Entropik Örgüt İklimi: Sessiz İstifa Ve Sosyal Kaytarma Davranışlarının Görünmeyen Tetikleyicisi

Öz

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, entropik örgüt ikliminin sessiz istifa ve sosyal kaytarma davranışları üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Çalışmada, entropik örgüt iklimi kavramı ile sessiz istifa ve sosyal kaytarma arasındaki ilişkiyi anlamaya yönelik literatür taraması yapılmış ve teorik altyapı oluşturulmuştur. Yöntem: Araştırma, Türkiye’nin çeşitli şehirlerinden, özel ve kamu sektörlerinde görev yapan 18 yaş ve üzeri 372 katılımcı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Anket yoluyla toplanan veriler, nicel araştırma deseni çerçevesinde SPSS 26.0 kullanılarak betimsel istatistikler, güvenilirlik analizleri ve korelasyon ile regresyon analizleri ile incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Bulgular, değişkenler arasında anlamlı, çoğunlukla pozitif ve orta düzeyde ilişkiler olduğunu göstermektedir. Süreçsel entropi ile motivasyonsuzluk arasında negatif ilişki öngören hipotez reddedilmiştir. Örgütsel katılımın düşük olduğu ortamlarda çalışanların sosyal kaytarma eğilimlerinin arttığı ve bu durumun ilişkisel entropi ile anlamlı biçimde bağlantılı olduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, entropik örgüt ikliminin alt boyutları ile sessiz istifa arasında çoğunlukla pozitif ilişkiler saptanmış ve her iki alt boyutun da çalışan sosyalleşmesini olumsuz etkilediği görülmüştür. Sonuç: Araştırma, entropik örgüt ikliminin çalışan motivasyonu, bağlılığı ve sosyal ilişkiler üzerinde olumsuz etkiler yarattığını ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışanlar, bu ortamlarda kendilerini güvende hissetmemekte, aidiyet duygularını kaybetmekte ve savunma mekanizmaları doğrultusunda sessiz istifa ve sosyal kaytarma gibi davranışlar sergileyebilmektedir. Bulgular, entropik örgüt ikliminin çalışan davranışları ve örgütsel bağlılık üzerinde belirleyici bir rol oynadığını göstermektedir. Özgünlük: Çalışma, örgüt iklimi ile çalışan davranışları arasındaki ilişkiye dair literatüre katkı sağlamaktadır ve insan kaynakları yönetimi ile örgütsel davranış alanlarında farkındalık yaratmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Entropi
• entropik örgüt
• istifa
• kaytarma
• iş yeri dinamikleri
• çalışan motivasyonu.

Entropic Organizational Climate: An Unseen Antecedent of Quiet Quitting and Social Loafing Behaviors

Öz

Aim: This study aims to examine the effects of an entropic organizational climate on quiet quitting and social loafing behaviors. A literature review was conducted to establish a theoretical framework on the relationship between entropic organizational climate and these employee behaviors. Method: The study was conducted with 372 participants aged 18 and above, working in various public and private sector organizations across different cities in Turkey. Data were collected via a structured questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS 26.0. Descriptive statistics, reliability analyses, and correlational and regression analyses were employed to examine the relationships between variables. Results: The results indicate significant, predominantly positive, and moderate correlations among the variables. The hypothesis predicting a negative relationship between process entropy and demotivation was rejected. Findings also reveal that employees in environments with low organizational engagement are more prone to social loafing, and this tendency is significantly associated with relational entropy. Additionally, mostly positive and significant relationships were observed between the subdimensions of the entropic organizational climate and quiet quitting. Both subdimensions were found to negatively affect employee socialization. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that an entropic organizational climate has notable adverse effects on employee motivation, work commitment, and social interactions. Employees in such environments tend to feel insecure, lose their sense of belonging, and develop self-protective mechanisms that may manifest as quiet quitting or social loafing. These behaviors reflect disengagement and reduced effort in fulfilling work responsibilities. Overall, the findings underscore the critical role of entropic organizational climates in shaping employee behaviors and organizational commitment. Originality: The study contributes to the literature by elucidating the link between organizational climate and employee behaviors, highlighting the negative impacts of entropic climates on motivation, and providing insights for human resources management and organizational behavior practices.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Entropy
• entropic organization
• quitting
• loafing
• workplace dynamics
• employee motivation

Kaynakça

1. Acar, A. Z. (2002). Örgütsel iklimin çalışan tutumları üzerindeki etkileri. Yönetim Dergisi, 13(42), 35-52.
2. Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom, C. P. M., & Peterson, M. F. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of organizational culture and climate. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
3. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands‐resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management, 43(1), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20004
4. Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York, NY: George Braziller.
5. Brinsfield, C. T. (2013). Employee silence motives: Investigation of dimensionality and development of measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(5), 671-697. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1829
6. Cole, G. A. (1993). Management: Theory and practice. London: DP Publications Ltd.
7. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H. & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
8. Cropanzano, R., & Wright, T. A. (2001). When a “happy” worker is really a “productive” worker: A review and further refinement of the happy–productive worker thesis. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53(3), 182-199. https://doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.53.3.182

