5. Sınıf Madde ve Değişim Ünitesi Kapsamında Hazırlanan Senaryoların Merak Edilme Düzeyinin Cinsiyete Göre Değişimi

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 44 Sayı: 44, 1 - 14, 01.07.2018

Cemal Tosun

Öz

Bu araştırma da üzerinde durulan problem durumu
beşinci sınıf düzeyinde madde ve değişim ünitesi kapsamında hazırlanan problem
senaryolarının merak edilme düzeylerini belirlemektir. Bu amaçla araştırmada
nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden deneysel olmayan araştırma desenlerinden
karşılaştırma araştırma deseninden faydalanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini
Bartın İl Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü bünyesindeki altı farklı devlet okulunda
2015-2016 öğretim yılı bahar döneminde öğrenim görmekte olan toplam 425
ortaokul öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında senaryoların merak
edilme düzeyini belirleme anketi kullanılmıştır. Ankete öğrencilerin verdikleri
cevaplardan elde edilen veriler betimsel analiz tekniği kullanılarak analiz
edilmiştir. Ayrıca senaryoların merak edilme düzeyleri arasında cinsiyete göre
herhangi bir farklılığın olup olmadığını belirlemek için ise bağımsız
örneklemler için t-testi tekniğinden faydalanılmıştır. Hazırlanan senaryolardan
özellikle araba, futbol, mumun erimesi ve buz sarkıtları konularıyla ilgili
olanlarda erkekler lehine, su ve suyun hal değişimleriyle ilgili olanlarda ise
kızlar lehine istatistiki olarak anlamlı farklılıkların olduğu sonuçlarına
ulaşılmıştır.   

Anahtar Kelimeler

Beşinci sınıf öğrencileri, madde ve değişim, merak

Effect of Gender on Levels of Curiosity towards Scenarios Prepared within the Scope of the “Matter and Change” Unit at the 5th Grade

Öz

This study aims to determine students’ levels of curiosity towards the problem-based scenarios prepared with the support of teacher candidates for the “Matter and Change” Unit under the 5th grade curriculum. It was also investigated whether gender influences the level of curiosity of fifth grade students. To this end, correlational- research design was used, which is a non-empirical research design among quantitative research methods. The research sample consisted of 425 (196 girl, 229 boy) 5th grade students who studied at six different state schools in Bartın in the spring term, 2015-2016. In the context of the study, a questionnaire prepared by the researcher -determining the curiosity levels- was used. The data obtained was analyzed with the descriptive analysis technique from quantitative data analysis techniques. In addition, Pearson-correlational analysis was used in order to determine whether gender influences the level of curiosity of fifth grade students. It has been found out that gender has a significant effect on students’ curiosity levels about the solution of some scenarios.

Anahtar Kelimeler

5th grade students, curiosity, matter and change, PBL and scenarios

Kaynakça

• Baser, M., & Geban, O. (2007). Effectiveness of conceptual change instruction on understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(1), 115–133.
• Campbell, J.R. (1972). “Is scientific curiosity a viable outcome in today's secondary school science program?” School Science and Mathematics, 72 (2), 139-147.
• Campbell, R.J. (2000). The development and validation of an instructional design model for creating problem based learning. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(01), 67A (UMI No: 9957710).
• Canpolat, N. (2006). Turkish undergraduates’ misconceptions of evaporation, evaporation rate, and vapour pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1757–1770.
• Canpolat, N., Pınarbası, T., & Sozbilir, M. (2006). Prospective teachers’ misconce- options of vaporization and vapor pressure. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(8), 1237–1242.
• Carlin, K.A. (1999). The impact of curiosity on learning during a school field trip to the zoo. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60 (09), 3253A. (UMI No. 9945941)
• Carlton, K. (2000). Teaching about heat and temperature. Physics Education, 35(2), 101-105.
• Cerezo, N.A. (2000). Problem-based learning in the middle school: Perception of at risk females and their teachers. Dissertation Abstracts Internatinal, 61(02), 475A. (UMI No: 9958903).
• Chang, J.Y. (1999). Teachers college students’ conceptions about evaporation, condensation, and boiling. Science Education, 83, 511–526.
• Conger, A. (2001). Problem based science learning in a mixed ability classroom that includes gifted and talented children. Master’s Abstracts International, 39 (03), 644. (UMI No: 1402664).
• Costu, B., & Ayas, A. (2005). Evaporation in different liquids: Secondary students’ conceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 75-97.
• Duch, B.J. (2007). Problem-based learning. University of Delaware, http://www.udel.edu/pbl/ (accessed December 20, 2010).
• Duch, B.J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education. The power of problem-based learning, Ed. Barbara J. Duch, Susan E. Groh, and Deborah E. Allen, 3-11. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus.
• Gopal, H., Kleinsmidt, J., Case, J., & Musonge, P. (2004). An investigation of tertiary students’ understanding of evaporation, condensation and vapor pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1597–1620.
• Harty, H., & Beall, D. (1984). “Toward the development of a children’s science curiosity measure”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21 (4), 425-436.
• Harty, H., Beall, D., & Scharmann, L. (1985). Relationships between elementary school students’ science achievement and their attitudes toward science, interest in science, reactive curiosity, and scholastic aptitude. School Science and Mathematics, 85 (6), 472-479.
• Johnson, P. (1998). Children’s understandings of changes of state involving the gas state, part 2: Evaporation and condensation below boiling point. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 695–709.
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (seventh edition). Boston: Pearson
• Pınarbası, T., & Canpolat, N. (2003). Students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 80, 1328-1332.
• Savery, J.R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.
• Sonmez, D. & Lee H. (2003). Problem-based learning in science. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education, ERIC Digest ED-SE–03–04,1–2.
• Zacharias C. Z., Georgios, O., & Marios, P. (2008). Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students’. conceptual understanding in heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Scıence Teaching, 45(9), 1021-1035.