Evaluation of 10th Grade Mathematics Curriculum of General Secondary Education Institutions

Öz

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the 10^th grade mathematics curriculum of General Secondary Education Institutions through the perceptions of mathematics teachers, students, and classroom observations. In this study, Malcolm Provus’ Discrepancy Evaluation Model was utilized. Data were collected through questionnaire, semi-structured interview schedule and observation form. Participants of this study were 136 students and 8 mathematics teachers were chosen through convenient sampling strategy. The quantitative data were analyzed by using SPSS 22.0 and qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis. The results indicated that although the existing program was planned as learner centered, the implementation process revealed that teachers maintained their traditional roles and teacher-centered methods. There is a discrepancy between the curriculum and implementation process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Key Words: Mathematics Curriculum,Discrepancy Evaluation Model

Kaynakça

1. Acar, H. (2007). The assessment of the new primary education programmes according to the teachers’ opinions. Unpublished Masters’s Thesis. Osmangazi University, Eskisehir.
2. Akozbek, A. (2008). The evaluation of 9th grade mathematics curriculum via the opinions of teachers and students by using cipp model. Unpublished Masters’s Thesis. Yıldız Teknik University, İstanbul.
3. Aksu, H., H. (2008). Teachers’ opinions of the new primary mathematics programme. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education 8 (1), 1-10.
4. Anılan, H. & Sarıer, Y. (2008). The opinions of the sixth grade mathematics teachers’about applicatiblity of mathematics curriculum. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 8 (16), 128-141.
5. Arseven, A., Kontas, H. & Arseven, İ. (2014). The opinions of primary school teachers’ concerning the component of evaluation of mathematics curriculum. Journal of Adıyaman University Social Sciences Institute, 7 (18), 657-677.
6. Aslan, E. (2011). Evaluating of estimation skill of the elementary school fifth grade mathematics course program in terms of teachers’ views. Unpublished Masters’s Thesis, Cukurova University, Adana.
7. Avcu, T. & Yenilmez, K. (2011). Evaluation of the seventh grade mathematics curriculum based on teachers’ opinions. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy 6 (1), 1-19.
8. Bal, P (2008). The evaluation of new mathematic curriculum in term of teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Çukurova University, Social Sciences Institute 17 (1), 53-68.

