Dark Leadership at the Workplace

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 65 - 76, 21.10.2016

Ufuk Başar , Ünsal Sığrı , Nejat Basım

https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.61037

Cited By: 18

Öz

The aim of this research is to uncover the behaviors that constitute the dark side of leadership, the impacts of these behaviors on employees and the employees’ reactions to these behaviors in Turkish context. The data were collected through structured face-to-face interviews, a focus group interview and observations and analyzed according to content analysis technique.  Interviews were done with 9 and focus group interview was done with 4 participants. Observations were made in an open plan office. Participants were selected from researchers’ social network according to purposive sampling technique. At the end of the analyses, dark leadership was explained by themes of wearisome, narcissistic, insincere and tyrannous leader behaviors, impacts of dark leadership on employees were explained by themes of physiological and psychological effects and employees’ reactions to dark leadership were explained by themes of active and passive reactions. Findings were discussed in terms of their contributions to the management and organization literature and practical implications.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Leadership, Toxic Leadership, Abusive Supervision, Destructive Leadership, Dark Leadership

İş Yerinde Karanlık Liderlik

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı iş yerinde liderliğin karanlık yüzünü oluşturan davranışların, bu davranışların çalışanlar üzerinde oluşturduğu etkilerin ve çalışanların bu davranışlara verdiği tepkilerin ne olduğunu ülkemiz bağlamında açığa çıkarmaktır. Araştırma verisi mülakat, odak grup görüşmesi ve gözlem yöntemleri kullanılarak toplanmış ve içerik analizi yöntemine uygun olarak analiz edilmiştir. Mülakatlar 9, odak grup görüşmesi ise 4 kişi ile yapılmıştır. Gözlem, açık ofis yerleşimli bir iş yerinde yapılmıştır. Katılımcılar araştırmacıların sosyal ağı içerisinden amaçlı örnekleme yöntemine göre belirlenmiştir. Analiz sonucunda karanlık liderliği oluşturan davranışlar; bezdirici, narsistik, samimiyetsiz ve zorbaca davranış temaları ile; karanlık liderliğin çalışanlar üzerindeki etkileri; psikolojik etkiler ve fizyolojik etkiler temaları ile, karanlık liderliğe verilen tepkiler ise; aktif tepkiler ve pasif tepkiler temaları ile açıklanmıştır. Araştırma bulguları yönetim ve organizasyon yazınına sağlanan katkılar ile uygulamaya dönük yansımaları açısından değerlendirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Liderlik, Zehirleyici liderlik; İstismarcı yönetim; Yıkıcı liderlik; Karanlık liderlik.

