A Portfolio Model for the Teaching and Learning of GIS Competencies in an Upper Secondary School: A Case Study from a Finnish Geomedia Course

Year 2020, Volume: 10 Issue: 3, 262 - 282, 31.08.2020

Henna Anunti Essi Vuopala Jarmo Rusanen

https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.741299

Abstract

The fast rate of technological development in today’s modern, digitalized society provides new opportunities and challenges for the future of geography education. The availability of geographic applications and geographical information systems (GIS) also create many interesting possibilities for the analysis, interpretation and production of geographic information (GI). The objective of this paper is to explore and discuss how a digital GIS portfolio can be used as an educational method for teaching and learning about the use of GIS. In this study, a design-based research (DBR) approach is used to develop a portfolio model for use in a Geomedia course in an upper secondary school setting. The design process occurred during January 2019 with pre-service teachers (n=8) and Geography teachers (n=2) at a university in Finland. There were six development cycles including problem analysis, design process and design solutions. The idea of a DBR approach is not only to create instructional materials to support students´ in their learning and development of GIS skills, but also to be an educative process for pre-service teachers who have minimal experience in teaching GIS skills. The digital GIS portfolio model follows Bloom´s taxonomy and includes progressively more demanding, inquiry-based activities for students. The digital GIS portfolio as a pedagogical practice was tested during Spring semester in 2019 with students (n=17) who were completing a Geomedia course at a local upper secondary school. It turned out that the use of a digital GIS portfolio is a very promising method for GIS education. Use of the portfolio improved student competence at using GIS; it developed student motivation to learn about GIS; and increased students' perceptions about the importance of GIS. However, a teacher-centred approach for teaching about GIS skills was also considered to be very important. The results of this study provide practical knowledge for Geography teachers and useful advice for developing teacher training in Geography.

