Ergenler için Deprem Sonrası Bilişler Ölçeği’nin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları

Öz

Bilişsel yaklaşıma göre bireylerin yaşadıkları travmatik bir olay karşısında vereceği tepkiler bireyin bilişleri ile ilişkilidir. Buradan hareketle deprem deneyimlemiş ergenlerin deprem sonrası ruh sağlığı sorunları yaşamalarında ve sorunların kronikleşmesinde bilişlerinin önemli rolü olduğu söylenebilir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, deprem deneyimlemiş olan ergenlerin deprem sonrası bilişlerini değerlendirmeye dönük olarak geçerli ve güvenilir ölçümler yapan bir ölçme aracı geliştirmektir. Çalışma 854 deprem deneyimlemiş lise öğrencisinin (Erkek = 337, %39,5; Kadın = 517, %60,5) katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ölçeğin geçerlik değerlendirmeleri için uzman görüşü, açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri, ölçüt geçerliliği, yakınsak geçerlilik ve ayırt edici geçerlik analizleri yapılmıştır. Yapılan tüm geçerlilik ölçümleri neticesinde ölçeğin 16 maddeli ve 4 faktörlü yapısının bahsi geçen tüm geçerlilik kriterlerini sağladığı tespit edilmiştir. Güvenirlik ölçümleri için ise kompozit güvenirlik değerleri, iç tutarlılık katsayıları ve test-tekrar test korelasyonları incelenmiştir. Ölçeğin tüm güvenirlik ölçümlerinin de güvenirlik kriterlerini sağladığı görülmüştür. Tüm bunlardan hareketle 16 madde 4 boyutlu Ergenler için Deprem Sonrası Bilişler Ölçeği’nin lise öğrencilerinde geçerli ve güvenilir ölçümler yaptığı tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Deprem sonrası bilişler
• ölçek
• bilişsel yaklaşım
• geçerlik ve güvenirlik

Development of Post-Earthquake Cognitions Scale for Adolescents: Validity and Reliability Studies

Abstract

According to the cognitive approach, how individuals will be affected by a traumatic event and their mental health are related to their cognitions. From this point of view, it can be said that cognitions play an important role in the post-earthquake mental health problems of adolescents who have experienced an earthquake and in the chronicisation of these problems. The main purpose of this study is to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to assess the post-earthquake cognitions of adolescents who have experienced an earthquake. The study was conducted with the participation of 854 high school students (Male = 337, 39.5%; Female = 517, 60.5%) who experienced an earthquake. Expert opinion, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, criterion validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity analyses were conducted for validity assessments of the scale. As a result of all validity measurements, it was determined that the scale met all validity criteria. For reliability measurements, composite reliability values, internal consistency coefficients, and test-retest correlations were analyzed. It was seen that the scale met the reliability criteria of all reliability measurements. Based on all these, it was determined that the 16-item, 4-dimensional Post-Earthquake Cognitions Scale for Adolescents is valid and reliable for high school students.

Keywords

• post-earthquake
• cognitions
• scale
• cognitive approach
• validity and reliability

Kaynakça

1. Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı-AFAD. (2023). 06 Şubat 2023 Pazarcık-Elbistan Kahramanmaraş (Mw: 7.7 – Mw: 7.6) Depremleri raporu. AFAD. https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/assets/pdf/Kahramanmaraş%20Depremi%20%20Raporu_02.06.2023.pdf
2. Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı-AFAD. (2024). https://www.afad.gov.tr/%C4%B0%C3%A7i%C5%9Fleri%20Bakan%C4%B1m%C4%B1z%20Say%C4%B1n%20Ali%20Yerlikaya,%206%20%C5%9Eubat%20depremleri%20sonras%C4%B1%20yap%C4%B1lan%20%C3%A7al%C4%B1%C5%9Fmalara%20ili%C5%9Fkin%20a%C3%A7%C4%B1klamalarda%20bulundu_2-merkezicerik
3. Akbaş, U. & Koğar, H. (2020). Nicel araştırmalarda kayıp veriler ve uç değerler: Çözüm önerileri ve SPSS uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi.
4. Anadolu Ajansı. (2025). Depremde yıkılan Ekim Apartmanı'na ilişkin yeni bilirkişi raporu hazırlandı. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/asrin-felaketi/depremde-yikilan-ekim-apartmanina-iliskin-yeni-bilirkisi-raporu-hazirlandi-/3474123
5. Ataç, M. & Özsezer G. (2021). Depremden etkilenen çocuk ve ergenlerin ruhsal durumu ve hemşirelik yaklaşımı. Acil Yardım ve Afet Bilimi Dergisi, 1(1) 22-27.
6. Aytaç, S., Ovayolu, Ö., & Serçe, S. (2025). The Level of Trauma and Hopelessness of Survivor Nursing Students of the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes: The Case of Türkiye. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 19, e4. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2024.345
7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Henry Holt.
8. Beck, A. T. (1987). Cognitive models of depression. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 1(1), 5–37.