Kaynakça

• Ashforth, B. E. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47, 755-778.
• Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 126-140.
• Aasland, M. S., Skogstad, A.,Notelaers, G., Birkeland, M. & Einarsen, S. (2010). The Prevalence of Destructive Leadership Behaviour. British Journal of Management, 21, 438-452.
• Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F. & Walumba, F. O. (2004). Authentic leadership: Theory building for veritable sustained performance. Working paper: Gallup Leadership Institute, University of Nebraska–Lincoln.
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
• Bass, B. M. & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.
• Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (2000). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mindgarden.
• Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J. & Atwater, L. (1996). The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45(1), 5–34.
• Bies, R. J. (2001). Interactional (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. İçinde J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Advances in organizational justice (ss. 89-118). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Brown, M. E. & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.
• Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K. & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.
• Çelebi, N., Güner H. & Yıldız V. (2015). Toksik liderlik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 249 – 268.
• Conger, J. A. (1990). The dark side of leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19(2), 44-55.
• Glad, B. (2002). Why tyrants go too far: Malignant narcissism and absolute power. Political Psychology, 23(1), 1-37.
• Goldman, A. (2006). High toxicity leadership borderline personality disorder and the dysfunctional organization. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(8), 733-746.
• Goldman, A. (2011). Demagogue to dialogue: An alternative to toxic leadership in corporate downsizings. Organizational Dynamics, 40, 235-241.
• Gündüz, Y. & Dedekorkut, S. E. (2014). Yıkıcı liderlik. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 95-104.
• Gürbüz S. & Şahin F. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Heppell, T. (2011). Toxic leadership: Applying the Lipman-Blumen model to political leadership. Representation, 47(3), 241-249.
• Higgs, M. (2009). The good, the bad and the ugly: Leadership and narcissism. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 165-178.
• Holstein J. A. & Gubrium J. F. (1994). Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and interpretive practice. İçinde N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research (ss. 262-272). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
• Howel, J. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 891–902.
• Judge, T. A., Le Pine, J. A. & Rich, B. L. (2006). Loving yourself abundantly: Relationship of the narcissistic personality to self- and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 762-776.
• Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad leadership: What it is, how it happens, why it matters. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
• Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1999). What’s playing in the organizational theater? Collusive relationships in management. Human Relations, 52, 745-773.
• Krasikova, D. V., Green, S. G. & Le Breton, J. M. (2013). Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1308-1338.
• Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
• Lipman-Blumen, J. (2005). Toxic leadership: When grand illusions masquerade as noble visions. Leader to Leader, 36, 29-36.
• Lipman-Blumen, J. (2011). Toxic leadership: A rejoinder. Representation, 47(3), 331-342.
• Liu, D., Liao, H. & Loi, R. (2012). The dark side of leadership: a three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1187-1212.
• Luthans, F. & Avolio, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: A positive development approach. İçinde K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R.E. Quinn (Ed.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (ss. 241-261). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
• Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K. M., Guest, G. & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative research methods: A data collectors’ field guide. North Carolina: Family Health International.
• Mathieu, C., Neumann, C. S., Hare, R. D. & Babiak, P. (2014). A dark side of leadership: Corporate psychopathy and its influence on employee well-being and job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 83-88.
• McShane, S. L. & Von Glinow, M. A. (2009). Organizational behavior. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
• Mehta, S. & Maheshwari, G. C. (2013). Consequence of toxic leadership on employee job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Contemporary Management Research, 8(2), 1-23.
• Padilla, A. & Mulvey, P. (2008). Leadership toxicity: sources and remedies. Organisations and People, 15(3), 27–37.
• Padilla, A., Hogan, R. & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 176-194.
• Reave, L. (2005). Spiritual values and practices related to leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 655−687.
• Reed G. E. & Olsen, R. A. (2010). Toxic leadership. Military Review, November-December, 58-64.
• Reed, G. E. & Bullis, R. C. (2009). The impact of destructive leadership on senior military officers and civilian employees. Armed Forces & Society, 36(1), 5-18.
• Shaw, J. B., Erickson, A. & Harvey, M. (2011). A method for measuring destructive leadership and identifying types of destructive leaders in organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 575-590.
• Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J. & Sherwood, H. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129(2), 216–269.
• Takala, T. (2010). Dark leadership, charisma and trust. Psychology, 1, 59-63.
• Tepper, B. J. (2000).Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178-190.
• Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261-289.
• Trevino, L. K., Brown, M. & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5–37.
• Trevino, L. K., Hartman, L. P. & Brown, M. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4), 128–142.
• Thoroughgood, C. N. & Padilla, A. (2013). Destructive leadership and the Penn State Scandal: A toxic triangle perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6, 144-149.
• Uymaz, A. O. (2013). Yıkıcı liderlik ölçeği geliştirme çalısması. İ. Ü. İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi, 24(75), 37-57.
• Waite, D. (2014). Imperial hubris: The dark heart of leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 24, 1202-1232.
• Webster, V., Brough, P. & Daly, K. (2016). Fight, flight or freeze: common responses for follower coping with toxic leadership. Stress And Health, 32(4), 346-354.
• Whicker, M. L. (1996). Toxic leaders: When organizations go bad. Westport, VA: Quorum Books.
• Wright, K. D. (2015). Great results through bad leaders: the positive effects of toxic leadership. Military Review, May-June, 33-39.
• Yagil, D., Ben-Zur, H. &Tamir, I. (2011). Do employees cope effectively with abusive supervision at work? An exploratory study. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(1), 5–23.