İnceleme Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Journal of ‘Computers & Education’ from Past to Present: Bibliomeric Analysis (1978-2025)

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 26, 1038 - 1065

Öz

This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of Computers & Education, a leading academic journal in the field of educational technology, covering the period from 1978 to 2025. Drawing upon data from the Web of Science database, a total of 4,715 articles were examined using bibliometric techniques, including co-citation, co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence, and thematic evolution analysis. The findings reveal a significant increase in publication volume and citation rates, particularly after 2008, indicating a growing scholarly interest in digital education. Thematic clustering analyses identified three dominant research foci: student performance and achievement, technology-enhanced learning and motivation, and user acceptance and self-efficacy. Furthermore, collaboration networks show that Taiwan, China, the USA, and the UK are central hubs in the global educational technology research landscape. Thematic evolution analysis reveals a paradigm shift from early discussions on "computer and distance education" toward more recent emphases on "digital content," "virtual learning," and "student-centered design." This study contributes to the literature by mapping structural patterns and identifying key trends, prolific authors, institutions, and countries, offering a macro-level understanding of how Computers & Education has shaped the educational technology discourse over nearly five decades.

Etik Beyan

Due to the scope and method of the study, ethics committee permission was not required.

Kaynakça

  • Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
  • Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142, 103647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103647
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
  • Biehl, M., Kim, H., & Wade, M. (2006). Relationships among the academic business disciplines: A multi-method citation analysis. Omega, 34(4), 359-371.
  • Chen, M. R. A., Hwang, G. J., Majumdar, R., Toyokawa, Y., & Ogata, H. (2021). Research trends in the use of e-books in English as a foreign language (EFL) education from 2011 to 2020: A bibliometric and content analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2001552
  • Dağdalan, G., Taş, E., & Kaya, E. (2021). The effects of virtual reality and animation supported science education on students’ some learning products. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9(17), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.818342
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  • Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
  • Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
  • Heradio, R., De La Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, 98, 14-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.010
  • Kantar, M., & Özpınar, İ. (2023). The effect of teaching data processing learning domain with vustat software activities on students’ academic achievement and retention of knowledge. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 11(22), 620-642. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1321815
  • Lee, S., Kuo, L.-J., Xu, Z., & Hu, X. (2020). The effects of technology integrated classroom instruction on K-12 English language learners’ literacy development: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1), 1–32.
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  • Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213–228. Öztuzcu, Ö., & Mısırlı, Z. A. (2023). Secondary School Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding Information Technology. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 11(22), 952-965. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1344348
  • Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004
  • Patel, P., Torppa, M., Aro, M., Richardson, U., & Lyytinen, H. (2018). GraphoLearn India: The effectiveness of a computer-assisted reading intervention in supporting struggling readers of English. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1045.
  • Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12.
  • Song, Y., Chen, X., Hao, T., Liu, Z., & Lan, Z. (2019). Exploring two decades of research on classroom dialogue by using bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, 137, 12-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.002
  • Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
  • Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
  • Taşdemir, C. (2023). Examination of mathematics course achievements of students who took the high school entrance exam in terms of different factors. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 11(21), 20-43. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1197026
  • Venkatesh, V. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
  • Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.

Journal of ‘Computers & Education’ from Past to Present: Bibliomeric Analysis (1978-2025)

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 26, 1038 - 1065

Öz

This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of Computers & Education, a leading academic journal in the field of educational technology, covering the period from 1978 to 2025. Drawing upon data from the Web of Science database, a total of 4,715 articles were examined using bibliometric techniques, including co-citation, co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence, and thematic evolution analysis. The findings reveal a significant increase in publication volume and citation rates, particularly after 2008, indicating a growing scholarly interest in digital education. Thematic clustering analyses identified three dominant research foci: student performance and achievement, technology-enhanced learning and motivation, and user acceptance and self-efficacy. Furthermore, collaboration networks show that Taiwan, China, the USA, and the UK are central hubs in the global educational technology research landscape. Thematic evolution analysis reveals a paradigm shift from early discussions on "computer and distance education" toward more recent emphases on "digital content," "virtual learning," and "student-centered design." This study contributes to the literature by mapping structural patterns and identifying key trends, prolific authors, institutions, and countries, offering a macro-level understanding of how Computers & Education has shaped the educational technology discourse over nearly five decades.

Kaynakça

  • Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
  • Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142, 103647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103647
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
  • Biehl, M., Kim, H., & Wade, M. (2006). Relationships among the academic business disciplines: A multi-method citation analysis. Omega, 34(4), 359-371.
  • Chen, M. R. A., Hwang, G. J., Majumdar, R., Toyokawa, Y., & Ogata, H. (2021). Research trends in the use of e-books in English as a foreign language (EFL) education from 2011 to 2020: A bibliometric and content analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2001552
  • Dağdalan, G., Taş, E., & Kaya, E. (2021). The effects of virtual reality and animation supported science education on students’ some learning products. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9(17), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.818342
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  • Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
  • Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
  • Heradio, R., De La Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, 98, 14-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.010
  • Kantar, M., & Özpınar, İ. (2023). The effect of teaching data processing learning domain with vustat software activities on students’ academic achievement and retention of knowledge. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 11(22), 620-642. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1321815
  • Lee, S., Kuo, L.-J., Xu, Z., & Hu, X. (2020). The effects of technology integrated classroom instruction on K-12 English language learners’ literacy development: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1), 1–32.
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  • Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213–228. Öztuzcu, Ö., & Mısırlı, Z. A. (2023). Secondary School Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding Information Technology. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 11(22), 952-965. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1344348
  • Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004
  • Patel, P., Torppa, M., Aro, M., Richardson, U., & Lyytinen, H. (2018). GraphoLearn India: The effectiveness of a computer-assisted reading intervention in supporting struggling readers of English. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1045.
  • Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12.
  • Song, Y., Chen, X., Hao, T., Liu, Z., & Lan, Z. (2019). Exploring two decades of research on classroom dialogue by using bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, 137, 12-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.002
  • Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
  • Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
  • Taşdemir, C. (2023). Examination of mathematics course achievements of students who took the high school entrance exam in terms of different factors. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 11(21), 20-43. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1197026
  • Venkatesh, V. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
  • Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Eğitimi (Ekonomi, İşletme ve Yönetim Hariç)
Bölüm İnceleme Makalesi
Yazarlar

Aydın Bulut 0000-0003-3139-4367

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 16 Eylül 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 23 Eylül 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 20 Mart 2025
Kabul Tarihi 8 Ağustos 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 26

Kaynak Göster

APA Bulut, A. (2025). Journal of ‘Computers & Education’ from Past to Present: Bibliomeric Analysis (1978-2025). Journal of Computer and Education Research, 13(26), 1038-1065.

Creative Commons Lisansı


Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.


Değerli Yazarlar,

JCER dergisi 2018 yılından itibaren yayımlanacak sayılarda yazarlarından ORCID bilgilerini isteyecektir. Bu konuda hassasiyet göstermeniz önemle rica olunur.

Önemli: "Yazar adından yapılan yayın/atıf taramalarında isim benzerlikleri, soyadı değişikliği, Türkçe harf içeren isimler, farklı yazımlar, kurum değişiklikleri gibi durumlar sorun oluşturabilmektedir. Bu nedenle araştırmacıların tanımlayıcı kimlik/numara (ID) edinmeleri önem taşımaktadır. ULAKBİM TR Dizin sistemlerinde tanımlayıcı ID bilgilerine yer verilecektir.

Standardizasyonun sağlanabilmesi ve YÖK ile birlikte yürütülecek ortak çalışmalarda ORCID kullanılacağı için, TR Dizin’de yer alan veya yer almak üzere başvuran dergilerin, yazarlardan ORCID bilgilerini talep etmeleri ve dergide/makalelerde bu bilgiye yer vermeleri tavsiye edilmektedir. ORCID, Open Researcher ve Contributor ID'nin kısaltmasıdır.  ORCID, Uluslararası Standart Ad Tanımlayıcı (ISNI) olarak da bilinen ISO Standardı (ISO 27729) ile uyumlu 16 haneli bir numaralı bir URI'dir. http://orcid.org adresinden bireysel ORCID için ücretsiz kayıt oluşturabilirsiniz. "