Design and Development of a Web Based Dynamic Assessment System to Increase Students' Learning Effectiveness

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4, 631 - 656, 20.12.2020

Arif Tuluk Halil Yurdugül

https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.730454

Cited By: 4

Öz

As Bloom (1984) stated that the way to increase students' achievements with one-to-one tutorial support can be the subject of instructional technologies today. In this context, the aim of the study was to design, develop and improve a web-based dynamic assessment system aimed at contributing to mathematics learning of secondary school students. For this purpose, a teaching environment has been designed in which 5th grade students can test themselves independently of time and place through internet technologies to learn mathematics lesson topics. A web-based environment combining the principles of dynamic assessment and gamification has been developed with the dynamic assessment algorithm developed within the scope of the research. The research is structured in accordance with the “Type 1” study features, one of the developmental research types. During the development of the prototype, pilot implementation was carried out with 47 5th grade students. In addition, focus group discussions were held with 12 students using the system. According to the findings obtained, it was concluded that the secondary school students' success scores constantly increase in each achievement, the instructional guidance they receive in each test decreases continuously and they can perform the next assessment tasks without help. The students stated that they were directed to the correct solution by the system while solving the questions they did not know, the instructional guidances for the solution were very helpful, the visual elements (monkey, robot and banana) were interesting, fun and beautiful and they wanted to use this system in other lessons.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Web-based assessment, , Formative assessment, , Dynamic assessment, Web-based dynamic assessment

Kaynakça

• Allal, L., & Ducrey, G. P. (2000). Assessment of- or in- the zone of proximal development. Learning and Instruction, 10, 137–152.
• Ashton, H.S., Beevers, C.E., Korabinski, A.A., & Youngson, M.A. (2006). Incorporating partial credit in computer-aided assessment of Mathematics in secondary education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 93 119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467 8535.2005.00512.x
• Bloom, B.S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.
• Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
• Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in continuing education, 22(2), 151 167. Erişim adresi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713695728
• Bransford, J. C., Delclos, J. R., Vye, N. J., Burns, M., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1987). State of the art and future directions. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 479–496). New York: Guilford Press.
• Campione, J.C., & Brown, A.L. (1985). Dynamic assessment: One approach and some initial data. Technical report no. 361, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL. (ERIC ED269735).
• Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An international approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82–115). New York: The Guilford Press.
• Critchley, L. A., Kumta, S. M., Ware, J., & Wong, J. W. (2009). Web-based formative assessment case studies: role in a final year medicine two-week anaesthesia course. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 37(4), 637-645.
• Costa, D. S., Mullan, B. A., Kothe, E. J., & Butow, P. (2010). A web-based formative assessment tool for Masters Students: A pilot study. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1248-1253.
• Deniz Kan, Ü. (2007). Okul öncesi eğitimde değerlendirme aracı olarak portfolyo. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 169-178.
• Elliott, J. G. (2003). Dynamic assessment in educational settings: Realizing potential. Educational Review, 55, 15–32.
• Haywood, H. C., Brown, A. L., & Wingenfeld, S. (1990). Dynamic approaches to psycho-educational assessment. School Psychology Review, 19, 411–422.
• Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice. Clinical & educational applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Kılıç, G. B. (2001). Oluşturmacı fen öğretimi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1, 7-22.
• Marinagi, C. (2011). Web-based adaptive self-assessment in Higher Education. Education in a technological world: communicating current and emerging research and technological efforts, 978-84.
• Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
• Moore-Brown, B., Huerta, M., Uranga-Hernandez, Y., & Peña, E. D. (2006). Using dynamic assessment to evaluate children with suspected learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 209–217.
• Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Nelson, W. A. (2004). Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, 2, 1099-1130.
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). All testing is dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7, 137–170.
• Van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1-14). Springer Netherlands.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Wang, K. H., Wang, T. H., Wang, W. L., & Huang, S. C. (2006). Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: enhancing student achievement in Web‐based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 207-217.
• Wang, T. H. (2007). What strategies are effective for formative assessment in an e-Learning environment? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 171–186.
• Wang, T. H. (2008). Web-based quiz-game-like formative assessment: Development and evaluation. Computers & Education, 51, 1247–1263.
• Wang, T. H. (2010). Web-based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as teaching and learning strategy for improving students' e-Learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1157–1166.
• Wang, T. H. (2011). Implementation of web-based dynamic assessment in facilitating junior high school students to learn mathematics. Computers & Education, 56, 1062-1071.
• Wang, T. H. (2014). Developing an assessment-centered e-Learning system for improving student learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 73, 189-203.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. 8. Basım, Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
• Zou, X. & Zhang, X. (2013). Effect of different score reports of Web-based formative test on students' self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 66, 54-63.