Modern Şehirde Flâneur, Fantazmagori ve Varoluş: Benjamin ve Sartre Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Öz

Modern şehir ethosu, 19. yüzyıl şair ve yazarı Charles Baudelaire'den bu yana sosyal ve edebi kuramlarda önemli bir tartışma konusu olagelmiştir. Baudelaire'in şehir imgeleri ve modernlik arasındaki ilişkiye duyduğu ilgi, siyaset, kültür, toplumsal cinsiyet, fenomenoloji ve ontoloji üzerine çalışan ardıllarının pek çoğuna esin kaynağı oluşturmuştur. Böylece çağdaş felsefe, modern şehri kesişimsellikler ile bezeli bir varoluş alanı olarak ele almıştır. Yirminci yüzyılın önde gelen iki düşünürü olan Walter Benjamin ve Jean-Paul Sartre da Baudelaire'in çalışmalarından modern şehir ethosuna ilişkin kuramlarını temellendirmek için faydalanmışlardır. Benjamin, modernlik deneyimini açıklamak için Baudelaire'in erken dönem modern kentlerdeki aylak, sıra dışı ve yalnız bireyleri simgeleyen flâneur kavramını kullanmıştır. Sartre ise varoluşçuluk düşüncesini ortaya koymak için romanlarında ve denemelerinde flâneur esintileri taşıyan şehir karakterlerine yer vermiştir. Her ikisi de modernite ile şehir ethosu arasındaki gerilimi, yabancılaşma, sömürü ve dışlama üreten bir muamma olarak görmüştür. Bu çalışmada Benjamin ve Sartre'ın modern kentlerdeki varoluş problemine ilişkin düşünceleri incelenmiştir. Önce modernitenin bir öznesi olarak flâneur kavramına bakılmış, daha sonra ise Benjamin ve Sartre’ın konuya temas eden eserleri sırasıyla incelenerek bu eserler arasındaki farklılıklar açıklanmıştır. Çalışma ile Benjamin'in modern şehir deneyimine sosyokültürel bir bağlam atfettiği, Sartre'ın ise probleme daha fenomenolojik bir perspektiften yaklaştığı sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Flâneur
• Fantazmagori
• Modern Şehir
• Walter Benjamin
• Jean-Paul Sartre

Flâneur, Phantasmagoria and Existence in Modern Cities: An Analysis of Benjamin and Sartre

Öz

The modern city ethos has been a significant subject in social and literary theories since Charles Baudelaire, the 19th-century poet and author. Baudelaire's interest in the relationship between city imageries and modernity has inspired many of his successors that look at politics, culture, gender, phenomenology, and ontology. Thus, contemporary philosophy has approached the modern city as an intersectional sphere of existence. The two prominent 20th-century thinkers, Walter Benjamin and Jean-Paul Sartre endeavor to use Baudelaire's work as a theoretical structure to ground their understanding of the modern city ethos. Benjamin uses Baudelaire's concept of flâneur, which initially symbolizes the idle, extraordinary, and lonely individuals in early modern cities, to interpret the experience of modernity. Sartre includes city characters that resemble flâneur in his novels and essays to disclose his existentialist thought. Both see the tension between modernity and the city ethos as an enigma that produces alienation, exploitation, and exclusion. In this study, we analyze the thoughts of Benjamin and Sartre regarding the problem of existence in modern cities. First, we look at the concept of flâneur as a subject of modernity. Then we respectively explain the thinkers' works, thus emphasizing their differences. We argue that Benjamin ascribes a relatively sociocultural context to the modern city experience, while Sartre mainly looks at the problem from a phenomenological perspective.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Flâneur
• Phantasmagoria
• Modern City
• Walter Benjamin
• Jean-Paul Sartre

