TASARIM, SÜREÇ YENİLİĞİ VE DİJİTAL DÖNÜŞÜM İLE TOPLAM VERİMLİLİĞİN ARTTIRILMASINA İLİŞKİN ÖRNEK BİR UYGULAMA

Yıl 2024, , 156 - 175, 25.03.2024

Erhan Özkan

https://doi.org/10.21923/jesd.1295874

Öz

Çalışmanın temel amacı tasarımdan son kullanıma kadar olan süreçlerdeki topyekûn verimlilik artışının detaylı olarak ele alındığı özgün bir çalışmanın literatüre kazandırılmasıdır. Çalışmada tasarım ile ürün verimliliğinin, süreç optimizasyonu ile enerji verimliliğinin, dijital dönüşüm ile operasyonel verimliliğin arttırılmasına ilişkin bilgisayar destekli tasarım, simülasyon, sayısal analiz ve dijital dönüşüm yazılımlarından faydalanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular neticesinde tasarım iyileştirme ile ürün veriminde %81,5, süreç optimizasyonu ile enerji ve işçilikte %45, operasyonel verimlilikte ise %55 mertebelerinde artış elde edilerek ülke ekonomisine katkıda bulunacak bir sistem kazandırılmıştır. 3D tasarımlar Solidworks katı modelleme ve tasarım programlarında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Mekanik işlemler ANSYS simülasyon programı kullanılarak sonlu elemanlar yöntemi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. ANSYS Fluid modu kullanılarak akış katsayısını ve sıvı direnci katsayısını tanımlamak için hesaplamalı akışkanlar dinamiği analizleri yapılmıştır. Üretim parametrelerinin tanımlanması için Anycasting simülasyon programları kullanılmıştır. Dijital dönüşüm kapsamında ülkemizde ilk defa üretim ekipmanları ile hiçbir ara yazılım kullanılmadan haberleşebilen, harici bir yazılım ve lisansa ihtiyaç duyulmadan çalışabilen özgün bir veri izleme sistemi hayata geçirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ürün Verimliliği, Sistem Verimliliği, Dijital Dönüşüm, Süreç Yeniliği, Operasyonel Verimlilik

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK

Proje Numarası

3210662

Teşekkür

"Üretim Hatlarından Toplanan Anlık Veriyi İşleyen, ERP Entegrasyonu ile Yorumlayan, Üretim Performans, Kalite ve Müşteri Memnuniyet Artışı Sağlayacak Üretim Yönetiminin Geliştirilmesi" başlıklı projenin kabulünden başarıyla sonuçlanmasına kadar geçen aşamada desteğini esirgemeyen TÜBİTAK'a teşekkürü borç bilirim.

A SAMPLE PRACTICE ON INCREASING TOTAL EFFICIENCY WITH DESIGN, PROCESS INNOVATION AND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION

Öz

The primary goal of this research is to bring an original study into the literature, in which the overall productivity increase in the processes from design to final use was discussed in detail. In the study, computer aided design, simulation, numerical analysis, and digital transformation software were used to increase product efficiency with design, process optimization and energy efficiency, and operational efficiency with digital transformation. With the findings obtained, an increase of 81.5% in product efficiency with design, 45% in energy and labour through process optimization, and 55% in operational efficiency has been achieved, resulting in a system that will benefit the economy of the nation. 3D designs were realized in Solidworks solid modelling and design programs. Mechanical were carried out with FEA method by using the ANSYS simulation program. CFD analyses were carried out to define flow coefficient, and fluid resistance coefficient by using the ANSYS Fluid mode. Anycasting simulation programs was used to define the production parameters. Within the scope of digital transformation, first time ever in our nation, a unique data monitoring system that can communicate with production equipment without use of any middleware and may run without requiring an external software and license has been implemented.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Product Efficiency, System Efficiency, Digital Transformation, Process Innovation, Operational Efficiency

