals. Ecological Economics, 130, 350-355.
12. Degirmenci, T., Aydin, M., Bozatli, O., and Ahmed, Z. (2025). Consolidating sustainable development in OECD countries: The role of green energy transition, green innovation, environmental policy stringency, and human capital. Sustainable Development, 33(1), 823-835. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70034
13. Fang, Z. (2023). Assessing the effect of renewable energy investment, green technology innovation, and industrialization on sustainable development: A case study of China. Renewable Energy, 205, 772-782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.014
14. Gebara, C. H., Thammaraksa, C., Hauschild, M., and Laurent, A. (2024). Selecting indicators for measuring progress towards sustainable development goals at the global, national and corporate levels. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 44, 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.12.004
15. Güney, T. (2020). Renewable energy consumption and sustainable development in high-income countries. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 28(4), 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1839807
16. Hametner, M. (2022). Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability. Ecological Economics, 199, 107490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107490
17. Hickel, J. (2020). The sustainable development index: Measuring the ecological efficiency of human development in the anthropocene. Ecological Economics, 167, 106331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.011
18. International Union for Conservation of Nature. (1980). World conservation strategy: Living resource conservation for sustainable development. IUCN.
19. Islam, M. M., Ali, M. I., Ceh, B., Singh, S., Khan, M. K., and Dagar, V. (2022). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption driven sustainable development in ASEAN countries: Do financial development and institutional quality matter?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 34231-34247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18488-x
20. Islam, H. (2025). Nexus of economic, social, and environmental factors on sustainable development goals: The moderating role of technological advancement and green innovation. Innovation and Green Development, 4(1), 100183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2024.100183
21. Jansen, A., Wang, R., Behrens, P., and Hoekstra, R. (2024). Beyond GDP: a review and conceptual framework for measuring sustainable and inclusive wellbeing. The Lancet Planetary Health, 8(9), 695-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00147-5
22. Khan, Z., Ali, S., and Zhu, X. (2025). Environmental sustainability via sustainable development: The role of green innovation, clean energy and financial inclusion. Journal of Environmental Management, 393, 127175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127175
23. Khan, A., Khan, T., and Ahmad, M. (2025). The role of technological innovation in sustainable growth: Exploring the economic effect of green innovation and renewable energy. Environmental Challenges, 18, 101109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101109
24. Konya, L. (2006). Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Economic Modelling, 23(6), 978-992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2006.04.008
25. Li, J., and Imran, A. (2025). Sustainable transitions: navigating green technologies, clean energy, economic growth, and human capital for a greener future. Sustainability, 17(8), 3446. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083446
26. Liu, C., Padhan, H., Rekha, V., and Gozgor, G. (2025). The path to green growth in OECD economies: The role of energy transition and education. Energy Economics, 145, 108419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108419
27. Maigne, J. (2025). Looking beyond GDP to reach the Sustainable Development Goals. https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/03/1161711 (Access Date: January 20, 2025).
28. Menyah, K., Nazlioglu, S., and Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2014). Financial development, trade openness and economic growth in African countries: New insights from a panel causality approach. Economic Modelling, 37, 386-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.11.044
29. Nazlioglu, S., Lebe, F., and Kayhan, S. (2011). Nuclear energy consumption and economic growth in OECD countries: Cross-sectionally dependent heterogeneous panel causality analysis. Energy Policy, 39(10), 6615-6621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.007
30. Neumayer, E. (2010). Human development and sustainability. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 11(2), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1711867
31. Noor, M., Khan, D., Khan, A., and Rasheed, N. (2024). The effect of renewable and non-renewable energy on sustainable development in South Asia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(6), 14621-14638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03210-3
32. OECD. Environmental patents. OECD Open Data Platform (Access Date: September 16, 2025).
33. Omri, A. (2020). Technological innovation and sustainable development: Does the stage of development matter?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 83, 106398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106398
