Prospective Information Technologies Teachers' Reflective Thinking Levels in Their Blogs / "Bilişim Teknolojileri Öğretmen Adaylarının Bloglarında Kullandıkları Yansıtıcı Düşünme Düzeyleri"

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 123 - 142, 02.02.2014

Harun Çiğdem , Adile Aşkım Kurt

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı öğretmen adaylarının bloglarında hangi yansıtıcı düşünme seviyelerini kullandığı belirlemektir. Nitel araştırma yöntemlerinin kullanıldığı araştırmaya  2010-2011 eğitim öğretim yılında Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümünde okuyan ve Öğretmenlik Uygulaması dersine kayıtlı 20 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Öğretmen adayları, Öğretmenlik Uygulaması dersi etkinlik raporları için bir dönem boyunca her hafta blog yazmışlardır. Yazılan bloglar betimsel analiz yoluyla çözümlenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda öğretmen adaylarının gittikleri okullarda uygulama öğretmenlerinin ya da diğer öğretmen adayları hakkında izlenimlerini aktardıkları bloglarında daha çok anlama boyutunda yazılar yazdıkları, kendi etkinlikleri hakkında yazdıkları bloglarda ise yansıtma ve eleştirel yansıtma boyutunda yazılar yazdıkları belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Blog, öğretmenlik uygulaması, yansıtıcı düşünme, Bilişim Teknoojileri öğretmen adayı.