9. Berk, Ş. (2012). Evaluation of modular system implemented in vocational and technical secondary schools by using provus’ discrepancy model. Unpublished Dissertation. Anadolu University, Eskişehir.
10. Bulut, A. (2006). 9th grade mathematics teachers' opinion on 2005 mathematics curriculum's evaluation dimension. Unpublised Masters’s Thesis. Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul.
11. Bulut, İ. (2008). Teacher views on student-centered practices in the new primary education curriculum. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 56, 521-546.
12. Creswell J. W. (2007). Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (3. Baskı). Merrill Prentice Hall.
13. Cet, S. (2000). Evaluation of lyce 1 mathematics curriculum in secondary education. Unpublished Masters’s Thesis, Marmara University, İstanbul.
14. Duru, A. & Korkmaz, H. (2010). Teachers’ views about a new mathematics curriculum and difficulties encountering curriculum change. Hacettepe University Journal of Education 38, 67-81.
15. Fitzpatrick, J. L., J. R. Sanders & B. R. Worthen. (2004). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
16. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
17. Geisert, P. (1973). A discrepancy evaluation system for university professors. Science and Mathematics Teaching Center. University of Wyoming, Center for Research, Service and Publication, Laramie, Wyoming. Retrieved May 16, 2014 from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED081855.
18. Gredler, E.M. (1996). Program Evaluation. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall.
19. Gunes, G & Baki, A. (2011). Reflections from application of the fourth grade mathematics course curriculum. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 41, 192-205.
20. Halat, E. (2007). The Views of Elementary School Teachers on the New Elementary School Mathematics Curriculum. Journal of Afyon Kocatepe University Social Sciences 9 (1), 63–88.
21. Inan, A. (2006). 9. sınıf matematik dersi için 2005 yılında uygulanan öğretim programina iliskin ögretmen gorusleri. Unpublished Masters’ Thesis. Yıldız Teknik University, İstanbul.
22. Izci, E. & Goktas, Ö. (2014).Opinions of mathematic teachers regarding curriculum of fifth grade mathematics lesson. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 41, 317-328.
23. Karacaoğlu, O. C. & Acar, E. (2010). The issues that teachers encounter during application of new curricula. Yüzüncü Yıl University, Journal of Education 7 (1), 45-58.
24. Keles, O. (2009). An investigation of elementary and mathematics teachers’ views about the new elementary school mathematıcs curriculum. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
25. Konur & Atlıhan (2012). Ortaöğretim matematik dersi öğretim programının içerik öğesinin organizesine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Cumhuriyet University International Journal of Education 1 (2) 82-100.
26. Kutluca & Aydın (2010). Difficulties secondary school mathematics teachers encountered during application of the new mathematics curriculum. Dicle University Journal of Social Sciences 2 (1) 11-20.
27. Kutluca, T. ve Baki, A. (2009). Investigation of views of students, student teachers and teachers about difficult subjects in 10th grade mathematics class. Kastamonu University Journal of Education, 17 (2) 609-624.
28. Merter, F. & San, İ. (2012). Teachers’ views about high-school mathematics curriculum. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 5 (7) 483-507.
29. MONE (2011). Ortaöğretim matematik (9, 10, 11, 12. sınıflar) dersi öğretim programı. Retrieved on March 10 from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretim programlari/icerik/72.
30. MONE (2012-2013). Ministry of National education statistics: formal education. Retrieved on March 15 from http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/istatistik/meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2012_201 pdf.
31. MONE (2013). Ortaöğretim matematik (9, 10, 11, 12. sınıflar) dersi öğretim programı. Retrieved on March 10, 2014 from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretim programlari/icerik/72.
32. NCTM, (2000). The standards 2000 project. Retrieved January 10, 2015 from http://www.nctm.org/standards/overview.htm#project.
33. OECD (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world. First results of PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
34. OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Results: Excellence Through Equity: Giving Every Student the Chance to Succeed (Volume II), PISA, OECD Publishing. Retrieved on January 20, 2015 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201132-en
35. Orbeyi, S (2007). The evaluation of the teaching program of primary schoool mathematics lesson based on teachers' views. Unpublished master’s thesis, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale.
36. Ozdemir, M. S. (2009). Curriculum evaluation in education and examination of the curriculum evaluation studies in turkey. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Education 6 (2), 126-149.
37. Sırmacı, N. (2002). Ortaogretim matematik dersi programının hedeflerine ulasabilme düzeylerinin ogrenci basarıları ve ogretmen gorusleri dogrultusunda degerlendirilmesi. Unpublished dissertation Ankara University, Ankara.
38. Sahin, I. (2008). Yeni ilköğretim birinci kademe fen ve teknoloji programının değerlendirilmesi. Journal of National Education, 177, 181-207.
39. Sahin, I. (2009). Curriculum assessment: constructivist primary mathematics curriculum in Turkey. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 51-72.
40. Taspınar, M. & Halat, E. (2009). Yeni ilkögretim 6. sınıf matematik programını ölçme değerlendirme kisminin ögrenci gorusleri dogrultusunda incelenmesi. Uludag University Journal of Education 22 (2), 551-572.
41. Umdu, E. (2012). Primary mathematics teachers’ opinions and knowledge levels about new approaches in mathematics teaching. Unpublished Masters’ Thesis, Uludag University, Bursa.
42. Usun, S. & Karagoz, E. (2009). Evaluation of the primary second term mathematicscurriculum according to teacher views. Muğla University Journal of Social Sciences, 22, 101-116.
43. Ucuncu, K. & Tertemiz, N. (2012). İlkogretim (2–5. sınıflar) matematik dersi ogretim programı carpma alt ogrenme alanının degerlendirilmesi. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences 10(1), 97-122.
44. Uzel, D. & Simseker, B. (2012). İlkogretim 6. sınıf matematik ogretim programının degerlendirilmesi. 10th National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, 27-30 of June, 2012, Nigde.
45. Yazcayır, N., Selvi, K., & Demirel, O. (2013). Assessment of the general secondary education curricula in Turkey. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies 3(5), 13-24.
46. Yıldırım, S. (2009). The evaluation of the first grade mathematics curriculum acquisitions dimensions according to the primary school teachers opinions. Unpublished master’s thesis, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University.
47. Yılmaz, T. (2006). The teacher thoughts about new fifth class mathematics curriculum. Unpublished master’s thesis, Sakarya University, Sakarya.
48. Yurday, H. (2006). Secondary school mathematics teachers' approaches to the new mathematics curriculum. Unpublished master’s thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon.