Requirement for Submission

1. The study should be an original research article written in one of the fields specified in our Aim and Scope page and related to Islamic Civilization.
2. The study must be prepared in accordance with ethical guidelines. You can review our Ethical Principles page.
3. The study must address a problem and offer either a solution or a proposed solution to the problem it addresses.
4. The study, which should address an important issue in depth, should be different from what has already been done. The framework of the study should not be so broad as to cover more than one topic.
   
5. Both classical sources and recent international studies (including research published in foreign languages) should be cited on relevant topics.
   
6. The abstract should reflect the significance, purpose, scope, boundaries and conclusion of the study in the shortest possible form and should not exceed 150 words. 
7. The introduction of the study should consist of the background of the problem being addressed and an expression of what is to be done to solve or propose a solution to the problem. The introduction should also include a brief literature review that states the general situation without listing specific works. 
8. The study should not exceed 9000 (nine thousand) words, including bibliography, footnotes and abstracts.
9. The language of the study should be Turkish or English.
10. The work should be free of spelling and punctuation errors, and the headings should be formatted to appear in Navigation Pane.
11. Footnotes and bibliography should be according to the Isnad Citation Style and should be error-free.
12. All authors must be at least PhD students.

If your manuscript meets the above requirements you can submit it.

We do not require the manuscript to be formatted according to our writing rules that listed below or applied to the template on the submit. We ask formatting for manuscripts that have passed the fist check.

You can visit the Process Guide for Authors page for submission and processes.

Manuscript Editing

1. Contents

• Turkish manuscripts should include both Turkish and English titles, abstracts and keywords. English manuscripts do not need Turkish content.
• Abstracts should consist of a maximum of 150 words and should be written in a single paragraph. 
• The number of keywords should be between 5-8, the first keyword should be the relevant department, and then they should be ordered from general to specific.
• For the spelling of non-Turkish proper names (religion, sect, person, sūrah, etc.), book titles and concepts, the Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi should be followed, and the Encyclopedia of Islam should be taken into account for English content.
• References should be indicated as footnotes in the study.
• It is essential that the study includes a comprehensive bibliography, which should encompass all sources cited within the text.
• The doi link of the works that have a doi should be added at the end of each reference. You can use the Crossref Link Reference to find the dois of the works in your bibliography.
  
• Contribution rate should be declared at the end of multi-authored studies. To access the statement of contribution form, please click here.

2. Formatting

• Although we have a large team, since we work on a voluntary basis, we cannot provide services that require professionalism such as proofreading and layout. Therefore, we expect our authors to make the necessary arrangements.
• You can apply the edits below on your manuscript, or you can use our templates for Libreoffice Writer and Microsoft Office Word that include these edits.
• Gentium Plus should be used as the text font, and the font size should be set to 11 points in all text except abstracts, keywords, tables and footnotes.
  
• Footnotes, bibliography, numbering, tables, figures and citations should be organized according to the Isnad Citation Style 2nd Edition.
• Author information should not be included in the article file.
• The title page with author information should be uploaded as a separate file.
• The uploaded files must be in docx or odt format.
  

2.1. Page Style

• Right and Left 3.5 cm.
• Top and Bottom 4 cm.
• All headings in the text should be 11 points.

2.2. Abstracts and Keywords

• Gentium Plus 9 points, top 0, bottom 6 pt (0.20 cm)
  
• Justified, no indentation.
• Single line spacing.
• There should be no space between the title and the text.
• The word "Keywords" should be bold and end with a colon.
• There should be no blank line between the keywords and the abstract.

2.3. Heading

• All headings should be in 11 point font and bold.
• Hierarchy should be determined by numbering.
  
• There should be 6 pt (0.20 cm) space above the headings and 0 below them.
• All headings except Abstract should be indented 1 cm.

        2.3.1. Numbering of Headings

• Headings should be numbered as
       1.
       1.1.
       1.1.1.
       while Introduction, Conclusion and Bibliography should not be numbered.

2.4. Text

• Text should be justified
• All text except Abstract, Keywords and Footnotes should be in Gentium Plus, 11 pt.
• The first line of paragraphs should be indented 1 cm.
• Indent: 0 above, 6 pt (0.20 cm) below.

2.5. Quotations

• Quotations of less than 40 words should be enclosed in quotation marks
• Quotations of more than 40 words should be as follows.
          10 pt,
          1 cm indented (all paragraph),
          single line spacing,
          above and below paragraph 6 pt (0.20 cm).

2.6. Footnotes and Bibliography

Footnotes and bibliography should be given according to ISNAD Citation Style 2nd Edition.

