Research Article

Comparison of the Growth Dynamics of Invasive Pseudorasbora parva in Three Different Freshwater Systems in Türkiye

Number: 2026 April 25, 2026
EN TR

Comparison of the Growth Dynamics of Invasive Pseudorasbora parva in Three Different Freshwater Systems in Türkiye

Abstract

Invasive species pose a major threat to aquatic ecosystems worldwide, making it crucial to understand their growth dynamics, dispersal patterns, and biological traits to effectively manage their populations and mitigate associated ecological and economic impacts. Pseudorasbora parva, a small cyprinid fish native to East Asia, has established invasive populations in various inland waters of Türkiye. Specifically, we examined three populations inhabiting Lake Beyşehir (Konya–Isparta), Lake Eğirdir (Isparta), and the Onaç reservoir (Burdur). Monthly sampling was conducted from March 2021 to June 2022 using multimesh gillnets, seine nets, and electrofishing. A total of 1,186 P. parva individuals were sampled from these sites to evaluate growth parameters and assess inter-population differences related to environmental variability. The aim of this study was to determine the growth parameters of P. parva and to evaluate how environmental differences influence population-level growth variability among the three habitats. The three populations studied were observed to differ significantly in terms of age distribution, sex ratio, and growth characteristics. Growth performance was highest in the Lake Beyşehir population, while lowest in the Onaç reservoir population. The Lake Eğirdir population, while growing more slowly, can reach older ages. Length-weight relationships also showed different growth patterns across populations. The results demonstrate a high degree of phenotypic plasticity in P. parva's growth strategies, which are strongly influenced by local habitat conditions. Lake Beyşehir appears to offer the most favourable conditions for its growth, potentially enhancing its invasive impact. The context-dependent growth patterns revealed in this study underscore the necessity for habitat-specific management strategies to control this invasive species and mitigate its threat to native biodiversity, particularly in ecosystems hosting endemic fish species.

Keywords

Stone moroko, Biological invasions, Growth patterns, Population variability, Ecosystem management

Supporting Institution

This study was supported by a grant from the Isparta University of Applied Sciences Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (ProjectNo: 2020-BTAP2-0085).

Project Number

Isparta University of Applied Sciences Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (ProjectNo: 2020-BTAP2-0085)

Ethical Statement

Ethics committee approval was received for this study from the ethics committee of Isparta University of Applied Sciences Local Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments (Date: 12.03.2020, No: 001). Fish samples collected during faunal surveys were preserved in 5% formaldehyde or 96% ethanol and stored in 70% ethanol following tricaine methanesulfonate anesthesia. Surgical procedures were only performed for the excision of fin clips. The experimental conditions did not distress any fish involved in our experiments.

Thanks

This study was supported by a grant from the Isparta University of Applied Sciences Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (ProjectNo: 2020-BTAP2-0085).

