ALGILANAN DESTEĞİN ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN GİRİŞİMCİLİK NİYETLERİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: KİŞİSEL TUTUMUN ARACI ROLÜ

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, algılanan desteğin üniversite öğrencilerinin girişimcilik niyetleri üzerindeki etkisini ve kişisel tutumun bu ilişkideki aracı rolünü incelemektir. Araştırma modeli; eğitimsel, yapısal ve ilişkisel desteğin girişimcilik niyetini doğrudan, kişisel tutum aracılığıyla ise dolaylı olarak etkilediğini öngörmektedir. Algılanan destek; eğitimsel, yapısal ve ilişkisel destek boyutlarıyla ölçülmüştür. Girişimcilik niyeti ve kişisel tutum, ilgili alanyazında kullanılan ölçeklerle değerlendirilmiştir. Veriler Marmara Üniversitesi ve İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi öğrencilerinden kolayda örnekleme yoluyla toplanmış ve 402 katılımcıya ulaşılmıştır. Hipotezlerin sınanmasında keşfedici faktör analizi, güvenilirlik analizi, korelasyon analizi, çoklu regresyon analizi ve aracılık analizi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, üç destek boyutunun da girişimcilik niyetini olumlu yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Yapısal ve ilişkisel destek kişisel tutumu anlamlı biçimde yordarken, eğitimsel desteğin ortak regresyon modelindeki benzersiz etkisi anlamlı değildir. Kişisel tutum girişimcilik niyetini olumlu yönde etkilemekte ve destek boyutları ile girişimcilik niyeti arasındaki ilişkilerde kısmi aracılık rolü üstlenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Girişimcilik Niyeti
• Algılanan Destek
• İlişkisel Destek
• Eğitimsel Destek
• Yapısal Destek
• Kişisel Tutum.

THE IMPACT OF PERCEIVED SUPPORT ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTIONS: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF PERSONAL ATTITUDE

Öz

The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of perceived support on university students’ entrepreneurial intentions and the mediating role of personal attitude. The research model proposes that educational, structural, and relational support influence entrepreneurial intention directly and indirectly through personal attitude. Perceived support was measured through educational, structural, and relational support; entrepreneurial intention and personal attitude were assessed using established scales. Data were collected from 402 students at Marmara University and Istanbul Kent University through convenience sampling. Exploratory factor analysis, reliability analysis, correlation analysis, multiple regression analysis, and mediation analysis were used to test the hypotheses. The findings show that all three support dimensions positively affect entrepreneurial intention. Structural and relational support significantly predict personal attitude, whereas educational support does not have a significant unique effect in the joint regression model. Personal attitude has a positive effect on entrepreneurial intention and partially mediates the relationships between the support dimensions and entrepreneurial intention.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Entrepreneurial Intentions
• Perceived Support
• Relational Support
• Educational Support
• Structural Support
• Personal Attitude.

Kaynakça

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2. Aladejebi, O. A. (2018). The effect of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention among tertiary institutions in Nigeria. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 1-2.
3. Al-Harrasi, A. S., Al-Zadjali, E. B. ve Al-Salti, Z. S. (2014). Factors impacting entrepreneurial intention: A literature review. Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering, 8(8), 2354-2456.
4. Al-Jubari, I., Hassan, A. ve Liñán, F. (2019). Entrepreneurial intention among university students in Malaysia: Integrating self-determination theory and the theory of planned behavior. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(4), 1323-1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00193-9
5. Aragon-Sanchez, A., Baixauli, J. S. ve Bellver, N. (2017). Entrepreneurship and attitudes towards risk: The influence of personal beliefs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(3), 437-456.
6. Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C. ve Fiet, J. O. (2014). The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: A meta-analytic review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 217-254.
7. Baughn, C. C. (2006). Normative, social, and cognitive predictors of entrepreneurial interest in China, Vietnam, and the Philippines. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 57-77.
8. Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442-453.

9. Çakmak, S. ve Düşükcan, M. (2020). Girişimci kişilik özelliklerinin girişimcilik niyetine etkisi: Spor bilimleri alanında öğrenim gören üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma. International Journal of Trade Economics and Business Studies (IJTEBS), 4(1), 1-19.
10. Lee-Ross, D. (2017). Entrepreneurship and small business management in the hospitality industry (2nd ed.). Routledge.
11. Engle, R. L., Schlaegel, C. ve Dimitriadi, N. (2011). Institutions and entrepreneurial intent: A cross-country study. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 227-250.
12. Fayolle, A. ve Gailly, B. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 75-93.
13. Ferreira, J. J., Raposo, M. L., Rodrigues, R. G., Dinis, A. ve do Paço, A. (2012). A model of entrepreneurial intention: An application of the psychological and behavioral approaches. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19(3), 424-440. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001211250144
14. Gür Erdoğan, D., Özdemir, Ü., Mutugu, E. ve Çolakoğlu Saburlu, Z. (2024). Üniversite öğrencilerinin girişimcilik niyetleri, risk alma düzeyleri ve akademik branş memnuniyetleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 14(2), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1325543
15. Kebaili, B., Al Subaie, A. ve Al Qahtani, F. (2017). A comparative study of entrepreneurial intentions among university students. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(3), 121-132.
16. Lee, S. M. (2017). Entrepreneurial intention and perceived attractiveness of entrepreneurship: A study of university students. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 22(1), 1-16.
17. Liñán, F. ve Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617.
18. Liñán, F. ve Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: Citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907-933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-015-0356-5
19. Liu, M., Gorgievski, M. J., Qi, J. ve Paas, F. (2022). Perceived university support and entrepreneurial intentions: Do different students benefit differently?. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 73, 101150.
20. Mustapha, M. ve Selvaraju, M. (2015). Personal attributes, family influences, entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurship inclination among university students. Economics and Management Journal, 33(1), 155-172.
21. Naktıyok, A. ve Timuroğlu, M. K. (2009). Öğrencilerin motivasyonel değerlerinin girişimcilik niyetleri üzerine etkisi ve bir uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 23(3), 85-105.
22. Nanda, R. ve Sorenson, O. (2006). The influence of networks on entrepreneurship. In The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship.
23. Saeed, S., Yousafzai, S. Y., Yani-De-Soriano, M. ve Muffatto, M. (2013). The role of perceived university support in the formation of students’ entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(2), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12020
24. Shirokova, G., Osiyevskyy, O. ve Bogatyreva, K. (2016). Exploring the intention-behavior link in student entrepreneurship: Moderating effects of individual and environmental characteristics. European Management Journal, 34(4), 386-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.12.007
25. Sullivan, D. M. ve Meek, W. R. (2012). Gender and entrepreneurship: A review of the recent literature and future directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 429-442.
26. Trivedi, R. (2016). Does university play significant role in shaping entrepreneurial intention? A cross-country comparative analysis. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23(3), 790-811.
27. Turker, D. ve Selcuk, S. S. (2009). Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students?. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(2), 142-159.
28. Van Stel, A., Storey, D. J. ve Thurik, A. R. (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28(2-3), 171-186.
29. Yurtkoru, E. S., Kabadayı-Kuşçu, Z. ve Doğanay, A. (2014). Exploring the antecedents of entrepreneurial intention in Turkish university students: The role of structural, relational and educational support. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 841-850.
30. Zhang, Y., Duysters, G. ve Cloodt, M. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students’ entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(3), 623-641.