Footnotes

• Gentium Plus 9 pt.
• Justified
• Single line spacing.
• Above and below 0.
• Hanging 0.6 cm
• First line should be intended one tab
  

Bibliography

• Gentium Plus 10 pt.
• Justified
  
• Single line spacing.
• Above 0, below 3 pt (0.10 cm)
• Hanging 1 cm.
  

We recommend using Zotero or a similar application for footnotes and bibliography.

2.7. Tables and Figures

• Tables should not be of fixed size, but should be adjusted to fit automatically on the page from the table specifications.
• Table and figure captions should be numbered as Table 1:, Figure 1:.
• All headings should be in normal type (not bold or italicized).
• Headings should be Gentium Plus, 9 pt.
• In headings, the initial letter of each word should be capitalized.
• Table contents should be 9 pt, single line, top-bottom 0.
• The first line of the table should be bold.
  

• The details of what is written here, and any necessary rules not included here, can be found in the ISNAD Citation Style Online Manual.
• You can also write your work on the template we have prepared according to the regulations here.
• You must have Gentium Plus font installed on your computer for the template to display properly.
• Click here to download the Gentium Plus font if you do not already have it installed.
  

Templates for Microsoft Word

• Article Template
• Single Author Title Page
• Two Authors Title Page
• Contribution Statement
  

Templates for Libreoffice Writer

• Article Template
• Single Author Title Page
• Two Authors Title Page
• Contribution Statement

Journal email: imad@dpu.edu.tr
Editor email: yusuf.sansarkan@dpu.edu.tr

The Journal of Islamic Civilization Studies is an academic journal that aims to publish quality scientific studies through a correct process and to contribute to the development of scientific knowledge. In line with this goal, it is essential that all stakeholders involved in the publication process of the journal (authors, publisher, referees and editors) comply with ethical principles.

Authorship and Contributorship

Who is an author?
As recommended by the ICMJE, an author is a person who meets the following four conditions.

• Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work,
• Drafting the work or reviewing it critically for important intellectual content,
  
• Final approval of the version to be published,
  
• Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Those who meet all four criteria are designated as authors. Those who do not meet them are considered non-author contributors.
How is the contribution rate determined?
The contribution rates of the authors included in the study are determined by the authors of the study. Our journal expects the contribution rate of the first author to be higher, but the responsibility in this regard belongs to the authors and the final decision will be made according to their statement. The following points should be noted about co-authorship.

• Each coauthor of the manuscript should directly aware that the submission is being made in their name.
  
• Contribution rates of the authors involved in the study should be indicated.

Author Authentication

• All authors contributing to the study must be a member of Dergipark and have ORCID.
  
• The contact information of all authors should be up-to-date and accurate, and the journal management should be able to reach them when necessary.

Peer Review Process

• We forward the manuscripts submitted to our journal to two reviewers for evaluation.
  
• We select reviewers based on their expertise in the subject matter of the submitted work.
  
• We make sure that the reviewers are not from the same institution as the author.
  
• We delete author information from the manuscripts we send to reviewers.
  
• We do not send the files returned from the reviewer to the author for revision until we are sure that the information belonging to the reviewer does not remain.
  
• We try to ensure that the review is unbiased and accurate by hiding the details of the reviewers and authors from each other.
  
• Since we have a field editor in every discipline we accept for publication, we do not accept reviewer suggestions from authors.
• If the reviewer discovers the identity of the author, we ask them to stop the review and return the manuscript to us.
  
• We check whether the reviewers' citations to their own work are necessary and remove the unnecessary ones before sending the manuscript to the author so that blind reviewing is not harmed.
  
• When we find that the reviewer has secretly added their work to the bibliography, we reject the review and warn them.
  
• Since we work on a voluntary basis, we cannot pay our reviewers, but we publish the reviewers' names below the issue.

Concurrent Submission

A manuscript submitted to our journal may not be submitted simultaneously to other journals. If this is reported to us:

• We suspend review in under way and consult with other journals editor to conduct investigation.
• We compare manuscripts that submitted first, check contents and author list.
• If the manuscripts are same or similar but the authors are different, we will reject the article and take steps to prevent the authors from submitting articles to our journal.
• If both manuscripts are by the same author, we contact the author to clarify the situation.
• If the author's response is that the error is the result of a misunderstanding or ignorance, and this response is satisfactory, then we ask the author to specify how his/her manuscripts in other journals should be handled. (If he/she wants revision or rejection of other manuscript)
• If the author's answer is not satisfactory, we reject the article. We notify all authors and reviewers. We inform the author's institution and the author's supervisor.
• Click here for COPE's Concurrent Submission of a Manuscript to Multiple Journals flowchart.
  