Proje Numarası

3210662

Kaynakça

• Audretsch, David B., and Maksim Belitski. (2020). "The role of R&D and knowledge spillovers in innovation and productivity.", European economic review, 123: 103391.
• Bampatsou, Christina, and George Halkos. (2019). "Economic growth, efficiency and environmental elasticity for the G7 countries.", Energy Policy, 130: 355-360.
• Bimpizas-Pinis, Meletios, et al. (2021). "Is efficiency enough for circular economy?." Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 167.
• Brogi, Marina, and Valentina Lagasio. (2019). "Environmental, social, and governance and company profitability: Are financial intermediaries different?." Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26.3: 576-587.
• Cavlak, Hakan. (2021). "Etkinlik, Etkililik, Verimlilik, Kârlılık, Performans: Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve ve Karşılaştırma", Journal of Research in Business, 6.1: 99-126.
• Chen, Ying, et al. (2019). "Energy efficient dynamic offloading in mobile edge computing for internet of things", IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 9.3: 1050-1060.
• Correani, Alessia, et al. (2020). "Implementing a digital strategy: Learning from the experience of three digital transformation projects.", California Management Review, 62.4: 37-56.
• De Loecker, Jan, and Chad Syverson. (2021). "An industrial organization perspective on productivity", Handbook of industrial organization, Vol. 4. No. 1. Elsevier, 141-223.
• Dieppe, Alistair, ed. Global productivity: Trends, drivers, and policies. (2021). World Bank Publications.
• Dong, Kangyin, Yue Dou, and Qingzhe Jiang. (2022). "Income inequality, energy poverty, and energy efficiency: Who cause who and how?", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179: 121622.
• Dubey, Rameshwar, et al. (2019). "Can big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability?", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144: 534-545.
• Economidou, Marina, et al. (2020). "Review of 50 years of EU energy efficiency policies for buildings", Energy and Buildings, 225: 110322.
• Evkaya, Bilal. (2021). "Araştırma ve Geliştirme Harcamalarının Ekonomik Büyümeye Etkisi: Oecd Ülkeleri İçin Ampirik Bir Analiz", Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Birimler Fakültesi, Ankara.
• Falivene, Laura, et al. (2019). "Towards the online computer-aided design of catalytic pockets", Nature Chemistry, 11.10: 872-879.
• Flammer, Caroline, Bryan Hong, and Dylan Minor. (2019). "Corporate governance and the rise of integrating corporate social responsibility criteria in executive compensation: Effectiveness and implications for firm outcomes", Strategic Management Journal, 40.7: 1097-1122.
• Gong, Cheng, and Vincent Ribiere. (2021). "Developing a unified definition of digital transformation", Technovation, 102: 102217.
• Guo, Ran, and Yijun Yuan. (2020). "Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on energy efficiency in the industrial sector: Evidence from Chinese provincial data", Energy Policy, 145: 111747.
• Halaç, Duygu Seçkin, and Cansu Güloğlu. (2019). "İşyerinde Psikolojik Yıldırma Olgusunun Çalışan Verimliliği Üzerine Etkisi: MOSB’de Bir Saha Araştırması", Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 26.1: 157-180.
• Hatfield, Jerry L., and Christian Dold. (2019). "Water-use efficiency: advances and challenges in a changing climate", Frontiers in plant science, 10: 103.
• Hussein, Nabil, et al. (2020). "Simulation of semilunar valve function: computer-aided design, 3D printing and flow assessment with MR", 3D Printing in Medicine, 6: 1-9.
• Iris, Çağatay, and Jasmine Siu Lee Lam. (2019). "A review of energy efficiency in ports: Operational strategies, technologies and energy management systems", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112: 170-182.
• Jhamb, Spardha, et al. (2020). "A review of computer-aided design of paints and coatings", Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 27: 107-120.
• Karakuş, Güzide. (2021). "Ar-Ge/Tasarım Merkezi Nedir? Türkiye’de Ar-Ge ve Tasarım Merkezi Kurulum Sürecine İlişkin Bir Araştırma", Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23.3: 1381-1404.
• Kaya, A. Ğ. I. N. (2020). "Toplam kalite yönetimi bağlamında kaizen felsefesinin örgütlerin maliyet, verimlilik ve kalite düzeylerine etkileri", Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24.3: 1191-1207.
• Kazekami, Sachiko. (2020). "Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework", Telecommunications Policy, 44.2: 101868.
• Kim, Jin Young, et al. (2020). "High-efficiency perovskite solar cells", Chemical Reviews, 120.15: 7867-7918.
• Nuchturee, Chalermkiat, Tie Li, and Hongpu Xia. (2020). "Energy efficiency of integrated electric propulsion for ships–A review", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 134: 110145.
• Otte, Andreas. (2020). "3D computer-aided design reconstructions and 3D multi-material polymer replica printings of the first “iron hand” of Franconian knight Gottfried (Götz) von Berlichingen (1480–1562): an overview", Prosthesis, 2.4: 27.
