BİR ORTAÖĞRETİM ÖĞRETMEN ADAYININ GELİŞİMİNİN İNCELENMESİ: ÖĞRETİM İÇİN ÇIKARIMLARI

Öz

Bu çalışmada bir matematik öğretmen adayının fonksiyon kavramı ile ilgili alan bilgisindeki 

eksiklikleri incelemeyi ve bu eksikliklerin öğretmen adayının üstel fonksiyon konusunu, bir grup lise 

öğrencisine anlatırken nasıl etkilediğini belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Dersi planlama ve planladığı dersi

öğretme sürecinde, öğretmen adayının alan bilgisindeki ve pedagojik alan bilgisindeki eksiklikler 

belirlendi. Elde edilen bulgular, öğretmen adayının kavram yanılgılarının olduğunu ve öğretme 

sürecinde bu kavram yanılgılarını öğrencilerine aktardığını gösterdi. 

Anahtar Sözcükler: Öğretmen Adayı, Alan Bilgisi, Pedagojik Alan Bilgisi, Fonksiyon. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Kaynakça

1. Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 449–466.
2. Ball, D. L., & McDiarmid, G.W. (1990). The subject-matter preparation of teachers. In W.R. Houston (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 437–449). New York, NY: MacMillan.
3. Cooney T. J. (1994). Research and teacher education: In search of common ground. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 608–636.
4. Cooney, T. J. (1996). Mathematics, pedagogy, and secondary teacher education: Developing a topic across the curriculum: Functions. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
5. Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method
6. approaches. London: Sage.
7. Even, R. (1989). Prospective secondary teachers’ knowledge and understanding about mathematical functions, Michigan State University, unpublished PhD thesis.
8. Even, R. (1993). Subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Prospective secondary teachers and the functions concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 94–116.

9. Even, R., & Tirosh, D. (1995). Subject-matter knowledge and knowledge about students as sources of teacher presentations of the subject matter. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 1–20.
10. Fernandez, M. L. (2005). Learning through microteaching lesson study in teacher preparation. Action in Teacher Education, 26, 37–47.
11. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park London: Sage Publications.
12. Merriam, S.B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Sanchez, V., & Llinares, S. (2003). Four student teachers’ pedagogical reasoning on functions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 5–25.
14. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
15. Wiersma, W. (2000). Research methods in education: An introduction (7th ed.). Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Wilson, M. R. (1992). A study of three preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about functions. Dissertation, University of Georgia.
17. Wilson, M. R. (1994). One preservice secondary teacher’s understanding of function: the impact of a course integrating mathematical content and pedagogy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 346–270.
18. Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). “150 ways of knowing”: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Carlderhead (Eds.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp.104–124). London: Cassell.