DİJİTAL ÇELİNME: BİR KAVRAM ÇALIŞMASI

Yıl 2021, , 48 - 64, 28.01.2021

Adile Aşkım Kurt , Büşra Küçük , Meriç Boynukara , Ferhan Odabaşı

https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.691399

Cited By: 3

Öz

Günümüzde dijital cihazların kullanım oranı her geçen gün artmakta ve gelişen teknolojiler bireylerin hayatlarına daha kolay dahil olabilmektedir. Bireyler yeni teknolojileri kullanma yolunda kendilerini daha güdülenmiş hissetmekte, bunun sonucunda aktif olarak kullandıkları dijital cihazların sayısı ve bu cihazlarla geçirdikleri süre de eş zamanlı olarak artmaktadır. Çeşitli bağımlılıklara da neden olabilen bu cihazlar, bireylerin yaşantılarında gün geçtikçe daha çok yer kaplarken çeşitli üstünlük ve sınırlılıkları da beraberinde getirmektedir. Teknolojiyi yakından takip eden ve her yeni teknolojiyi denemek için güdülenmiş bir bireyin yakın çevresinde dizüstü bilgisayar, akıllı telefon, tablet, akıllı saat gibi çeşitli dijital cihazlar sürekli bulunabilmektedir. Bireylerin etrafındaki dijital cihazların sayısının ve sundukları olanakların artmasıyla birlikte günümüzde sıklıkla gerçekleştirilen davranışlarından biri olan “dijital çelinme” kavramını doğurmuştur. Bu çalışmada dijital çelinme kavramının, Türkçe alanyazına kazandırılması amaçlanmış ve beraberinde alanyazında geçen ilişkili kavramlar, nedenleri ve türleri bütüncül bir bakış açısıyla ele alınmaya çalışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

dijital çelinme, çoklu görev, sosyotelizm, siber aylaklık, dijital-e çelinme, dijital-de çelinme

