Research Article

Exploring EFL Learners’ Writing Motivation Across Traditional and Flipped Instructional Contexts

Volume: 14 July 13, 2026
EN TR

Exploring EFL Learners’ Writing Motivation Across Traditional and Flipped Instructional Contexts

Abstract

In this mixed-methods study, EFL learners’ writing motivation across traditional face-to-face and flipped instructional contexts was explored. The study was conducted on ninety-four B2 students in a university preparatory program in Türkiye (traditional group: n = 47; flipped group: n = 47) and lasted for eight weeks. The scores obtained from the AWMQ, which was administered as a pre- and post-test, constituted quantitative data, and semi-structured interviews were held with 36 students (18 from each context) to collect qualitative data. For the analysis of the quantitative data, paired samples t-tests and independent samples t-tests were utilized. Within-group analysis indicated no statistically significant change in overall writing motivation in the traditional context. However, the flipped context showed a statistically significant increase with a small-to-medium effect size (d=0.35). As to the between-group comparison of post-test scores, not a statistically significant difference was found. However, the qualitative findings helped contextualize these patterns by highlighting differences in how students experienced writing instruction: flipped-classroom students associated writing with scaffolded, step-by-step practice, immediate feedback, and peer interaction and defined all these as motivational supports, while traditional-context students persistently mentioned homework-oriented writing and obligation-driven engagement. To conclude, though the comparative quantitative findings remain inconclusive within the scope of this study, the results suggest that flipped instructional structures may be associated with more supportive motivational experiences over time.

Keywords

EFL writing, writing motivation, flipped learning, preparatory program, mixed methods

Ethical Statement

Ethical Committee Permission Information Name of the board that carries out ethical assessment: Hacettepe University Educational Sciences Institute Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Board The date and number of the ethical assessment decision: 31.05.2025 - E-51944218-050-00003573528

References

  1. Andewi, W., & Hastomo, T. (2022). Effect of using flipped classroom for teaching writing based on students' motivation: A quasi-experimental research. Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 615-631.
  2. Badri, N. (2016). The main psychological factors affecting EFL learners’ academic writing: A case study of master one students at Biskra university [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Biskra.
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
  4. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). The psychology of written composition. Routledge.
  5. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2023). Flip your classroom, revised edition: Reach every student in every class every day. ASCD.
  6. Bruning, R., & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_4
  7. Camacho, A., Alves, R. A., & Boscolo, P. (2021). Writing motivation in school: A systematic review of empirical research in the early twenty-first century. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 213-247.
  8. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
APA
Aygün, S., & Altay, İ. F. (2026). Exploring EFL Learners’ Writing Motivation Across Traditional and Flipped Instructional Contexts. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 14. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1885363
AMA
1.Aygün S, Altay İF. Exploring EFL Learners’ Writing Motivation Across Traditional and Flipped Instructional Contexts. JCER. 2026;14. doi:10.18009/jcer.1885363
Chicago
Aygün, Sibel, and İsmail Firat Altay. 2026. “Exploring EFL Learners’ Writing Motivation Across Traditional and Flipped Instructional Contexts”. Journal of Computer and Education Research 14 (July). https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1885363.
EndNote
Aygün S, Altay İF (July 1, 2026) Exploring EFL Learners’ Writing Motivation Across Traditional and Flipped Instructional Contexts. Journal of Computer and Education Research 14
IEEE
[1]S. Aygün and İ. F. Altay, “Exploring EFL Learners’ Writing Motivation Across Traditional and Flipped Instructional Contexts”, JCER, vol. 14, July 2026, doi: 10.18009/jcer.1885363.
ISNAD
Aygün, Sibel - Altay, İsmail Firat. “Exploring EFL Learners’ Writing Motivation Across Traditional and Flipped Instructional Contexts”. Journal of Computer and Education Research 14 (July 1, 2026). https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1885363.
JAMA
1.Aygün S, Altay İF. Exploring EFL Learners’ Writing Motivation Across Traditional and Flipped Instructional Contexts. JCER. 2026;14. doi:10.18009/jcer.1885363.
MLA
Aygün, Sibel, and İsmail Firat Altay. “Exploring EFL Learners’ Writing Motivation Across Traditional and Flipped Instructional Contexts”. Journal of Computer and Education Research, vol. 14, July 2026, doi:10.18009/jcer.1885363.
Vancouver
1.Sibel Aygün, İsmail Firat Altay. Exploring EFL Learners’ Writing Motivation Across Traditional and Flipped Instructional Contexts. JCER. 2026 Jul. 1;14. doi:10.18009/jcer.1885363