Plagiarism

Plagiarism is presenting someone else's views, thoughts and expressions as one's own without proper referencing. We try to prevent this kind of fraud by similarity testing all manuscripts submitted to our journal, but we may also encounter situations that exceed the test. When we suspect or receive a report of plagiarism, we take the following steps, regardless of whether the work is in the process of publication or has already been published.

Plagiarism in a Submitted Manuscript

• If the work is in review, we inform the reviewers and stop the process.
• We check degree of copying.
• In the case of minor copying of short phrases, we inform the author and ask him to correct the manuscript.
• In the case of major plagiarism, we contact the authors and notify them.
• If we do not receive satisfactory or no response from the author, we reject the work. We inform the referees, the author's institution and supervisor.
• When we receive a satisfactory answer from the author that he/she has made a mistake, we ask him/her to decide whether to reject or correct the article.

Plagiarism in a Published Article

• We check degree of copying.
• In the case of minor copying of short phrases, we inform the author and ask him to publish correction.
• In the case of major plagiarism, we contact the authors and notify them.
• If we do not receive satisfactory or no response from the author, we withdraw the article, inform the author's institution and supervisor.
• When we receive a satisfactory answer from the author that he/she has made a mistake, we ask him/her to decide whether to withdraw the article or publish correction.
  

In the case of self-plagiarism or duplication, we follow the same steps as listed above.

Click here for COPE's plagiarism in submitted manuscript flowchart, here for plagiarism in published article flowchart, and here for self-plagiarism flowchart.

Use of AI

The following points should be considered in the use of AI tools:

• Authors must be human, AI tools cannot be added to the list of authors.
• AI tools cannot be held responsible in any case.
• The responsibility for all ethical violations, even if they are caused by AI, belongs to the authors of the study.
• Authors should clearly state, in the ethical statement, which AI model they are using and for what purpose.
  
• If necessary, it should be stated in the method how AI tools were utilized.
• Editors should never upload submitted manuscripts to AI tools, regardless of the purpose.
• Editors should never upload any text containing information about manuscripts or authors (including decisions etc.) to AI tools, even for language correction.
• Reviewers should never upload manuscripts to AI tools, regardless of the purpose.
• Reviewers should never upload reports they created for decision-making purposes that containing information about works to AI tools, even for language correction.

Fabrication

• The data in the manuscripts submitted to the journal must be verifiable.
  
• If there is a suspicion that the data are fabricated, the issue is investigated by us.
  
• The author is obliged to verify the data as requested by the journal.
  
• If the author cannot provide a satisfactory answer, the manuscript is rejected or, if published, withdrawn and the author's institution is notified.
  
• Click here for COPE's fabricated data in a submitted manuscript flowchart and here for fabricated data in a published article.
  

Citation Manipulation

In order to increase the citation rate

• Authors referring to their own work,
  
• Reviewers asking authors for citations,
  
• Editors asking authors for citations for themselves or for the journal,
  
• Editors or reviewers inserting their own sources into the article,

The above-mentioned are considered as citation manipulation and are not accepted. If this situation is detected, those concerned are warned and the added citations are deleted. If the wrongly cited article is published, it is withdrawn or a correction is published.

Whether the citation is unfair or not is determined by the relevance of the cited source. This is also the rule when referees cite their own sources when requesting a correction.

Conflicts of Interest

• As we are a non-profit, free journal, we do not make any financial gain from the articles we publish.
• We keep communication with authors and reviewers at a formal level and do not privilege any author.
• We process articles according to the date of receipt and publish them according to the date of acceptance.
• We make efforts to send manuscripts to reviewers who have no relationship with the author.
• We do not involve editors who have an inescapable relationship with the author in the publication process.
• When the editorial team or someone from our institution submits a manuscript to our journal, we follow the same procedures as for other manuscripts.

Retraction Policy

Authors, institutions or editors may request the retraction of a published article. The editor will retract an article if any of the following issues are determined:

• The article's findings are unreliable due to major errors in the data, data fabrication, data alteration, or incorrect conclusions.
  
• The autorship cannot be verified.
  
• Any kind of misrepresentation, such as deception, fraud, plagiarism, concealing the use of AI, or misrepresentation of responsibility.
  
• Significant similarity to a previously published work.
  
• Sharing previously published findings without permission or proper citation.
  
• Unauthorized use of data that would affect the results if removed from the article.
  
