National Level Evaluation of Fish Consumption and Analysis of Consumption Trends and Regional Differences in Türkiye
Abstract
This study examines fish consumption habits across Türkiye’s seven geographical regions and identifies the factors driving regional differences in consumption. Data were collected through face-to-face surveys with 387 randomly selected individuals between May and September and analyzed using a Decision Tree algorithm. The findings indicate that regional, socio-economic, and demographic variables significantly affect fish consumption behavior. Despite Türkiye being surrounded by seas on three sides and having substantial inland water resources, per capita fish consumption has remained below global and European averages. Although consumption has increased in recent years, annual per capita intake in Türkiye ranges from 7 to 11 kg, compared with approximately 20 kg worldwide and 24 kg in the European Union. Fish is a nutritionally valuable food, providing high-quality protein, omega 3 fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals, with well-established health benefits. However, low consumption in Türkiye is mainly linked to traditional dietary habits, price fluctuations, limited access to fresh fish, insufficient consumer awareness, and socio-economic constraints. Consumption is higher in coastal regions, while inland regions show lower intake due to accessibility and cultural factors. The study highlights the need for region-specific awareness initiatives, consumer education, and sustainable aquaculture policies to increase fish consumption in Türkiye.
Keywords
Fish consumption, Türkiye, geographical region, dietary habits
Supporting Institution
Ethical Statement
Thanks
References
- Bostock, J. (2011). The application of science and technology development in shaping current and future aquaculture production systems. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 149(1), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859610001127
- Chalamaiah, M., Kumar, B. D., Hemalatha, R., & Jyothirmayi, T. (2012). Fish protein hydrolysates: Proximate composition, amino acid composition, antioxidant activities and application: A review. Food Chemistry, 135(4), 3020-3038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.06.100
- Che, B., N’Souvi, K., Sun, C., Leibrecht, M., & Nantob, B. (2022). Between tradition, strategies and taste: understanding fish consumption habits in Togo. Sustainability, 14(18), 11475. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811475
- Chen, J., Jayachandran, M., Bai, W., & Xu, B. (2022). A critical review on the health benefits of fish consumption and its bioactive constituents. Food Chemistry, 369, 130874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130874
- Darmon, N., & Drewnowski, A. (2008). Does social class predict diet quality? The American journal of clinical nutrition. 87(5), 1107-1117. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1107
- FAO. (2020). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in action. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (Access date: 10.04.2024)
- FAO. (2022). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022, https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cc046. (Access date: 26.06.2024)
- Fawcett, T. (2006). “An Introduction to ROC Analysis.” Pattern Recognition Letters, 27, no. 8: 861–874.
- GDFA. (2020). “Republic of Turkey ministry of agriculture and forestry general directorate of fisheries and aquaculture. Statistics”, available at: Ankara, Türkiye. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BSGM/Documen ts.
- Karadaş, N.F., Karadaş, K., & Duman, H. (2024). Determination of consumers’ seafood consumption preferences in the provinces of Adıyaman and Iğdır. Osmaniye Korkut Ata University Journal of the Institute of Science, 7(5), 2374-2392. https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1496511
