PDCA Cycle in Quality Processes: Proficiency Levels of Turkish Universities According to the Opinions of External Evaluators

Yıl 2023, Sayı: 57, 281 - 305, 01.01.2023

Sedat Yazıcı , Fatma Ünal , Özer Çulhaoğlu

https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1008011

Cited By: 2

Öz

Turkish universities have been experiencing a rapid change and transformation in their quality and accreditation processes. The stakeholders of this development have encountered many new concepts, methods, and techniques. Among others, the Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA) cycle has been a frequently recommended technique to be used. The study aims to introduce the conceptual and theoretical analysis of the PDCA, examine its application conditions in the Turkish higher education institutions given the view of external evaluators, and determine the application areas of this cycle. A qualitative case model was used in the study. Data obtained from 42 participants who worked as external evaluators in the quality processes of higher education were analyzed. Findings show that Turkish universities’ knowledge about the PDCA cycle is very limited; the cycle has been used only because of necessity; and whereas the Plan and Do stages were successfully performed, the application of the Control and Act stages were insufficient. The technical use of the PDCA was also found very limited. We suggest that training support by the Turkish Higher Education Quality Counsel and universities will contribute to effectively using the cycle as an auxiliary tool in quality processes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

PDCA cycle, quality, accreditation, evaluation, THEQC

Kalite Süreçlerinde PUKÖ Döngüsü: Dış Değerlendiricilerin Görüşlerine Göre Türk Üniversitelerinin Yeterlik Düzeyleri

Öz

Türk üniversiteleri kalite ve akreditasyon süreçlerinde hızlı bir değişim, dönüşüm yaşamaktadır. Sürecin paydaşları birçok yeni kavram, yöntem ve teknikle karşılaşmaktadır. Planla, Uygula, Kontrol Et, Önlem Al (PUKÖ) döngüsü Türkiye’de yükseköğretim kalite süreçlerinde kullanılması sıklıkla önerilen bir tekniktir. Çalışmanın amacı, PUKÖ döngüsünün kavramsal ve kuramsal çerçevesini tanıtmak; kalite süreçlerine katılan değerlendiricilerin görüşlerine göre Türkiye’de yükseköğretim kurumlarında PUKÖ döngüsünün uygulanma durumunu incelemek; döngünün yükseköğretimde uygulama alanlarını tespit etmektir. Çalışmada, nitel araştırma desenlerinden durum çalışması kullanılmıştır. Yükseköğretim kalite süreçlerinde dış değerlendirici olarak görev alan 42 katılımcıdan elde edilen veriler analiz edilmiş, üniversitelerde bilgi yetersizliklerinin olduğu; döngüyü bir zorunluluk gereği kullandıkları, Planla ve Uygula aşamalarının başarıyla gerçekleştirildiği ancak Kontrol Et ve Önlem Al aşamalarının yetersiz düzeyde gerçekleştirildiği görülmüştür. Bazı katılımcıların izleme sürecinde veri toplama sorununa işaret etmelerine rağmen genel olarak PUKÖ döngüsünün kullanımında yararlanabilecek araçlara dikkat çekmemiş olmaları, döngüyü kendi başına yeterli bir iyileştirme aygıtı olarak algılıyor olmaları şaşırtıcıdır. Sonuçlar, PUKÖ döngüsünün teknik açıdan kullanma yeterliliği konusunda önemli eksikliklerin olduğunu göstermektedir. Katılımcılar, döngünün kullanımıyla ilgili eğitim gereksinimini belirtmekle birlikte hangi araçlarla desteklenmesi gerektiği, ne gibi yöntemsel veya teknik eksikliklerin olduğu konusunda herhangi bir görüş bildirmemişlerdir. YÖKAK ve üniversitelerin PUKÖ uygulamasında kullanılan yardımcı araçlarla ilgili eğitim desteği sağlaması, döngünün etkin şekilde kullanılmasına katkı sağlayacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

PUKÖ döngüsü, kalite, akreditasyon, değerlendirme, YÖKAK.

Kaynakça

• Borys, M., Milosz, M., & Plechawska-Wojcik, M. (2012). Using Deming cycle for strengthening cooperation between industry and university in IT engineering education program. 2012 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, ICL 2012, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL.2012.6402164
• Candiello, A., & Cortesi, A. (2011). KPI-supported PDCA model for innovation policy management in local government. In M. Janssen, H. J. Scholl, M. A. Wimmer, & Y. Tan (Eds.), Electronic Government. EGOV 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 6846, pp. 320–331). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_27
• Carder, B., & Ragan, P. (2004). Measurement matters: how effective assessment drives business and safety performance. ASQ Quality Press.
• Charantimath, P. M. (2017). Total Quality Management (3rd ed.). Pearson.
• Chojnacka-Komorowska, A., & Kochaniec, S. (2019). Improving the quality control process using the PDCA cycle. Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, 63(4), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2019.4.06
• Condrea, E., Stanciu, A. C., & Aivaz, K. A. (2012). The use of quality function deployment in the implementation of the quality management system. In M. Savsar (Ed.), Quality assurance and management. Intech.
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Sage Publications.
• Dahlgaard, J. J., Kristensen, Ka., & Kanji, G. K. (2002). Fundementals of Total Quality Management. Taylor and Francis.
• Deming, W. E. (2000). Out of the crisis. The MIT Press.
• Derdiyok, T. (2019). Üniversitelerde kalite güvence sistemi kapsamında PUKÖ yönetim döngüsü uygulamasında bir model önerisi. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15, 173–198.
• Knight, J. E., & Allen, S. (2012). Applying the PDCA Cycle to the Complex Task of Teaching and Assessing Public Relations Writing. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v1n2p67
• Garza-Reyes, J. A., Torres Romero, J., Govindan, K., Cherrafi, A., & Ramanathan, U. (2018). A PDCA-based approach to Environmental Value Stream Mapping (E-VSM). Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.121
• Georgantzas, N. C. (1998). Tools for Quality control and process redesign. In M. H. Lu (Ed.), Handbook of Total Quality Management (pp. 508–527). Springer Science+Business Media, B.V.
• Glesne, C. (2013). Nitel araştırmalara giriş. Çeviri Editörleri: A. Arsoy ve P. Yalçınoğlu, Anı Yayıncılık.
• Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. B. (2014). Quality management for organizational excellent: Introduction to Total Quality (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Habibie, M. H., & Kresiani, R. H. (2019). Implementation of PDCA Cycle in Calibration and Testing Laboratory Based on ISO/IEC 17025:2017. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 598(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/598/1/012108
• Hasan, Z., & Hossain, M. S. (2018). Improvement of effectiveness by applying PDCA cycle or kaizen: An Experimental study on engineering students. Journal of Scientific Research, 10(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v10i2.35638
• Jarvinen, J., Perklen, E., Kaila-Stenberg, S., Hyvarinen, E., Hyytiainen, S., & Tornqvist, J. (1998). PDCA-cycle in implementing design for environment in an R&D Unit of Nokia Telecommunications. IEEE International Symposium on Electronics & the Environment, 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1109/isee.1998.675064
• Jianbing, L., & Jianliang, C. (2016). Construction cost control based on PDCA cycle. International Journal of Simulation: Systems, Science and Technology, 17(37), 19.1-19.8. https://doi.org/10.5013/IJSSST.a.17.37.19
• Jonny, J. (2016). Improving the average session evaluation score of supervisory program by using PDCA cycle at PT XYZ. The Winners, 17(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v17i2.1972
• Jovanović, B., Filipović, J., & Bakić, V. (2017). Energy management system implementation in Serbian manufacturing – Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162 (2017), 1144–1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.140
• Júnior, A. A., & Broday, E. E. (2019). Adopting PDCA to loss reduction: A case study in a food industry in Southern Brazil. International Journal for Quality Research, 13(2), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR13.02-06
• Kehoe, D. F. (1996). The fundamentals of quality management. In: The fundamentals of Quality Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0545-3
• Kemp, P. S. (2006). Quality Management Demystified. McGraw-Hill.
• Kholif, A. M., Abou El Hassan, D. S., Khorshid, M. A., Elsherpieny, E. A., & Olafadehan, O. A. (2018). Implementation of model for improvement (PDCA-cycle) in dairy laboratories. Journal of Food Safety, 38(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfs.12451
• Kotvitska, A., Lebedynets, V., & Karmavrova, T. (2019). The PDCA cycle implementation at the internal audit process of quality management systems of pharmaceutical companies. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 8(2), 709–713. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21487.07845
• Laverentz, D. M., & Kumm, S. (2017). Concept evaluation using the PDSA cycle for continuous quality improvement. Nursing Education Perspectives, 38(5), 288–290. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000161
