The Effect of Responsible Leadership and Autonomous Environmental Motivatıon on Voluntary Green Behavior: A Research in the Banking Sector

Öz

The purpose of this research is to determine the effects of responsible leadership and autonomous environmental motivation on voluntary green behavior. The population of the research consists of 1830 bank employees working in Balıkesir province. The sample of the research consists of 340 bank employees working in Bandırma district and Balıkesir city center. Data was obtained through survey. Frequency, reliability, exploratory factor, normality, correlation, multiple regression analyses were performed with the data obtained. As a result of the multiple regression analysis, it was determined that responsible leadership had a significant and positive effect on voluntary green behavior. However, it was determined that autonomous environmental motivation did not have a significant effect on voluntary green behavior. The fact that there are very few studies in the literature regarding the variables subject to the research and that the effects of responsible leadership and autonomous environmental motivation on voluntary green behavior will be discussed in this study will reveal the unique aspect of the research. In the conclusion section, suggestions are presented in the light of the research findings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Responsible leadership
• Autonomous environmental motivation
• Voluntary green behavior
• Bank.

Sorumlu Liderliğin ve Otonom (Özerk) Çevre Motivasyonunun Gönüllü Yeşil Davranış Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı sorumlu liderliğin ve otonom (özerk) çevre motivasyonunun gönüllü yeşil davranış üzerindeki etkilerini belirlemektir. Araştırmanın evrenini Balıkesir ilinde ve ilçelerinde görev yapan 1830 banka personeli oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemini Bandırma ilçesi ve Balıkesir il merkezinde görev yapan 340 banka personeli oluşturmaktadır. Veriler anket yolu ile elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen verilerle frekans analizi, güvenilirlik analizi, keşfedici faktör analizi, normallik testi, korelasyon analizi ve çoklu regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Yapılan çoklu regresyon analizinin neticesinde sorumlu liderliğin gönüllü yeşil davranış üzerinde anlamlı ve olumlu etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ancak otonom (özerk) çevre motivasyonunun gönüllü yeşil davranış üzerinde anlamlı etkisi olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Araştırmaya konu olan değişkenlerle ilgili literatürde oldukça az sayıda çalışmanın olması ve bu çalışmada sorumlu liderlik ile otonom (özerk) çevre motivasyonunun gönüllü yeşil davranış üzerindeki etkilerinin ele alınacak olması, araştırmanın özgün yönünü ortaya koyacaktır. Sonuç bölümünde araştırma bulguları ışığında öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sorumlu liderlik
• Otonom çevre motivasyonu
• Gönüllü yeşil davranış
• Banka.

Kaynakça

1. Afsar, B., Maqsoom, A., Shahjehan, A., Afridi, S. A., Nawaz, A. ve Fazliani, H. (2020). Responsible leadership and employee's proenvironmental behavior: The role of organizational commitment, green shared vision, and internal environmental locus of control. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 297-312.
2. Ahmed, F., Faraz, N. A., Xiong, Z. ve Ma, Y. (2023). The multilevel interplay of responsible leadership with leader identification and autonomous motivation to cultivate voluntary green behavior. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2, 1-29.
3. Akandere, G. (2019). Çalışanların çevresel tutkusunun yeşil davranışları üzerindeki etkisi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(04), 387-404.
4. Amrutha, V. N. ve Geetha, S. N. (2021). Linking organizational green training and voluntary workplace green behavior: Mediating role of green supporting climate and employees’ green satisfaction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125876.
5. Barszcz, S. J., Oleszkowicz, A. M., Bąk, O. ve Słowińska, A. M. (2023). The role of types of motivation, life goals, and beliefs in pro-environmental behavior: The self-determination theory perspective. Current Psychology, 42(21), 17789-17804.
6. Bauer, T.N. ve Aiman-Smith, L. (1996). Green career choices: The influence of ecological stance on recruiting. Journal of Business Psychology., 10, 445-458.
7. Bissing-Olson, M.J., Iyer, A., Fielding, K.S. ve Zacher, H. (2012). Relationships between daily affect and pro-environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitude. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 156-175.
8. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

9. Boiral, O. (2009). Greening the corporation through organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 221-236.
10. Bronson, S. (2016). Autonomy support environment and autonomous motivation on nursing student academic performance: An exploratory analysis. Nurse Education Today, 44, 103-108.
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A. Yayıncılık.
12. Cai, X., Zhu, B., Zhang, H., Li, L. ve Xie, M. (2020). Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Science Of The Total Environment, 746, 140810.
13. Cameron, K. (2011). Responsible leadership as virtuous leadership. Responsible Leadership, 2, 25-35.
14. Chen, X., Li, Y., Hu, Y. ve Yu, G. (2023). The impact of general manager’s responsible leadership and executive compensation incentive on enterprise ESG performance. Sustainability, 15(15), 118-133.
15. Chaudhary, R. (2020). Green human resource management and employee green behavior: an empirical analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 630-641.
16. Ciocirlan, C. E. (2017). Environmental workplace behaviors: Definition matters. Organization & Environment, 30(1), 51-70.
17. Çetin, A. ve Şentürk, M. (2016). Bilgi Paylaşma Davranışının Planlı Davranış Teorisi ve Sosyal Değişim Teorisi Bağlamında İncelenmesi: Dermatologlar Üzerine Ampirik Bir Araştırma. Ege Academic Review, 16(2).
18. Daily, B.F., Bishop, J.W. ve Govindarajulu, N. A (2009). Conceptual model for organizational citizenship behavior directed toward the environment. Business & Society, 48, 243–256.
19. Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
20. Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 182-185.
21. De Young, R. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 509-526
22. Epstein, M. J. ve Buhovac, A. R. (2010). Solving the sustainability implementation challenge. Organizational Dynamics, 39(4), 306.
23. Fernet, C., Gillet, N., Austin, S., Trépanier, S. G. ve Drouin-Rousseau, S. (2021). Predicting nurses’ occupational commitment and turnover intention: The role of autonomous motivation and supervisor and coworker behaviors. Journal Of Nursing Management, 29, 2611-2619.
24. Gagné, M. ve Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
25. Green-Demers, I., Pelletier, L. ve Ménard, S. (1997). The impact of behavioral difficulty on the saliency of the association between self-determined motivation and environmental behaviors. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 29, 157-166.
26. Groeneveld, R. A. (1998). A class of quantile measures for kurtosis. The American Statistician, 52(4), 325-329.
27. Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri felsefe-yöntem-analiz. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
28. Hadi, N. U. ve Rasool, F. (2017). Environmental transformational leadership and employee pro-envirnmental behaviours: The bridging role of autonomous motivation. Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences, 10, 42-53.
29. Han, Z., Wang, Q. ve Yan, X. (2019). How responsible leadership motivates employees to engage in organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: A double-mediation model. Sustainability, 11(3), 60-65.
30. Haşıloğlu, S. B., Baran, T. ve Aydın, O. (2015). Pazarlama araştırmalarındaki potansiyel problemlere yönelik bir araştırma: Kolayda örnekleme ve sıklık ifadeli ölçek maddeleri. Pamukkale İşletme ve Bilişim Yönetimi Dergisi, 1, 19-28.
31. Huang, L., Guo, Z., Deng, B. ve Wang, B. (2023). Unlocking the relationship between environmentally specific transformational leadership and employees’ green behaviour: A cultural self-representation perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 134-148.
32. Ismail, S. S. M. ve Hilal, O. A. (2023). Behaving green who takes the lead? The role of responsible leadership, psychological ownership, and green moral identity in motivating employees green behaviors. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 42(4), 11-29.
33. Javed, M., Rashid, M. A., Hussain, G. ve Ali, H. Y. (2020). The effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate reputation and firm financial performance: Moderating role of responsible leadership. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1395-1409.
34. Jeno, L. M., Nylehn, J., Hole, T. N., Raaheim, A., Velle, G. ve Vandvik, V. (2023). Motivational determinants of students’ academic functioning: The role of autonomy-support, autonomous motivation, and perceived competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(2), 194-211.
35. Johnson, R. A. ve Wichern, D. W. (2002). Applied multivariate statistical analysis.
36. Kalaycı, N. (2010). Yükseköğretimde proje istikrarına ilişkin bir uygulama projesinin yönetimini açısından analiz eder. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(147), 85-105.
37. Kaplan, H. ve Madjar, N. (2015). Autonomous motivation and pro-environmental behaviours among Bedouin students in Israel: A self-determination theory perspective. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 31(2), 223-247.
38. Kerse, G., Maden, Ş. ve Selçuk, E. T. (2021). Yeşil dönüştürücü liderlik, yeşil içsel motivasyon ve çalışanın yeşil davranışı: Ölçek uyarlama ve ilişki tespiti, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(2), 1574-1591.
39. Kim, A., Kim, Y., Han, K., Jackson, S. E. ve Ployhart, R. E. (2017). Multilevel influences on voluntary workplace green behavior: Individual differences, leader behavior, and coworker advocacy. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1335-1358.
40. Kline, T. J. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage publications.
41. Kollmuss, A. ve Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
42. Maqsoom, A., Umer, M., Alaloul, W. S., Salman, A., Ullah, F., Ashraf, H. ve Musarat, M. A. (2023). Adopting green behaviors in the construction sector: The role of behavioral intention, motivation and environmental consciousness. Buildings, 13(4), 10-36.
43. Norton, T. A., Zacher, H. ve Ashkanasy, N. M. (2014). Organisational sustainability policies and employee green behaviour: The mediating role of work climate perceptions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 49-54.
44. Onurlubaş, E. ve Öztürk, D. (2020). Hizmet kalitesinin müşteri memnuniyeti üzerindeki etkisi: Butik oteller üzerine bir uygulama. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 756-766.
45. Osbaldiston, R. ve Sheldon, K.M. (2003). Promoting internalized motivation for environmentally responsible behavior: A prospective study of environmental goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 349-357.
46. Osbaldiston, R. ve Sheldon, K. M. (2003). Promoting internalized motivation for environmentally responsible behavior: A prospective study of environmental goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(4), 349-357.
47. Li, Z., Xue, J., Li, R., Chen, H. ve Wang, T. (2020). Environmentally specific transformational leadership and employee’s pro-environmental behavior: The mediating roles of environmental passion and autonomous motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1408-1420.
48. Liu, A., Ma, E., Qu, H. ve Ryan, B. (2020). Daily green behavior as an antecedent and a moderator for visitors’ pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(9), 1390-1408.
49. Liu, R., Yue, Z., Ijaz, A., Lutfi, A. ve Mao, J. (2023). Sustainable business performance: examining the role of green HRM practices, green innovation and responsible leadership through the lens of pro-environmental behavior. Sustainability, 15(9), 7317.
50. Luu, T. T. (2023). Reducing unethical pro-organizational behavior in the hospitality sector through socially responsible human resource practices and responsible leadership. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(3), 706-734.
51. Maak, T. ve Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society–a relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 99-115.
52. Marques, T. M., Miska, C., Crespo, C. F. ve Branco, M. M. (2023). Responsible leadership during international assignments: a novel approach toward expatriation success. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(2), 253-285.
53. Norton, T. A., Parker, S. L., Zacher, H. ve Ashkanasy, N. M. (2015). Employee green behavior: A theoretical framework, multilevel review, and future research agenda. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 103-125.
54. Pelletier, L., Tuson, K., Green-Demers, I., Noels, K. ve Beaton, A. (1998). Why are you doing things for the environment? The Motivation Toward the Environment Scale (MTES). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 437-468.
55. Pelletier, L. (2002). A motivational analysis of self-determination for proenvironmental behaviors. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
56. Penner, L. A. (2002). Dispositional and organizational influences on sustained volunteerism: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 447-467.
57. Peters, J. ve Simaens, A. (2020). Integrating sustainability into corporate strategy: A case study of the textile and clothing industry. Sustainability, 12(15), 612-625.
