Türkiye’de fizyoterapi öğrencilerinin beklentileri ve kariyer seçimi

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 38 - 45, 04.06.2018

Selnur Narin Bayram Ünver Ayşe Neriman Narin

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, fizyoterapi öğrencilerinin meslek seçimleri, meslek hakkında ve fizyoterapi eğitimi ile ilgili görüş ve beklentilerini belirlemekti.

Yöntem: Araştırmanın örneklemini 2012-2013 öğretim yılında, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi fizyoterapi öğrenim gören ve araştırmanın yürütüldüğü tarihte sınıfta olan ve araştırmayı kabul eden 232 öğrenci (68’i 1. sınıf, 7’si 2. sınıf, 57’si 3. sınıf, ve 35’i 4.sınıf) oluşturuldu. Birinci sınıfın % 73,5'i, ikinci sınıfın % 63,8'i, üçüncü sınıfın % 59,6'sı ve dördüncü sınıfın % 57,1 öğrencileri mesleğinin geleceğinin farkındaydılar. Öğrencilerin fizyoterapi eğitimine başlamasında başlıca etkenler, kariyer beklentileri ve toplumsal değer yargılarıydı. Öğrencilerin % 92'den fazlası, fizyoterapi seçiminde, tanıdıklarından ve arkadaşlarından olumlu yönde etkilendiğini açıkladı.

Bulgular: Eğitim yıllarına göre, öğrencilerin hak ve sorumluluk düzeyleri arasında, mesleki kaygı düzeyleri ile bilgi seviyeleri arasında fark bulunmadı. Öğrencilerin büyük çoğunluğu fizyoterapi mesleği hakkında yeterli bilgiye sahipler ve mezuniyet sonrası iş bulma konusunda endişe duymuyorlardı.

Sonuç: Öğrencinin fizyoterapi mesleğini seçme kararında başlıca etkenleri, kariyer beklentileri ve topluluk değer yargıları şeklinde düşünülebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fizyoterapi öğrencileri, Kariyer seçimi, Eğitim, Fizyoterapi

Physiotherapy students’ expectations and career choice in Turkey

Öz

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine physiotherapy students’ perceptions and expectations related to their physiotherapy profession and education.

Method: Two hundred and thirty two students (68 were first-year students, 72 were second-year students, 57 were third-year students, and 35 were fourth-year students) who were studying in the School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation of Dokuz Eylül University in the 2012–2013 academic year and who accepted to participate in the research were consisted in the sample of the study. Students were aware of their future profession: 73.5% of first-year students, 63.8% of second-year students, 59.6% of third-year students, and 57.1% of fourth-year students. Reasons for preferring physiotherapy were community perception and career opportunities. More than 92% of the students declared they were positively affected by acquaintances and friends in choosing physiotherapy.

Results: Analyzed in terms of years of education, there were no differences between students’ rights and responsibility levels, in terms of their vocational anxiety and knowledge levels. The major numbers of students had adequate information about physiotherapy profession and they did not have worries about finding a job after graduation.

Conclusion: Main factors for student’s decision to study physiotherapy were their career expectations and community perception.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Physiotherapy students, Career choice, Education, physiotherapy

Kaynakça

• 1. Jain R, Menezes RG, Chawla P, et al. Career choice among physiotherapy students at Mangalore, India. JCDR. 2011;5:344-346.
• 2. Watmough S, Taylor D, Ryland I. Using questionnaires to determine whether medical graduates’ career choice is determined by undergraduate or postgraduate experiences. Med Teach. 2007;29:830-832.
• 3. Lambert TW, Goldacre MJ, Turner G. Career choices of United Kingdom medical graduates of 2002: questionnaire survey. Med Educ. 2006;40:514-521.
• 4. van Offenbeek MAG, Kiewiet DJ, Oosterhuis MJ. The compatibility of future doctors’ career intentions with changing health care demands. Med Educ. 2006;40:530-538.
• 5. McParland M, Noble LM, Livingston G, et al. The effect of a psychiatric attachment on students’ attitude s to and intention to pursue psychiatry as a career. Med Educ. 2003;37:447-754.
• 6. Ohman A, Stenlund H, Dahlgren L. Career choice, professional preferences and gender? The case of Swedish physiotherapy students. Adv Physiother. 2001;3:94-107.
• 7. Nordholm LA, Westbrook MT. Career selection, satisfaction and aspirations among female students in five health professions. Aust Psychol. 1981;16:63-76.
• 8. Turner P. The occupational prestige of physiotherapy. Perceptions of student physiotherapists in Australia. Aust J Physiother. 2001;47:191-197.
• 9. Starczynska M, Kiebzak W, Sliwinski Z. Autonomy of physiotherapist profession. The case of the US educational system. Pol J Physiother. 2008;2:217-222.
• 10. Kiebzak W, Szczegielniak J, Butkiewicz M, et al. Standards of competence in the physiotherapist profession. Pol J Physiother. 2009;9:84-96.
• 11. Gotlib J, Białoszewski D, Sierdzinski J, e t a l . A comparison of the perceptions and aspirations of third-year physiotherapy students trained in three educational settings in Poland. Physiotherapy. 2010;96:30-37.
• 12. Charles G, Bainbridge L, Gilbert J. The University of British Columbia model of interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 2010;24:9-18.
• 13. Ojeda BS, Creutzberg M, Feoli AMP, et al. Nursing, nutrition and physiotherapy students: career choice. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2009;17:396-402.
• 14. Richardson S. Undergraduates’ perceptions of tourism and hospitality as a career choice. Int J Hosp Manag. 2009;28:382-388.
• 15. Miers ME, Rickaby CE, Pollard KC. Career choices in health care: Is nursing a special case? A content analysis of survey data. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44:1196-1209.
• 16. Park JR, Coombs C, Wilkinson AJ, et al. Attractiveness of physiotherapy in the National Health Service as a career choice: a qualitative study. Physiotherapy. 2003;89:575-583.
• 17. Ünlü S, Ozgür G, Gümüş AB. School of nursing students’ views and expectations related to nursing profession and education. Ege University School of Nursing Journal. 2008;24:43-56.
• 18. Sirin A, Oztürk R, Bezci G, et al. Nursing students’ opinions related to selection and application of profession. Dirim Medicine Journal. 2008;83:69-75.
• 19. Jones M, Mcintyre J, Naylor S. Are physiotherapy students adequately prepared to successfully gain employment? Physiotherapy. 2010;96:169-175.
• 20. European Region of the World Confederation for Physical Therapy. Summary of physiotherapy education within the national educational system. London, United Kingdom: World Confederation for Physical Therapy; 2005. Available at: http://www.physioeurope.org/public/File/3 pdf.
• 21. McMeeken J. Physiotherapy education in Australia. Phys Ther Rev. 2007;9:83-91.
• 22. Bithell CH. Entry-level physiotherapy education in the United Kingdom: governance and curriculum. Phys Ther Rev. 2007;9:145-155.
• 23. Lindquist I, Engardt M, Garnham L, et al. Physiotherapy students’ professional identity on the edge of working life. Med Teach. 2006;28:270-276.
• 24. Oster I, Munk KP, Henriksen J. Career dreams among health care students: I want to make a difference. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2017; Mar 28:1-14. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2017.1311881.
• 25. Johanson MA. Sex differences in career expectations of physical therapist students. Phys Ther. 2007;87:1199-1211.