9. Çavuş, M. F. (2021). Entropic organizational climate (EOC): Development and validation of new scale. Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 106-119.
10. Çavuş, M. F. & Develi, A. (2022). Entropik örgüt iklimi, örgütsel umursamazlık ve iş tatmini: Kavramlar ve ölçme araçları. Örgütsel Davranış Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 110-123.
11. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
12. Detert, J. R. & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
13. Detert, J. R. &Treviño, L. K. (2010). Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organization Science, 21(1), 249-270.
14. Detert, J. R. & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461-488.
15. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
16. Efeoğlu, İ. E. & Özgen, H. (2009). Çalışanların örgütsel bağlılık düzeylerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(9), 185-204.
17. Erol, M. (2001). Sosyal entropinin verimlilik üzerindeki etkileri. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 1(2), 127-143.
18. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
19. George, J. M. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic origins of perceived social loafing in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.2307/256475
20. Ghosh, P. (2022). Quiet quitting: Organizational implications and management challenges. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability, 5(2), 33-45.
21. Gürbüz, S. & Şahin, F. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
22. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
23. Hunt, M. (2023). The rise of quiet quitting: A threat to workplace engagement. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, 2023(7), 1-3.
24. Høigaard, R. (2002). Perceived social loafing questionnaire (Yayınlanmamış makale). Agder University College, Kristiansand.
25. Jackson, S. E. & Schuler, R. S. (1985). A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(1), 16-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90020-2
26. Jain, S., Kumar, S. & Singh, R. (2023). Quiet quitting and employee engagement: A conceptual exploration. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, ahead-of-print.
27. Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (5. baskı). Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
28. Karabay, M. E. & Ataman, B. (2021). İş yerinde pasifleşme: Nedenleri ve sonuçları üzerine bir inceleme. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 8(1), 89-106.
29. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. & Gümüşlüoğlu, L. (2013). Social loafing in the workplace: The role of organizational identification and trust. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(3), 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.739581
30. Karau, S. J. & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681-706.
31. Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
32. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K. & Edmondson, A. C. (2009). Silenced by fear: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 163-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009.07.002
33. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34. Klotz, A. C. & Bolino, M. C. (2022). When quiet quitting is worse than the real thing. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2022/09/when-quiet-quitting-is-worse-than-the-real-thing
35. Kont, B. (2022). What is quiet quitting? Reasons and solutions for companies. Retrieved from https://www.ixtalent.com/comprehensive-approach-what-does-quiet-quitting-mean-to-companies
36. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J. & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.407
37. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski, R. A. & Bennett, N. (2004). Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30(2), 285-304.
38. Maslach, C. & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205
39. Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
40. Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
41. Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W. & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don't communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453-1476.
42. Morrison, E. W. & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725.
43. Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412.
44. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
45. Özçelik, G. & Turgut, H. (2023). Sessiz istifa olgusu: Kavramsal bir çerçeve ve güncel yönetsel yansımalar. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.1266251
46. Özdemir, G. & Sarıoğlu Uğur, S. (2020). Algılanan örgütsel belirsizliğin tükenmişlik ve işten ayrılma niyeti üzerindeki etkisinde psikolojik dayanıklılığın rolü. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(21), 2775-2800. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.710047
47. Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J. & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150-163. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391486
48. Savaş, B. Ç. & Turan, M. (2023). Sessiz istifa ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. The Online Journal of Recreation and Sports, 12(3), 442-453.
49. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
50. Schneider, B. (1975). Organizational climates: An essay. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 447-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01386.x
51. Scott, W. R. & Davis, G. F. (2007). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural and open systems perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
52. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
53. Sezer, U., Kocaekşi, S., Ektirici, A., Aygün, C. & Özcan, T. (2021). Algılanan sosyal kaytarma ölçeği–Türkçe formu: Genç ve yetişkin sporcu örnekleminde geçerlik ve güvenirliğin incelenmesi. Psikoloji Çalışmaları - Studies in Psychology, 41(3), 899-926.
54. Simms, A. M. & Nichols, T. (2014). Social loafing: A review of the literature. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 15(1), 58-67.
55. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465. https://doi.org/10.5465/256865
56. Stacey, R. D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
57. Şahin, F. & Dündar, G. (2021). Örgütsel entropi algısının çalışan performansı üzerindeki etkisinde stresin aracılık rolü. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(2), 1107-1123. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2021.1227
58. Tangirala, S. & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Employee silence on critical work issues: The cross-level effects of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 61(1), 37-68.
59. Tyler, T. R. & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349-361. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
60. Ülker, F. & Kanten, P. (2009). Örgütlerde sessizlik iklimi, işgören sessizliği ve örgütsel bağlılık ilişkisine yönelik bir araştırma. Aksaray Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 1(2), 111-126.
61. Vakola, M. (2014). What’s in there for me? Individual readiness to change and the perceived impact of organizational change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(3), 195-209.
62. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
63. Zenger, J. & Folkman, J. (2022). Quiet quitting is about bad bosses, not bad employees. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2022/08/quiet-quitting-is-about-bad-bosses-not-bademployees