Learning and Teaching on Screen: Middle School Students' and Teachers' Perspectives on Distance Education

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 26, 1341 - 1363

Fadime Temelli , Üzeyir Arı , Oktay Baykara

Öz

This research investigated the perspectives of secondary school teachers and students in Malatya Province towards distance education during the 2022-2023 academic year. This research employs a mixed-methods research design, utilizing both qualitative and quantitative data. The sample of the study consists of 385 students and 65 teachers studying in public and private secondary schools. Data were collected through the “Middle School Students’ Distance Education Perception Scale,” the “Teachers’ Opinions on Distance Education Scale,” and semi-structured interviews. The findings revealed no significant differences in perceptions based on students’ gender, grade level, or school type. However, infrastructure limitations had a negative impact on rural students. While students appreciated the flexibility of distance education, most preferred face-to-face learning for better interaction and motivation. Teachers reported similar concerns, with female teachers expressing more positive attitudes. According to the research findings, English teachers have a more positive approach to distance education due to their easier access to digital content. However, in general, it has been observed that problems such as limited interaction, lack of motivation and inadequate infrastructure negatively affect the effectiveness of distance education. This situation reveals the necessity of targeted and sustainable improvements in distance education practices.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Distance education , middle schools , student and teacher perspectives

Kaynakça

• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital compass learning: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group.
• Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University.
• Artino Jr, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 146-151.
• Ayvacı, H.Ş., Bebek, G., & Yamaçlı, S. (2023). Experiences of pre-service science teachers in “teaching practice” during the covid-19 pandemic. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 7 (13), 134- 152. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1229871
• Azmat, M., & Ahmad, A. (2022). Lack of social interaction in online classes during COVID-19. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, 13(2), 185-196.
• Baker, J. B. (2002). The case for antitrust enforcement. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(4), 27-50.
• Bates, A. W., & Poole, G. (2003). A framework for selecting and using technology. Effective Teaching with Technology in Higher Education, 75-105.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
• Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply, demand, and standards: How we can ensure a competent, caring, and qualified teacher for every child. National Commission on Teaching & America's Future, Kutztown Distribution Center.
• Duman, N. (2020). COVID-19 fear and intolerance to uncertainty in university students]. The Journal of Social Science, 4(8), 426-437
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. Handbook of Distance Education, 1(4), 113-127.
• Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies. Routledge.
• Kazana, A., Armakolas, S., Kazantzis, S., & Krotký, J. (2022). The teacher's cognitive role in the efficiency of distance education: A case study. Social Education Research, 299-306.
• Kemp, W. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on the future of education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 12-25.
• Kurnaz, A., Kaynar, H., Barışık, C. Ş., & Doğrukök, B. (2020). Teachers’ views on distance learning. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 293-322.
• Metin, M., Çevik, A., & Gürbey, S. (2021). The scale for determining teachers' opinions on distance education: Validity and reliability study. Maarif Mektepleri Uluslararası Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), 15-35.
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. pp 361
• Özkan, İ., Taylan, S. & İlaslan, E. (2021). The experiences of nursing students towards distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. International e-Journal of Educational Studies (IEJES), 5 (10), 106-117. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.942443
• Pallant, J. (2011). A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. McGraw Hill,
• Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. John Wiley & Sons.
• Sarı, R.İ., & Korucu, A.T. (2023). Perception of gender equality of teacher candidates and the relationship between technology use levels. Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 5(1), 79-95.
• UNESCO, I. (2020). Basic texts of the 2003 convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage.
• Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2013). Adaptability to online learning: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. Columbia University Community College Research.