Gelişen Bir Paradigma: Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı

Öz

Teknolojik gelişmelerin zirvesinde olan yapay zekâ günümüzde hayatımızı önemli ölçüde etkilemekte ve kullanım alanları giderek genişlemektedir. Bu bağlamda, bireylerin yapay zekâ teknolojilerini anlaması ve etkili bir şekilde kullanabilmesi için yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı kavramı önemlidir. Yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı, yapay zekâ kavramlarını ve tekniklerini öğrenmeyi, yapay zekâ tarafından sunulan bilgileri eleştirel bir bakış açısıyla değerlendirmeyi ve toplumsal fayda odaklı içerikleri analiz ederek yeni uygulamalara entegre etmeyi içerir. Bu doğrultuda, bu kavramın önemine yönelik olarak, bu çalışmada, literatürde yer alan araştırmalar temel alınarak yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı kavramı açıklanması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda yapay zekâ nedir?, yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı nedir? ve yapay zekâ okuryazarlığının önemi ve eğitimi nedir?, araştırma sorularına cevap aranmıştır. Çalışmada, yapay zekânın gelişimi, yapay zekâ okuryazarlığının tanımı ve toplumlar için neden önemli olduğu gibi konular açıklanmıştır ve bu sayede çalışmanın literatüre katkı sağlanacağı söylenebilir. Sonuç olarak, bireylerin yapay zekâ teknolojileriyle uyumlu bir şekilde yaşamalarına katkı sağlayacak bir anlayış oluşturulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yapay
• Zekâ
• Okuryazarlık
• Güncel
• Paradigma

An Emerging Paradigm: Artificial Intelligence Literacy

Öz

At the pinnacle of technological advancements, artificial intelligence (AI) significantly influences our lives, with its applications continually expanding. In this context, the concept of AI literacy is crucial for individuals to comprehend and effectively utilize AI technologies. AI literacy involves learning AI concepts and techniques, critically evaluating information provided by AI, and analyzing socially beneficial content to integrate into new applications. In line with emphasizing the importance of this concept, this study aims to explain the concept of AI literacy by drawing on existing research in the literature. To address this goal, the research questions "What is artificial intelligence?" "What is AI literacy?" and “The Importance and Education of Artificial Intelligence Literacy” are explored. The study delves into topics such as the development of artificial intelligence, the definition of AI literacy, and why it is important for societies, contributing insights to the literature. As a result, an understanding is established that contributes to individuals leading lives in harmony with AI technologies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artificial
• Intelligence
• Literacy
• Current
• Paradigm

Kaynakça

1. Arslan, K. (2020). Eğitimde yapay zekâ ve uygulamaları. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 71-88. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1174773
2. Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernández-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., & Barro, S. (2023). AI literacy in K-12: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7
3. Çelebi, C., Demir, U. & Karakuş, F. (2023). Yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı konulu çalışmaların sistematik derleme yöntemiyle incelenmesi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Ereğli Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 5(2), 535-560. https://doi.org/ 10.51119/ereegf.2023.67
4. Çiftçi, D. H. (2004). Türkiye’nin bilim ve teknoloji stratejisi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(1), 57-73. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cusosbil/issue/4369/59754
5. Çobanoğlu, A., & Oğuzhan, H. (2023). Hemşirelikte teknolojinin gelişimi ve mesleğin geleceğine etkileri. Hemşirelik Bilimi Dergisi, 6(2), 114-122. https://doi.org/10.54189/hbd.1036888
6. Duarte, F. (2024). Number of ChatGPT Users (Mon 2024). Retrieved from https://explodingtopics.com/blog/chatgpt-users
7. Gong, X., Tang, Y., Liu, X., Jing, S., Cui, W., Liang, J., & Wang, F. Y. (2020, October). K-9 artificial intelligence education in qingdao: Issues, challenges and suggestions. In IEEE İnternational Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), 1–6. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSC48988.2020.9238087
8. Han, X., Hu, F., Xiong, G., Liu, X., Gong, X., Niu, X., & Wang, X. (2018, November-December). Design of AI+curriculum for primary and secondary schools in Qingdao. In Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), 4135–4140. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAC.2018.8623310