Kaynakça

• Aagaard, J. (2014). Media multitasking, attention, and distraction: A critical discussion. Phenomenology & the Cognitive Sciences. 6 Aralık 2019 tarihinde http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9375-x adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Aagaard, J. (2015). Drawn to distraction: A qualitative study of off-task use of educational technology. Computers & Education, 87, 90-97.
• Aagaard, J. (2017). Digital Distraction: A Qualitative Exploration of Media Multitasking. PhD Dissertation. Aarhus: Aarhus University.
• Akbulut, Y., Dursun, Ö. Ö., Dönmez, O. & Şahin, Y. L. (2016). In search of a measure to investigate cyberloafing in educational settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 616-625.
• Al‐Saggaf, Y. & O'Donnell, S., B. (2019). Phubbing: Perceptions, reasons behind, predictors, and impacts. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 132-140.
• Anand, A., Chakraborty, T. & Park, N. (2017). We used neural networks to detect clickbaits: You won’t believe what happened next! Lecture Notes in Computer Science Advances in Information, 541–547.
• Anandarajan, M., Devine, P. & Simmers, C. A. (2004). A multidimensional sealing approach to personal web usage in the workplace. In M. Anandarajan & C. A. Simmers (Eds.), A personal web usage in the workplace: a guide to effective human resources management (pp. 61-78). Hensey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
• Askew, K., Buckner, J. E., Taing, M. U., Ilie, A., Jeremy, A.B. & Coovert, M. D. (2014). Explaining cyberloafing: The role of theory of planned behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 510-519.
• Berry, M. J. & Westfall, A. (2015). Dial D for distraction: The making and breaking of cell phone policies in the college classroom. College Teaching, 63(2), 62-71.
• Beranuy, M., Oberst, U., Carbonell, X. & Chamarro, A. (2009). Problematic Internet and mobile phone use and clinical symptoms in college students: The role of emotional intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (5), 1182-1187.
• Beranuy, M. Oberst, U. & Carbonell, X. (2013). The cell phone in the twenty-first century: A risk for addiction or a necessary tool. Principles of Addiction: Comprehensive Addictive Behaviors and Disorders, 1, 901-909.
• Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5), 28-37.
• Blanchard, A.L. & Henle, C.A. (2008) Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The Role of Norms and External Locus of Control. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1067-1084.
• Blau G., Yang Y. & Ward-Cook, K. (2006). Testing a measure of cyberloafing. Journal of Allied Health, 35(1), 9-17.
• Campbell, S. (2006). Perceptions of mobile phone in college classrooms: Ringing, cheating, and classroom policies. Communication Education, 55(3), 280-294.
• Candemir, A., Zalluhoğlu, A. E., Diyadin, A., ve Karslı, C. (2018). Öğrencilerin mobil kozalanma (mobile cocooning) davranışlarının analizi: İzmir Örneği. Pazarlama İçgörüsü Üzerine Çalışmalar, 2(1), 1-12.
• Casey, B. M. (2012). Linking psychological attributes to smartphone addiction, face-to-face communication, present absence and social capital. PhD dissertation. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
• Chakraborty, A., Paranjape, B., Kakarla, S. & Ganguly, N. (2016). Stop clickbait: Detecting and preventing clickbaits in online news media. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).
• Chen, L., Nath, R. & Insley, R. (2014). Determinants of digital distraction: A cross-cultural investigation of users in Africa, China and the U.S. Journal of International Technology & Information Management, 23(3/4), 145–171.
• Chen, Q. & Yan, Z. (2016). Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 34-42.
• Chen Y. F. & Katz J. (2009). Extending family to school life: College students use of the mobile phone. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(2), 179–191.
• Dahlstrom, E., & Bichsel, J. (2014). ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2014. Research Report. Louisville, CO: ECAR
• Dietz, S. & Henrich, C. (2014). Texting as a distraction to learning in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 163-167.
• Douglas K. D., Angel R. H. &Bethany R. W. (2012). Digital devices, distraction, and student performance: Does in-class cell phone use reduce learning? Astronomy Education Review, 11(1).
• Ergün E. ve Altun A. (2012). Öğrenci gözüyle siber aylaklık ve nedenleri. Eğitim Teknolojisi. Kuram ve Uygulama, 2(1), 36- 53.
• Foerde K., Knowlton B. J. & Poldrack R. A. (2006). Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 11778–11783.
• Froese, Arnold D., Carpenter, Christina N., Inman, Denyse A., Schooley, Jessica R., Barnes, Rebecca B., Brecht, Paul W., Chacon & Jasmin D. (2012). Effects of classroom cell phone use on expected and actual learning. College Student Journal, 46(2), 323-332.
