The Effects of Online Collaborative Learning and Using E-Portfolio on Success, Attitudes and Permanency

Öz

 The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of e-portfolio implementation in the Online Collaborative Learning (OCL) setting on students’ academic success, attitude, achievement and stabilty levels in the Operating Systems and Applications (OSA) course. The randomized pretest-posttest control group model and semi-structured interview techniques, which are true experimental models, were used. In order to apply the e-portfolio implementation in the OCL setting, the Online Collaborative Learning and E-portfolio Portal (OCLEP) and the virtual classroom implementation were used. According to the implementation results, it was observed that all students were successful and the method had a positive effect especially on stabilty. The difference between student attitudes on the course and on the OCL settings was not significant. It was observed that the number of students who thought that the method had benefits were high. It was evident that the most frequent problem was related to the application of OCLEP and virtual classroom implementations. Students emphasized that, when compared with other methods, this method has more benefits, it should be applied in theoretic courses and that courses delivered through this method are more comprehensible. Thus, this method can be used in teaching many courses.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Collaborative learning,online collaborative learning,e-portfolio,virtual class

The Effects of Online Collaborative Learning and Using E-Portfolio on Success, Attitudes and Stability

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of e-portfolio implementation in the Online Collaborative Learning (OCL) setting on students’ academic success, attitude, achievement and stabilty levels in the Operating Systems and Applications (OSA) course. The randomized pretest-posttest control group model and semi-structured interview techniques, which are true experimental models, were used. In order to apply the e-portfolio implementation in the OCL setting, the Online Collaborative Learning and E-portfolio Portal (OCLEP) and the virtual classroom implementation were used. According to the implementation results, it was observed that all students were successful and the method had a positive effect especially on stabilty. The difference between student attitudes on the course and on the OCL settings was not significant. It was observed that the number of students who thought that the method had benefits were high. It was evident that the most frequent problem was related to the application of OCLEP and virtual classroom implementations. Students emphasized that, when compared with other methods, this method has more benefits, it should be applied in theoretic courses and that courses delivered through this method are more comprehensible. Thus, this method can be used in teaching many courses.

Keywords

• Collaborative learning,online collaborative learning,e-portfolio,virtual class

Kaynakça

1. Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (1990, September). İşbirliğine dayalı öğrenme ve geleneksel öğretimin üniversite öğrencilerinin akademik başarısı, hatırda tutma düzeyleri ve duyuşsal özellikleri üzerindeki etkileri [Collaborative learning and the effects of traditional teaching on the academic success, reminiscence and affective characteristics of university students]. I. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi [National Congress of Educational Sciences], (pp. 187-201). AnkaraÜniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi, Ankara.
2. Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (2009). Etkili öğrenme ve öğretme [Effective learning and teaching]. (8th ed.). İzmir: Biliş Publications.
3. Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (2011). Aktif öğrenme [Active learning]. (12th ed.). İzmir: Biliş Publications.
4. Barış, M. F., & Tosun, N. (2013). Sosyal ağ ve E-portfolyo entegrasyonu: Facebook örneği [Integration of social network and E-portfolio: Case study of Facebook]. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi [Journal of Research in Education and Teaching], 2(2), 122-129.
5. Bélanger, M. (2012). Online collaborative learning. Retrieved from http://training.itcilo.it/actrav/library/english/publications/online_cl.doc
6. Bennett, S. (2004). Supporting collaborative project teams using computer-based technologies. In T. S. Roberts (Ed.), Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice (pp. 1-27). USA, Idea Group Publishing.
7. Bilgin, İ., & Karaduman, A. (2005). İşbirlikli öğrenmenin 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin Fen dersine karşı tutumlarına etkisinin incelenmesi [Investigating the effects of cooperative learning on 8 grade students’ attitudes toward Science]. İlköğretim Online [Elementary Education Online], 4(2), 32-45.
8. Bilgin, T., & Akbayır, K. (2002, September). İşbirlikli öğrenmenin dizi ve serilerin öğretimindeki etkililiği [The effectiveness of collaborative learning in teaching sequences and series]. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Sempozyumu [National Science and Mathematics Education Symposium], Vol. 2, pp. 933-938, Ankara.