58. Robertson, J. L. ve Barling, J. (2017). Toward a new measure of organizational environmental citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Research, 75, 57-66.
59. Séguin, C., Pelletier, L. G. ve Hunsley, J. (1999). Predicting environmental behaviors: The influence of self-determined motivation and information about perceived environmental health risks. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1582-1604.
60. Shah, S. H. A., Fahlevi, M., Jamshed, K., Aman, N., Rafiq, N., Jermsittiparsert, K. ve Aljuaid, M. (2023). Sustaining the earth: unraveling the synergy of workplace spirituality, responsible leadership, and pro-environmental behavior in pakistan’s SMEs. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 1, 3075-3093.
61. Sobaih, A. E. E., Hasanein, A., Gharbi, H. ve Abu Elnasr, A. E. (2022). Going green together: effects of green transformational leadership on employee green behaviour and environmental performance in the Saudi food industry. Agriculture, 12(8), 1100-1114.
62. Sovey, S., Osman, K. ve Mohd-Matore, M. E. (2022). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for disposition levels of computational thinking instrument among secondary school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 639-652.
63. Tasman, D. R. ve Aydoğmuş, M. E. (2022). İlişki kalitesinde temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların önemi: Öz belirleme kuramı ve temel ilişki türleri temelinde bir derleme. Nesne Dergisi, 10(24): 294-315.
64. Tian, H. ve Suo, D. (2021). The trickle-down effect of responsible leadership on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors: Evidence from the hotel industry in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 116-127.
65. Topbaş, Z. S., ve Karakaya, A. (2021). Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu Öğrencilerinde Dürtüsellik Düzeyleri ve Sosyal Medya Bağımlılığı Arasındaki İlişki. Bağımlılık Dergisi, 22(4): 360-369.
66. Tuan, L. T. (2022). Promoting employee green behavior in the Chinese and Vietnamese hospitality contexts: the roles of green human resource management practices and responsible leadership. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 105, 103-125.
67. Uddin, M. A., Akter, R., Al-Amin, M., Rahman, M. S. ve Ferdausy, S. (2020). How do socially responsible human resource management and voluntary green behavior influence organizational competitiveness?. Studies in Business and Economics, 15(2), 243-255.
68. Wu, J., Font, X. ve Liu, J. (2021). Tourists’ pro-environmental behaviors: Moral obligation or disengagement?. Journal of Travel Research, 60(4), 735-748.
69. Xiao, J., Mao, J. Y., Huang, S. ve Qing, T. (2020). Employee-organization fit and voluntary green behavior: a cross-level model examining the role of perceived insider status and green organizational climate. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2193-2207.
70. Voegtlin, C. (2012). Development of a scale measuring discursive responsible leadership. Springer Netherlands, 1, 57-73.
71. Yıldırım, F. B. (2020). Hizmetkâr liderliğin kariyer başarısı üzerindeki etkisinde lider-üye etkileşiminin aracı rolü: Belediye çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. İstinye Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
72. Ying, M., Faraz, N. A., Ahmed, F. ve Raza, A. (2020). How does servant leadership foster employees’ voluntary green behavior? A sequential mediation model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1792-1806.
73. Zhao, C. ve Liang, L. (2023). A study on the influence of environmental responsible leadership on employee pro-environmental behavior. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 1, 1-12.
74. Zhang, J., Ul-Durar, S., Akhtar, M. N., Zhang, Y. ve Lu, L. (2021). How does responsible leadership affect employees’ voluntary workplace green behaviors? A multilevel dual process model of voluntary workplace green behaviors. Journal of Environmental Management, 296, 113-125.
75. Zhao, H. ve Zhou, Q. (2019). Exploring the impact of responsible leadership on organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: A leadership identity perspective. Sustainability, 11(4), 931-944.
76. Zhou, Y., Ning, Y., He, H. ve Li, D. (2022). How and when does responsible leadership affect employees’ pro-environmental behavior?. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-12.