34. Our World in Data. Renewable energy. https://ourworldindata.org/renewable-energy (Access Date: October 26, 2025).
35. Ozcan, B., and Ozturk, I. (2019). Renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus in emerging countries: A bootstrap panel causality test. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.020
36. Pata, U. K. (2025). How to progress towards sustainable development by leveraging renewable energy sources, technological advances, and human capital. Renewable Energy, 241, 122367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.122367
37. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (Discussion Paper No. 1240). IZA Institute of Labor Economics. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.5113
38. Pesaran, M. H., and Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
39. Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., and Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x
40. Rahman, S. U., Faisal, F., Ali, A., Abu Mansor, N. N., Ul Haq, Z., Sulimany, H. G. H., and Ramakrishnan, S. (2024). Assessing country risk in the stock market and economic growth nexus: Fresh insights from bootstrap panel causality. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 94, 294-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2024.02.005
41. Ramesh, S. (2022). The dimensions of human development. In The political economy of human behaviour and economic development (pp. 43-86).
42. Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing.
43. Raza, K., and Chen, Y. (2025). The synergy of green growth, clean energy, and foreign direct investment in achieving sustainable development. Natural Resources Forum. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.70017
44. Swamy, P. A. V. B. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica, 38(2), 311-323.
45. Togtokh, C., and Gaffney, O. (2010). The 2010 Human Sustainable Development Index. United Nations University-Our World. https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/the-2010-human-sustainable-development-index (Access Date: December 20, 2025).
46. Topf, J., Schultz, L. A., and da Silva, J. M. C. (2023). An index to measure the sustainability of place-based development pathways. Ecological Economics, 204, 107645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107645
47. United Nations. Energy. https://sdgs.un.org/topics/energy (Access Date: December 15, 2025).
48. United Nations. (2021). Beyond GDP. https://unsceb.org/topics/beyond-gdp (Access Date: November 11, 2025).
49. Wang, L., Pal, S., Mahalik, M. K., and Gozgor, G. (2025). Empowering sustainable development in emerging economies: The role of renewable energy and domestic investment. Energy Economics, 148, 108631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108631
50. Wei, Z., and Huang, L. (2022). Does renewable energy matter to achieve sustainable development? Fresh evidence from ten Asian economies. Renewable Energy, 199, 759-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.101
51. WCED. (1987). World commission on environment and development: Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
52. Xing, H., Danish, D., and Buyukkantarci Tolgay, S. (2025). Sustainable development in OECD countries: Articulating the role of natural resources and green technological innovation. Sustainable Development, 33(5), 7513-7525. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3527
53. Yang, S., Wang, J., Dong, K., & Jiang, Q. (2023). A path towards China’s energy justice: how does digital technology innovation bring about a just revolution?. Energy Economics, 127, 107056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107056
54. Yilanci, V., and Özgür, Ö. (2019). Testing the environmental Kuznets curve for G7 countries: evidence from a bootstrap panel causality test in rolling windows. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(24), 24795-24805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05745-3
55. Zeng, Y., Maxwell, S., Runting, R. K., Venter, O., Watson, J. E. M., & Carrasco, L. R. (2020). Environmental destruction not avoided with the sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability, 3, 795-798.
56. Zhang, W., Wang, Z., Adebayo, T. S., and Altuntaş, M. (2022). Asymmetric linkages between renewable energy consumption, financial integration, and ecological sustainability: Moderating role of technology innovation and urbanization. Renewable Energy, 197, 1233-1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.021
57. Zhang, S., Xie, W., Sun, S., Wu, F., and Xue, Y. (2024). Nexus of green energy innovation, governance quality, and CO₂ emissions in natural resource sector: The role of sustainable human development. Resources Policy, 88, 104493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104493
58. Zhang, Y., and Wu, Z. (2022). Environmental performance and human development for sustainability: Towards to a new environmental human index. Science of the Total Environment, 838(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156491
59. Zhao, T., and Shah, S. A. A. (2024). Green energy, economic growth, and innovation for sustainable development in OECD countries. Sustainability, 16(22), 10113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210113