9. Blake, C., & Scanlon, E. (2013). Design for collaboration. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2, 1-15.
10. Bozkurt, O., Orhan, A. T., Keskin, A., & Mazi, A. (2008). Fen ve Teknoloji dersinde işbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin akademik başarıya etkisi [The effect of cooperative learning method to the academic achievement in Science and Technology lesson]. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi [The Journal of Turkish Social Research], 12(2), 63-78.
11. Brindley, J. E., Walti, C., & Blaschke, L. M. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1-18.
12. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Deneysel desenler: Öntest-sontest kontrol grubu desen ve veri analizi [Experimental design: pretest-posttest control group design and data analysis]. (3th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing.
13. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. (18th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing.
14. Chang, C. C. (2008). Enhancing self-perceived effects using web-based portfolio assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1753-1771.
15. Chang, C. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2008). Use and performances of web-based portfolio assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 358-370.
16. Chou, C.-M. (2012). Influence of teachers' perceived e-portfolio acceptance on teacher evaluation effectiveness in Taiwan. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 719-739.
17. Çayırcı, Ç. (2007). İlköğretim 7. sınıfta web tabanlı portfolyo uygulaması: Fen bilgisi ve sosyal bilgiler örnekleri [Web-Based Portfolio Application in Primary School 7th Grade: Samples of Sciences and Social Sciences]. (Unpublished master thesis). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
18. Daradoumis, T., Martínez-Monés, A., & Xhafa, F. (2006). A layered framework for evaluating on-line collaborative learning interactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(7), 622-635.
19. Demirel, Ö. (2002). Kuramdan uygulamaya eğitimde program geliştirme [Cirriculum development from theory to practice]. (4th. ed.). Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
20. Demirel, Ö. (2003). Öğretimde planlama ve değerlendirme öğretme sanatı [Planning and evaluation in teaching art of teaching]. (6th. ed.). Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
21. Demirel, Ö., Başbay, A., & Erdem, E. (2006). Eğitimde çoklu zeka kuram ve uygulama [Multiple intelligence theory and practice in education]. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
22. Demirli, C. (2007). Elektronik portfolyo öğretim sürecinin öğrenen tutumlarına ve öğrenme algılarına etkisi [The effect of electronic portfolio process on learners’ attitudes and learning perceptions]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
23. Demirli, C., & Gürol, M. (2010, March-April). Teacher candidates’ attitudes and perceptions towards electronic portfolio process. 21st Annual Conference of The Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE), San Diego, CA, USA.
24. Doymuş, K., & Şimşek, Ü. (2007). Kimyasal bağların öğretilmesinde jigsaw tekniğin etkisi ve bu teknik hakkında öğrenci görüşleri [The effect of jigsaw technique on chemical bonding learning and students’ opinions about this technique]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi [National Education], 173(1), 231-244.
25. Efe, R., Hevedanlı, M., Ketani, Ş., Çakmak, Ö., & Aslan Efe, H. (2008). İşbirlikli öğrenme teori ve uygulama [Cooperative learning theory and practice]. Ankara: Eflatun Publisher.
26. Ekinci, N. (2005). İşbirliğine dayalı öğrenme [Cooperative learning], In Ö. Demirel (Ed.). Eğitimde Yeni Yönelimler [New Trends in Education]. (1st ed., pp. 91-107). Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
27. Francis, K., & Jacobsen, M. (2013). Synchronous online collaborative professional development for elementary mathematics teachers. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 319-343.
28. Gabbert, B., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1986). Cooperative learning, group-to-individual transfer, process gain, and the acquisition of cognitive reasoning strategies. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 120(3), 265-278.
29. Gök, Ö., Doğan, A., Doymuş, K., & Karaçöp, A. (2009). İşbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin ilköğretim öğrencilerinin akademik başarılarına ve fene olan tutumlarına etkileri [The effects of cooperative learning on elementary school students’ academic achievement and attitudes toward science]. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 193-209.
30. Graham, C. R., & Misanchuk, M. (2004). Computer-mediated learning groups: Benefits and challenges to using groupwork in online learning environments. In T. S. Roberts (Ed.). Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. (pp. 181-202). USA: Idea Group Publishing.
31. Gülbahar, Y., & Köse, F. (2006). Öğretmen adaylarının değerlendirme için elektronik portfolyo kullanımına ilişkin görüşleri [Perceptions of preservice teachers about the use of electronic portfolios for evaluation]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(2), 75-93.
32. Gümüş, O., & Buluç, B. (2007). İşbirliğine dayalı öğrenme yaklaşımının Türkçe dersinde akademik başarıya etkisi ve öğrencilerin derse ilgisi [The Effects Of Cooperative Learning Approach On Students’ Achievements And Interests Towards The Turkish Course]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 49, 7-30.
33. Gümüş, S. (2007). Çevrimiçi işbirliği ekiplerinde öğrenenlerin sorun çözerek öğrenmeyle ilgili tutum ve görüşleri [Attitudes and views of online cooperative learning teams toward learning by problem solving]. (Unpublished master thesis). Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
34. Gürol, M., & Demirli, C. (2006, April). E-portfolio sürecinde öğrenci motivasyonu [Students’ motivation in e-portfolio process]. VI. Uluslararası Eğitim Teknolojileri Konferansı, Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Gazimağusa, KKTC.
