Uygulama Öğretmenlerinin Hizmet Öncesi Öğretmenlere Kuram-Uygulama Boşluğu Desteği: Bir Çevrimiçi Uygulama

Yıl 2018, , 590 - 601, 21.12.2018

Derya Yaylı

https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.484594

Cited By: 3

Öz

Öğretmen yetiştirme
süreçlerinin önemli paydaşlarından biri olan okullarda uygulama öğretmenlerinin
hizmet öncesi öğretmenlere vermiş olduğu destek son yıllarda bir çalışma konusu
olmuştur. Aynı zamanda uygulama okullarında yaşanan kuram-uygulama boşluğu
sorunu da çalışılmaktadır. Gelişen teknolojinin de ışığında, bu çalışmanın
amacı uygulama öğretmenlerinin uygulama okullarında öğretmen adaylarına
kuram-uygulama boşluğu açısından verdikleri desteği incelemektir. Bu nitel çalışmada
veri a) yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler, b) bir çevrimiçi yansıtma ve dönüt
ortamı ve c) bir odak grup görüşmesi yoluyla toplanmıştır. İçerik analizi
sonucunda söz konusu destekle ilgili olarak ortaya çıkan alt başlıklar;
danışman rolü-öğretmen rolü, yeni kuramsal bilgi ve kişilik özellikleri olarak
belirlenmiştir. Bulgular bu alt başlıklar ve çevrimiçi ortamda işbirliği
açılarında yorumlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hizmet öncesi öğretmen yetiştirme, Uygulama öğretmeni desteği, Kuram-uygulama boşluğu

Mentor Support to Pre-service Teachers on Theory-Practice Gap in Practicum: An Online Practice

Öz

Recent research has
put much emphasis on the mentor teacher as an important stakeholder of the
practicum period of teacher education. Also the issue of theory-practice gap
has been studied in the field. With the developing technology in mind, this
study aimed at investigating the mentor teacher support to pre-service teachers
on theory-practice gap issues during the practicum. The qualitative data were
collected through a) semi-structured interviews, b) online reflection and
feedback, and c) a focus group interview. As a result of the content analysis,
the emerging themes were mentor role vs. teacher role, knowledge of recent
theory and personality traits. The findings were discussed under these
sub-headings along with online collaboration among the participants.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Pre-service teacher education, Mentor support, Theory-practice gap

Kaynakça

• Allen, J. M. (2011). Stakeholders’ perspectives of the nature and role of assessment during practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 742–750.
• Allen, J. M., & Peach, D. (2007). Exploring connections between the in-field and on-campus components of a preservice teacher education program: A student perspective. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 8, 23–36.
• Allen, J.M. & Wright, S.E. (2014). Integrating theory and practice in the pre-service teacher education practicum, Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 20(2), 136-151.
• Bean, T. W. (2000). Reading in the content areas: Social constructivist dimensions. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (vol. 3, pp. 629–644). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
• Creswell, J. (2004). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
• Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th Edition). Los Angeles: Sage. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 166–173.
• Delaney, Y.A. (2012). Research on mentoring language teachers: Its role in language education. Foreign Language Annals, 45, S1, 184-202.
• Genç, Z.S. (2016). More practice for pre-service teachers and more theory for in-service teachers of English language. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 677–683.
• Grimmett, H., Forgasz, R., Williams, J., & White, S. (2018). Reimagining the role of mentor teachers in professional experience: moving to I as fellow teacher educator. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(4), 340-353.
• Jaspers, W.M., Meijer, P.C., Prins, F. & Wubbels, T. (2014). Mentor teachers: Their perceived possibilities and challenges as mentor and teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 106-116.
• Korhonen, H., Heikkinen, H.L.T., Kiviniemi, U., & Tynjala, P. (2017). Student teachers' experiences of participating in mixed peer mentoring groups of in-service and pre-service teachers in Finland. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 153-163.
• Korthagen, F. A. J. (2010). How teacher education can make a difference. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36, 407–423.
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press
• Leshem, S. (2012). The many faces of mentor-mentee relationships in a pre-service teacher education programme. Creative Education, 3(4), 413-421.
• Liu, K.Y. (2012). A design framework for online teacher professional development communities. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(4), 701-711.
• Lofthouse, R. M. (2018). Re-imagining mentoring as a dynamic hub in the transformation of initial teacher education: The role of mentors and teacher educators. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 7(3), 248-260.
• Mallette, M. H., Kile, R. S., Smith, M. M., McKinney, M., & Readence, J. E. (2000). Constructing meaning about literacy difficulties: Preservice teachers beginning to think about pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5–6), 593–612.
• Moore, R. (2003). Reexamining the field experiences of preservice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 31–42.
• Nguyen, H.T.M., & Loughland, T. (2018) Pre-service teachers’ construction of professional identity through peer collaboration during professional experience: a case study in Australia. Teaching Education, 29(1), 81-97.
• Ottesen, E. (2007). Teachers “in the making”: Building accounts of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 612–623.
• Pillen, M., Beijaard, D., & den Brok, P. (2013). Tensions in beginning teachers' professional identity development, accompanying feelings and coping strategies. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36, 240-260.
• Pinho, A.S. & Andrade, A.I. (2015). Redefining professional identity: the voice of a language teacher in a context of collaborative learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(1), 21-40.
• Risko, V. J., Roskos, K., & Vukelich, C. (2002). Prospective teachers’ reflection: Strategies, qualities, and perceptions in learning to teach reading. Reading Research and Instruction, 41(2), 149–176.
• Taylor, A. (2008). Developing understanding about learning to teach in a university-schools partnership in England. British Educational Research Journal, 34, 63-90.
• Teräs, H. & Kartoğlu, Ü. (2017). A Grounded theory of professional learning in an authentic online professional development program. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7).
• Vick, M. (2006). It’s a difficult matter: Historical perspectives on the enduring problem of the practicum in teacher preparation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34, 181–198.
• Volante, L., & Earl, L. (2002). Teacher candidates’ perceptions of conceptual orientations in their preservice program. Canadian Journal of Education, 27(4), 419–438.
• Wolf, S. A., Ballentine, D., & Hill, L. A. (2000). “Only connect!”: Cross-cultural connections in the reading lives of preservice teachers and children. Journal of Literacy Research, 32, 533–569.
• Yayli, D. (2008). Theory-practice dichotomy in inquiry: Meanings and preservice teacher-mentor teacher tension in Turkish literacy classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 889–900.
• Yayli, D. (2017). Coping strategies of pre-service teachers of Turkish with tensions in achieving agency. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 68, 189-204
• Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 89–99.