• Genç, Ş. & Surer, E. (2019). Detecting Clickbait news on social media using machine learning algorithms. In 2019 27th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU). 1-4.
• Glassman, J., Prosch, M. & Shao, B. B. M. (2015). To monitor or not to monitor: Effectiveness of a cyberloafing countermeasure. Information & Management, 170-182.
• Günüç, S. (2011). Dijital yerlilerde çalışan bellek ve çoklu görev. 5. Uluslararası Bilgisayar Ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Sempozyumu. Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ.
• Ha, J. H., Kim, S. Y., Bae, S. C., Bae, S., Kim, H., Sim, M., Lyoo, I. K. & Cho, S. C. (2007). Depression and internet addiction in adolescents. Psychopathology, 40(6), 424-430.
• Haigh, A. (2015). Stop phubbing. 6 Aralık 2019 tarihinde http://stopphubbing.com adresinden erişildi.
• Humphreys, L. (2003). Can you hear me now? A field study of mobile phone usage in public space. Master’s thesis. USA:Cornell University.
• İşgüzar, S. ve Ayden, C. (2017). Siber aylaklık üzerine değerlendirmeler: Toplu bir bakış. 4. Uluslararası Bölgesel Kalkınma Konferansı (IRDC’2017). Tunceli.
• İyigün, N. Ö., Yıldız B. ve Yıldız, H. (2014), Çalışanların sanal kaytarma davranışları psikolojik sözleşme algısıyla açıklanabilir mi?, Kayseri Melikşah Üniversitesi 2. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 57-64.
• Jacobsen, W. C. & Forste, R. (2011). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(5), 275-280.
• Jia, H., Jia, R. & Karau, S. (2013). Cyberloafing and personality: The impact of the big five traits and workplace situational factors. Journal Of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 358-365.
• Judd, T. & Kennedy, G. (2011). Measurement and evidence of computer-based task switching and multitasking by Net Generation students. Computer & Education, 56, 625-631.
• Kalaycı, E. (2010). Üniversite öğrencilerinin siber aylaklık davranışları ile öz düzenleme stratejileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
• Kaplan, M. ve Çetinkaya, A. Ş. (2014). Sanal kaytarma ve demografik özellikler açısından farklılıklar. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 25(1), 26-34.
• Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B. M., Çulha, İ. & Babadağ, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 60–74.
• Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Mızrak Şahin, B., Çulha, İ. ve Babadağ, B. (2016). Sanal dünyanın kronolojik bağımlılığı: Sosyotelizm (phubbing). The Turkish Journal on Addiction, 3, 223‒269.
• Karaduman, M. ve Kurt, H. (2010). İletişim fakültesi öğrencilerinin sosyal medyayı kullanım düzeyleri. XV. Türkiye’de İnternet Konferansı. İstanbul.
• Kaynarca, İ. (2019). Üniversite öğrencilerinin çoklu görev davranışları ve çoklu görev algıları ile öz düzenleme becerileri arasındaki ilişki. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
• Khalid, H. & Dix, A. (2007). Designing for photo lurking. T. Ormerod ve C. Sas (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI... but not as we know it. 2. 145–148. Lanchester, UK: British Computer Society.
• Kim, S.J. & Byrne, S. (2011) Conceptualizing personal web usage in work contexts: A preliminary framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6),22712283.
• Kim, K., del Carmen Triana, M., Chung, K., & Oh, N. (2016). When do employees cyberloaf? An interactionist perspective examining personality, justice and empowerment. Human Resource Management, 55(6), 1041-1058.
• King, A. L. S., Valença, A. M., Silva, A. C. O., Baczynski, T., Carvalho, M. R., & Nardi, A. E. (2013). Nomophobia: Dependency on virtual environments or social phobia? Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 140-144.
• Koca, B. E. (2019). Akıllı telefon bağımlılığı ve sosyotelizm üzerine bir yazın taraması. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi (ASEAD), 6- 6.
• Kutanis, R. Ö., Karakiraz, A., ve Aras, M. (2014). İş stresi sanal kaytarma üzerinde etkili midir?. 2. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi. Kayseri.
• Kuznekoff, J. H. & Titsworth, S. (2013). The impact of mobile phone usage on student learning. Communication Education, 62(3), 233-252.
• Kuznekoff, J., Munz, S., & Titsworth, S. (2015). Mobile phones in the classroom: Examining the effects of texting, twitter, and message content on student learning. Communication Education, 64(3), 344-365.
• Lavie, N., Aleksandra H., Jan W. F., & Essi V. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 133 (3), 339-354.
• Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (2), 75-82.
• Lee, J. K. & Hwang, S. J. (2009). A study on teenager’s mobile phone use motives and addiction. Korea Association for Broadcasting & Telecommunication Studies, 23(5), 296–338.
• Lee, K., Flinn, J. & Noble, B. (2015) The case for operating system management of user attention. In Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 111-116.