35. Hoppe, H. U. (2007). Educational information technologies and collaborative learning. In H. U. Hoppe, H. Ogata and A. Soller (Eds.). The Role of Technology in CSCL (pp. 1-11). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
36. Iberri, E., Kim, J., & Joppie, A. (2009). Collaboratively writing about collaborative-writing tools. Retrieved from http://www.iddblog.org/?p=161
37. Ingram, A. L., & Hathorn, L. G. (2004). Methods for analyzing collaboration in online communications. In T. S. Roberts (Ed.). Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice (pp. 215-241). USA: Idea Group Publishing.
38. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2009). Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 161-170.
39. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Using technology to revolutionize cooperative learning: An opinion. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1156), 1-3.
40. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. (2012). The cooperative link: Cooperative learning. The Newsletter of The Cooperative Learning Institute, 26(1), 1-4. Retrieved from http://www.co-operation.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Volume-261.pdf
41. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Holubec, E. J. and Roy, P. (1984). Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
42. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No: 4. The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development, Washington, DC.
43. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Chance, 27-35.
44. Jung, I., Kudo, M., & Choi, S.-K. (2012). Stress in Japanese learners engaged in online collaborative learning in English. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 1016-1029.
45. Kagan, S. (1989). The structural approach to cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 12-15.
46. Kaptan, S. (1998). Bilimsel araştırma ve istatistik teknikleri [Scientific research and statistics techniques]. Ankara: Tekışık Web Ofset Tesisleri.
47. Karasar, N. (2003). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method]. (12th ed.). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
48. Korkmaz, H., & Kaptan, F. (2002). Fen eğitiminde ögrencilerin gelişimini değerlendirmek için portfolyo kullanımı üzerine bir inceleme [An investigation on using portfollo for assessing students' development in science educatlon]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 167-176.
49. Korkmaz, Ö. (2012). A validity and reliability study of the online cooperative learning attitude scale (OCLAS). Computer & Education, 59(4), 1162-1169.
50. Korkmaz, Ö. (2013). BÖTE öğretmen adaylarının çevrimiçi işbirlikli öğrenmeye dönük tutumlarıve görüşleri [CEIT Teacher candidates’ attitude toward online collaborative learning and their opinions]. İlköğretim Online [Elementary Education Online], 12(1), 283-294.
51. Köseoğlu, P. (2010). The influence of jigsaw technique-based teaching on academic achievement, self-efficacy and attitudes in biolology education. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, 244-254.
52. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2004). Do online collaborative groups need leaders? In T. S. Roberts (Ed.). Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice (pp. 262-280). USA: Idea Group Publishing.
53. Lee, K., & Bos, B. (2011, November). Online collaborative learning: Promoting a culture of cooperation. 17th Annual Sloan Consortium International Conference on Online Learning. Lake Buena Vista, Florida. Retrieved from http://olc.onlinelearningconsortium.org/conferences/2011/aln/online-collaborative-learning-promoting-culture-cooperation
54. Maloof, J., & White, V. K. B. (2005). Team study training in the college biology laboratory. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 120-124.
55. McInnerney, J. M., & Roberts, T. S. (2004). Collaborative or cooperative learning? In T. S. Roberts (Ed.). Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice (pp. 203-214). USA: Idea Group Publishing.
56. Nam, C. W., & Zellner, R. D. (2011). The relative effects of positive interdependence and group processing on student achievement and attitude in online cooperative learning. Computers & Education, 56(3), 680-688.
57. Özbuğutu, E., & Hasenekoğlu, İ. (2013). Bitkisel dokular konusunun öğretilmesinde işbirliğine dayalı öğretimin öğrenci başarısı ve kalıcılığına etkisi [The effects of cooperative learning on students’ successand retention in learning plantal tissues]. Turkish Studies-International Periodical for The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(8), 1013-1025.
58. Rossi, D., van Rensburg, H., Harreveld, R. E. B., Beer, C., Clark, D., & Danaher,P. A. (2012). Exploring a cross-institutional research collaboration and innovation: Deploying social software and web 2.0 technologies to investigate online learning designs and interactions in two Australian universities. Journal of Learning Design, 5(2), 1-11.
59. Rummel, J. F. (1968). Eğitimde araştırmaya giriş (Trans. R. Taşçıoğlu). Ankara: MTÖ Publications.
60. Senemoğlu, N. (2010). Gelişim öğrenme ve öğretim: Kuramdan uygulamaya [Developmental learning and teaching: From theory to practice] (16th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing.
61. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Development and motivational perspectives on cooperative learning: A reconciliation. Child Development, 58(5), 1161-1167.
62. Sorensen, E. K. (2004). Reflection and intellectual amplification in online communities of collaborative learning. In T. S. Roberts (Ed.). Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice (pp. 242-261). USA: Idea Group Publishing.
63. Tabuk, M. (2009). Proje tabanlı öğrenmede çoklu zeka yaklaşımının matematiksel öğrenme başarısına etkisi [The effects of multiple intelligence approach in project based learning on mathematics achievement]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
64. Tambouris, E., Panopoulou, E., Tarabanis, K., Ryberg, T., Buus, L., Peristeras, V. et al. (2012). Enabling Problem Based Learning through Web 2.0 Technologies: PBL 2.0. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 238-251.
65. Zhu, C. (2012). Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 127-136.