Evaluation of Social Sustainability Principles with Place Attachment Parameter: İstanbul Bahçelievler Neighborhood

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 6, 33 - 56, 22.06.2023

Senanur Kevser Göksoy , Orhan Hacihasanoglu

Öz

For a healthy and happy life, the user should feel that s/he belongs to the place where s/he lives and should be able to define the natural, physical and social life of the place where s/he lives. It is important for individuals to establish a relationship with the region they live in, to associate themselves and to establish a bond with a place in order to create sustainable environments. The living environment must be able to respond to the social and physical requirements and desires of the individual in order to generate sustainable ecosystems. n the social context, sustainability focuses on the issues of access to facilities and services, social cohesion, participation in social life, and supporting place attachment/ belonging. This study focuses on the neighbourhood while exploring human and environmental issues in the areas where place attachment and social sustainability studies intersect. The aim of this study is to investigate how the sense of attachment to the neighbourhood depends on which environmental and social factors in order to evaluate social sustainability principles in the Istanbul Bahçelievler Merkez neighbourhood. In this research, survey questions determined at the intersection of Bahçelievler Merkez neighbourhood residents and the parameters of place attachment and social sustainability, and observations made by the researcher for the neighbourhood were used as a means of collecting information.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social Sustainability, Sustainable Urban Neighborhoods, Neighborhood Attachment, Place Attachment, Bahçelievler Merkez Neighborhood

Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik İlkelerinin Yere Aidiyet Parametresi ile Değerlendirmesi: İstanbul Bahçelievler Merkez Mahallesi

Öz

Sağlıklı ve mutlu bir yaşam için insan kendisini yaşadığı yere ait hissetmeli, yaşadığı yerin doğal, fiziksel ve sosyal yaşamın bir parçası olarak tanımlayabilmelidir. Bireylerin yaşadıkları bölgeyle ilişki kurması, kendilerini bağdaştırmaları bir mekân ile aralarında bağ kurmaları sürdürülebilir çevreler oluşturmak için önemlidir. Sürdürülebilir çevreler oluşturmak için yaşanılan çevrenin bireyin sosyal ve fiziksel gereksinimine ve isteklerine yanıt verebilmesi gerekir. Sürdürülebilirlik sosyal bağlamda tesislere ve hizmetlere erişim, sosyal uyum, sosyal yaşama katılım, yere bağlılığını (aidiyetini) desteklemesi konularına odaklanmıştır. Bu çalışmada, insan ve çevreyi inceleyen yere bağlılık (aidiyet) ve sosyal sürdürülebilirlik çalışmalarının mahalle odağında kesiştikleri alanlar incelenmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, İstanbul Bahçelievler Merkez Mahallesinde, sosyal sürdürülebilirlik ilkelerinin değerlendirilmesi için mahalleye duyulan bağlılık (aidiyet) duygusunun hangi çevresel ve sosyal etmenlere (faktörlere) ne kadar bağlı olduğunu araştırmaktır. Bu araştırmada Bahçelievler Merkez Mahallesi için yere bağlılık-aidiyet ve sosyal sürdürülebilirlik ölçütlerinin (parametrelerinin) kesişiminde belirlenmiş anket soruları, derinlemesine görüşme ve araştırma alanının tarihsel ve güncel durum analizi veri toplama yöntemi olarak kullanılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik, Yere bağlılık-aidiyet, Sürdürülebilir Kentsel Mahalleler, Mahalleye bağlılık-aidiyet, Bahçelievler Merkez Mahallesi