Kaynakça

• Absalom, M., & Léger D.S. (2011). Reflecting on reflection learner perceptions of diaries and blogs in tertiary language study. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 10(2): 189-211. DOI: 10.1177/1474022210389141
• Barret, J. (2010). Blogging it: encouraging reflective thinking for architectural practice. CEBE Transactions, 7,(1), 38-50.
• Chang , Y.J., & Chang, Y.S. (2011): Assessing peer support and usability of blogging in hybrid learning environments, Interactive Learning Environments, 1-15 DOI:10.1080/10494820.2011.619889
• Chu S. K.W., Chan C. K.K., & Tiwari A. F.Y. (2012). Using blogs to support learning during internship. Computers & Education 58 (2012) 989–1000.
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
• Dechert, D. A. (2007). Creating a “new pedagogy” for reflection in reading education. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Graduate School of State University of New York at Buffalo (UMI No: 3291559).
• Demirel, Ö. (2003). Kuramdan uygulamaya eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D.C., Heath and Company.
• Ekiz, D. (2006). Kendini ve başkalarını izleme: Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının yansıtıcı günlükleri [Elektronik Versiyon]. İlköğretim Online, 5(1), 45-57.
• Fraenkel, R.M., & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. (6th Edition). Newyork: McGraw-Hill International Edition.
• Gelter, H. (2003). Why is reflective thinking uncommon? [Elektronik Versiyon]. Reflective Practice, 4 (3), 337-344.
• Gültekin, M. (2012). Reflections to future in primary education programs in Turkey. Journal of Education and Future, 1, 1-20
• Hall, H., & Davison, B. (2007). Social software as support in hybrid learning environments: The value of the blog as a tool for reflective learning and peer support [Elektronik Versiyon]. Library and Information Science Research, 29 (2), 163–187.
• Hramiak, A., Boulton, H., & Irwin, B. (2009): Trainee teachers’ use of blogs as private reflections for professional development. Learning, Media and Technology, 34:3, 259-269
• Kember, D., Jones, A., Loke, A., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., & Tse H (1999) Determining the level of reflective thinking from students' written journals using a coding scheme based on the work of Mezirow [Elektronik Versiyon]. Int J Lifelong Educ. 1999;18:18–30.
• Kember, D., Leung, D., Jones, A., & Loke, A. Y. (2000) Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking [Elektronik Versiyon]. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 380-395.
• Kember, D., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., & Wong, F. K. Y. (2008). A four-category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work [Elektronik Versiyon]. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 369–379.
• Kızılkaya, G., & Aşkar, P. (2009). Problem çözmeye yönelik yansıtıcı düşünme becerisi ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34 (154), 82-92.
• Killeavy, M., & Moloney, A. (2010). Reflection in a social place: Can blogging support reflective practice for beginning teachers [Elektronik Versiyon]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1070-1076.
• Kim, Y. (2005). Cultivating reflective thinking: the effects of a reflective thinking tool on learners’ learning performance and metacognitıve awareness in the context of on-line learning. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Pennsylvania State University, Graduate School of College of Education (UMI No:3193201).
• Korkmazgil, S. (2009). How does blogging enhance pre-service English Language teachers’ reflectivity ın practicum? Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Lee, H.J. (2005). Understanding and assessing preservice teachers’ reflective thinking [Elektronik Versiyon]. Teaching and Teacher Education 21, 699– 7
• Leslie, P. (2008). Post-secondary students’ purposes for blogging. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Memorial University, Faculty of Education (UMI No. 3324665).
• Lim, L.Y.L. (2011). A comparison of students’ reflective thinking across different years in a problem-based learning environment[Elektronik Versiyon]. Instr Sci (2011) 39:171–188. DOI 10.1007/s11251-009-9123-8
• Liou, H. C. (2001). Reflective practice in a pre-service teacher education program for high school English teachers in Taiwan, ROC [Elektronik Versiyon]. System, 29, 197–208.
• Luik, P., Voltri, O., Taimalu, M. & Kalk, K. (2011). On the use of student teacher blogs during teaching practice. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 11 (2011), 165–169
• Mewborn, D. S. (1999). Reflective thinking among preservice elementary mathematics teachers [Elektronik Versiyon]. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30 (3), 316 – 341.
• Mezirow, J. (1991) Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 74, 5–12.
• Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
• Minott, M. A. (2008). Valli’s typology of reflection and the analysis of pre-service teachers’ reflective journals. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(5), 55– http://ajte.education.ecu.edu.au/issues/PDF/335/Minott.pdf adresinden 20 Nisan 2010 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Moon, J. A. (1999). Reflection in learning & professional development: Theory & practice. London: Kogan Page.
• Moon, J. A. (2006). Learning Journals: a handbook for reflective practice and professional development. London: Routledge.
• O’Connell, T. S., & Dyment, J. E. (2004). Journals of post secondary outdoor recreation students: The result of a content analysis [Elektronik Versiyon]. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 4(2), 159–172.
• Perschbach, W.J. (2006). Blogging: an inquiry into the efficacy of a web-based technology for student reflection in community college computer science programs. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Nova Southeastern University, Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences, (UMI No. 3206012)
• Saban, A. (2004) Öğrenme ve öğretme süreci yeni teori ve yaklaşımlar. Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Savran Gencer, A. (2008). Professional development of preservice biology teachers through reflective thinking. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
• Semerci, Ç. (2007). Öğretmen ve öğretmen adayları için yansıtıcı düşünme eğilimi (YANDE) ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 7/
• Strauss, A.L. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research, grounded theory procedures and technics. London: Sage Publications.
• Sumsion, J. & Fleet, A. (1996). Reflection: Can we assess it? Should we assess it? [Elektronik Versiyon] Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(2), 121–131.
• Thorpe, K. (2004). Reflective learning journals: From concept to practice [Elektronik Versiyon]. Reflective Practice. 5 (3), 327-343.
• Tok, ġ. (2008). The effects of reflective thinking activities in science course on academic achievements and attitudes toward science. Elemantary Education Online, 7 (3), 557-568.
• Ünver, G. (2003). Yansıtıcı düşünme. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
• Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students' reflective learning processes [Elektronik Versiyon]. The Internet and High Education 11(1), 18-25.
• Xie, Y., & Sharma, P. (2004). Students lived experience of using weblogs in a class an exploratory. Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
• Wessel, J., & Larin, H. (2006). Change in reflection of physiotherapy students over time in clinical placements [Elektronik Versiyon]. Learning in Health and Social Care, 5(3), 119–132.
• Williams, R. M.,Wessel, J., Gemus, M., & Foster-Seargeant, E. (2002). Journal writing to promote reflection by physical therapy students during clinical placements [Elektronik Versiyon]. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5–15.
• Wilson, J., & Jan, W. L. (1993). Thinking for themselves developing strategies for reflective learning. Australia: Eleanor Curtain Publishing.
• Yang, S. H. (2009). Using blogs to enhance critical reflection and community of practice [Elektronik Versiyon]. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 11−
• Yıldırım, A., & ġimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.