Pandemi sürecinde kullanılan ders kitabının incelenmesi: Öğretmen ve öğrenci gözünden

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 29, 833 - 844, 21.08.2022

Semahat Aysu

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1164894

Öz

Ders kitabı dil öğretme sürecinde hem öğretmenler hem de öğrenciler için önemli bir role sahiptir. Bu yüzden, öğretmenler, öğrenci ihtiyaçlarını, dil öğretme yöntem ve yollarını göz önünde bulundurarak ders kitabı seçimi yapmalıdır. Diğer bir deyişle, bir kitap yabancı dil öğrencileri için uygun olabilir ama ikindi dil öğrencileri için uygun olmayabilir ya da bir kitap yüz yüze eğitimde kullanım için uygun olabilir ama çevrimiçi eğitim için uygun olmayabilir. Bu yüzden, bu çalışma Türkiye’de bir devlet üniversitesinde isteğe bağlı hazırlık sınıflarında kullanılan Life adlı ders kitabını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. İsteğe bağlı hazırlık sınıfında 20 kişiden az öğretim elemanı olduğu için ve sonuçlar istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı olmayacağı için nitel bir analiz yapılmıştır. Dahası, kitap ve aktiviteleri hakkında öğrenci görüşleri de paralel anket aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Burada açık uçlu sorular kullanılmıştır. Anketlerden elde edilen veriler tematik analiz yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Elde edilen veriye bağlı olarak, 3 kod ortaya çıkmıştır. Güçlü yönler, zayıf yönler ve öneriler.

Anahtar Kelimeler

COVID-19 pandemisi, çevrimiçi eğitim, ders kitabı inceleme, öğrenci görüşleri, öğretmen görüşleri

Evaluation of the textbook used in the pandemic: From teachers’ and students’ perspectives

Öz

The textbook has a significant role in language teaching process for both teachers and learners. Therefore, teachers should select it considering the needs of learners, language teaching method or channel. In other words, a textbook might be appropriate for foreign language learners but not for second language learners or a textbook might be very useful for face-to-face teaching but not for online teaching. Therefore, this current study aims to evaluate “Life” textbook series, which was used in an elective preparatory school of a state university in Turkey. It was used through online learning during the pandemic. Since the number of English teachers in the elective preparatory class is less than 20 and the results, in turn, cannot be statistically significant, qualitative analysis was carried out. Furthermore, students’ opinions about the book and its activities were revealed through the parallel questionnaire. Open-ended questions were employed in this study. Data gathered by means of the questionnaires were analyzed via thematic analysis. Based on the gathered data, 3 codes were revealed, which are listed as in the following: strengths, weaknesses and suggestions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Covid-19 pandemic, online teaching, students, teachers’ opinions, textbook evaluation

Kaynakça

• Alemi, M., & Sadehvandi, N. (2012). Textbook evaluation: EFL teachers’ perspectives on “Pacesetter Series”. English Language Teaching, 5(7), 64-74.
• Azizifar, A., & Baghelani, E. (2014). Textbook Evaluation from EFL Teachers’ Perspectives: The Case of “Top-Notch” Series. International SAMANM Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(1), 22-41.
• Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
• Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36-42.
• Gedik Bal, N. (2020). Students' and instructors' evaluation of a foreign language textbook from an intercultural perspective. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 2023-2038. https:// doi.org/10.17263/jlls.851032
• Jamalvandi, B. (2014). ELT textbook evaluation in Iran, New Insights. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 3(4), 1068-1078.
• Littlejohn, A. (2011). The analysis of language teaching materials: Inside the Trojan Horse. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 179-211). Cambridge University Press.
• McDonald, N., Schoenebeck, S., & Forte, A. (2019). Reliability and inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: norms and guidelines for CSCW and HCI practice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 39. https:// doi.org/ 10.1145/3359174
• McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher's guide. Wiley-Blackwell.
• Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E., & Moules, N.J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1-13.
• Rea-Dickins, P. (1994). Evaluation and English language teaching. Language Teaching, 27, 71–91.
• Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (1999). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
• Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press.
• Tok, H. (2010). TEFL textbook evaluation: From teachers’ perspectives. Educational Research and Review, 5(9), 508-517.
• Tomlinson, B. (2011). Introduction: Principles and procedures of materials development. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 1-31). Cambridge University Press.
• Tosun, S. (2013). A comparative study on evaluation of Turkish and English foreign language textbooks. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 70, 1374 – 1380.
• Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge University Press.
• Yapıcı, B. (2019). Textbook evaluation in English language teaching: Solutions, pre-intermediate. KUSAD, 2(1), 62-74.