Kaynakça

• Aldous, T., Lunts, D., & Greenleaf, N. (1997). Urban villages: A concept for creating mixed-use urban developments on a sustainable scale. Urban Villages Forum.
• Allen, J., & Lloyd-Jones, T. (2010). Neighbourhood asset management: life cycles and learning for social sustainability. In Social Sustainability in Urban Areas (pp. 83-100). Routledge.
• Altman, I., & Low, S. (1992). Place attachment: Human behavior and environment (Vol. 12).
• Åhman, H. (2013). Social sustainability–society at the intersection of development and maintenance. Local Environment, 18(10), 1153-1166.
• Barron, L., & Gauntlet, E. (2002, March). WACOSS housing and sustainable communities indicators project. In Sustaining our Communities International Local Agenda 21 Conference, Adelaide (pp. 3-6).
• Bonaiuto, M., Aiello, A., Perugini, M., Bonnes, M., & Ercolani, A. P. (1999). Multidimensional perception of residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in the urban environment. Journal of environmental psychology, 19(4), 331-352.
• Bramley, G., Dempsey, N., Power, S., Brown, C., & Watkins, D. (2009). Social sustainability and urban form: evidence from five British cities. Environment and planning A, 41(9), 2125-2142.
• Bramley, G., & Power, S. (2009). Urban form and social sustainability: the role of density and housing type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(1), 30-48.
• Brown, B., Perkins, D. D., & Brown, G. (2003). Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(3), 259-271.
• Burton, E. (2000). The compact city: just or just compact? A preliminary analysis. Urban studies, 37(11), 1969-2006.
• Clayton, S. (2007). Domesticated nature: Motivations for gardening and perceptions of environmental impact. Journal of environmental psychology, 27(3), 215-224.
• Cohen, D., Finch, B., Bower, A., & Sastry, N. (2006). Collective efficacy and obesity: the potential influence of social factors on health. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 769-778.
• Cohen, D., Inagami, S., & Finch, B. (2008). The built environment and collective efficacy. Health & Place, 14, 198-208.
• Colantonio, A. (2009). Social sustainability: a review and critique of traditional versus emerging themes and assessment methods.
• Colantonio, A., & Dixon, T. (2011). Urban regeneration and social sustainability: Best practice from European cities. John Wiley & Sons.
• Chan, E., & Lee, G. K. (2008). Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Social Indicators Research, 85(2), 243-256.
• Comstock, N., Dickinson, L. M., Marshall, J. A., Soobader, M. J., Turbin, M. S., Buchenau, M., & Litt, J. S. (2010). Neighborhood attachment and its correlates: Exploring neighborhood conditions, collective efficacy, and gardening. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(4), 435-442.
• Dave, S. (2011). Neighbourhood density and social sustainability in cities of developing countries. Sustainable development, 19(3), 189-205.
• Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable development, 19(5), 289-300.
• Dempsey, N., Brown, C., & Bramley, G. (2012). The key to sustainable urban development in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability. Progress in planning, 77(3), 89-141.
• Dixon, T., Bacon, N., Caistor Arendar, L., Nielsen, E., Callway, R., & Naylor, A. (2019). Measuring the initial social sustainability impacts of estate regeneration: a case study of Acton Gardens, London. Journal of Sustainability Research, 1(1).
• Feldman, R. M. (1990) Settlement- identity: psychological bonds with home places in a mobile society. Environment and Behavior, 22, 183-229.
• Fried, M. (1963). Grieving for a lost home. In L. J. Duhl (Ed.), The urban condition: People and policy in the metropolis (pp. 124-152). New York, NY: Simon &Schuster.
• Fried, M. (2000). Continuities and discontinuities of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 193-205. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0154.
• Galster ve Hesser, 1982; Galster, G. C., & Hesser, G. W. (1982). The social neighborhood: An unspecified factor in homeowner maintenance? Urban Affairs Quarterly, 18(2), 235-254.
• Harris, P. B., Werner, C. M., Brown, B. B., & Ingebritsen, D. (1995). Relocation and privacy regulation: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of environmental psychology, 15(4), 311-320.
• Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of environmental psychology, 21(3), 273-281.
• Hummon, D. M. (1992). Community attachment. In Place attachment (pp. 253-278). Springer, Boston, MA. Hussein, F., Stephens, J., & Tiwari, R. (2020). Memory for social sustainability: Recalling cultural memories in Zanqit Alsitat historical street market, Alexandria, Egypt. Sustainability, 12(19), 8141.
• Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of environmental psychology, 21(3), 233-248.
• Karuppannan, S., & Sivam, A. (2011). Social sustainability and neighbourhood design: an investigation of residents' satisfaction in Delhi. Local Environment, 16(9), 849-870.
• Kearns, A., & Forrest, R. (2000). Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance. Urban studies, 37(5-6), 995-1017.
• Koohsari, M. J., Kaczynski, A. T., Giles-Corti, B., & Karakiewicz, J. A. (2013). Effects of access to public open spaces on walking: Is proximity enough?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 117, 92-99.
• Knez, I. (2005). Attachment and identity as related to a place and its perceived climate. Journal of environmental psychology, 25(2), 207-218.
• Kyle, G. T., Mowen, A. J., & Tarrant, M. (2004). Linking place preferences with place meaning: An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 439-454.
• Kyle, G., Graefe, A., & Manning, R. (2005). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environment and behavior, 37(2), 153-177.
• Larimian, T., & Sadeghi, A. (2021). Measuring urban social sustainability: Scale development and validation. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(4), 621-637.
• Lee, K. Y., & Jeong, M. G. (2021). Residential environmental satisfaction, social capital, and place attachment: the case of Seoul, Korea. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36(2), 559-575.