9. How, M. L., & Hung, W. L. D. (2019). Educing AI-thinking in science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education. Education Sciences, 9(3), 2-41. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030184
10. Kandlhofer, M., Steinbauer, G., Hirschmugl-Gaisch, S., & Huber, P. (2016, October). Artificial intelligence and computer science in education: From kindergarten to university. In IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–9. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757570
11. Karakaş, Z. (1998). Teknoloji yönetimi (Master's thesis, Sakarya Üniversitesi). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
12. Karakoç-Keskin, E. (2023). Yapay zekâ sohbet robotu chatgpt ve türkiye internet gündeminde oluşturduğu temalar. Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergisi, 7(2), 114-131. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ejnm/issue/77129/1266798
13. Karakuş, A. (2023). Social studies and artificial intelligence. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 8(24), 3079-3102. http://dx.doi.org/10.35826/ijoecc.1813
14. Kaul, V., Enslin, S., & Gross, S. A. (2020). History of artificial intelligence in medicine. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 92(4), 807-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.040
15. Klein, A. (2023). AI literacy, explained. Retrieved from Https://Www.Edweek.Org/Technology/Ai-Literacy-Explained/2023/05
16. Kong, S. C., Cheung, W. M. Y., & Zhang, G. (2021). Evaluation of an artificial intelligence literacy course for university students with diverse study backgrounds. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100026
17. Köroglu, Y. (2017). Yapay zekâ’nın teorik ve pratik sınırları. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi. Księżak, P. & Wojtczak, S. (2023). Toward a conceptual network for the private law of artificial intelligence. Springer.
18. Kuipers, B., Feigenbaum, E. A., Hart, P. E., & Nilsson, N. J. (2017). Shakey: From conception to history. AI Magazine, 38(1), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i1.2716
19. Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Haverkamp, N., & Raupach, T. (2023). Development of the “Scale for the assessment of non-experts’ AI literacy”–An exploratory factor analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100338
20. Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Schirch, J., & Raupach, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101
21. Lin, P. Y., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., Guo, Y., & Qin, J. (2021). Modeling the structural relationship among primary students’ motivation to learn artificial intelligence. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100006
22. Lin, X. F., Zhou, Y., Shen, W., Luo, G. Xian, X. & Pang, B. (2023). Modeling the structural relationships among Chinese secondary school students’ computational thinking efficacy in learning AI, AI literacy, and approaches to learning AI. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12029-4
23. McCarthy, J. (2007). From here to human-level AI. Artificial Intelligence, 171(18), 1174–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.10.009
24. Mondal, B. (2020). Artificial intelligence: State of the art. In V. E. Balas, R. Kumar & R. Srivastava (Eds.), Recent trends and advances in artificial intelligence and internet of things (pp. 389-424). Springer.
25. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
26. Ng, D. T. K., Wu, W., Leung, J. K. L., Chiu, T. K. F., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13411
27. Ng, D. T. K., Su, J. & Chu, S. K.W. (2023). Fostering secondary school students’ aı literacy through making AI-Driven recycling bins. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12183-9
28. Okuyucu, Ç., Ramazanoğlu, F., & Tel, M. (2006). Teknolojik gelişim ile serbest zaman faaliyetleri ilişkisi. Fırat Üniversitesi Doğu Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(3), 58-60. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/fudad/issue/47088/592228
29. Oral, A. (2021). Yapay zekâ ve makine öğrenmesi. Beta Yayınları. Robinson, S. C. (2020). Trust, transparency, and openness: How inclusion of cultural values shapes Nordic national public policy strategies for artificial intelligence (AI). Technology in Society, 63, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101421
30. Schwaber, K. & Sutherland, J. (2020). The scrum guide: The definitive guide to scrum: the rules of the game. Retrieved from https://scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2020/2020-Scrum-Guide-US.pdf#zoom=100
31. Steinbauer, G., Kandlhofer, M., Chklovski, T., Heintz, F., & Koenig, S. (2021). A differentiated discussion about AI education K-12. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(2), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00724-8
32. Stolpe, K., & Hallström, J. (2024). Artificial ıntelligence literacy for technology education. Computers and Education Open, 6, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100159
33. Su, J., Ng, D. T. K., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in early childhood education: The challenges and opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124
34. Tiernan, P., Costello, E., Donlon, E., Parysz, M., & Scriney, M. (2023). Information and media literacy in the age of AI: Options for the future. Education Sciences, 13(9), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090906 ,
35. Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., Martin, F., & Seehorn, D. (2019, January- February). Envisioning AI for K-12: What should every child know about AI?. In Proceedings of the AAAI-19 Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(01), 9795-9799. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019795
36. UNESCO (2023). What you need to know about literacy. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/literacy/need-know
37. Wang, B., Rau, P. L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(9), 1324-1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768
38. Wang, N., & Lester, J. (2023). K-12 education in the age of AI: A call to action for K-12 AI literacy. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(4), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00358-x
39. Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1145/365153.365168 Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., ... & Zhang, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research. The Innovation, 2(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124
40. Yılmaz, A. (2021). Yapay zekâ. Kodlab Yayın Dağıtım Yazılım Ltd. Şti. Karaoğlan-Yılmaz, F. G., & Yılmaz, R. (2023). Yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı ölçeğinin türkçeye uyarlanması. Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 5(2), 172-190. https://doi.org/10.53694/bited.1376831
41. Yılmaz, O. G. (2021). Yargı uygulamasında yapay zekâ kullanımı-yapay zekâ hâkim cübbesini giyebilecek mi?. Adalet Dergisi (66), 379-415. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/adaletdergisi/issue/62377/940417
42. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
43. Zhang, H., Lee, I., Ali, S., DiPaola, D., Cheng, Y., & Breazeal (2023). Integrating ethics and career futures with technical learning to promote aı literacy for middle school students: An exploratory study. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33(4), 290–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00293-3
44. Burgsteiner, H., Kandlhofer, M., & Steinbauer, G. (2016, March). Irobot: Teaching the basics of artificial intelligence in high schools. In Proceeding of the AAAI Conference on Artificial İntelligence, 30(1), 4126-4127. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v30i1.9864
45. Druga, S., Vu, S. T., Likhith, E., & Qiu, T. (2019, March). Inclusive AI literacy for kids around the world. In Proceedings of FabLearn 2019, 104–111. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311890.3311904
46. Vazhayil, A., Shetty, R., Bhavani, R. R., & Akshay, N. (2019, December). Focusing on teacher education to introduce ai in schools: Perspectives and illustrative findings. In 2019 IEEE Tenth İnternational Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), 71–77. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2019.00021
47. Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020, April). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
48. Julie, H., Alyson, H., & Anne-Sophie, C. (2020, October). Designing digital literacy activities: An interdisciplinary and collaborative approach. In 2020 IEEE frontiers in education conference (FIE), 1–5. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274165
49. Van Brummelen, J., Heng, T., & Tabunshchyk, V. (2021, February). Teaching tech to talk: K-12 conversational artificial intelligence literacy curriculum and development tools. In Proceedings of the AAAI-21 Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 35(17), 15655-15663. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i17.17844