Kaynakça

1. Adorno, T. W. (1980). Letters to Walter Benjamin. E. Bloch, G. Lukács, B. Brecht, W. Benjamin, & T. W. Adorno, Aesthetics and Politics (pp. 110-133). Translation: Ronald Taylor. London: Verso.
2. Ally, M. C. (2003). Sartre's wagers: humanism, solidarity, liberation. Sartre Studies International, 9(2), 68-76.
3. Baudelaire, C. (1970). Paris spleen. Translation: Louise Varèse. Cambridge: New Directions.
4. Baudelaire, C. (1995). The painter of modern life and other essays (arts & letters). Translation: Thom Mayne. New York: Phaidon.
5. Beaumont, M. (2021). “Fevers of curiosity”: Charles Baudelaire and the convalescent flaneur. The Public Domain Review. https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/charles-baudelaire-and-the-convalescent-flaneur.
6. Benjamin, W. (1992). Illuminations. London: Fontana.
7. Benjamin, W. (1997). Charles Baudelaire. London: Verso.
8. Benjamin, W. (2006). Paris, the capital of the nineteenth century. H. Eiland (Ed.), Selected Writings: Volume III (1935-1938) (pp. 32-49). Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

9. Benjamin, W. (2006a). Exchange with Theodor W. Adorno on the essay "Paris, the capital of the nineteenth century". H. Eiland (Ed.), Selected Writings: Volume III (1935-1938) (pp. 50-67). Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
10. Boutin, A. (2012). Rethinking the flâneur: flânerie and the senses. Dix-Neuf, 16(2), 124-132.
11. Buck-Morss, S. (1986). The flâneur, the sandwichman and the whore. New German Critique, 39, 99-140.
12. Cohen, M. (1989). Walter Benjamin's phantasmagoria. New German Critique, 48, 87-107.
13. Duncan, N. (1996). Renegotiating gender and sexuality in public and private spheres. N. Duncan (Ed.), BodySpace: Destabilising Geographies of Gender and Sexuality (pp. 145-154). London: Routledge.
14. Enjuto-Rangel, C. (2007). Broken presents: the modern city in ruins in Baudelaire, Cernuda, and Paz. Comparative Literature, 59(2), 140-157.
15. Foucault, M. (1997). The politics of truth. New York: Semiotext.
16. Geis K. J., & Ross, C. E. (1998). A new look at urban alienation: the effect of neighborhood disorder on perceived powerlessness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(3): 232-246.
17. Husserl, E. (1999). The idea of phenomenology. Translation: Lee Hardy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Jenks, C. (1998). Watching your step: the history and practice of the flaneur. C. Jenks (Ed.), Visual Culture (pp. 142-160). London: Routledge.
19. Jenks, C., & Neves, T. (2000). A walk on the wild side: urban ethnography meets the flaneur. Cultural Values, 4(1), 1-17.
20. Jennings, M. (2003). On the banks of a new lethe: commodification and experience in Benjamin’s Baudelaire book. Boundary, 30(1), 89-104.
21. Jennings, M. (2006), Introduction. W. Benjamin, The Writer of Modern Life: Essays on Charles Baudelaire (pp. 1-26). Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
22. Leak, A. (2011). The significance of context in illustrative examples. J. Webber (Ed.), Reading Sartre: On Phenomenology and Existentialism (pp. 118-129). Oxon: Routledge.
23. Melville, S. (1996). Division of the gaze. T. Brennan & M. Jay (Eds.), Vision in Context: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Sight (pp. 101-116). London: Routledge.
24. Murail, E. (2017). A body passes by: the flâneur and the senses in nineteenth-century London and Paris. The Senses and Society, 12(2), 162-176.
25. Pile, S. (1996). The Body and the City. London: Routledge.
26. Pollock, G. (1994). Vision & difference: femininity, feminism and the histories of art. London: Routledge.
27. Sartre, J. P. (1978). Being and nothingness: a phenomenological essay on ontology. Translation: Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Pocket Books.
28. Sartre, J. P. (1992). The Age of reason. New York: Vintage Books.
29. Sartre, J. P. (2007). Existentialism is a humanism. Translation: Carol Macomber. New Haven: Yale University Press.
30. Sartre, J. P. (2013). Nausea. Translation: Lloyd Alexander. Cambdrige: New Directions.
31. Sennett, R. (1986). The fall of public man. London: Faber and Faber.
32. Sennett, R. (1996). Flesh and stone: the body and the city in western civilization. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
33. Will, F. (1961). Sartre and the question of character in literature. PMLA, 76(4), 455-460.
34. Wilson, E. (1992). The invisible flaneur. New Left Review, 191.