• Lewicka, M. (2005). Ways to make people active: The role of place attachment, cultural capital, and neighborhood ties. Journal of environmental psychology, 25(4), 381-395.
• Lewicka, M. (2008). Place attachment, place identity, and place memory: Restoring the forgotten city past. Journal of environmental psychology, 28(3), 209-231.
• Lewicka, (2010). What makes neighbourhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 35-51.
• Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?. Journal of environmental psychology, 31(3), 207-230.
• Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment. In Place attachment (pp. 1-12). Springer, Boston, MA.
• Manzi, T., Lucas, K., Jones, T. L., & Allen, J. (Eds.). (2010). Social sustainability in urban areas: Communities, connectivity and the urban fabric. Routledge.
• Manzo, L. C., & Perkins, D. D. (2006). Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of planning literature, 20(4), 335-350.
• Mesch, G. S., Manor, O. (1998). Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment and Behavior, http://www.uvm.edu/~jdericks/QOL/Literature/Mesch-Social_ties.pdf
• McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: towards some definitions.
• Porta, S., & Renne, J. L. (2005). Linking urban design to sustainability: formal indicators of social urban sustainability field research in Perth, Western Australia. Urban Design International, 10(1), 51-64.
• Polèse, M., Stren, R. E., & Stren, R. (Eds.). (2000). The social sustainability of cities: Diversity and the management of change. University of Toronto press.
• Raman, S. (2010). Designing a liveable compact city: physical forms of city and social life in urban neighbourhoods. Built environment, 36(1), 63-80.
• Ramkissoon, H., Smith, L. D. G., & Weiler, B. (2013). Relationships between place attachment, place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviour in an Australian national park. Journal of Sustainable tourism, 21(3), 434-457.
• Raymond, C.M., Brown, G. and Weber, D. (2010), “The measurement of place attachment: personal, community, and environmental connections”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 30 No.4, pp. 422-434.
• Riger, S., Lavrakas, P. J. (1981). Community ties: patterns of attachment and social interaction in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 55–66.
• Sampson, R. J. (1988). Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model. American sociological review, 766-779.
• Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American journal of sociology, 94(4), 774-802.
• Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2017). Place attachment enhances psychological need satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 49(4), 359-389.
• Semenza, J. C., March, T. L., & Bontempo, B. D. (2007). Community-initiated urban development: an ecological intervention. Journal of Urban Health, 84(1), 8-20.
• Shirazi, M. Reza, and Ramin Keivani. (2017). “Critical Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Social Sustainability in the Built Environment – a Meta-Analysis.” Local Environment 22 (12): 1526–1545.
• Shirazi, M. R., & Keivani, R. (2019). The triad of social sustainability: Defining and measuring social sustainability of urban neighbourhoods. Urban Research & Practice, 12(4), 448-471.
• Spangenberg, J. H. (2004). Reconciling sustainability and growth: criteria, indicators, policies. Sustainable development, 12(2), 74-86.
• Stedman, R. C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and behavior, 34(5), 561-581.
• Stokols, D. & Shumaker, S. A. (1981) People in places: A transactional view of settings. IN HARVEY (Ed.) Cognition social behaviour and the environment. Lawrence Erlbaum
• Talmage, C. A., Hagen, B., Pijawka, D., & Nassar, C. (2018). Measuring neighborhood quality of life: placed-based Sustainability indicators in Freiburg, Germany. Urban Science, 2(4), 106.
• Taylor, R. B. (1996, March). Neighborhood responses to disorder and local attachments: The systemic model of attachment, social disorganization, and neighborhood use value. In Sociological forum (Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 41-74). Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers.
• Tekin, H. (2006). Nitel Araştirma Yönteminin Bir Veri Toplama Tekniği Olarak Derinlemesine Görüşme. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 3(13), 101-116.
• Tümertekin, E. (1997). İstanbul, insan ve mekân (Vol. 50). Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı.
• Tweed, C., & Sutherland, M. (2007). Built cultural heritage and sustainable urban development. Landscape and urban planning, 83(1), 62-69.
• Twigger-Ross, C. L., & Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Place and identity processes. Journal of environmental psychology, 16(3), 205-220.
• Üngür E. (2017) Kentsel bir altyapının biyopolitikası: D-100 karayolu / Biopolitics of an urban infrastructure: D-100 highway, İstanbul teknik üniversitesi doktora tezi
• Williams, D. R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1989, October). Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. In NRPA Symposium on Leisure Research, San Antonio, TX (Vol. 9).
• Walker, A.J. and Ryan, R.L. (2008), “Place attachment and landscape preservation in rural new England: a Mainecasestudy”, lands cape and Urban Planning, Vol.86No.2, pp.141-152.
• Winter, J., & Farthing, S. (1997). Coordinating facility provision and new housing development: impacts on car and local facility use. Evaluating local environmental policy, 1, 159-179.
• Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and urban planning, 125, 234-244. Yiftachel, O., & Hedgcock, D. (1993). Urban social sustainability: the planning of an Australian city. Cities, 10(2), 139-157.
• Yoo, C., & Lee, S. (2016). Neighborhood built environments affecting social capital and social sustainability in Seoul, Korea. Sustainability, 8(12), 1346.
• http://www.bahcelievler.gov.tr/bahcelievler-in-tarihcesi
• https://www.bahcelievler.istanbul/bahcelievler-detay/45/441/2020-Yili-Faaliyet-Raporu/.