• MUJAD is a peer-reviewed journal.
• The secretary checks articles for compliance with the journal format (template, APA 7, etc.) and the Similarity Report. Articles that do not meet the criteria are returned to the author.
• The Editorial Board Reviews articles for content and language. Those that do not meet the criteria are returned to the authors. For those that meet the criteria, a Field Editor is assigned.
• The Field Editor evaluates the article's suitability for the field and its academic competence.
• Co-editors send articles approved by the Field Editor to referees.
• Articles are sent anonymously to two reviewers selected based on their level of knowledge and areas of expertise.
• Reviewers are given two weeks to complete their evaluations.
• Minor and major revisions requested by the reviewers from the authors are checked again by the reviewers.
• If the evaluation results in one positive and one negative opinion, the work is sent to a third reviewer. If the third reviewer also gives a negative opinion, the article is rejected.
• Article evaluation forms are sent to authors anonymously in accordance with the double-blind peer review process.
• In cases where changes are required based on reviewers' recommendations, authors are given one week for minor revisions and two weeks for major revisions.
Click here for the article publishing process.