References

  1. Ağdamar, S., & Gaygusuz, Ö. (2021). Condition, length- length and length-weight relationships for four introduced freshwater fish species from an island ecosystem (Gökçeada, Turkey). J. Anatolian Env. and Anim. Sciences, 6(3), 403-408. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.923425
  2. Apaydın Yağcı, M., Alp, A., Yağcı, A., Uysal, R., Bilgin, F., Cesur, M., & Yeğen, V. (2022). Length- weight relationships of ten fish species from Lake Eğirdir, Turkey. J. Anatolian Env. and Anim. Sciences, 7(2), 105-109. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.982459
  3. Arslan, P., & Özeren, S.C. (2019). Growth biology of the topmouth gudgeon (Pseudorasbora parva) from Lake Mogan (Turkey). Ankara Üniversitesi Çevrebilimleri Dergisi, 7(1), 47-55. https://izlik.org/JA24WR58US
  4. Banarescu, P. (1964). Pisces-Osteichthyes, Vol. 13. Bucharest: Fauna Republikii Populare Romine. Barusˇ, V., Kux, Z., & Libosva´rski, J. (1984). On Pseudorasbora parva (Pisces) in Czechoslovakia. Folia Zoologica, 33, 5-18.
  5. Bagenal, T. B., & Tesch, F. W. (1978). Age and growth. In T. B. Bagenal (Ed.), Methods for assessment of fish production in freshwaters (3rd ed., IBP Handbook No. 3, pp. 101-136). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  6. Benzer, S. (2019). Morphometric features of topmouth gudgeon Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846) in the Hirfanlı Reservoir, Turkey. Acta Aquatica: Aquatic Sciences Journal, 7(1), 8- 12. https://doi.org/10.29103/aa.v7i1.2030
  7. Benzer, S., & Benzer, R. (2020a). Growth properties of Pseudorasbora parva in Süreyyabey Reservoir: traditional and artificial ıntelligent methods. Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine, 36, 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-020- 00192-1
  8. Benzer, S., & Benzer, R. (2020b). Growth and length– weight relationships of Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846) in Hirfanlı Dam Lake: comparison with traditional and artificial neural networks approaches. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 19(3), 1098-1110. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijfs.2018.119889
  9. Bostancı, D., Yedier, S., & Polat, N. (2020). Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846): a new threat to fish biodiversity in Ordu Province (Middle Black Sea Region). LimnoFish, 6(1), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.17216/limnofish.560633
  10. Britton, J.R., Davies, G.D., & Harrod, C. (2010). Trophic interactions and consequent impacts of the invasive fish Pseudorasbora parva in a native aquatic foodweb: A field investigation in the UK. Biological Invasions, 12(5), 1533-1542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9566-5
APA
Güçlü, S. S., Küçük, F., Gülle, İ., & Bahrioğlu, E. (2026). Comparison of the Growth Dynamics of Invasive Pseudorasbora parva in Three Different Freshwater Systems in Türkiye. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 2026. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1809815
AMA
1.Güçlü SS, Küçük F, Gülle İ, Bahrioğlu E. Comparison of the Growth Dynamics of Invasive Pseudorasbora parva in Three Different Freshwater Systems in Türkiye. JAES. 2026;(2026). doi:10.35229/jaes.1809815
Chicago
Güçlü, Salim Serkan, Fahrettin Küçük, İskender Gülle, and Ergi Bahrioğlu. 2026. “Comparison of the Growth Dynamics of Invasive Pseudorasbora Parva in Three Different Freshwater Systems in Türkiye”. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, nos. 2026. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1809815.
EndNote
Güçlü SS, Küçük F, Gülle İ, Bahrioğlu E (April 1, 2026) Comparison of the Growth Dynamics of Invasive Pseudorasbora parva in Three Different Freshwater Systems in Türkiye. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences 2026
IEEE
[1]S. S. Güçlü, F. Küçük, İ. Gülle, and E. Bahrioğlu, “Comparison of the Growth Dynamics of Invasive Pseudorasbora parva in Three Different Freshwater Systems in Türkiye”, JAES, no. 2026, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.35229/jaes.1809815.
ISNAD
Güçlü, Salim Serkan - Küçük, Fahrettin - Gülle, İskender - Bahrioğlu, Ergi. “Comparison of the Growth Dynamics of Invasive Pseudorasbora Parva in Three Different Freshwater Systems in Türkiye”. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences. 2026 (April 1, 2026). https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1809815.
JAMA
1.Güçlü SS, Küçük F, Gülle İ, Bahrioğlu E. Comparison of the Growth Dynamics of Invasive Pseudorasbora parva in Three Different Freshwater Systems in Türkiye. JAES. 2026. doi:10.35229/jaes.1809815.
MLA
Güçlü, Salim Serkan, et al. “Comparison of the Growth Dynamics of Invasive Pseudorasbora Parva in Three Different Freshwater Systems in Türkiye”. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, no. 2026, Apr. 2026, doi:10.35229/jaes.1809815.
Vancouver
1.Salim Serkan Güçlü, Fahrettin Küçük, İskender Gülle, Ergi Bahrioğlu. Comparison of the Growth Dynamics of Invasive Pseudorasbora parva in Three Different Freshwater Systems in Türkiye. JAES. 2026 Apr. 1;(2026). doi:10.35229/jaes.1809815