• Failure to comply with copyright or other legal issues.
  
• Ethical violations.
  
• Compromising blind peer review or the publication process.
  
• Concealing a conflict of interest by the author that could influence the editors's or reviewers' suggestions for correction.

Retracted work remains accessible and is clearly marked such.

There is no need to retract the article in the following cases. The issue is resolved with a correction article:

• Identification or errors that do not affect the main findings and can be corrected.
  
• Disclosure of conflicts of interest that do not affect the results of the work.
  
• Disagreement between authors that do not affect the outcome of the work and for which the author's contributions are verifiable.

Data Availability

• If the data used in the studies published in our journal are open to access, the information required to access them (DOI, etc.) should be indicated.
• If the data used in the study are not accessible, the reason for this should be clearly stated.
• If the data used in the study requires permission, the necessary permission must be obtained and uploaded to the system with the article file as an additional file.

Intellectual Property

• The copyrights of the articles published in our journal belong to their authors. Except for the reproduction of the data presented in the studies for commercial purposes, it is free to use with attribution, including for commercial purposes.
• On the other hand, the data in the articles sent to us must be used in accordance with the licenses of the sources from which they are taken. If, during or after publication, we suspect or receive a report of improper use of data, we investigate the matter.
• If, after contacting the author, it becomes clear that a breach has occurred, we reject the publication in process and withdraw the published article.

Complaints and Appeals

• As publishers and editors, it is imperative that we adhere to the aforementioned guidelines and ethical rules and do not allow ethical violations under any circumstances, as well as provide solutions to the situations that occur.
• Likewise, those who submit manuscripts to our journal or review the manuscripts should not violate the ethical principles and should inform the editor in cases that occur and know that they can file a complaint in case of irregularities.
  
• The author can appeal the rejection of his/her manuscript. In this case, the editorial team is obliged to provide the author with a valid justification. If we are unable to provide the author with a justification, we will apologize to him/her and re-process the manuscript.
• The author's objections and complaints about the processes and the time taken during the processes are evaluated and responded to by us. If it is determined that the author's work has been deliberately delayed, the relevant editor will be warned and, in the event of a recurrence, suspended.
• The author's complaints of ethical misconduct against the editorial team are reviewed by the editorial team and, if necessary, the journal owner and our publisher. If the editors are found to have committed ethical misconduct, the relevant editor will be suspended from duty.
• Other complaints of ethical misconduct by the author are handled within the COPE framework according to the Ethical Principles above.
• Authors can contact us for the steps to withdraw the manuscript and publish a correction article.
  
• You can contact us via Dergipark or via e-mail and phone on our contact page.

Ethical Oversight

If we suspect that a study that has been published or is in the process of publication has ethical problems, such as lack of ethics clearance etc., we take the following steps.

• We inform reviewers and field editors that we will investigate.
• We ask the author to provide the necessary information.
• In case the author gives a satisfactory answer, we apologize to him and continue the process.
• If the author does not respond, or if the response is not satisfactory, we inform him/her that we are stopping the process and notify the relevant institution.
• If the problem is solved as a result of communication with the institution, we continue the process, otherwise we report the situation to the higher institution and inform the reviewers.

Submission

• Our journal publishes only research articles. Studies such as book reviews, review articles, etc. are not accepted.
  
• The submitted studies should contribute to the expansion of the circle of scientific knowledge in accordance with our purpose of existence.
  
• The editor and the editorial board have the authority to reject directly the manuscripts that do not meet the 12 items “Conditions to be met by the manuscript to be submitted” stated on our Writing Rules page.
  
• Our journal publishes studies in Turkish and English.
  
• All authors of the submitted studies must be at least PhD students.
  
• An author can be listed as an author in only one article per year. 
• At most one our faculty member's article can be published in one year.
• Papers produced from symposiums, etc., will not be accepted. 
• In accordance with our policy of focusing on problem-solution oriented studies, taḥkîk studies will not be accepted.

Publication Process

• You can find our detailed publication process on our Process Guide for Authors page.

Publication Period

• The journal operates on Continuous Publishing model. Under this model, where there are no fixed issues, authors can submit their work any day of the year. Accepted and completed articles are published independently without delay. 

Citation and Reference Style

• The Journal requires the use of Isnad Citation Style 2nd edition in citation and bibliography writing.
  

Similarity Rate Limit

• The maximum similarity rate is accepted as 15% in our journal.
  

Publication and Review Fees

• The Journal does not charge any fee to the authors for the article evaluation and publication process.
  

Copyright

• Copyrights of the published articles belong to their authors.