Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Student Opinions About The Academic Nature Camp

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 178 - 187, 25.03.2020

Öz

The aim of this study is to determine the views of the students participating in the academic camp, where the activities that were originally designed by the researchers carried out in the Nebiyan Mountain National Park, which is located within the borders of the province of Samsun. The study group consisted of 17 students who volunteered to participate in the camp. Games and activities related to various disciplines have been carried out in the classroom, which lasted for one night and two days. Science and mathematics education, music and visual arts activities, orienteering, climbing, walking and sportive activities were also included for the activities. In the study, the data were collected through semi-structured interviews with the students in the end of all activities. In the interviews, their wives’ about the camp was asked to the participants. The data obtained from the interviews were analyzed using qualitative research techniques. When all the findings are considered as a whole, it was determined that the participants included in the study liked the activities and felt more free in the camp environment. They stated that staying in a tent was a new experience for them. These statements are considered as the finding that the study has achieved its purpose. It is recommended to expand these types of camps and expand them to cover different subject areas.

Kaynakça

  • Asmara, C. H., Anwar, K., & Muhammad, R. N. (2016). EFL Learners' Perception toward an Outdoor Learning Program. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 4(2), 74.
  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five traditions. California: SAGE Publications.
  • Fletcher, J. K. (1980). Traditional planetarium programming versus participatory planetarium programming. School Science and Mathematics, 80(3), 227-232.
  • Ford, P. (1989). Outdoor education-Definition and philosophy. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 60(2), 31-34.
  • Gray, T. ve Martin, P. (2012). The role and place of outdoor education in the australian national curriculum. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 16(1), 39-50.
  • Lakin, L. (2006). Science beyond the classroom. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 88-90.
  • Lappin, E. (1984). Outdoor education for behavior disordered students. ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools Las Cruces NM. Erişim adresi: https://www.ericdigests.org/pre-922/outdoor.htm
  • Lane, B., J. Bonic ve N. Wallgren-Bonic. (1983). The group walk-talk: a therapeutic challenge for secondary students with social/emotional problems. Teaching Exceptional Children, 16 (1), 12-17.
  • Mallon, G. L. & Bruce, M. H. (1982). Student achievement and attitudes in astronomy: An experimental comparison of two planetarium programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(1), 53-61.
  • Nicol, R. (2002). Outdoor education: research topic or universal value? Part two, Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 2(2), 85-99.
  • Petrina, S. (2000). The political ecology of design and technology education: An inquiry into methods. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 207–237.
  • Plummer, J. D. (2009). Early elementary students' development of astronomy concepts in the planetarium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 192-209.
  • Reed, G. & Campbell, J. R. (1972). A comparison of the effectiveness of the planetarium and the classroom chalkboard and celestial globe in the teaching of specific astronomical concepts. School Science and Mathematics, 72(5), 368-374.
  • Sibley, A. B., Etnier, J. (2003). The Relationship between Physical Activity and Cognition in Children: A Meta-Analysis. Pediatric exercise Science, 15(3), 243-256.

Akademik Doğa Kampına Yönelik Öğrenci Görüşleri

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 178 - 187, 25.03.2020

Öz

Bu çalışmada amaç, Samsun ili sınırları içinde yer alan Nebiyan Dağı Milli Parkı’nda gerçekleştirilen araştırmacılar tarafından özgün olarak tasarlanmış etkinliklerin gerçekleştirildiği akademik kampa katılan öğrencilerin, kamp ile ilgili görüşlerini belirlemektir. Çalışma grubunu kampa katılmaya gönüllü olan 17 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Bir gece iki gün süren sınıf dışı eğitim ortamında, çeşitli disiplinlere ilişkin oyunlar ve etkinlikler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yapılan etkinlikler için de fen ve matematik eğitimleri, müzik ve görsel sanatlar etkinlikleri, oryantiring, tırmanış, yürüyüş ve sportif aktiviteler yer almıştır. Çalışmada veriler, tüm aktivitelerin sona ermesiyle birlikte kampa katılan öğrenciler ile yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler ile toplanmıştır. Yapılan görüşmeler sırasında katılımcılara; kampa ilişkin görüşleri sorulmuştur. Görüşmelerden elde edilen veriler, nitel araştırma teknikleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulguların tamamı bir bütün olarak ele alındığında, çalışmaya dâhil olan katılımcıların, yapılan etkinlikleri beğendiği ve kendilerini kamp ortamında daha özgür hissettikleri belirlenmiştir. Özellikle çadırda kalmanın kendileri için yeni bir deneyim olduğunu ifade etmişlerdir. Bu ifadeler çalışmanın amacına ulaştığının bulgusu olarak düşünülmektedir. Bu tip kampların yaygınlaştırılması ve farklı konu alanlarını da kapsayacak şekilde genişletilmesi önerilmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Asmara, C. H., Anwar, K., & Muhammad, R. N. (2016). EFL Learners' Perception toward an Outdoor Learning Program. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 4(2), 74.
  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five traditions. California: SAGE Publications.
  • Fletcher, J. K. (1980). Traditional planetarium programming versus participatory planetarium programming. School Science and Mathematics, 80(3), 227-232.
  • Ford, P. (1989). Outdoor education-Definition and philosophy. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 60(2), 31-34.
  • Gray, T. ve Martin, P. (2012). The role and place of outdoor education in the australian national curriculum. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 16(1), 39-50.
  • Lakin, L. (2006). Science beyond the classroom. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 88-90.
  • Lappin, E. (1984). Outdoor education for behavior disordered students. ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools Las Cruces NM. Erişim adresi: https://www.ericdigests.org/pre-922/outdoor.htm
  • Lane, B., J. Bonic ve N. Wallgren-Bonic. (1983). The group walk-talk: a therapeutic challenge for secondary students with social/emotional problems. Teaching Exceptional Children, 16 (1), 12-17.
  • Mallon, G. L. & Bruce, M. H. (1982). Student achievement and attitudes in astronomy: An experimental comparison of two planetarium programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(1), 53-61.
  • Nicol, R. (2002). Outdoor education: research topic or universal value? Part two, Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 2(2), 85-99.
  • Petrina, S. (2000). The political ecology of design and technology education: An inquiry into methods. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 207–237.
  • Plummer, J. D. (2009). Early elementary students' development of astronomy concepts in the planetarium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 192-209.
  • Reed, G. & Campbell, J. R. (1972). A comparison of the effectiveness of the planetarium and the classroom chalkboard and celestial globe in the teaching of specific astronomical concepts. School Science and Mathematics, 72(5), 368-374.
  • Sibley, A. B., Etnier, J. (2003). The Relationship between Physical Activity and Cognition in Children: A Meta-Analysis. Pediatric exercise Science, 15(3), 243-256.
Toplam 14 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm MAKALE
Yazarlar

Elif Çobanoğlu

Mahir Yerlikaya 0000-0003-2678-1776

Aslı Yerlikaya 0000-0002-9132-8874

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Mart 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 30 Ocak 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Çobanoğlu, E., Yerlikaya, M., & Yerlikaya, A. (2020). Akademik Doğa Kampına Yönelik Öğrenci Görüşleri. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(1), 178-187.

  Bilginin ışığında aydınlanmak dileğiyle....

 ODÜSOBİAD