• Lee, Y.-H. (2015). Facilitating critical thinking using the C-QRAC collaboration script: Enhancing science reading literacy in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 88, 182–191.
• Lim, V.K.G. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(5), 675-694.
• Lim, V. K. G. & Teo, T. S. H. (2005). Prevalence, perceived seriousness, justification and regulation of cyberloafing in Singapore an exploratory study. Information & Management, 42, 1081-1093.
• Lin, J. J. H., Lee, Y.-H., Wang, D.-Y. & Lin, S. S. J. (2016). Reading subtitles and taking Enotes while learning scientific materials in a multimedia environment: Cognitive load perspectives on EFL students. Educational Technology & Society, 19(4), 47–58.
• Ling, R. (2005). The sociolinguistics of SMS: An analysis of SMS use by a random sample of Norwegians. In R. Ling & Per E. Pedersen (Eds.), Mobile communications, 335–349. London, UK: Springer.
• Lodge, M., J. & Harrison, J., W. (2019). The Role of Attention in learning in the digital age. Yale J Biol Med, 92(1), 21–28.
• Makany, T., Kemp, J., & Dror, I. E. (2009). Optimising the use of note-taking as an external cognitive aid for increasing learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 619–635.
• McCoy, B. (2013). Digital distractions in the classroom: Student classroom use of digital devices for non-class related purposes. Journal of Media Education, 4(4), 5-14.
• Mueller, D., N. (2009). Digital Underlife in the Networked Writing Classroom. Computers and Composition, 26 (2009) 240–250.
• Nagata, S. F. (2003). Multitasking and interruptions during mobile web tasks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 47(11), 1341-1345. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
• Nath, R., Chen, L. D. & Muyingi, H. (2015). An empirical study of the factors that influence in-class digital distraction among university students: a US – Namibia cross-cultural study. Information Resources Management Journal, 28 (4), 1-18.
• Nazir, T. & Pişkin, M. (2016). Phubbing: Technological invasion which connected the world but disconnected humans tehseen. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(4), 39-46.
• Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583-15587.
• Oiu, T. & Peschek B. S. (2012). The effect of interpersonal counterproductive workplace behaviors on the performance of new product development teams. American Journal of Management, 12(1), 21-33.
• Örücü, E. ve Yıldız, H. (2014). İşyerinde kişisel internet ve teknoloji kullanımı: sanal kaytarma. Ege Akademik Bakış, 14(1), 99-114.
• Özkalp, E., Aydın, U., ve Tekeli, S. (2012). Sapkın örgütsel davranışlar ve çalışma yaşamında yeni bir olgu: Sanal Kaytarma (Cyberloafing) ve iş ilişkilerine etkisi. Çimento Endüstrisi İşverenleri Sendikası, 18-33.
• Potthast M., Köpsel S., Stein B. & Hagen M. (2016) Clickbait detection. In Ferro N. et al. (Eds.) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9626. Springer, Cham.
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, Part I. On the Horizon, 9(5), 2-6.
• Rahim, A. R. A. & Nasurdin, A. M. (2008). Trust in organizational and workplace deviant behavior: The moderating effect of locus of control. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 10(2), 221-235.
• Rainie, L. (2012). Smartphone ownership update: September 2012. Pew Internet and American Life Project. 8 Aralık 2019 tarihinde http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Smartphone-Update-Sept2012/Findings.aspx adresinden alınmıştır.
• Patil, R., Brown, M., Ibrahim, M., Myers, J., Brown, K., Khan, M. & Callaway, R. (2019). Digital Distraction Outside the Classroom: An Empirical Study. The Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 46.
• Restubog, S.L.D., Garcia, P.R.J.M., Toledano, L.S., Amarnani, R.K., Tolentino, L.R. & Tang, R.L. (2011). Yielding to (Cyber)-temptation: Exploring the buffering role of self-control in the relationship between organizational justice and cyberloafing behavior in the workplace. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(2), 247-251.
• Richtel, M. (2012). Technology changing How students learn, teachers say. 13 Aralık 2019 tarihinde http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/01/education/technologyis-changing-how-students-learn-teachers-say.html?pagewanted=all adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Robert, J. A. & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134-141.
• Roda, C. (2011). Human attention in digital environments. NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E. & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 763–797.
• Schweizer, K. (2010). The relationship of attention and ıntelligence. In A. Gruszka, G. Matthews, & B. Szymura (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Cognition: Attention, Memory, and Executive Control (pp. 247-262). New York: Springer
• Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native - myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364-379.
• Selwyn, N. (2011). In praise of pessimism - the need for negativity in educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 713–718.
• Selwyn, N. (2015). Education in the digital age. In R. Jones, A. Chik & C. Hafner (Eds.), Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age. New York: Routledge.
• Spink, A., Cole, C. & Waller, M. (2008). Multitasking behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42, 93–118.
• Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A. & Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated drivin. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 9 (1), 23-32.
• Strayer, D., L. & Johnston W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychological Science, 12 (6), 462-466.
• Syaebani, M. I. & Sobri, R. R. (2011). Relationship between organizational justice perception and engagement in deviant workplace behavior. The South East Asian Journal Management, 5(1), 37-49.
• Taneja, A., Fiore, V. & Fisher, B. (2015). Cyber-slacking in the classroom: Potential for digital distraction in the new age. Computers&Education, 82, 141-151.
• TDK. (2019). Güncel Türkçe Sözlük. 26 Ekim 2019 tarihinde https://sozluk.gov.tr adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Tindell, D. R. & Bohlander, R. W. (2012). The use and abuse of cell phones and text messaging in the classroom: A survey of college students. College Teaching, 60(1), 1-9.
• Ting, Y. & Grant, R. (2005). Internet usage of local government employees: A study of the effect of ındividual preferences, group influences, and administrative factors. The Social Science Journal, 42, 323-331.
• Turunç, Ö. (2015). İş stresi - kaytarma ilişkisinde liderin rolü turizm sektöründe bir araştırma. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), s.142-159.
• Ugrın, C. J. & Pearson, M. J. (2013), The effects of sanctions and stigmas on cyberloafing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 812-820.
• Ulukapı, H., Çelik, A. ve Yılmaz, A. (2014). Algılanan işe adanmışlığın sanal kaytarma davranışı üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi: Selçuk Üniversitesi örneği. 2. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi, 7–8 Kasım, Kayseri.
• Utrecht, C. (2016) Nomophobia: a rising trend among adolescents. 4 Aralık 2019 tarihinde http://strengthinourvoices.org/2016/09/09/in-our-own-personals-nomophobia/ adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Vanden Abeele, M., & Postma-Nilsenova, M. (2018). More than just gaze: An experimental vignette study examining how phone-gazing and newspaper-gazing and phubbing-while-speaking and phubbing-while-listening compare in their effect on affiliation. Communication Research Reports, 35(4), 303-313.
• Vermaat, M. E., Sebok, S. L., Freund, S. M., Campbell, J. T. & Frydenberg, M. (2017). Discovering Computers 2018: Digital Technology, Data, and Devices. Nelson Education.
• Walsh, S. P., White, K. M. & Young, R. M. (2008). Over-connected? A qualitative exploration of the relationship between Australian youth and their mobile phones. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 77–92
• Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P. & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married chinese adults: the roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 12–17.
• Wei, F. F. & Wang, Y. K., (2010). Students’ silent messages: Can teacher verbal and nonverbal ımmediacy moderate student use of text messaging in class? Communication Education. 59(4), 475-496.
• Wei, F. F., Wang, Y. K. &Klausner, M. (2012). Rethinking college students' selfregulation and sustained attention: Does text messaging during class influence cognitive learning? Communication Education, 61(3), 185-204.
• Wu, J. Y. (2017). The indirect relationship of media multitasking self-efficacy on learning performance within the personal learning environment: Implications from the mechanism of perceived attention problems and self-regulation strategies. Computers & Education, 106, 56-72.
• Wu, J. Y. & Xie, C. (2018). Using time pressure and note-taking to prevent digital distraction behavior and enhance online search performance: Perspectives from the load theory of attention and cognitive control. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 244 – 254.
• Yıldız, H., Yıldız, B. ve Ateş, H. (2015). Sanal kaytarma davranışlarının sergilenmesinde örgütsel adalet algısının rolü var mıdır? Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi (The Jkem), 10(2), 55-66.
• Zoghbi, P. (2007). Relationship between organizational justice and cyberloafing in the workplace: Has anomia a say in the matter? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 464-470.