Global Trends in Flipped Learning Research: A Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis

Murat Yüksel

doi:10.53850/joltida.1788161

Global Trends in Flipped Learning Research: A Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis

Abstract

In the last decade of accelerated digital transformation, the Flipped Learning Model (FLM), as a technology-supported and student-centered pedagogical model, has become increasingly visible in instructional designs, but the research accumulation in this field is fragmented. This study aims to map the scope, temporal development and conceptual structure of academic production in the field of FLM from a holistic perspective. To this end, as a result of the search conducted in the Web of Science and Scopus databases in the subject area of "flipped learning" OR "flipped classroom", a total of 8,683 records were obtained, 4,188 of which were WoS and 4,495 of which were Scopus. By removing 2,896 duplicate records and including only English-language research articles, a final dataset of 5,787 articles distributed across 1,639 journals published between 2012 and 2025 was created. Data analysis was conducted in RStudio using the Bibliometrix/Biblioshiny package, applying annual production and citation trends, author-institution-country-level collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrences, trend topic analysis, factor analysis and thematic mapping techniques, and findings were supported by descriptive content analysis. The results show that the field has moved from a phase of rapid expansion to a phase of maturity, with significant growth particularly after 2013 and a peak publication volume in 2019-2022. An interdisciplinary structure with health sciences, engineering, mathematics, language education and K-12 contexts was observed, with the US and China identified as the most productive countries, while institutions based in East Asia and Southern Europe formed strong but relatively limited networks of international collaboration. Conceptual analyses indicate a transition from early work focused on implementation and course design to themes of engagement, motivation and self-regulation, and more recently to artificial intelligence, online/blended learning and learning analytics. The findings suggest that the research on FLM is dynamic yet geographically uneven and that there is a need for more international, equity-oriented and AI-integrated designs in the future.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

The present study obtained approval from Hatay Mustaf Kemal University Research Ethics Committee in 2025 with the decision number 2025/26, document date and number: 10.11.2025-576875.

References

Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
Arco, I., Mercadé-Melé, P., Ramos-Pla, A., & Flores-Alarcia, Ò. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of the flipped classroom pedagogical model: Trends and strategic lines of study. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1022295. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1022295
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Ateş, A. & Ünsal, H. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of research on flipped learning. TEBD, 22(2), 1084-1098. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1489685
Baker, J. W. (2000). The "classroom flip": Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning (Jacksonville, FL).
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 23-1200). American Society for Engineering Education. https://peer.asee.org/22585
Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K–12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819

Chen, F., Lui, A. M., & Martinelli, S. M. (2018). A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Medical Education, 51(6), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13272
Chen, H. S., Wang, W. C., Kinshuk, & Chen, N. S. (2017). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 107, 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580.
Gannod, G. C., Burge, J. E., & Helmick, M. T. (2008). Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 777-786). https://doi.org/10.1145/1368088.1368198
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
Hao, Y. (2016). Exploring undergraduates’ perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.032
Hwang, G.-J., Lai, C.-L., & Wang, S.-Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0
Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2018). Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2018). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12548
Khan, S. (2014). World school: Rethinking education (C. Akaş, Trans.). Yapı Kredi Publications.
King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781
Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (Revised and updated). Cambridge Books.
Kuo, Y. C., Chu, H. C., & Huang, C. H. (2014). A case study of integrating the MOOC into a flipped classroom to enhance EFL learners' speaking and writing skills. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 220-229.
Kushairi, N., & Ahmi, A. (2021). Flipped classroom in the second decade of the millennia: A bibliometrics analysis with Lotka’s law. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4401–4431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10457-8 Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759
Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students' learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
Lin, C. J. (2017). Effects of the flipped classroom on learning effectiveness and satisfaction: The case of an elementary school information technology course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 134-142.
Linling, Z., & Abdullah, R. B. (2021). Flipped classroom in higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO), 11(9), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.48047/rigeo.11.09.126 Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper- division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430-435. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. Harvard University Press.
Miller, P. H. (2011). Piaget's theory: Past, present, and future. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed., pp. 649-672). Wiley Blackwell.
O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2014.08.003
Schmidt, S. M., & Ralph, D. L. (2016). The flipped classroom: A twist on teaching. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 9(1), 1-6.
Talbert, R. (2015). Inverting the transition-to-proof classroom. PRIMUS, 25(8), 614-626. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1027831
Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom: Online instruction at Duke University. Educause Review, 47(1), 22-27.
Turan, Z., & Akdağ-Çimen, B. (2020). Flipped classroom in English language teaching: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Cole (Ed.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79-91). Harvard University Press.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Information Systems Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Murat Yüksel ^*
0000-0001-9517-6241
Türkiye

Publication Date

March 29, 2026

Submission Date

October 6, 2025

Acceptance Date

December 12, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 11 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1788161

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA55MJ94GJ

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Yüksel, M. (2026). Global Trends in Flipped Learning Research: A Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 11(2), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1788161