Keywords

Geomedia, Upper secondary school, GIS education, Educational portfolio

References

• Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives (Abridged edition.). New York: Longman.
• Anunti, H., Vuopala, E. & Rusanen, J. (2018). Lukiolaisten kokemuksia geomedian käytöstä tutkivassa oppimisessa. High school students' experiences of using geomedia in problem based learning. Terra, 130 (1), 17-30.
• Baker, T. & Bednarz, S. (2003). Lessons learned from reviewing research in GIS education. Journal of Geography, 102(6), 231-233.
• Baker, T., Kerski, J., Huynh, N., Viehrig, K. & Bednarz, S. (2012). Call for an agenda and center for GIS education research. Review of International Geographical Education Online (RIGEO), 2(3), 254-288.
• Baker, T., Battersby, S., Bednarz, S., Bodzin, A., Kolvoord, B., Moore, S., Sinton, D. & Uttal, D. (2015) A research agenda for geospatial technologies and learning, Journal of Geography, 114(3), 118-130.
• Barnikel, F. & Ploetz, R. (2015). The acquisition of spatial competence - fast and easy multidisciplinary learning with an online GIS. European Journal of Geography, 6(2), 6-14.
• Bearman, N., Jones, N., André, I., Cachinho, A. H. & DeMers, M. (2016). The future role of GIS education in creating critical spatial thinkers. Journal of Geography in Higher Education,40 (3), 394-408.
• Chatel, A. & Falk, G. (2017). Smartgeo - mobile learning in geography education. European Journal of Geography, 8(2), 153-165.
• Donert, K., Desmidt, F., de Lázaro Y Torres, M. L., González, R. D. M., Lindner-Fally, M., Parkinson, A. & Zwartjes, L. (2016). The gi-learner approachlearning lines for geospatial thinking in secondary schools. GI_Forum, 2, pp. 134-146.
• Edelson , D. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11 (1), 105-121.
• Esri (2018). Building a GIS portfolio.. Retrieved from:https://downloads.esri.com/learnarcgis/educators/building-a-gis-portfolio.pdf.
• Esteves, M. H. & Rocha, J. (2015). Geographical information systems in Portuguese geography education. European Journal of Geography, 6(3), 6-15.
• Favier, T. & Schee, J. (2014). Digital earth and geography teacher training for the 21st century: teacher competences for inquiry-based geography teaching. In: Donert, K. & Miguel
• Gonzalez, R. de. (2014). Innovative learning geography in Europe : new challenges for the 21st century. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Flick, U. (2018). Qualitative research kit: doing grounded theory. 55 City Road, London: SAGE Publications Ltd. GI Learner Competences (version 2017). Retrieved from: http://www.gilearner.ugent.be/wp-content/uploads/GI-Learner-competencies.pdf
• Havelková, L. & Hanus, M. (2019). Map skills in education: a systematic review of terminology, methodology, and influencing factors. Review of International Geographical Education Online (RIGEO), 9(2), 361-401.
• Hirvensalo, V. & Koskelo, K. (2014). Paikkatietotekniikalla innovatiivisuuta maantieteen kouluopetukseen. Terra, 126(4), 187-196.
• Kerski, J.J, Demirci, A. & Milson, A. (2013). The global landscape of GIS in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 112, 232-24.
• Kerski, J. J. (2003). The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information systems technology and methods in secondary education. Journal of geography, 102(3), 128 137.
• Lee, J. (2020). Designing an inquiry-based fieldwork project for students using mobile technology and its effects on students’ experience. Review of International Geographical Education Online (RIGEO), 10(1), 14-39.
• Lukion opetussuunnitelman perusteet (2019). Helsinki, Opetushallitus, Finnish National Board of Education
• Martin-Kniep, G. (1998). Why am i doing this? purposeful teaching through portfolio assessment. Heinemann, 196.
• Metsämuuronen, J. (2006). Tutkimuksen tekemisen perusteet ihmistieteissä: Tutkijalaitos. 3. Edition. International Methelp, Helsinki.
• National Core Curriculum for General Upper Secondary Schools (2015). National core curriculum for general upper secondary education intended for young people. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education, 2016.
• Neuendorf, K. (2016). The Content Analysis Guidebook (Second Edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
• Oikarinen, J. (2016). Technology-enhanced statistics learning experiment. A case study at upper secondary level. University of Oulu. Universitatis Ouluensis E168.
• Pernaa, J. & Aksela, M. K. (2012). Model-based design research: A practical method for educational innovation in Antoncic, B. (ed.), Advances in Business-Related Scientific Research Conference 2012 in Venice: Conference proceedings. Venice, Business-Related Scientific Research Conference - ABSRC 2012, Venice, Italy, 28/03/2012.
• Schell, E., Roth, K., Mohan, A., Edelson, D., Shavelson, R., Wertheim, J., Bednarz, S., Heffron, S. & Huynh, N. (2013). A road map for 21st century geography education. Executive summary for the Road Map for 21st Century Geography Education Project. National Geographic Society.
• Schubert, J. C. & Uphues, R. (2009). "Learning with geoinformation in german schools: systematic integration with a gis competency model." International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 18(4), 275-286.
• Simon, M. & Forgette-Giroux, R. (2000). Impact of a content selection framework on portfolio assessment at the classroom level. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 7(1), 83-100.
• Sözen, E. (2019). High school students’ views and attitudes towards geography courses in turkey. Review of International Geographical Education Online (RIGEO), 9(2), 458-478.
• Tate, N. J. & Jarvis, C. H. (2017). Changing the face of GIS education with communities of practice, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(3), 327-340.
• Tuomi, J. & A. Sarajärvi. (2002). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi. p. 159. Kustannusosakeyhtiö Tammi, Helsinki.
• Tuomisto, M. (2018). Design-based research: Educational Chemistry card and board games. Academic Dissertation. The University of Helsinki. 175.
• Ugodulunwa, C. & Wakjissa, S. (2015). Teaching Map Sketching and Location in Secondary School Geography in Jos, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(17), 23-31.
• Vartiainen, J. (2016). Kehittämistutkimus: Pienten lasten tutkimuksellisen luonnontieteiden opiskelun edistäminen tiedekerho-oppimisympäristössä. Academic Dissertation. The University of Helsinki.
• Vuopala, E. & al. (2020). Implementing a maker culture in elementary school - students’ perspectives technology. Pedagogy, and Education. Accepted for publication.
• West, B. A. (2003). Student attitudes and the impact of GIS on thinking skills and motivation, Journal of Geography, 102(6), 267-274.
• Zwartjes, L. & de Lázaro y Torres, M. L. (2019) Geospatial Thinking Learning Lines in Secondary Education: The GI Learner Project. In: de Miguel González R., Donert K. & Koutsopoulos K. (eds) Geospatial Technologies in Geography Education. Key Challenges in Geography. EUROGEO Book Series. Springer, Cham.