Reflections from the Mathematics Lesson with Micro learning: A Different Educational Experience in the Digital Age
Abstract
The process of mathematics lessons was differentiated through microlearning, and the student experiences at the end of this process constitute the focus of this study. This approach, which offers students an innovative educational experience in the digital age, has become even more important with the rapid development of technology. The participants in the study, which employed a qualitative research method, consisted of sixth-grade students. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed through content analysis. The findings of this study identified three main categories: positive and negative aspects of microlearning, digital content context, and comparison with face-to-face teaching. Students were able to follow the digital content at their own pace and rewatch it when needed. Learning mathematics in small chunks provided a different and engaging experience for them, allowing them to discover the power of digital media in education. This study highlights the advantages of microlearning and its potential for integration with face-to-face instruction. Microlearning provides a richer and more flexible learning environment in mathematics courses and is adaptable to various courses and subjects.
Keywords
Mathematics, micro learning, student experience, digital age, education technology.
Ethical Statement
The present study obtained approval from the Kilis 7 Aralık University Education Faculty Research Ethics Committee in 2021 with the decision number 2021/09.
References
- Alias, N. F., & Razak, R. A. (2024). Revolutionizing learning in the digital age: a systematic literature review of microlearning strategies. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2331638
- Brandenburg, D.C., & Ellinger, A.D. (2003). The future: just-in-time learning expectations and potential implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(3), 308-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422303254629 Buchem, I., & Hamelmann, H. (2010). Microlearning: a strategy for ongoing professional development. E-Learning Papers, 21(7), 1-15. http://www.elearningpapers.eu/
- Carter, J. W., & Youssef-Morgan, C. (2022). Psychological capital development effectiveness of face-to-face, online, and Micro-learning interventions. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6553-6575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10824-5
- Chong, X. (2022). Design and application of digital ımage resources in microlearning. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 5(9), 668-676. https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202209_5(9).0096
- Christen, A. (2009). Transforming the classroom for collaborative learning in the 21st century. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers, 84(1), 28-31. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ829507
- Costley, K. C. (2014). The positive effects of technology on teaching and student learning (Arkansas, ed.). Arkansas Tech University
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches(4th edition). Sage publications.
- Dalong, O. M., & Jonah, D. T. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of microlearning on primary school puipils’ academic performance in mathematics in mangulocal government area, plateau state. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(3s), 4788-4794. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803352S
- Gabrielli, S., Kimani, S., & Catarci, T. (2006). The design of microlearning experiences: a research agenda, in Hug, T., Lindner, M. and Bruck, P.A. (Eds), Microlearning: Emerging Concepts, Practices and Technologies after E-Learning: Proceedings of Micro learning Conference 2005: Learning and Working in New Media, pp. 45-53.
- Gallo, P. (2024). Educate in Narrative Thinking at University Through Bite-Sized Learning. In Optimizing Education Through Micro-Lessons: Engaging and Adaptive Learning Strategies (pp. 254-267). IGI Global.