9. Beck, A. T., & Haigh, E. A. (2014). Advances in cognitive theory and therapy: The generic cognitive model. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153734
10. Belsley, D. A. (1991). Conditioning diagnostics: Collinearity and weak data in regression. John Wiley ve Sons.
11. Benight, C. C., & Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(10), 1129–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.008
12. Bernardi, J., Engelbrecht, A., & Jobson, L. (2019). The impact of culture on cognitive appraisals: Implications for the development, maintenance, and treatment o posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinical Psychologist, 23 (2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.1216
13. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet (London, England), 1(8476), 307–310.
14. Briere, J. (2000). Cognitive distortion scales. Psychological Assessment Resources.
15. Brown, L. A., Belli, G. M., Asnaani, A., & Foa, E. B. (2019). A review of the role of negative cognitions about oneself, others, and the world in the treatment of PTSD. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 43, 143–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9938-1
16. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (ss. 136–162). Sage Publications.
17. Brunner, M., & Süß, H.M. (2005). Analyzing the reliability of multidimensional measures: an example from ıntelligence research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404268669
18. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Yayıncılık.
19. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çokluk, Ö., & Köklü, N. (2013). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik. Pegem Akademi.
20. Cahill, S. P. & Foa, E. B. (2007). Psychological theories of PTSD. In Friedman, M. J., Keane, T. M., Resick, P. A. (Eds.) Handbook of PTSD: Science and practice (pp. 55-77). Guilford Press.
21. Caruso, G. & Miller, S. (2015). Long run effects and intergenerational transmission of natural disasters: A case study on the 1970 Ancash Earthquake. Journal of Development Economics, 117, 134-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.07.012
22. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
23. Cénat, J. M., McIntee, S. E., & Blais-Rochette, C. (2020). Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety and other mental health problems following the 2010 earthquake in Haiti: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 273, 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.04.046
24. Center of Research on the Epidemiology of Disaster [CRED]. (2023). 2022 Disasters in numbers. https://www.un-spider.org/news-and-events/news/cred-publication-2022-disasters-numbers
25. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
26. Cuaresma, J. C. (2010). Natural disasters and human capital accumulation. The World Bank Economic Review, 24(2), 280-302.
27. Dai, W., Chen, L., Lai, Z., Li, Y., Wang, J., & Liu, A. (2016). The incidence of post-traumatic stress disorder among survivors after earthquakes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 188. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0891-9
28. Davis, L.L.(1992). “Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts”. Applied Nursing Research, 5, 194-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4
29. Deng, L., & Chan, W. (2017). Testing the Difference Between Reliability Coefficients Alpha and Omega. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416658325
30. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications. DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2022). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage Publications
31. Dunmore, E., Clark, D. M.,& Ehlers, A. (1999). Cognitive factors involved in the onset and maintenance of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after physical or sexual assault. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37(9), 809-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00181-8
32. Ehlers, A., & Clark, D. M. (2000). A cognitive model of post- traumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(4), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00123-0
33. Epstein, S. (1991). Impulse control and self-destructive behavior. In L. P. Lipsitt & L. L. Mitick (Eds.), Self-regulatory behavior and risk-taking: Causes and consequences (pp. 273-284). Ablex.
34. Erarslan, Ö. & Işıklı, S. (2019). Bilişsel Üçlü Envanteri’nin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Arch Neuropsychiatry, 56, 32-39. https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.19390
35. Eroğlu, M., & Yaksı, N. (2025). Long-term psychopathology rates of children and adolescents and associated factors in the worst-sticken area of 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 79(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2430245
36. Farooqui, M., Quadri, S. A., Suriya, S. S., Khan, M. A., Ovais, M., Sohail, Z., Shoaib, S., Tohid, H., & Hassan, M. (2017). Posttraumatic stress disorder: a serious post-earthquake complication. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 39(2) 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2016-0029
37. Foa, E.B., Steketee, G., & Rothbaum, B. O., (1989). Behavioral/cognitive conceptualizations of post-traumatic stress disorder. Behavior Therapy, 20, 155-176. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S0005-7894(89)80067-X
38. Ford, J. K., MacCallum, R. C., & Tait, M. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39(2), 291 314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.x
39. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
40. Gomez, C. J., & Yoshikawa, H. (2017). Earthquake effects: Estimating the relationship between exposure to the 2010 Chilean earthquake and preschool children’s early cognitive and executive function skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 38, 127 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.08.004
41. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
42. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203
43. Han, Z., Wang, L., & Cui, K. (2021). Trust in stakeholders and social support: risk perception and preparedness by the Wenchuan earthquake survivors. Environmental Hazards, 20(2), 132-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2020.1725410
44. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
45. Hoffman, B., & Schraw, G. (2009). The influence of self-efficacy and working memory capacity on problem-solving efficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.08.001
46. Hoffman, B., & Spatariu, A. (2008). The influence of self-efficacy and metacognitive prompting on math problem-solving efficiency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.07.002
47. Hogarty, K. Y., Hines, C. V., Kromrey, J. D., Ferron, J. M., & Mumford, K. R. (2005). The Quality of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: The Influence of sample size, communality, and overdetermination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 202-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404267287
48. Howard, M. C. (2016). A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664
49. Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2017). Research methods in psychology. Pearson Education Limited.
50. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
51. Janoff-Bulman, R. (2002). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. Free Press.
52. Kahn, J. H. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, practice: Principles, advances, and applications. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 684–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286347
53. Kalaycı, Ş. (2014). SPSS uygulamaları çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (6.Baskı). Asil Yayınevi.
54. Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2001). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (5th ed.). Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
55. Kar, N., & Bastia, B. K. (2006). Post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and generalised anxiety disorder in adolescents after a natural disaster: A study of comorbidity. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 2, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-2-17
56. Karabulut, D. & Bekler, T. (2019). Doğal afetlerin çocuklar ve ergenler üzerindeki etkileri. Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Dergisi, 5 (2) , 368-376 . https://doi.org/10.21324/dacd.500356
57. Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
58. Kılıç, A. F., & Uysal, İ. (2019). Comparison of factor retention methods on binary data: A simulation study. Turkish Journal of Education, 8(3), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.518636
59. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation mod- elling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
60. Kuman-Tunçel, Ö. (2023). Deprem, kitlesel travma ve sonrası. Arch Neuropsychiatry, 60, 97-98. https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.2849
61. Kurt, E. & Gülbahçe, A. (2019). Van Depremini yaşayan öğrencilerin travma sonrası stres bozukluğu düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(3) , 957-972.
62. Kušević, Z., Krstanović, K., & Kroflin, K. (2021). Some psychological, gastrointestinal and cardiovascular consequences of earthquakes. Psychiatria Danubina, 33(Suppl 4), 1248–1253.
63. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
64. Liang, Y., & Ju, W. (2016). Interpersonal Trust and Ability of Elderly Victims to Perform Activities of Daily Living in the Ya'an Earthquake Reconstruction Area, China. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 10(5), 739–745. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2015.179
65. Liu, S., Lu, L., Bai, Z. Z., Su, M., Qi, Z. Q., Zhang, S. Y., Chen, Y., Ao, B. Y., Cui, F. Z., Lagarde, E., & Lii, K. (2019). Post-Traumatic Stress and School Adaptation in Adolescent Survivors Five Years after the 2010 Yushu Earthquake in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(21), 4167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214167
66. Lorenzo-Seva, U., Timmerman, M. E., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2011). The Hull method for selecting the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 340–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.564527
67. LoSavio, S. T., Dillon, K. H., & Resick, P. A. (2017). Cognitive factors in the development, maintenance, and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. Current Opinion in Psychology, 14, 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.09.006
68. Lu, Y., Yang, D., Niu, Y., Zhang, H., Du, B., & Jiang, X. (2020). Factors associated with the resilience of Tibetan adolescent survivors five years after the 2010 Yushu earthquake. PloS One, 15(4), e0231736. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231736
69. Luszczynska, A., Benight, C. C., & Cieslak, R. (2009). Self-efficacy and health-related outcomes of collective trauma: A systematic review. European Psychologist, 14(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.51
70. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
71. Mavruk, C., Cam, S., & Sengul, S. (2024). Moderated mediation role of trust in authorities by the Kahramanmaras earthquake survivors. Environmental Hazards, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2024.2419021
72. Mertler, C. A. & Vannatta, R. A. (2005). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: practical application and interpretation (third edition). Pyrczak Publishing.
73. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2023). Zorlayıcı yaşam olayları sonrası öğrenci psikoeğitim programı. https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/www/deprem-bolgesindeki-ogrencilerimiz-icin-yeni-programlarimiz-hazir/icerik/2622
74. Nijdam, M. J., & Wittmann, L. (2015). Psychological and social theories of PTSD. In U. Schnyder & M. Cloitre (Eds.), Evidence based treatments for trauma-related psychological disorders: A practical guide for clinicians (pp. 41–61). Springer International Publishing/Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07109-1_3
75. Niu, Y., Jiang, N., & Jiang, X. (2021). Factors related to the resilience of Tibetan adolescent survivors ten years after the Yushu earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 65, 102554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102554
76. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
77. Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge
78. Park, A., Sawada, Y., Wang, H., & Wang, S. (2015). Natural disaster and human capital accumulation: The case of the Great Sichuan Earthquake in China. In Y. Sawada, & S. Oum (Eds.), Disaster risks, social preferences, and policy effects: Field experiments in selected Asian and East Asian Countries (pp. 201–232). ERIA Research Project Report FY2013
79. Paudel, J., & Ryu, H. (2018). Natural disasters and human capital: The case of Nepal’s earthquake. World Development, 111, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.019
80. Resick, P. A., Monson, C. M. & Chard, K. M. (2008). Cognitive processing therapy: Therapist’s manual. Department of Veterans Affairs.
81. Riffle, O. M., Lewis, P. R. & Tedeschi R. G. (2020). Posttraumatic growth after disasters. In: Schulenberg S. E. (Ed.)., Positive psychological approaches to disaster: Meaning, resilience, and posttraumatic growth. Springer.
82. Rush, J. V. (2018). The impact of natural disasters on education in Indonesia. Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, 2, 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-017-0022-1
83. Sabuncuoğlu, O., Çevikaslan, A., & Berkem, M. (2003). Marmara depreminden etkilenen iki ayrı bölgede ergenlerde depresyon, kaygı ve davranış. Klinik Psikiyatri, 6, 189-197.
84. Salkovskis, P. M., Sighvatsson, M. B., & Sigurdsson, J. F. (2023). How effective psychological treatments work: Mechanisms of change in cognitive behavioural therapy and beyond. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 51(6), 595-615. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465823000590
85. Sert-Ağır, M. & Yavuzer, H. (2018). Bilişsel Çarpıtma Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formunun geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(26), 175-198. https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2018.172.10
86. Shaluf, I. M., Ahmadun, F. & Said, A. M. (2003). A review of disaster and crisis. Disaster Prevention and Management, 12(1), 24-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09653560310463829
87. Southward, M. W., Sauer-Zavala, S., & Cheavens, J. S. (2021). Specifying the mechanisms and targets of emotion regulation: A translational framework from affective science to psychological treatment. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 28(2), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000003
88. Soysal, S. (2023). Çok boyutlu test yapılarında alfa, tabakalı alfa ve omega güvenirlik katsayılarının karşılaştırılması. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), 213-236. https://doi.org/10.38151/akef.2023.51