• Lewis, W. E. (1999). PDCA / Test a quality framework for software testing. Auerbach.
• Lin, L. (2017). Discussion the practice of PDCA circulation in teaching management. 3rd International Conference on Education and Social Development (ICESD 2017), 540–543. https://doi.org/10.12783/dtssehs/icesd2017/11606
• Maruta, R. (2012). Maximizing knowledge work productivity: A time constrained and activity visualized pdca cycle. Knowledge and Process Management, 19(4), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm
• Matsuo, M., & Nakahara, J. (2013). The effects of the PDCA cycle and OJT on workplace learning. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(1), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.674961
• Mergen, S., Kepler, F. N., da Silva, J. P. S., & Cera, M. C. (2014). Using PDCA as a general framework for teaching and evaluating the learning of software engineering disciplines. ISys: Revista Brasileira de Sistemas de Informação, 7(2), 5–24.
• Moen, R. (2009). Foundation and history of the PDSA cycle. Associates in Process Improvement-Detroit (USA), 2–10.
• Moen, R., & Norman, C. (2009). Evolution of the PDCA cycle. ANQ Congress, 1–11. [Çevrim-içi: https://rauterberg.employee.id.tue.nl/lecturenotes/DG000%20DRP-R/references/Moen-Norman-2009.pdf] Erişim tarihi: 05.05.2021
• Ning, J. F., Chen, Z., & Liu, G. (2010). PDCA process application in the continuous improvement of software quality. 2010 International Conference on Computer, Mechatronics, Control and Electronic Engineering CMCE 2010, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/CMCE.2010.5609635
• Nsafon, B. E. K., Butu, H. M., Owolabi, A. B., Roh, J. W., Suh, D., & Huh, J. S. (2020). Integrating multi-criteria analysis with PDCA cycle for sustainable energy planning in Africa: Application to hybrid mini-grid system in Cameroon. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 37, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100628
• Özcan, S. (2018). İstatistiksel proses kontrol tekniklerinden pareto analizi ve çimento sanayiinde bir uygulama. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), 151–174.
• Prashar, A. (2017). Adopting PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle for energy optimization in energy-intensive SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 145, 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.068
• Qiu, Y. X., Zhao, C. Y., Zhu, J. M., & Li, L. J. (2019). Analysis of the application and practice of PDCA cycle in management of the naked medicine dispensing - The quality and safety of the drug. Frontiers of Nursing, 6(3), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.2478/FON-2019-0030
• Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Arredondo-Soto, K. C., Carrillo-Gutiérrez, T., & Ravelo, G. (2018). Applying the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle to reduce the defects in the manufacturing industry. A case study. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 8(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/app8112181
• Sallis, E. (2002). Total quality management in education. In Total Quality Management in Education (3rd ed.). Kogan Page. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203417010
• Sangpikul, A. (2017). Implementing academic service learning and the PDCA cycle in a marketing course: Contributions to three beneficiaries. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 21(August), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2017.08.007
• Sevinç, E. (2015). Diyabetli hastalarda ayak bakımı risk yönetiminde hemşireler PUKÖ döngüsünü kullanabilir mi? Anatol J Clin Investig, 9(4), 225–228.
• Shi, Y., & Song, G. (2009). Process control system of roof disaster based on PDCA cycle. IE and EM 2009- Proceedings 2009 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEEM.2009.5344605
• Shoji, Y., & Kukobo, Y. (2016). PDCA cycle model of drawing process for class placement of liberal arts: The trial work of the IR section at the university of Hyogo. Proceedings - 2016 5th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics IIAI-AAI 2016, 513–516. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2016.189
• Silva, A. S., Medeiros, C. F., & Vieira, R. K. (2017). Cleaner Production and PDCA cycle: Practical application for reducing the Cans Loss Index in a beverage company. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.033
• Simons, E. (2012). “Paradise by the dashboard light”: Working with a simple PDCA cycle at Avans University of applied sciences. LIBER Quarterly, 21(2), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.8024
• Tapiero, C. S. (1996). The Management of Quality and its Control. Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V.
• Walasek, T. A., Kucharczyk, Z., & Morawska-Walasek, D. (2011). Assuring quality of an e-learning project through the PDCA approach. Archives of Materials Science and Engineering, 48(1), 56–61.
• YÖKAK. (2020). YÖKAK İzleme Raporları. Erişim Adresi: [Çevrim-içi: https://yokak.gov.tr/raporlar/kurumsal-izleme-raporlari?termYear=2019] (Erişim tarihi:: 25.04.2021)
• Zhu, Y., Geng, X., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Research on curriculum reform of industrial training center based on PDCA cycle. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 9(8), 570–574. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2019.9.8.1268