• Pan, Wenrong, et al. (2022). "Digital economy: An innovation driver for total factor productivity", Journal of Business Research, 139: 303-311.
• Prokopenko, Joseph. (1987). “Productivity management: A practical handbook”, International Labour Organization, Moscow.
• Safitri, Vera Apridina, Lindriana Sari, and Rindu Rika Gamayuni. (2020). "Research and Development (R&D), Environmental Investments, to Eco-Efficiency, and Firm Value", The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 22.3.
• Santa, Ricardo, Jason B. MacDonald, and Mario Ferrer. (2019). "The role of trust in e-Government effectiveness, operational effectiveness and user satisfaction: Lessons from Saudi Arabia in e-G2B", Government Information Quarterly, 36.1: 39-50.
• Sickles, Robin C., and Valentin Zelenyuk. (2019). “Measurement of productivity and efficiency”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Su, Shuai, et al. (2019). "An energy-efficient train operation approach by integrating the metro timetabling and eco-driving", IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21.10: 4252-4268.
• Sun, Huaping, et al. (2020). "Estimating environmental efficiency and convergence: 1980 to 2016", Energy Policy: 208, 118224.
• Sun, Huaping, et al. (2019). "Institutional quality, green innovation and energy efficiency", Energy Policy, 135: 111002.
• Tabrizi, Behnam, et al. (2019). "Digital transformation is not about technology", Harvard Business Review, 13.March: 1-6.
• Thakur, Madhav P., et al. (2021). "Plant–soil feedbacks and temporal dynamics of plant diversity–productivity relationships", Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36.7: 651-661.
• TÜBİTAK (1995). “Bilim ve Teknolojiye Ayrılmış İnsan Kaynaklarının Ölçümü Hakkında Kılavuz: Canberra Kılavuzu”, https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files/BTYPD/kilavuzlar/canberra_tr.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2023).
• TÜBİTAK (2002). “Frascati Kılavuzu: Araştırma ve Deneysel Geliştirme Taramaları İçin Önerilen Standart Uygulama”, https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files/BTYPD/kilavuzlar/frascati_tr.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2023).
• TÜBİTAK (2005). “Oslo Kılavuzu Işığında Yenilik”, https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files/BTYPD/kilavuzlar/Oslo_Presentation.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2023).
• TÜBİTAK (2006). “Oslo Kılavuzu Yenilik Verilerinin Toplanması ve Yorumlanması İçin İlkeler”, https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files/BTYPD/kilavuzlar/Oslo_3_TR.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2023).
• TÜBİTAK (2010). “TÜBİTAK: Sanayi Ar-Ge Projeleri Destekleme Programı Uygulama Esaslarında Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Uygulama Esasları”, https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/208_sayili_bilim_kurulu_karari.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 06.05.2023).
• Ulusoy, Ahmet. (2021). "Türk bankacılık sisteminde kârlılık üzerinde etkili olan faktörlerin belirlenmesi", Bankacılık ve Sermaye Piyasası Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5.11: 20-48.
• Vial, Gregory. (2019). "Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda", The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28.2: 118-144.
• Vishwakarma, Satyendra K., et al. (2019). "Smart energy efficient home automation system using IoT", 2019 4th international conference on internet of things: Smart innovation and usages (IoT-SIU), IEEE, 18th -19th April 2019, Ghaziabad.
• Wang, Li, J. E. Dykstra, and Shihong Lin. (2019). "Energy efficiency of capacitive deionization", Environmental Science & Technology, 53.7: 3366-3378.
• Wu, Haitao, Yu Hao, and Siyu Ren. (2020). "How do environmental regulation and environmental decentralization affect green total factor energy efficiency: Evidence from China", Energy Economics, 91: 104880.
• Wu, Wenwang, et al. (2019). "Mechanical design and multifunctional applications of chiral mechanical metamaterials: A review", Materials & Design, 180: 107950.
• Xie, Jun, et al. (2019). "Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance?", Business Strategy and the Environment, 28.2 (2019): 286-300.
• Xu, Zhenyuan, et al. (2020). "Ultrahigh-fficiency desalination via a thermally-localized multistage solar still", Energy & Environmental Science, 13.3: 830-839.
• Yildiz Çankaya, Sibel, and Bulent Sezen. (2019). "Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance", Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30.1: 98-121.
• Zakari, Abdulrasheed, et al. (2022). "Energy efficiency and sustainable development goals (SDGs)", Energy, 239: 122365.
• Zakoldaev, D. A., et al. (2019). "Computer-aided design of technical documentation on the digital product models of Industry 4.0", IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,. Vol. 483. No. 1. IOP Publishing.
• Ziyadin, S., Saltanat Suieubayeva, and A. Utegenova. (2020). "Digital transformation in business", Digital Age: Chances, Challenges and Future, 7. Springer International Publishing.