89. Sugawara, Y., Tomata, Y., Sekiguchi, T., Yabe, Y., Hagiwara, Y., & Tsuji, I. (2020). Social trust predicts sleep disorder at 6 years after the Great East Japan earthquake: data from a prospective cohort study. BMC Psychology, 8(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00436-y
90. Suveg, C., & Zeman, J. (2004). Emotion regulation in children with anxiety disorders. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 53, 33(4), 750–759. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3304_10
91. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Ed. 6). Pearson.
92. Tanaka, E., Tsutsumi, A., Kawakami, N., Kameoka, S., Kato, H., & You, Y. (2016). Long-term psychological consequences among adolescent survivors of the Wenchuan earthquake in China: A cross-sectional survey six years after the disaster. Journal of Affective Disorders, 204, 255–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.001
93. Tang, W., Wang, Y., Lu, L., Lu, Y., & Xu, J. (2021). Post-traumatic growth among 5195 adolescents at 8.5 years after exposure to the Wenchuan earthquake: Roles of post-traumatic stress disorder and self-esteem. Journal of Health Psychology, 26(13), 2450–2459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320913947
94. Taycan, O. (2019). Travma sonrası stres bozukluğu fenomenolojisi. İçinde Aker, A.T., Taycan, O., & Çelik, F. (Eds.), Travma ve stresörle ilişkili bozukluklar. Türkiye Psikiyatri Derneği Yayınları.
95. Tortella-Feliu, M., Fullana, M. A., Pérez-Vigil, A., Torres, X., Chamorro, J., Littarelli, S. A., Solanes, A., Ramella-Cravaro, V., Vilar, A., González-Parra, J. A., Andero, R., Reichenberg, A., Mataix-Cols, D., Vieta, E., Fusar-Poli, P., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Stein, M. B., Radua, J., & Fernández de la Cruz, L. (2019). Risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 107, 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.013
96. Türkçapar, M. H. (2019). Depresyon: Klinik uygulamada bilişsel davranışçı terapi. Epsilon
97. Valenti, M., Vinciguerra, M. G., Masedu, F., Tiberti, S., & Sconci, V. (2012). A before and after study on personality assessment in adolescents exposed to the 2009 earthquake in L'Aquila, Italy: influence of sports practice. BMJ Open, 2(3), e000824. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000824
98. Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory Factor Analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807
99. Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A Content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
100. Xu, J., Wang, Y., Zhao, J., Tang, W., & Lu, Y. (2019). Influence of earthquake exposure and left-behind status on severity of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression in Chinese adolescents. Psychiatry Research, 275, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.109
101. Yaghmaei, N. (Eds.). (2020). Human cost of disasters: An overview of the last 20 years, 2000-2019. UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.
102. Yağcı Yetkiner, D. (2010). Travma Sonrası Bilişler Ölçeği; Türkçe uyarlama ve üniversite öğrencileri üzerinde geçerlik güvenirlik çalışması. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kocaeli Üniversitesi]. Ulusal Tez Merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=zD1B0cW7zVr3VcnZjitVXnMv0o8sUYee4uigXCU5jv-azDGkTHDt3lwjTWHKtqrt
103. Yakşi, N., & Eroğlu, M. (2024). Determinants of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) among children and adolescents in the subacute stage of Kahramanmaras earthquake, Turkey. Archives of Public Health, 82(1), 199. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01434-x
104. Yang, Y., Zhang, Y. & Qiao, Z. (2011). Related factors of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms among adolescents after Wenchuan Earthquake.Chinese Journal of Public Health, 27(7), 855-856. https://doi.org/10.11847/zgggws2011-27-07-18
105. Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74-85.
106. Yavrutürk, A. R., & Altun Kobul, F. (2024). Lise öğrencilerinin gözünden deprem olgusu: Kahramanmaraş Depreminin duygusal ve bilişsel yansımaları üzerine nitel bir çalışma. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, 7(3), 857-875. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1528690
107. Yu, M., Lin, H., Wang, G. G., Liu, Y., & Zheng, X. (2022). Is too much as bad as too little? The S-curve relationship between corporate philanthropy and employee performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(4), 1511–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09775-9
108. Zhang, Y., Kong, F., Wang, L., Chen, H., Gao, X., Tan, X., Chen, H., Lv, J., & Liu, Y. (2010). Mental health and coping styles of children and adolescent survivors one year after the 2008 Chinese earthquake. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(10), 1403–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.06.009