THE CONTRIBUTION OF ETWINNING PROJECT PRACTICES ON STUDENTS’ ENGLISH LEARNING PROCESS

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 16, 152 - 171, 30.12.2019

Bilge Akıncı , Ramazan Sağ

Öz

The
aim of this study is to determine the contribution of eTwinning project
practices to foreign language skills and the engagement of students to the
courses. In the study, an eTwinning Project of which aim was to enrich the
English teaching process by web 2.0 tools was conducted. Action research model
was used in the study. Working group was of the students of 3/A class in a
primary school in the city centre of Isparta, Turkey. A graded scoring form,
student outputs, focus group discussions, researcher’s log, photographs and
videos recorded during the classes are the data collection tools. Acquired
qualitative data was expressed by frequency and percentage statistics and
analysed by content analysis. In the study, that eTwinning project practices
affects foreign language teaching processes positively was deduced. Another result
of the study is eTwinning project practices affect the engagement of students
to the courses positively by increasing their motivation. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

eTwinning, web 2.0 tools, computer assisted language learning

Kaynakça

• Akdemir, A. S. (2017). eTwinning in language learning: The perspectives of successful teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 8 (10), 182-190. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316597722_eTwinning_in_Language_Learning_The_Perspectives_of_Successful_Teachers
• Bahrani, T. (2011). Computer assisted language learning – some aspects. Language in India, 11(9), 271-278.
• Bilgiç, H. G., Duman, D. & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2011). The characteristics of digital natives’ and their effects of on the design of online environments. 13rd Academic Infromatics Conference, 2 - 4 Feb 2011: İnönü University, Malatya.
• Bozdağ, Ç. (2017). Technology integration in Turkish and German schools: A comparative analysis of eTwinning. Journal of Ege Education Technologies 1 (1) July 2017, 42-64. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/322113
• Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society (2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell.
• eTwinning. (2017). https://www.eTwinning.net/tr/pub/about.htm
• Garrett, N. (1991). Technology in the service of language learning: Trends and issues. Modern Language Journal 75 (1), 74-101. Retieved from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb01085.x
• Gouseti, A. (2013), ‘Old wine in even newer bottles’: the uneasy relationship between web 2.0 technologies and European school collaboration. European Journal of Education, 48, ss. 570–585. Retrieved from: https://onlinelibrary.Wiley.com /doi /pdf/10.1111/ejed.12051
• Gülnar, S. & Yatağan, M. (2014) “eTwinning: European schools online network” TBD 31st National Informatics Congress, Ankara. Retrieved from: https://www.tbd.org.tr/31-ulusal-bilisim-kurultayi-bildiriler-kitabi/
• Gülnar S. (2015). Designed based learning and web 2.0 Tools in eTwinning: Community for schools in Europa. 17th Academic Informatics Conference, 4-6 Feb 2015: Eskişehir. Retrieved from: https://ab.org.tr/ab15/bildiri/179.docx
• Hartoyo, M. (2006). Individual differences in computer assisted language learning (CALL). Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang Press.
• Krashen, S. D. (1992). Fundamentals of language education. Chicago: Laredo Publishing.
• Krashen, S. D. (2003). Explorations in language acquisition and use. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
• Mills, G. E. (2003). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
• O’Reilly, T. (2005). What Is web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html.
• Peachey, N. (2009). Web 2.0 tools for teachers. Retrieved from: https://tr.scribd.com/doc/19576895/ Web-2-0-Tools-for-Teachers Pereira Coutinho C. & Rocha C. (2007). The eTwinning project: A study with Portuguese 9th grade students.
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9 (5), 1-6. Prentza, A. (2013). CLIL & ICT in English foreign language learning: The eTwinning experience of a primary school of intercultural education. International Conference "ICT for Learning" 6th edition.
• Rampone, S. (2013). eCLIL4You a European Comenius project to promote language learning through web 2.0 tools from pre-school to lower secondary education. International Conference "ICT for Learning" 6th edition.
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education (MEB), (2017). English curriculum (Primary and secondary 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th grades): Ankara.
• Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Tapscot, D. (2009). Grown up digital. London: McGraw-Hill.
• Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer assisted language learning: An introduction. Retrieved from: http://www.ict4lt.org/en/warschauer.htm
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yılmaz F. & Altun Yılmaz S. (2012). A multicultural project: Students' views on the eTwinning applications. Dicle University Journal of Social Sciences, 4(5), 120-132.